Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Direct Stenting of Intracranial Atherosclerosis-related Acute Large Vessel Occlusion

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Endovascular reperfusion therapy (ERT) in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS)-related acute large vessel occlusion (ALVO) may require different strategies based on the underlying culprit plaque lesion. This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of direct stent placement in ICAS-related ALVO compared with initially attempted mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with or without rescue treatment.

Methods

Direct stenting for ICAS-related ALVO was performed in 30 consecutive patients between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018. As a control for comparison, MT with or without rescue stenting for patients with ICAS-related ALVO was performed in 73 consecutive patients during the same period. Clinical outcomes were assessed by measuring modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days.

Results

Patients who underwent direct stenting and those who underwent MT with or without rescue stenting showed no significant differences in baseline characteristics. There was a higher proportion of patients with mRS 0–2 at 90 days in the direct stenting group than in the MT with or without rescue stenting group [24 (80.0%) vs. 34 (46.6%); p = 0.004]. Successful recanalization to modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction category 2b or 3 was achieved in 93.3% of patients who underwent direct stenting, and in 90.4% of patients who underwent MT with or without rescue stenting.

Conclusion

Direct stenting is an effective and safe option for ICAS-related ALVO. Further studies are needed to confirm that endovascular treatments are effective and safe in patients with ALVO and underlying ICAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALVO:

Acute large vessel occlusion

CI:

Confidence interval

CTA:

Computed tomography angiography

DWI:

Diffusion weighted imaging

ERT:

Endovascular reperfusion therapy

HARM:

Hyperintense acute reperfusion marker

ICAS:

Intracranial atherosclerosis

LSCW:

Last significant clinical worsening

LVO:

Large vessel occlusion

MRA:

Magnetic resonance angiography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

mRS:

Modified Rankin scale

mTICI:

Modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction

MT:

Mechanical thrombectomy

NIHSS:

National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

TIA:

