Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 15, 2019

Carbon nanostructures for advanced nanocomposite mixed matrix membranes: a comprehensive overview

  • Ehsan Salehi

    Ehsan Salehi received his PhD (in 2012) in Chemical Engineering from Membrane Research Centre, Razi University. In 2012, he joined the Department of Chemical Engineering, Arak University. His current research interests include nanocomposite polymer membranes, hybrid separation systems, biosorption, membrane adsorbents and mathematical modelling. He has authored more than 40 papers (including one review) in high-ranking journals and one book chapter.

    EMAIL logo
    , Farhad Heidary

    Farhad Heidary received his PhD (in 2015) in Applied Chemistry from College of Science, University of Tehran, Iran. In 2016, he joined the Department of Chemistry, Arak University, as an Assistant Professor. His current research interests include wastewater treatment, preparation and modification of polymeric nanocomposite membranes, electrodialysis systems and synthesis of nanostructures. He has authored more than 16 papers and a membrane book.

    EMAIL logo
    , Parisa Daraei

    Parisa Daraei received her PhD (in 2013) in Applied Chemistry from Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. In 2013, she joined the Department of Chemical Engineering, Kermanshah University of Technology, as an Assistant Professor. Her current research interests include wastewater treatment, preparation and modification of membranes, nanoparticle synthesis and modification and adsorption processes. She has authored more than 26 papers (including one review) and one book chapter.

    , Mohammad Keyhani

    Mohammad Keyhani is presently an environmental chemical engineering MSc student at Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran. In 2009, he gained the second rank at the 11th Kharazmi youth festival. Later, he joined Razi University in Kermanshah, Iran, where he participated in writing five publications for ISI-listed journals. Currently he works as CEO in a scientific startup named “Fanavarane Cheshmehaye Abi” (see http://nanostartup.ir/en).

    and Milad Behjomanesh

    Millad Behjoomanesh received his B.E. degree in chemical engineering from Petroleum University of Technology, Ahvaz, Iran, in 2014. As s a project partner he joined Razi University, Kermanshah, in 2014. In 2015, he was a project partner at Semnan University. Afterwards, he joined Petrochemical Research and Technology Company, Arak, Iran, to work in a control room as a shift worker in a multipurpose pilot of chemical production unit (ongoing).

Abstract

The highly progressive membrane separation technology challenges conventional separation processes such as ion exchange, distillation, precipitation, solvent extraction, and adsorption. The integration of many desired properties such as low energy consumption, high removal efficiency, affordable costs, suitable selectivity, acceptable productivity, ease of scale-up, and being environmentally friendly have made the membranes capable of being replaced with other separation technologies. Combination of membrane technology and nanoscience has revolutionized the nano-engineered materials, e.g. nanocomposites applied in advanced membrane processes. Polymer composites containing carbon nanostructures are promising choices for membrane fabrication owing to their enhanced chemistry, morphology, electromagnetic properties, and physicochemical stability. Carbon nanostructures such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), nano graphene oxides (NGOs), and fullerenes are among the most popular nanofillers that have been successfully applied in modification of polymer membranes. Literature review shows that there is no comprehensive overview reporting the modification of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) using carbon nanofibers, nano-activated carbons, and carbon nanospheres. The present overview focuses on the applications of carbon nanostructures mainly CNTs and NGOs in the modification of MMMs and emphasizes on the application of CNTs and NGO particles.

About the authors

Ehsan Salehi

Ehsan Salehi received his PhD (in 2012) in Chemical Engineering from Membrane Research Centre, Razi University. In 2012, he joined the Department of Chemical Engineering, Arak University. His current research interests include nanocomposite polymer membranes, hybrid separation systems, biosorption, membrane adsorbents and mathematical modelling. He has authored more than 40 papers (including one review) in high-ranking journals and one book chapter.

Farhad Heidary

Farhad Heidary received his PhD (in 2015) in Applied Chemistry from College of Science, University of Tehran, Iran. In 2016, he joined the Department of Chemistry, Arak University, as an Assistant Professor. His current research interests include wastewater treatment, preparation and modification of polymeric nanocomposite membranes, electrodialysis systems and synthesis of nanostructures. He has authored more than 16 papers and a membrane book.

Parisa Daraei

Parisa Daraei received her PhD (in 2013) in Applied Chemistry from Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. In 2013, she joined the Department of Chemical Engineering, Kermanshah University of Technology, as an Assistant Professor. Her current research interests include wastewater treatment, preparation and modification of membranes, nanoparticle synthesis and modification and adsorption processes. She has authored more than 26 papers (including one review) and one book chapter.

Mohammad Keyhani

Mohammad Keyhani is presently an environmental chemical engineering MSc student at Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran. In 2009, he gained the second rank at the 11th Kharazmi youth festival. Later, he joined Razi University in Kermanshah, Iran, where he participated in writing five publications for ISI-listed journals. Currently he works as CEO in a scientific startup named “Fanavarane Cheshmehaye Abi” (see http://nanostartup.ir/en).

Milad Behjomanesh

Millad Behjoomanesh received his B.E. degree in chemical engineering from Petroleum University of Technology, Ahvaz, Iran, in 2014. As s a project partner he joined Razi University, Kermanshah, in 2014. In 2015, he was a project partner at Semnan University. Afterwards, he joined Petrochemical Research and Technology Company, Arak, Iran, to work in a control room as a shift worker in a multipurpose pilot of chemical production unit (ongoing).

References

Abdali N, Marjani A, Heidary F, Adimi M. Fabrication of PVA coated PES/PVDF nanocomposite membranes embedded with: in situ formed magnetite nanoparticles for removal of metal ions from aqueous solutions. New J Chem 2017; 41: 6405–6414.10.1039/C7NJ00798ASearch in Google Scholar

Aerts P, Kuypers S, Genne I, Leysen R, Mewis J, Vankelecom IFJ, Jacobs PA. Polysulfone-ZrO2 surface interactions. The influence on formation, morphology and properties of zirfon-membranes. J Phys Chem B 2006; 110: 7425–7430.10.1021/jp053976cSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Agboola O, Sadiku ER, Mokrani T. Nanomembrane materials based on polymer blends. In: Thomas S, Shanks R, Chandrasekharakurup S, editors. Design and applications of nanostructured polymer blends and nanocomposite systems. Oxford: Elsevier, 2016: 101–123.10.1016/B978-0-323-39408-6.00006-6Search in Google Scholar

Ahmad Nor Naimah R, Mukhtar H, Mohshim Dzeti F, Nasir R, Man Z. Surface modification in inorganic filler of mixed matrix membrane for enhancing the gas separation performance. Rev Chem Eng 2016;32: 181–200.Search in Google Scholar

Al Amer AM, Laoui T, Abbas A, Al-Aqeeli N, Patel F, Khraisheh M, Atieh MA, Hilal N. Fabrication and antifouling behaviour of a carbon nanotube membrane. Mater Des 2016; 89: 549–558.10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.018Search in Google Scholar

Ali MEA, Wang L, Wang X, Feng X. Thin film composite membranes embedded with graphene oxide for water desalination. Desalination 2016; 386: 67–76.10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.034Search in Google Scholar

Amini M, Younesi H, Najafpour G, Zinatizadeh-Lorestani AA. Application of response surface methodology for simultaneous carbon and nitrogen (SND) removal from dairy wastewater in batch systems. Int J Environ Stud 2012; 69: 962–986.10.1080/00207233.2012.739428Search in Google Scholar

Amirilargani M, Sadrzadeh M, Sudhölter EJR, de Smet LCPM. Surface modification methods of organic solvent nanofiltration membranes. Chem Eng J 2016; 289: 562–582.10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.062Search in Google Scholar

Aroon MA, Ismail AF, Matsuura T, Montazer-Rahmati MM. Performance studies of mixed matrix membranes for gas separation: a review. Sep Purif Technol 2010; 75: 229–242.10.1016/j.seppur.2010.08.023Search in Google Scholar

Aroon MA, Ismail AF, Matsuura T. Beta-cyclodextrin functionalized MWCNT: a potential nano-membrane material for mixed matrix gas separation membranes development. Sep Purif Technol 2013; 115: 39–50.10.1016/j.seppur.2013.04.025Search in Google Scholar

Baek Y, Seo DK, Choi JH, Lee B, Kim YH, Park SM, Jung J, Lee S, Yoon J. Improvement of vertically aligned carbon nanotube membranes: desalination potential, flux enhancement and scale-up. Desalin Water Treat 2016; 57: 1–8.10.1080/19443994.2016.1184188Search in Google Scholar

Baek Y, Kim HJ, Kim SH, Lee JC, Yoon J. Evaluation of carbon nanotube-polyamide thin-film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane: surface properties, performance characteristics and fouling behavior. J Ind Eng Chem 2017; 56: 327–334.10.1016/j.jiec.2017.07.028Search in Google Scholar

Bernholc J, Brenner D, Buongiorno Nardelli M, Meunier V, Roland C. Mechanical and electrical properties of nanotubes. Annu Rev Mater Res 2002; 32: 347–375.10.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112601.134925Search in Google Scholar

Bhadra M, Roy S, Mitra, S. Nanodiamond immobilized membranes for enhanced desalination via membrane distillation. Desalination 2014; 341, 115–119.10.1016/j.desal.2014.02.036Search in Google Scholar

Bhadra M, Roy S, Mitra, S. Flux enhancement in direct contact membrane distillation by implementing carbon nanotube immobilized PTFE membrane. Sep Purif Technol 2016; 161: 136–143.10.1016/j.seppur.2016.01.046Search in Google Scholar

Bonaccorso F, Colombo L, Yu G, Stoller M, Tozzini V, Ferrari AC, Ruoff RS, Pellegrini V. Graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems for energy conversion and storage. Science 2016; 347: 1246501.10.1126/science.1246501Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Brunet L, Lyon DY, Zodrow K, Rouch JC, Caussat B, Serp P, Remigy JC, Wisener MR, Alwarez PJ. Properties of membranes containing semi-dispersed carbon nanotubes. Environ Eng Sci 2008; 25: 565–576.10.1089/ees.2007.0076Search in Google Scholar

Buonomenna MG. Smart composite membranes for advanced wastewater treatments. In: Montemor, MF, editor. Smart composite coatings and membranes. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2016: 371–419.10.1016/B978-1-78242-283-9.00014-2Search in Google Scholar

Chan WF, Chen HY, Surapathi A, Taylor MG, Shao X, Marand E, Jhonson JK. Zwitterion functionalized carbon nanotube/polyamide nanocomposite membranes for water desalination. ACS Nano 2013; 7: 5308–5319.10.1021/nn4011494Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Chan WF, Marand E, Martin SM. 2016. Novel zwitterion functionalized carbon nanotube nanocomposite membranes for improved RO performance and surface anti-biofouling resistance. J Membr Sci 2016; 509: 125–137.10.1016/j.memsci.2016.02.014Search in Google Scholar

Chen H, Xie LQ, Qin J, Jia Y, Cai X, Nan Wang W, Lv F, Zhang QQ. Surface modification of PLGA nanoparticles with biotinylated chitosan for the sustained in vitro release and the enhanced cytotoxicity of epirubicin. Colloids Surf B 2016a; 138: 1–9.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.11.033Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Chen J, Zhang M, Li F, Qian L, Lin H, Yang L, Wu X, Zhou X, He Y, Liao BQ. Membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor: high filtration resistance of gel layer and its underlying mechanism. Water Res 2016b; 102: 82–89.10.1016/j.watres.2016.06.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Choi J, Jegal HJ, Kim WN. Modification of performances of various membranes using MWNTs as a modifier. Macromol Symp 2007; 249–250: 610–617.10.1002/masy.200750444Search in Google Scholar

Choi HG, Son M, Yoon S, Celik K, Kang S, Park H, Park CH, Choi H. Alginate fouling reduction of functionalized carbon nanotube blended cellulose acetate membrane in forward osmosis. Chemosphere 2015; 136: 204–210.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Cooling NA, Barnes E, Almyahi F, Feron K, Al-Mudhaffer MF, Al-Ahmad A, Vaughan B, Andersen TR, Griffith MJ, Hart AS, Lyons AG, Belchera WJ, Dastoora PC. A low-cost mixed fullerene acceptor blend for printed electronics. J Mater Chem A 2016; 4: 10274–10281.10.1039/C6TA04191DSearch in Google Scholar

Daraei P, Madaeni SS, Ghaemi N, Khadivi MA, Astinchap B, Moradian R. Enhancing antifouling capability of PES membrane via mixing with various types of polymer modified multi-walled carbon nanotube. J Membr Sci 2013a; 444: 184–191.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.020Search in Google Scholar

Daraei P, Madaeni SS, Ghaemi N, Khadivi MA, Astinchap B, Moradian R. Fouling resistant mixed matrix polyethersulfone membranes blended with magnetic nanoparticles: study of magnetic field induced casting. Sep Purif Technol 2013b; 109: 111–121.10.1016/j.seppur.2013.02.035Search in Google Scholar

Daraei P, Madaeni SS, Ghaemi N, Monfared HA, Khadivi MA. Fabrication of PES nanofiltration membrane by simultaneous use of multi-walled carbon nanotube and surface graft polymerization method: comparison of MWCNT and PAA modified MWCNT. Sep Purif Technol 2013c; 104: 32–44.10.1016/j.seppur.2012.11.004Search in Google Scholar

Das R, Ali ME, Hamid SBA, Ramakrishna S, Chowdhury ZZ. Carbon nanotube membranes for water purification: a bright future in water desalination. Desalination 2013; 336: 97–109.10.1016/j.desal.2013.12.026Search in Google Scholar

De Lannoy CF, Soyer E, Wiesner MR. Optimizing carbon nanotube-reinforced polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes through carboxylic acid functionalization. J Membr Sci 2013; 447: 395–402.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.023Search in Google Scholar

Dong G, Hou J, Wang J, Zhang Y, Chen V, Liu J. Enhanced CO2/N2separation by porous reduced graphene oxide/Pebax mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 2016; 520: 860–868.10.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.059Search in Google Scholar

Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Eklund PC. Science of fullerenes and carbon nanotubes: their properties and applications. London, UK: Academic Press, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

Ebrahimi S, Mollaiy-Berneti S, Asadi H, Peydayesh H, Akhlaghian F, Mohammadi T. PVA/PES-amine-functional graphene oxide mixed matrix membranes for CO2/CH4separation: experimental and modeling. Chem Eng Res Des 2016; 109: 647–656.10.1016/j.cherd.2016.03.009Search in Google Scholar

El-Gohary FA, Kamel G. Characterization and biological treatment of pre-treated landfill leachate. Ecol Eng 2016; 94: 268–274.10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.05.074Search in Google Scholar

Espinosa RB, Rafieian D, Lammertink RG, Lefferts L. Carbon nano-fiber based membrane reactor for selective nitrite hydrogenation. Catal Today 2016; 273: 50–61.10.1016/j.cattod.2016.02.057Search in Google Scholar

Etemadi HR, Yegani R, Babaeipour V. Study on the reinforcing effect of nanodiamond particles on the mechanical, thermal and antibacterial properties of cellulose acetate membranes. Diamond Relat Mater 2016; 69: 166–176.10.1016/j.diamond.2016.08.014Search in Google Scholar

Etemadi HR, Yegani R, Babaeipour V. Performance evaluation and antifouling analyses of cellulose acetate/nanodiamond nanocomposite membranes in water treatment. J Appl Polym Sci 2017a; 134: 44873.10.1002/app.44873Search in Google Scholar

Etemadi HR, Yegani R, Seyfollahi M. The effect of amino functionalized and polyethylene glycol grafted nanodiamond on anti-biofouling properties of cellulose acetate membrane in membrane bioreactor systems. Sep Purif Technol 2017b; 177: 350–362.10.1016/j.seppur.2017.01.013Search in Google Scholar

Farid MU, Luan HY, Wang Y, Huang H, An AK, Khan RJ. Increased adsorption of aqueous zinc species by Ar/O2 plasma-treated carbon nanotubes immobilized in hollow-fiber ultrafiltration membrane. Chem Eng J 2017; 325: 239–248.10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.020Search in Google Scholar

Fornasiero FH, Park G, Holt JK, Stadermann M, Grigoropoulos CP, Noy A, Bakajin O. Ion exclusion by sub-2-nm carbon nanotube pores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 17250–17255.10.1073/pnas.0710437105Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Ganesh B, Isloor AM, Ismail AF. Enhanced hydrophilicity and salt rejection study of graphene oxide-polysulfone mixed matrix membrane. Desalination 2013; 313: 199–207.10.1016/j.desal.2012.11.037Search in Google Scholar

Garcia-Castello EM, McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M. Performance evaluation of sucrose concentration using forward osmosis. J Membr Sci 2009; 338: 61–66.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.04.011Search in Google Scholar

Ghaemi N, Madaeni SS, Daraei P, Rajabi H, Shojaeimehr T, Rahimpour F, Shirvani B. PES mixed matrix nanofiltration membrane embedded with polymer wrapped MWCNT: fabrication and performance optimization in dye removal by RSM. J Hazard Mater 2015; 298: 111–121.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.05.018Search in Google Scholar

Gu J, Xiao P, Chen J, Zhang J, Huang J, Chen T. Janus polymer/carbon nanotube hybrid membranes for oil/water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2014; 6: 16204–16209.10.1021/am504326mSearch in Google Scholar

He Y, Xu Z, Wu F, Yang Q, Zhang J. Preparation and adsorption studies of β-cyclodextrin grafted onto multi-walled carbon nanotube. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2015; 90: 2257–2264.10.1002/jctb.4541Search in Google Scholar

Hebbar RS, Isloor AM, Inamuddin, Asiri AM. Carbon nanotube- and graphene-based advanced membrane materials for desalination. Environ Chem Lett 2017; 15: 643–671.10.1007/s10311-017-0653-zSearch in Google Scholar

Heidary F, Khodabakhshi AR, Kharat AN. Novel ion-exchange nanocomposite membrane containing in-situ formed FeOOH nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization and transport properties. Korean J Chem Eng 2016; 33: 1380–1390.10.1007/s11814-015-0275-8Search in Google Scholar

Heidary F, Khodabakhshi AR, Ghanbari D. A novel sulfonated poly phenylene oxide-poly vinylchloride/ZnO cation-exchange membrane applicable in refining of saline liquids. J Clust Sci 2017; 28: 1489–1507.10.1007/s10876-017-1156-6Search in Google Scholar

Henry C, Dorr B, Brant JA. Buckminsterfullerene (C60) nanoparticle fouling of microfiltration membranes operated in a cross-flow configuration. Sep Purif Technol 2012; 100: 30–43.10.1016/j.seppur.2012.08.019Search in Google Scholar

Higuchi A, Agatsuma T, Uemiya S, Kojima T, Mizoguchi K, Pinnau I, Nagai K, Freeman BD. Preparation and gas permeation of immobilized fullerene membranes. J. Appl Polym Sci 2000; 77: 529–537.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(20000718)77:3<529::AID-APP8>3.0.CO;2-YSearch in Google Scholar

Huang Y, Chen X. Carbon nanomaterial-based composites in wastewater purification. Nano LIFE 2014; 4: 1441006.10.1142/S1793984414410062Search in Google Scholar

Huyskens C, Brauns E, Van Hoof E, De Wever H. A new method for the evaluation of the reversible and irreversible fouling propensity of MBR mixed liquor. J Membr Sci 2008; 323: 185–192.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.06.021Search in Google Scholar

Ismail AF, Goh PS, Sanip SM, Aziz M. Transport and separation properties of carbon nanotube-mixed matrix membrane. Sep Purif Technol 2009; 70: 12–26.10.1016/j.seppur.2009.09.002Search in Google Scholar

Ismail AF, Rahim N, Mustafa A, Matsuura T, Ng BC, Abdullah S, Hashemifard SA. Gas separation performance of polyethersulfone/multi-walled carbon nanotubes mixed matrix membranes. Sep Purif Technol 2011; 80: 20–31.10.1016/j.seppur.2011.03.031Search in Google Scholar

ISO Nanotechnologies 2010. Vocabulary, core terms. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) Geneva.Search in Google Scholar

Jamil A, Ching OP, Shariff A. Current status and future prospect of polymer layered silicate mixed matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. Chem Eng Tech 2016; 39: 1393–1405.10.1002/ceat.201500395Search in Google Scholar

Jermann D, Pronk W, Meylan S, Boller M. Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production. Water Res 2007; 41: 1713–1722.10.1016/j.watres.2006.12.030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Jusoh N, Yeong YF, Chew TL, Lau KK, Shariff AM. 2016. Current development and challenges of mixed matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. Sep Purif Rev 2016; 45: 321–344.10.1080/15422119.2016.1146149Search in Google Scholar

Kaleekkal NJ, Thanigaivelan A, Durga M, Girish R, Rana D, Soundararajan P, Mohan D. Graphene oxide nanocomposite incorporated poly (ether imide) mixed matrix membranes for in vitro evaluation of its efficacy in blood purification applications. Ind Eng Chem Res 2015; 54: 7899–7913.10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01655Search in Google Scholar

Kaleekkal NJ, Thanigaivelan A, Rana D, Mohan D. Studies on carboxylated graphene oxide incorporated polyetherimide mixed matrix ultrafiltration membranes. Mater Chem Phys 2017; 186: 146–158.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.10.040Search in Google Scholar

Kannan AM, Munukutla L. Carbon nano-chain and carbon nano-fibers based gas diffusion layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. JPS 2007; 167: 330–335.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.02.064Search in Google Scholar

Karimnezhad H, Rajabi L, Salehi E, Derakhshan AA, Azimi S. Novel nanocomposite Kevlar fabric membranes: fabrication characterization, and performance in oil/water separation. Appl Surf Sci 2014a; 293: 275–286.10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.12.149Search in Google Scholar

Karimnezhad H, Salehi E, Rajabi L, Azimi S, Derakhshan AA, Ansari M. Dynamic removal of n-hexane from water using nanocomposite membranes: serial coating of para-aminobenzoate alumoxane, boehmite-epoxide and chitosan on Kevlar fabrics. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014b; 20: 4491–4498.10.1016/j.jiec.2014.02.021Search in Google Scholar

Khalid AA, Al-Juhani A, Al-Hamouz OC, Laoui T, Khan Z, Atieh MA. Preparation and properties of nanocomposite polysulfone/multi-walled carbon nanotubes membranes for desalination. Desalination 2015; 367: 134–144.10.1016/j.desal.2015.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Khan MM, Filiz V, Bengtson G, Shishatskiy S, Rahman MM, Lillepaerg J, Abetz V. Enhanced gas permeability by fabricating mixed matrix membranes of functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes and polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIM). J Membr Sci 2013; 436: 109–120.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.02.032Search in Google Scholar

Kiadehi AD, Jahanshahi M, Rahimpour A, Ghoreyshi SAA. The effect of functionalized carbon nano-fiber (CNF) on gas separation performance of polysulfone (PSf) membranes. Chem Eng Process 2015a; 90: 41–48.10.1016/j.cep.2015.02.005Search in Google Scholar

Kiadehi AD, Rahimpour A, Jahanshahi M, Ghoreyshi AA. Novel carbon nano-fibers (CNF)/polysulfone (PSf) mixed matrix membranes for gas separation. J Ind Eng Chem 2015b; 22: 199–207.10.1016/j.jiec.2014.07.011Search in Google Scholar

Ko K, Yu YJ, Kim MJ, Kweon J, Chung H. Improvement in fouling resistance of silver-graphene oxide coated polyvinylidene fluoride membrane prepared by pressurized filtration. Sep Purif Technol 2018; 194: 161–169.10.1016/j.seppur.2017.11.016Search in Google Scholar

Koolivand H, Sharif A, Kashani MR, Karimi M, Salooki MK, Semsarzadeh MA. Functionalized graphene oxide/polyimide nanocomposites as highly CO2-selective membranes. J Polym Res 2014; 21: 1–12.10.1007/s10965-014-0599-9Search in Google Scholar

Lee J, Jeong S, Naidu G, Ye Y, Chen V, Liu Z, Vigneswaran S. Performance evaluation of carbon nanotube enhanced membranes for SWRO pretreatment application. J Ind Eng Chem 2016a, 38: 123–131.10.1016/j.jiec.2016.04.012Search in Google Scholar

Lee JS, Hwang IT, Jung CH, Choi JH. Surface modification of Nafion membranes by ion implantation to reduce methanol crossover in direct methanol fuel cells. RSC Adv 2016b; 6: 62467–62470.10.1039/C6RA12756HSearch in Google Scholar

Lee JG, Lee EJ, Jeong S, Guo J, An AK, H. Guo, Kim J, Leiknes T, Ghaffour N. Theoretical modeling and experimental validation of transport and separation properties of carbon nanotube electrospun membrane distillation. J Membr Sci 2017; 526: 395–408.10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.045Search in Google Scholar

Li JF, Xu ZL, Yang H, Yu LY and Liu M. Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on the surface morphology and performance of microporous PES membrane. Sep Sci Technol 2009; 255: 4725–4732.10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.07.139Search in Google Scholar

Li C, Song C, Tao P, Sun M, Pan Z, Wang T, Shao M. Enhanced separation performance of coal-based carbon membranes coupled with an electric field for oily wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol 2016a; 168: 47–56.10.1016/j.seppur.2016.05.020Search in Google Scholar

Li Q, Yang D, Shi J, Xu X, Yan S, Liu Q. Biomimetic modification of large diameter carbon nanotubes and the desalination behavior of its reverse osmosis membrane. Desalination 2016b 379: 164–171.10.1016/j.desal.2015.11.008Search in Google Scholar

Liu H, Gong C, Wang J, Liu X, Liu H, Cheng F, Wang G, Zheng G, Qin C, Wen S. Chitosan/silica coated carbon nanotubes composite proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications. Carbohydr Polym 2016; 56: 327–334.10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.085Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ma CCM, Sung SC, Wang FY, Chiang LY, Wang LY, Chiang CL. Thermal, mechanical, and morphological properties of novolac-type phenolic resin blended with fullerenol polyurethane and linear polyurethane. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 2001; 39: 2436–2443.10.1002/polb.1215Search in Google Scholar

Madaeni S, Zinadini S, Vatanpour V. Preparation of superhydrophobic nanofiltration membrane by embedding multiwalled carbon nanotube and polydimethylsiloxane in pores of microfiltration membrane. Sep Purif Technol 2013; 111: 98–107.10.1016/j.seppur.2013.03.033Search in Google Scholar

Majumder M, Clayton V, Ajayan A. Carbon nanotube membranes: a new frontier in membrane science. Compr Membr Sci Eng 2010; 1: 291–310.10.1016/B978-0-08-093250-7.00038-4Search in Google Scholar

Marqui DM, Chivas-Joly C, Guillaume É. Properties of nanofillers in polymer. In: Cuppoletti J, editor. Nanocomposites and polymers with analytical methods. Croatia: InTech, 2011: 261–284.Search in Google Scholar

Mattia D, Lee KP, Calabrò F. Water permeation in carbon nanotube membranes. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2014; 4: 32–37.10.1016/j.coche.2014.01.006Search in Google Scholar

Mattia D, Leese H, Lee KP. Carbon nanotube membranes: from flow enhancement to permeability. J Membr Sci 2015; 475: 266–272.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.035Search in Google Scholar

Maximous N, Nakhla G, Wan W, Wong K. Preparation, characterization and performance of Al2O3/PES membrane for wastewater filtration. J Membr Sci 2009; 341: 67–75.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.05.040Search in Google Scholar

McCutcheon JR, McGinnis RL, Elimelech M. A novel ammonia–carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination 2005; 174: 1–11.10.1016/j.desal.2004.11.002Search in Google Scholar

Mezher T, Fath H, Abbas Z, Khaled A. Techno-economic assessment and environmental impacts of desalination technologies. Desalination 2011; 266: 263–273.10.1016/j.desal.2010.08.035Search in Google Scholar

Miskan M, Ismail M, Ghasemi M, Jahim JM, Nordin D, Bakar MHA. Characterization of membrane biofouling and its effect on the performance of microbial fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2016; 41: 543–552.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.037Search in Google Scholar

Mochalin VN, Gogotsi Y. Nanodiamond–polymer composites. Diamond Relat Mater 2015; 58: 161–171.10.1016/j.diamond.2015.07.003Search in Google Scholar

Moghadassi AR, Rajabi Z, Hosseini SM, Mohammadi M. Fabrication and modification of cellulose acetate based mixed matrix membrane: gas separation and physical properties. J Ind Eng Chem 2014; 20: 1050–1060.10.1016/j.jiec.2013.06.042Search in Google Scholar

Molinari R. Special Issue “Membrane Catalysis”. Molecules 2016; 21: 851.10.3390/molecules21070851Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Mukherjee R, De S. Novel carbon-nanoparticle polysulfone hollow fiber mixed matrix ultrafiltration membrane: adsorptive removal of benzene, phenol and toluene from aqueous solution. Sep Purif Technol 2016; 157: 229–240.10.1016/j.seppur.2015.11.015Search in Google Scholar

Nan Q, Li P, Cao B. Fabrication of positively charged nanofiltration membrane via the layer-by-layer assembly of graphene oxide and polyethylenimine for desalination. Appl Surf Sci 2016; 387: 521–528.10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.150Search in Google Scholar

Navarro RR, Wada S, Tatsumi K. Heavy metal precipitation by polycation–polyanion complex of PEI and its phosphonomethylated derivative. J Hazard Mater 2005; 123: 203–209.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.03.048Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Nie C, Ma L, Xia Y, He C, Deng J, Wang L, Cheng C, Sun S, Zhao C. Novel heparin-mimicking polymer brush grafted carbon nanotube/PES composite membranes for safe and efficient blood purification. J Membr Sci 2015; 475: 455–468.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.005Search in Google Scholar

Nunes S, Peinemann K. Advanced polymeric and organic–inorganic membranes for pressure-driven processes. In: Drioli E, Giorno L, editors. Comprehensive membrane science and engineering. Oxford: Elsevier, 2010: 113–126.10.1016/B978-0-08-093250-7.00044-XSearch in Google Scholar

Nunn N, Torelli M, McGuire G, Shenderova O. Nanodiamond: a high impact nanomaterial. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 2017; 21: 1–9.10.1016/j.cossms.2016.06.008Search in Google Scholar

Oh EJ, Hempelmann R, Nica V, Radev I, Natter H. New catalyst supports prepared by surface modification of graphene- and carbon nanotube structures with nitrogen containing carbon coatings. J Power Sources 2017; 341: 240–249.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.116Search in Google Scholar

Panahian S, Raisi A, Aroujalian A. Multilayer mixed matrix membranes containing modified-MWCNTs for dehydration of alcohol by pervaporation process. Desalination 2017; 355: 45–55.10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.027Search in Google Scholar

Pande M, Bhaskarwar AN. Nanoparticles: preparation and characterization. New Jersey, USA: Momentum Press, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Papanicolaou GC, Papaefthymiou KP, Koutsomitopoulou AF, Portan DV, Zaoutsos SP. Effect of dispersion of MWCNTs on the static and dynamic mechanical behavior of epoxy matrix nanocomposites. J Mat Sci 2012; 47: 350–359.10.1007/s10853-011-5804-1Search in Google Scholar

Park CH, Tocci E, Fontananova E, Bahattab MA, Aljlil SA, Drioli E. Mixed matrix membranes containing functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes: mesoscale simulation and experimental approach for optimizing dispersion. J Membr Sci 2016; 514: 195–209.10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.011Search in Google Scholar

Pendergast MM, Hoek EM. A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies. Energy Environ Sci 2011; 4: 1946–1971.10.1039/c0ee00541jSearch in Google Scholar

Penkova AV, Acquah SF, Dmitrenko ME, Chen B, Semenov KN, Kroto HW. Transport properties of cross-linked fullerenol-PVA membranes. Carbon 2014; 76: 446–450.10.1016/j.carbon.2014.04.053Search in Google Scholar

Penkova AV, Acquah SF, Dmitrenko ME, Sokolova MP, Mikhailova ME, Polyakov ES, Ermakov SS, Markelov DA, Roizard D. Improvement of pervaporation PVA membranes by the controlled incorporation of fullerenol nanoparticles. Mater Design 2016a; 96: 416–423.10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.046Search in Google Scholar

Penkova AV, Dmitrenko ME, Sokolova MP, Chen B, Plisko TV, Markelov DA, Ermakov SS. Impact of fullerene loading on the structure and transport properties of polysulfone mixed-matrix membranes. J Mater Sci 2016b; 51: 7652–7659.10.1007/s10853-016-0047-9Search in Google Scholar

Pierson HO. Handbook of carbon, graphite, diamonds and fullerenes: processing, properties and applications. New Jersey, USA: William Andrew Publishing, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Poinern GEJ. A laboratory course in nanoscience and nanotechnology, 1st ed., Florida, USA: CRC Press, 2014.10.1201/b17753Search in Google Scholar

Polotskaya GA, Penkova A, Toikka A, Pientka Z, Brozova L, Bleha M. Transport of small molecules through polyphenylene oxide membranes modified by fullerene. Sep Sci Technol 2007; 42: 333–347.10.1080/01496390600997963Search in Google Scholar

Polotskaya GA, Pulyalina AY, Rostovtseva VA, Toikka AM, Saprykina NN, Vinogradova LV. Effect of polystyrene stars with fullerene C60 cores on pervaporation properties of poly (phenylene oxide) membrane. Polym Int 2016; 65: 407–414.10.1002/pi.5069Search in Google Scholar

Polotskaya GA, Avagimova NV, Toikka AM, Tsvetkov NV, Lezov AA, Strelina IA, Pientka Z. Optical, mechanical, and transport studies of nanodiamonds/poly (phenylene oxide) composites. Polym Compos 2018; 39: 3952–3961.10.1002/pc.24437Search in Google Scholar

Qiu S, Wu L, Shi G, Zhang L, Chen H, Gao C. Preparation and pervaporation property of chitosan membrane with functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Ind Eng Chem Res 2010; 49: 11667–11675.10.1021/ie101223kSearch in Google Scholar

Rahimi S, Moattari RM, Rajabi L, Derakhshan AA. Optimization of lead removal from aqueous solution using goethite/chitosan nanocomposite by response surface methodology. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Aspects 2015a; 484: 216–225.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.07.063Search in Google Scholar

Rahimi S, Moattari RM, Rajabi L, Derakhshan AA, Keyhani M. Iron oxide/hydroxide (α, γ-FeOOH) nanoparticles as high potential adsorbents for lead removal from polluted aquatic media. J Ind Eng Chem 2015b; 23: 33–43.10.1016/j.jiec.2014.07.039Search in Google Scholar

Ramanathan T, Abdala A, Stankovich S, Dikin D, Herrera-Alonso M, Piner R, Adamson DH, Schniepp HC, Chen X, Ruoff RS, Nguyen ST, Aksay IA, Prud’Homme RK, Brinson LC. Functionalized graphene sheets for polymer nanocomposites. Nat Nanotechnol 2008; 3: 327–331.10.1038/nnano.2008.96Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Rambabu G, Nagaraju N, Bhat SD. Functionalized fullerene embedded in Nafion matrix: a modified composite membrane electrolyte for direct methanol fuel cells. Chem Eng J 2016; 306: 43–52.10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.032Search in Google Scholar

Ray SS, Chen SS, Nguyen NC, Nguyen HT, Li CW, Wang J, Yan B. Forward osmosis desalination by utilizing chlorhexidine gluconate based mouthwash as a reusable draw solute. Chem Eng J 2016; 304: 962–969.10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.023Search in Google Scholar

Robeson LM. The upper bound revisited. J Membr Sci 2008; 320: 390–400.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030Search in Google Scholar

Safarpour MA, Khataee A, Vatanpour V. Effect of reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 nanocomposite with different molar ratios on the performance of PVDF ultrafiltration membranes. Sep Purif Technol 2015a; 140: 32–42.10.1016/j.seppur.2014.11.010Search in Google Scholar

Safarpour MA, Khataee A, Vatanpour V. Thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane modified by reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 with improved desalination performance. J Membr Sci 2015b; 489: 43–54.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.010Search in Google Scholar

Safarpour MA, Vatanpour V, Khataee A. Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide/TiO2 blended PES nanofiltration membrane with improved antifouling and separation performance. Desalination 2016; 393: 65–78.10.1016/j.desal.2015.07.003Search in Google Scholar

Salehi E, Madaeni SS, Rajabi L, Vatanpour V, Derakhshan AA, Zinadini S, Ghorabi S, Monfared HA. Novel chitosan/poly (vinyl) alcohol thin adsorptive membranes modified with amino functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes for Cu(II) removal from water: preparation, characterization, adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics. Sep Purif Technol 2012; 89: 309–319.10.1016/j.seppur.2012.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Salehi E, Madaeni SS, Rajabi L, Derakhshan AA, Daraei A, Vatanpour V. Static and dynamic adsorption of copper ions on chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol thin adsorptive membranes: combined effect of polyethylene glycol and aminated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Chem Eng J 2013; 215: 791–801.10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.071Search in Google Scholar

Salehi E, Abdi J, Aliei MH. Assessment of Cu (II) adsorption from water on modified membrane adsorbents using LS-SVM intelligent approach. J Saudi Chem Soc 2014; 20: 213–219.10.1016/j.jscs.2014.02.007Search in Google Scholar

Salehi E, Daraei P, Shamsabadi AA. A review on chitosan-based adsorptive membranes. Carbohydr Polym 2016; 152: 419–432.10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.033Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Sarfraz M, Ba-Shammakh M. Synergistic effect of incorporating ZIF-302 and graphene oxide to polysulfone to develop highly selective mixed-matrix membranes for carbon dioxide separation from wet post-combustion flue gases. J Ind Eng Chem 2016; 36: 154–162.10.1016/j.jiec.2016.01.032Search in Google Scholar

