Next Article in Journal
The pathogen Mycoplasma dispar Shows High Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations for Antimicrobials Commonly Used for Bovine Respiratory Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Degraded Limonoid Analogs as New Antibacterial Scaffolds against Staphylococcus aureus
Previous Article in Journal
Post-Antibiotic Effect of Ampicillin and Levofloxacin to Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus Based on Microscopic Imaging Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
From Ocean to Medicine: Pharmaceutical Applications of Metabolites from Marine Bacteria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

HPLC-DAD and UHPLC/QTOF-MS Analysis of Polyphenols in Extracts of the African Species Combretum padoides, C. zeyheri and C. psidioides Related to Their Antimycobacterial Activity

1
Faculty of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Viikki Biocenter, P.O. Box 56, FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland
2
Department of Forest Products and Industries, Shambat Campus, SUD-13314, University of Khartoum, Khartoum 11111, Sudan
3
Faculty of Science and Forestry, Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 80101 Joensuu, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2020, 9(8), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9080459
Submission received: 22 June 2020 / Revised: 13 July 2020 / Accepted: 25 July 2020 / Published: 29 July 2020

Abstract

:
Combretum padoides Engl. & Diels, C. psidioides Welv. and C. zeyheri Sond. are used for the treatment of infections and tuberculosis related symptoms in African traditional medicine. In order to verify these uses, extracts were screened for their growth inhibitory effects against M. smegmatis ATCC 14468. Ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC/QTOF-MS) and GC-MS were used to investigate the polyphenolic composition in the active extracts. The lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), 625 µg/mL, was shown by a methanol extract of the stem bark of C. psidioides. A butanol extract of C. psidioides gave large inhibition zone diameters (IZD 21 mm) and inhibited 84% of the mycobacterial growth at 312 µg/mL. Combretastatin B-2 and dihydrostilbene derivatives were present in the methanol extract of C. psidioides, whereas the butanol extract of this species contained punicalagin, corilagin, and sanguiin H-4. Methanol and butanol extracts of the stem bark of C. padoides gave large inhibition zone diameters (IZD 26.5 mm) and MIC values of 1250 and 2500 µg/mL, respectively. C. padoides contained an ellagitannin with a mass identical to punicalagin ([M-H] 1083.0587) and a corilagin like derivative ([M-H] 633.0750) as well as ellagic acid arabinoside and methyl ellagic acid xyloside. A butanol extract of the roots of C. zeyheri showed mild antimycobacterial activity and contained a gallotannin at m/z [M-H] 647.0894 as the main compound along with punicalagin and three unknown ellagitannins at m/z [M-H] 763.0788, 765.0566, and 817.4212. Our results indicate that the studied species of Combretum contain phenolic and polyphenolic compounds with possible potential as leads for antimycobacterial drugs or as adjuvants for conventional anti-TB drugs.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be of global concern [1]. Worldwide, TB is among the top ten causes of death, and according to World Health Organization [1], 1.2 million people died from TB in 2018. Developing countries have significantly higher incidents of TB due to malnutrition, poverty, and crowded settings [2]. In the African region, the incidence rate of TB is estimated to be 363 per 100,000 compared to 4.4 per 100,000 in the United States [3,4]. Moreover, up to 22.4% of the population in Africa is infected with latent TB [5]. In Sub-Saharan Africa, the HIV/AIDS epidemic has contributed to create a large reservoir of TB susceptible individuals [6,7,8,9].
Drug-resistant TB continues to be a global health threat and multidrug-resistant (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR-TB) strains of M. tuberculosis are common in Africa [1,10]. Interruption of TB medication due to long treatment courses of 6–9 months has been thought to be the primary contributor to the emergence of drug resistant TB [2,11,12]. The multidrug-resistant strains of M. tuberculosis, which are resistant to the two first-line TB drugs, rifampicin and isoniazid, are estimated to result in up to 91% mortality among AIDS patients [13,14]. MDR-TB therapy is more costly, prolonged, and toxic than conventional TB therapy since several drugs, often eight to nine, are used in combination and, in addition, the cure rates are uncertain [15]. The need for finding new and more efficient low-toxic anti-tuberculosis scaffolds is therefore urgent [15,16].