Transient ischemic attack

References

  1. Zaidat OO, Yoo AJ, Khatri P, Tomsick TA, von Kummer R, Saver JL, et al. Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement. Stroke. 2013;44:2650–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim BM. Refractory occlusion to stentriever thrombectomy: etiological considerations and suggested solutions. In: Park J, editor. Acute ischemic stroke: medical, endovascular, and surgical techniques. Singapore: Springer; 2017. pp. 213–26.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoon W, Kim SK, Park MS, Kim BC, Kang HK. Endovascular treatment and the outcomes of atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis in patients with hyperacute stroke. Neurosurgery. 2015;76:680–6. discussion 686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baek JH, Kim BM, Kim DJ, Heo JH, Nam HS, Yoo J. Stenting as a rescue treatment after failure of mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation large artery occlusion. Stroke. 2016;47:2360–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi JW, Kim JK, Choi BS, Kim JH, Hwang HJ, Kim JS, et al. Adjuvant revascularization of intracranial artery occlusion with angioplasty and/or stenting. Neuroradiology. 2009;51:33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ko SB, Park HK, Kim BM, Heo JH, Rha JH, Kwon SU, et al. 2019 update of the Korean clinical practice guidelines of stroke for endovascular recanalization therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Neurointervention. 2019;14:71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jia B, Feng L, Liebeskind DS, Huo X, Gao F, Ma N, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy and rescue therapy for intracranial large artery occlusion with underlying atherosclerosis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10:746–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lü PH, Park JW, Park S, Kim JL, Lee DH, Kwon SU, et al. Intracranial stenting of subacute symptomatic atherosclerotic occlusion versus stenosis. Stroke. 2011;42:3470–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hwang YH, Kim YW, Kang DH, Kim YS, Liebeskind DS. Impact of target arterial residual stenosis on outcome after endovascular revascularization. Stroke. 2016;47:1850–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang DH, Kim YW, Hwang YH, Park SP, Kim YS, Baik SK. Instant reocclusion following mechanical thrombectomy of in situ thromboocclusion and the role of low-dose intra-arterial tirofiban. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;37:350–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee JS, Lee SJ, Hong JM, Choi JW, Hong JH, Chang HW, et al. Temporal changes in care processes and outcomes for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: retrospective registry data from three Korean centers. Neurointervention. 2018;13:2–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim BJ, Kim SM, Kang DW, Kwon SU, Suh DC, Kim JS. Vascular tortuosity may be related to intracranial artery atherosclerosis. Int J Stroke. 2015;10:1081–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Seo KD, Suh SH. Endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke: a nationwide survey in Korea. Neurointervention. 2018;13:84–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi JW, Kim JK, Choi BS, Lim HK, Kim SJ, Kim JS, et al. Angiographic pattern of symptomatic severe M1 stenosis: comparison with presenting symptoms, infarct patterns, perfusion status, and outcome after recanalization. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;29:297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Suh DC, Kim EH. The therapeutic time window related to the presenting symptom pattern, that is, stable versus unstable patients, can affect the adverse event rate of intracranial stenting. Stroke. 2009;40:e588–9; author reply e590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Saver JL, Filip B, Hamilton S, Yanes A, Craig S, Cho M, et al. Improving the reliability of stroke disability grading in clinical trials and clinical practice: the Rankin Focused Assessment (RFA). Stroke. 2010;41:992–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fiorelli M, Bastianello S, von Kummer R, del Zoppo GJ, Larrue V, Lesaffre E, et al. Hemorrhagic transformation within 36 hours of a cerebral infarct: relationships with early clinical deterioration and 3-month outcome in the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study I (ECASS I) cohort. Stroke. 1999;30:2280–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang Y, Kim BM, Bang OY, Baek JH, Heo JH, Nam HS, et al. Rescue stenting for failed mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter experience. Stroke. 2018;49:958–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu SC, Leung TW, Lee KT, Wong LK. Learning curve of Wingspan stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis: single-center experience of 95 consecutive patients. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:212–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee JS, Hong JM, Kim JS. Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for acute intracranial atherosclerosis-related occlusions. J Stroke. 2017;19:143–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Baek JH, Kim BM, Kim DJ, Heo JH, Nam HS, Song D, et al. Importance of truncal-type occlusion in stentriever-based thrombectomy for acute stroke. Neurology. 2016;87:1542–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee JS, Hong JM, Lee KS, Suh HI, Choi JW, Kim SY. Primary stent retrieval for acute intracranial large artery occlusion due to atherosclerotic disease. J Stroke. 2016;18:96–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature. 2002;420:868–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nighoghossian N, Derex L, Douek P. The vulnerable carotid artery plaque: current imaging methods and new perspectives. Stroke. 2005;36:2764–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schuhmann MK, Gunreben I, Kleinschnitz C, Kraft P. Immunohistochemical Analysis of Cerebral Thrombi Retrieved by Mechanical Thrombectomy from Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Arai D, Ishii A, Chihara H, Ikeda H, Miyamoto S. Histological examination of vascular damage caused by stent retriever thrombectomy devices. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8:992–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gory B, Bresson D, Kessler I, Perrin ML, Guillaudeau A, Durand K, et al. Histopathologic evaluation of arterial wall response to 5 neurovascular mechanical thrombectomy devices in a swine model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:2192–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta R. Arterial vasospasm during mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke. J Neuroimaging. 2009;19:61–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Balami JS, White PM, McMeekin PJ, Ford GA, Buchan AM. Complications of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: Prevention and management. Int J Stroke. 2018;13:348–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee JS, Hong JM, Lee KS, Suh HI, Demchuk AM, Hwang YH, et al. Endovascular therapy of cerebral arterial occlusions: intracranial atherosclerosis versus embolism. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24:2074–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Park S, Kim JH, Kwak JK, Baek HJ, Kim BH, Lee DG, et al. Intracranial stenting for severe symptomatic stenosis: self-expandable versus balloon-expandable stents. Interv Neuroradiol. 2013;19:276–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao LB, Park S, Lee D, Lee DH, Suh DC. Mechanism of procedural failure related to wingspan. Neurointervention. 2012;7:102–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hashimura N, Mutoh T, Matsuda K, Matsumoto K. Evaluation and management of plaque protrusion or thrombus following carotid artery stenting. Neurol Med Chir(Tokyo). 2015;55:149–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen YA, Hussain M, Zhang JY, Zhang KP, Pang Q. Stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms using the enterprise and the solitaire devices. Neurol Res. 2014;36:461–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Woo HG, Jung C, Sunwoo L, Bae YJ, Choi BS, Kim JH, et al. Dichotomizing level of pial collaterals on multiphase CT angiography for endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke: should it be refined for 6-hour time window? Neurointervention. 2019;14:99-106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim JS, Bonovich D. Research on intracranial atherosclerosis from the east and west: Why are the results different? J Stroke. 2014;16:105–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by a research grant from Jeju National University Hospital in 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DC Suh conceptualized and designed the study. DC Suh, YS Song and J.-G. Kim reviewed the articles and collected the data. DC Suh, YS Song, DH Lee and J.-G. Kim recruited patients. YS Song and J.-G. Kim analyzed the data. All authors contributed to data interpretation, writing, editing, and revisions of the final manuscript. All authors contributed to the production of the final version of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dae Chul Suh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

J.-G. Kim, D.C. Suh, Y. Song, J.C. Choi and D.H. Lee declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

Ethical approval was granted in accordance with national requirements, and the need for written informed consent was waived. (Institutional Review Board of Asan Medical Center).

Additional information

Availability of data and material

The data and material used in the present study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Caption Electronic Supplementary Material

62_2020_934_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Supplemental data 1. Flowchart of the patient selection process according to technique in patients with ICAS-related LVO.

Supplemental data 2. Baseline characteristics of patients who underwent direct stenting and mechanical thrombectomy with or without rescue stenting.

Supplemental data 3. Clinical and imaging outcomes in patients with ICAS-related ALVO who underwent direct stenting and mechanical thrombectomy with or without rescue stenting.

Supplemental data 4. Distribution of clinical outcome at three months according to the methods of endovascular reperfusion therapy for intracranial atherosclerosis-related acute large vessel occlusion.

Supplemental data 5. Comparison of clinical characteristics between performing the balloon angioplasty or not during endovascular reperfusion therapy.

Supplemental data 6. Comparison of clinical characteristics between performing the balloon angioplasty or not during endovascular reperfusion therapy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, JG., Suh, D.C., Song, Y. et al. Direct Stenting of Intracranial Atherosclerosis-related Acute Large Vessel Occlusion. Clin Neuroradiol 31, 833–841 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00934-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00934-x

Keywords

Navigation