Scholes E, Verheyen V, Brook-Carter P. A review of practical tools for rapid monitoring of membrane bioreactors. Water Res 2016; 102: 252–262.10.1016/j.watres.2016.06.031Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Semenov K, Charykov N, Postnov V, Sharoyko V, Vorotyntsev I, Galagudza M, Murin IV. Fullerenols: physicochemical properties and applications. Prog Solid State Chem 2016; 44: 59–74.10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2016.04.002Search in Google Scholar

Shaikjee A, Coville NJ. The synthesis, properties and uses of carbon materials with helical morphology. J Adv Res 2012; 3: 195–223.10.1016/j.jare.2011.05.007Search in Google Scholar

SharmaVK, McDonald TJ, Kim H, Garg VK. Magnetic graphene–carbon nanotube iron nanocomposites as adsorbents and antibacterial agents for water purification. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2015; 225: 229–240.10.1016/j.cis.2015.10.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Shenderova OA, Gruen DM, editors. Ultrananocrystalline diamond: synthesis, properties and applications, 2nd ed., Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Shi Z, Zhang W, Zhang F, Liu X, Wang D, Jin J, Jiang L. Ultrafast separation of emulsified oil/water mixtures by ultrathin free standing single walled carbon nanotube network films. Adv Mater 2013; 25: 2422–2427.10.1002/adma.201204873Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Smirnov YN, Arbuzov A, Shtefan I, Lesnichaya V, Muradyan V. Polymeric dressing formulations containing water-soluble fullerene derivatives. Russ J Appl Chem 2011; 84: 1821–1825.10.1134/S1070427211100247Search in Google Scholar

Son M, Choi HG, Liu L, Celik E, Park H, Choi H. Efficacy of carbon nanotube positioning in the polyethersulfone support layer on the performance of thin-film composite membrane for desalination. Chem Eng J 2015, 266: 376–384.10.1016/j.cej.2014.12.108Search in Google Scholar

Song X, Wang L, Tang CY, Wang Z, Gao C. Fabrication of carbon nanotubes incorporated double-skinned thin film nanocomposite membranes for enhanced separation performance and antifouling capability in forward osmosis process. Desalination 2015; 369: 1–9.10.1016/j.desal.2015.04.020Search in Google Scholar

Sudareva NN, Penkova AV, Kostereva TA, Polotskii AE, Polotskaya GA. Properties of casting solutions and ultrafiltration membranes based on fullerene-polyamide nanocomposites. eXPRESS Polym Lett 2012; 6: 178–188.10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.20Search in Google Scholar

Thomas S, Shanks R, Chandrasekharakurup S, editors. Design and applications of nanostructured polymer blends and nanocomposite systems, 1st ed., Boston, USA: William Andrew Publishing, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Tijing LD, Woo YC, Shim WG, He T, Choi TS, Kim SH, Shon HK. Superhydrophobic nanofiber membrane containing carbon nanotubes for high-performance direct contact membrane distillation. J Membr Sci 2016; 502: 158–170.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.12.014Search in Google Scholar

Tongwen X, editor. Advances in membrane science and technology, New York, USA: Nova Science Publishers, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Uragami T, Okazaki K, Matsugi H, Miyata T. Structure and permeation characteristics of an aqueous ethanol solution of organic-inorganic hybrid membranes composed of poly (vinyl alcohol) and tetraethoxysilane. Macromolecules 2002; 35: 9156–9163.10.1021/ma020850uSearch in Google Scholar

US National Nanotechnology Initiative. What is nanotechnology. Available from http://www.nano.gov/nanotech-101/what/definition. May 20, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Van der Bruggen B. The separation power of nanotubes in membranes: a review. ISRN Nanotechnol 2012; 2012: 693485.10.5402/2012/693485Search in Google Scholar

Vane LM. A review of pervaporation for product recovery from biomass fermentation processes. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2005; 80: 603–629.10.1002/jctb.1265Search in Google Scholar

Varga M, Stehlik S, Kaman O, Izak T, Domonkos M, Lee D, Kromka A. Templated diamond growth on porous carbon foam decorated with polyvinyl alcohol-nanodiamond composite. Carbon 2017; 119: 124–132.10.1016/j.carbon.2017.04.022Search in Google Scholar

Vatanpour V, Madaeni SS, Moradian R, Zinadini S, Astinchap B. Fabrication and characterization of novel antifouling nanofiltration membrane prepared from oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotube/polyethersulfone nanocomposite. J Membr Sci 2011; 375: 284–294.10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.055Search in Google Scholar

Vatanpour V, Madaeni SS, Moradian R, Zinadini S, Astinchap B. Novel antibifouling nanofiltration polyethersulfone membrane fabricated from embedding TiO2 coated multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Sep Purif Technol 2012; 90: 69–82.10.1016/j.seppur.2012.02.014Search in Google Scholar

Vatanpour V, Safarpour M, Khataee A, Zarrabi H, Yekavalangi ME, Kavian M. A thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane containing amine-functionalized carbon nanotubes. Sep Purif Technol 2017; 184: 135–143.10.1016/j.seppur.2017.04.038Search in Google Scholar

Vatanpour V, Salehi E, Sahebjamee N, Ashrafi M. Novel chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol thin membrane adsorbents modified with detonation nanodiamonds: preparation, characterization, and adsorption performance. Arabian J Chem 2018; doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.01.010 (in press).10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.01.010Search in Google Scholar

Vinogradova L, Pulyalina AY, Rostovtseva V, Toikka A, Polotskaya G. C60 fullerene-containing polymer stars in mixed matrix membranes. Nanosystems: Phys Chem Math 2016; 7: 118–124.10.17586/2220-8054-2016-7-1-118-124Search in Google Scholar

Wang, H, DeSousa R, Gasa J, Tasaki K, Stucky G, Jousselme B, Wudl F. Fabrication of new fullerene composite membranes and their application in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Membr Sci 2007; 289: 277–283.10.1016/j.memsci.2006.12.008Search in Google Scholar

Wang Z, Yu H, Xia J, Zhang F, Li F, Xia Y, Li Y. Novel GO-blended PVDF ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 2012; 299: 50–54.10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.015Search in Google Scholar

