Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

In this paper, a modified extreme ranked set sampling (MERSS) scheme is presented. The ratio estimator under the modified scheme is discussed, and expression of mean square error is derived. The performance of the ratio estimator under MERSS is compared with simple random sampling (SRS), ranked set sampling (RSS), median ranked set sampling (MRSS), quartile ranked set sampling (QRSS) and extreme ranked set sampling (ERSS). A simulation study is conducted, and the results showed that MERSS provides the efficient results as compared to SRS, RSS, MRSS, QRSS and ERSS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McIntyre GA (1952) A method for unbiased selective sampling using ranked sets. Aust J Agric Res 3:385–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dell TR, Clutter JL (1972) Ranked set sampling theory with order statistics background. Biometrics 28:545–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stokes SL (1977) Ranked set sampling with concomitant variables. Commun Stat Theory Methods 6:1207–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Samawi HM, Muttlak HM (1996) Estimation of ratio using ranked set samples. Biom J 36:753–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Samawi HM, Muttlak HM (2000) On ratio estimation using median ranked set sampling. J Appl Stat Sci 10:89–98

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ganeslingam S, Ganesh S (2006) Ranked set sampling versus simple random sampling in the estimation of the mean and the ratio. J Stat Manag Syst 2:459–472

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kadilar C, Unyazici Y, Cingi H (2007) Ratio estimator for the population mean using ranked set sampling. Stat Pap 50:301–309

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Omari AI, Jaber K, Al-Omari A (2008) Modified ratio-type estimators of the mean using extreme ranked set sampling. J Math Stat 4:150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Omari AI, Al-Saleh MF (2009) Quartile double rankled set sampling for estimating the population mean. Econ Qual Control 24:243–253

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Koyuncu N (2015) Ratio estimation of the population mean in extreme ranked set and double robust extreme ranked set sampling. Int J Agric Stat Sci 11:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bouza CN, Al-Omari AI, Santiago A, Sautto JM (2017) Ratio type estimation using the knowledge of the auxiliary variable for ranking and estimating. Int J Stat Probab 6:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Noor-ul-Amin M, Tayyab M, Hanif M (2019) Mean estimation using even order ranked set sampling. Punjab Univ J Math 51:91–99

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Tayyab M, Noor-ul-Amin M, Hanif M (2019) Even order ranked set sampling with auxiliary variable. J Mod Appl Stat Methods. accepted for publication

  14. Koyuncu N (2016) New difference-cum-ratio and exponential type estimators in median ranked set sampling. Hacet J Math Stat 45:207–225

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Koyuncu N (2017) Improved ratio estimation of population mean under median and neoteric ranked set sampling. AIP Conf Proc 1863:120004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koyuncu N (2017) Ratio estimation of population mean based on truncated ranked set sampling. AIP Conf Proc 1863:120005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Koyuncu N (2018) Regression estimators in ranked set, median ranked set and neoteric ranked set sampling. Pak J Stat Oper Res 14:89–94

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Haq A, Brown J, Moltchanova E, Al-Omari AI (2016) Paired double-ranked set sampling. Commun Stat-Theory Methods 45:2873–2889

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Arnold BC, Balakrishnan N, Nagaraja HN (1992) A first course in order statistics. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Michael JR, Schucany WR (2002) The mixture approach for simulating bivariate distributions with specific correlations. Am Stat 56:48–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Minhajuddin ATM, Harris IR, Schucany WR (2004) Simulating multivariate distributions with specific correlations. J Stat Comput Simul 74:599–607

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Hadhrami SA (2010) Estimation of the population variance using ranked set sampling with auxiliary variable. Int J Contemp Math Sci 5:2567–2576

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the anonymous referee for precious comments which led to improvement in the paper. Authors thankfully acknowledge the useful contribution of Muhammad Tayyab to improve the version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Noor-ul-Amin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Significance Statement Modified extreme ranked set sampling (MERSS) scheme can be used to improve the accuracy of estimation with respect to SRS, RSS, MRSS, QRSS and ERSS and also for maintaining cost and time limit on sampling. The information about auxiliary variable is used to obtain the efficient estimator of population mean under the proposed scheme, i.e., MERSS. It is observed that increase in efficiency can be achieved by increasing the sample size. The efficiency of ratio estimator under the proposed scheme is greater than one for different set sizes using different correlation coefficient values under normal and non-normal distributions.

Appendix

Appendix

The ratio estimator based on MERSS is given by

$$ \hat{\mu }_{yMh} = \mu_{x} \frac{{\bar{Y}_{\left[ M \right]h} }}{{\bar{X}_{\left( M \right)h} }} $$
(13)

Using general form of Taylor series for a bivariate function

$$ \begin{aligned} & f\left( {\bar{X}_{\left( M \right)h} ,\bar{Y}_{\left[ M \right]h} } \right) \cong f\left( {\mu_{x} , \mu_{y} } \right) + \left( {\bar{X}_{\left( M \right)h} - \mu_{x} } \right)f_{{\bar{X}_{\left( M \right)h} }} \left( {\mu_{x} , \mu_{y} } \right) + \left( {\bar{Y}_{\left[ M \right]h} - \mu_{y} } \right)f_{{\bar{Y}_{\left[ M \right]h} }} \left( {\mu_{x} , \mu_{y} } \right) \\ & \quad + \frac{1}{2!}\left[ {\left( {\bar{X}_{\left( M \right)h} - \mu_{x} } \right)^{2} f_{{\bar{X}_{\left( M \right)h} \bar{X}_{\left( M \right)h} }} \left( {\mu_{x} , \mu_{y} } \right) + \left( {\bar{Y}_{\left[ M \right]h} - \mu_{y} } \right)^{2} f_{{\bar{Y}_{\left[ M \right]h} \bar{Y}_{\left[ M \right]h} }} \left( {\mu_{x} , \mu_{y} } \right) + 2\left( {\bar{X}_{\left( M \right)h} - \mu_{x} } \right)\left( {\bar{Y}_{\left[ M \right]h} - \mu_{y} } \right)f_{{\bar{X}_{\left( M \right)h} \bar{Y}_{\left[ M \right]h} }} \left( {\mu_{x} , \mu_{y} } \right)} \right] + \ldots \\ \end{aligned} $$
(14)

where \( f\left( {\bar{X}_{\left( M \right)h} ,\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{Y}_{\left[ M \right]h} } \right) = \hat{\mu }_{yMh} \) and \( h = e,o \) denotes the sample size is even or odd. By using general form of Taylor series for bivariate function, we will get the first degree of approximation of the estimator in Eq. (13) is obtained as:

((15))

where , the MSE of \( \hat{\mu }_{yMh} \) from (15) is approximated as

((16))

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noor-ul-Amin, M., Arif, F. & Hanif, M. Modified Extreme Ranked Sets Sampling with Auxiliary Variable. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci. 91, 537–542 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-020-00698-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40010-020-00698-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation