Preliminary structure design and stress analysis of preload structure of DC magnet for Super-X test facility
Introduction
Many large-scale superconducting conductors and testing facilities have been designed and built to carry out research on superconductor performance, and many advanced superconducting technologies have been established using these facilities. SULTAN [1,2] conductor test facility provides performance testing services for cable-in-conduit conductors (CICC) developed by ITER, which handles most worldwide testing tasks. After the large-scale superconducting test facility SSTF [3] is completed, it can meet the performance testing requirements of high-field superconducting strands, high-performance CICC superconductors and KSTAR [4,5] device PF and TF coils. The DC magnetic field provided by ITER central solenoid (CS) model coil (CSMC), it can be utilized as a superconducting coil performance test platform [6]. Performance tests have been conducted on Japan's Nb3Sn interpolated coils, Russian TF interpolated coils, and Nb3Al interpolated coils [7,8]. These facilities have provided important test platforms for the development of large superconducting magnet technologies. However, because testing must develop rapidly toward large-scale high-field capacities, existing superconducting test facilities will soon not meet the needs of users. The Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (ASIPP) plans to establish the Super-X test facility to test the performances of conductors (e.g., CFETR CS and TF) in which the DC magnet will provide a test magnetic field of 15 T, which has not been achieved before [9,10]. The DC magnet is the core of Super-X test facility and is installed using three pairs of Nb3Sn coils through a preload structure, as shown in Fig. 1.
The DC magnet will withstand huge electromagnetic forces and will endure low temperatures during operation. Therefore, mechanical analysis is necessary to evaluate the preload structure design. The design purpose of the preload structure is to axially fix these coils, support the joints and other components, and provide friction to overcome the coil gravity. ITER’s Magnet Department has analyzed the stress distribution of the ITER CS coil structure under various load conditions, and the results have shown that the design of the coil preload structure is reasonable. ASIPP has completed the stress and deformation distribution of CFETR CSMC [11,12] under gravity, preload stress, thermal load, and electromagnetic load [13]. These studies provide the bases for the research of this paper. The base includes elasticity theory, electromagnetic and thermal analysis, and finite element simulation to evaluate the mechanical properties of preload structure. This will also lead to the production of a technical guide and support for the final manufactured DC magnet.
Section snippets
Structure design and analysis process of preload structure
Fig. 2 shows the preload structure of the DC magnet, which includes preloaded rods, pre-tightening screws, end plates having a thickness of 40 mm, an intermediate connection flange, buffer layers, and shims between the coils. The size of the preload structure is 3.2 × 3.6 × 3.2 m, and its main function is to overcome the gravity of the coils so that they will not separate. It also provides axial contraction to the coils. Preloaded rods and pre-tightening screws composed of 316 L N provide the
Results
The results of the analyses using combined loading cases on the preloaded DC magnet are discussed in the following sections including contour plots of stresses.
Conclusions
The 3D structure of the Super-X test facility DC magnet was established. We focused on the material selection and design rationality of the preload structure and conductor under various conditions. For the preload structure, the most dangerous moment occurred during installation. Considering the economics and structural safety of coils manufacturing, 316 L N is used to manufacture all 316 L N components. Furthermore, the stress distribution of 316 L N components met the design requirements.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Wenbiao Zhu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft. Ke Chen: Supervision. Yu Wu: Funding acquisition. Yi Shi: Project administration, Funding acquisition. Hongmei Zheng: Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - review & editing.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by Comprehensive Research Facility for Fusion Technology Program of China (Contract No. 2018-000052-73-01-001228).
References (14)
- et al.
AC losses and heat removal in three-dimensional winding pack of Samsung superconducting test facility under pulsed magnetic field operation
Cryog.
(2001) - et al.
Model coil development and testing for ITER
Fusion Eng. Des.
(1995) - et al.
ITER R&D: magnets: central solenoid model coil
Fusion Eng. Des.
(2001) ITER Model Coil tests overview: Nb3Sn strand properties in cable-in-conduit conductors
Phys. C
(2004)- et al.
The superconductor test facility SULTAN
IEEE Trans. Magn.
(1981) - et al.
Upgrade of operating range for SULTAN test facility
IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.
(2002) - et al.
Status of the KSTAR superconducting magnet system development
Nucl. Fusion
(2005)