Wang L, Song X, Wang T, Wang S, Wang Z, Gao C. Fabrication and characterization of polyethersulfone/carbon nanotubes (PES/CNTs) based mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) for nanofiltration application. Appl Surf Sci 2015a; 330: 118–125.10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.183Search in Google Scholar

Wang Y, Zhu J, Huang H, Cho HH. Carbon nanotube composite membranes for microfiltration of pharmaceuticals and personal care products: capabilities and potential mechanisms. J Membr Sci 2015b; 479: 165–174.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.01.034Search in Google Scholar

Wei Y, Chu HQ, Dong BZ, Li X, Xia SJ, Qiang ZM. Effect of TiO2 nanowire addition on PVDF ultrafiltration membrane performance. Desalination 2011; 272: 90–97.10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.013Search in Google Scholar

Wu H, Tang B, Wu P. Development of novel SiO2–GO nanohybrid/polysulfone membrane with enhanced performance. J Membr Sci 2014; 451: 94–102.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.09.018Search in Google Scholar

Xu L, He J, Yu Y, Chen JP. Effect of CNT content on physicochemical properties and performance of CNT composite polysulfone membranes. Chem Eng Res Des 2017; 121: 92–98.10.1016/j.cherd.2017.01.031Search in Google Scholar

Yan L, Li YS, Xiang CB, Xianda S. Effect of nano-sized Al2O3 particle addition on PVDF ultrafiltration membrane performance. J Membr Sci 2006; 276: 162–167.10.1016/j.memsci.2005.09.044Search in Google Scholar

Yu LY, Xu ZL, Shen HM, Yang H. Preparation and characterization of PVDF–SiO2 composite hollow fiber UF membrane by sol–gel method. J Membr Sci 2009; 337: 257–265.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.054Search in Google Scholar

Yuan B, Sun H, Wang T, Xu Y, Li P, Kong Y, Kong Yn, Niu QJ. Propylene/propane permeation properties of ethyl cellulose (EC) mixed matrix membranes fabricated by incorporation of nanoporous graphene nanosheets. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 28509–28521.10.1038/srep28509Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Zambare RS, Dhopte KB, Patwardhan AV, Nemade PR. Polyamine functionalized graphene oxide polysulfone mixed matrix membranes with improved hydrophilicity and anti-fouling properties. Desalination 2017; 403: 24–35.10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.003Search in Google Scholar

Zamora H, Plaza J, Cañizares P, Lobato J, Rodrigo MA. Improved electrodes for high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells using carbon nanospheres. ChemSusChem 2016; 9: 1187–1193.10.1002/cssc.201600050Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Zare K., Gupta VK, Moradi O, Makhlouf ASH, Sillanpää M, Nadagouda MN, Sadegh H, Shahryari-ghoshekandi R, Pal A, Wang ZJ, Tyagi I, Kazemi M. A comparative study on the basis of adsorption capacity between CNTs and activated carbon as adsorbents for removal of noxious synthetic dyes: a review. J Nanostruct Chem 2015; 5: 227–236.10.1007/s40097-015-0158-xSearch in Google Scholar

Zeng G, He Y, Yu Z, Yang X, Yang R, Zhang L. Preparation of novel high copper ions removal membranes by embedding organosilane functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2015; 91: 2322–2330.10.1002/jctb.4820Search in Google Scholar

Zhang J, Xu Z, Mai W, Min C, Zhou B, Shan M, Li Y, Yang C, Qian X. Improved hydrophilicity, permeability, antifouling and mechanical performance of PVDF composite ultrafiltration membranes tailored by oxidized low-dimensional carbon nanomaterials. J Mater Chem A 2013a; 1: 3101–3111.10.1039/c2ta01415gSearch in Google Scholar

Zhang J, Xu Z, Shan M, Zhou B, Li Y, Li B, Niu J, Qian X. Synergetic effects of oxidized carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide on fouling control and anti-fouling mechanism of polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 2013b; 448: 81–92.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.064Search in Google Scholar

Zhang X, Lang WZ, Yan X, Lou ZY, Chen XF. Influences of the structure parameters of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) on PVDF/PFSA/O-MWNTs hollow fiber ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 2016; 499: 179–190.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.034Search in Google Scholar

Zhang J, Pan X, Xue Q, He D, Zhub L, Guo Q. Antifouling hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile/graphene oxide membrane with spindle-knotted structure for highly effective separation of oil-water emulsion. J Membr Sci 2017a; 532: 38–46.10.1016/j.memsci.2017.03.004Search in Google Scholar

Zhang J, Wang Z, Liu M, Zhao F, Wu Z. In-situ modification of PVDF membrane during phase-inversion process using carbon nanosphere sol as coagulation bath for enhancing anti-fouling ability. J Membr Sci 2017b; 526: 272–280.10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.044Search in Google Scholar

Zhao C, Xu X, Chen J, Yang F. Effect of graphene oxide concentration on the morphologies and antifouling properties of PVDF ultrafiltration membranes. J Environ Chem Eng 2013a; 1: 349–354.10.1016/j.jece.2013.05.014Search in Google Scholar

Zhao Y, Xu Z, Shan M, Min C, Zhou B, Li Y, Li B, Liu L, Qian X. Effect of graphite oxide and multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the microstructure and performance of PVDF membranes. Sep Purif Technol 2013b; 103: 78–83.10.1016/j.seppur.2012.10.012Search in Google Scholar

Zinadini S, Zinatizadeh AA, Rahimi M, Vatanpour V, Zangeneh H. Preparation of a novel antifouling mixed matrix PES membrane by embedding graphene oxide nanoplates. J Membr Sci 2014; 453: 292–301.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.070Search in Google Scholar

Zinadini S, Vatanpour V, Zinatizadeh AA, Rahimi M, Rahimi Z, Kian M. Preparation and characterization of antifouling graphene oxide/polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane: application in MBR for dairy wastewater treatment. J Water Precess Eng 2015; 7: 280–294.10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.07.005Search in Google Scholar

Zolfaghari R, Fakhru’l-Razi A, Abdullah LC, Elnashaie SS, Pendashteh A. Demulsification techniques of water-in-oil and oil-in-water emulsions in petroleum industry. Sep Purif Technol 2016; 170: 377–407.10.1016/j.seppur.2016.06.026Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-08-09
Accepted: 2018-10-18
Published Online: 2019-01-15
Published in Print: 2020-08-26

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/revce-2017-0073/html
Scroll to top button