Efforts to identify new anti-TB drugs have been made by screening pharmaceutical library collections, but the efficiency has been poor due to limited chemical diversity in these collections [17]. There is a re-emergence in the interest of natural products as providers of novel structures for antibacterial leads [18]. Natural products, and among them plant derived products, are rich in chemical diversity and thus new anti-TB compounds might be found from plants, and especially from plants used in traditional medicinal systems for TB related symptoms, such as chronic cough, bloody cough, and chest pain [19,20]. Plant derived compounds might act on other sites with other mechanisms of actions than the conventional antibiotics [21]. A number of antimycobacterial compounds have been explored from plants, among them (+)-calanolide A and abruquinone B with MIC 3.13 and 12.5 µg/mL, respectively, against M. tuberculosis [18,22,23].
Tropical rain forests, savanna and Miombo woodland forests and other forest biomes in Africa have a high biodiversity, which increases the possibilities for finding new scaffolds for antimicrobial drugs [24,25]. Moreover, there is still a large number of plant species, endemic to Africa, which have not been investigated for their antimicrobial potential [21]. The genus Combretum (Combretaceae) comprises about 250–370 species of trees, shrubs, and woody climbers in tropical and subtropical regions of Africa, the Arabic peninsula, Madagascar, India, Asia, Australia, and America [26,27]. The genus has its greatest species diversity in Africa with roughly 300 species [28], and an estimated 163 species occur in tropical Sub-Saharan Africa [29,30]. Combretum species occur in a variety of habitats, including Miombo woodlands, dry woodlands, riverine forests, and savannas [31]. Species of Combretum have characteristic 4–5 winged fruits, which are important for species characterization [31]. Many species resemble each other closely to their morphology and are therefore usually perceived as a common “Combretum-group” with the vernacular name “Mlama”, by traditional healers in Tanzania, although separate vernacular names are sometimes used to distinguish between species [32]. At least twenty-four species of Combretum have documented uses in African traditional medicine [33]. Species of Combretum are commonly used as decoctions, infusions, and macerations for the treatment of infectious diseases and their symptoms such as diarrhea, cough, fever, chest-pain, and vomiting [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Some species of Combretum are reported to be used specifically for tuberculosis, such as C. hereroense, C. molle and C. collinum [2,33,41,42]. The frequent use of Combretum spp. in traditional medicine for the treatment of infectious diseases indicates that they contain valuable (novel) antimicrobial compounds.
De Morais Lima et al. [43] give a comprehensive review on antimicrobial and other biological activities of African and Asian Combretum spp. According to this review, there is a wealth of studies concerning the growth inhibitory activities of various species of Combretum against a number of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. However, fewer investigations have been performed involving mycobacteria. Most of these investigations were performed using extracts and most of them involved other mycobacterial species than Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Several compound classes and among them unusual compounds [44] have been characterized from species of Combretum, such as tetra- and pentacyclic triterpenes and their desmosides [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54], cyclobutane chalcone dimers [55], cycloartane triterpenes [56], diarylpropanes [57,58], flavonoids [59,60], substituted bibenzyls and 9,10-dihydrophenanthrenes [61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68], alkaloids and flavonoid alkaloids [69,70], ellagic acid derivatives [71,72,73], ellagitannins [13,60,74,75,76], and gallotannins [60].
Some recent references on phytochemicals from Combretum spp. indicate that the genus contains compounds with topoisomerase activity, such as myricitrin, a flavonoid rhamnoside that was isolated from Combretum lanceolatum, a Brazilian medicinal plant [77]. Topoisomerase I is essential for the viability of M. tuberculosis and is therefore considered an important drug target for antimycobacterial compounds.
To date, the most active antimycobacterial compound in the genus Combretum, the diarylpropane, 1-(2-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)propane, was isolated from the Asian species Combretum griffithii and inhibited the growth of M. tuberculosis with a MIC value of 3.13 µg/mL [57,58]. Moreover, the ellagitannin punicalagin, isolated from an acetone extract of the stem bark of Combretum molle gave mild growth inhibitory effects against strains of M. tuberculosis [13]. Cholest-5-en-3-ol, 2-phyten-1-ol, gallocatechin, and apigenin isolated from Combretum paniculatum were active against Mycobacterium vaccae [73].
The aim of the present study was to investigate the antimycobacterial effects of the crude methanolic extracts of Combretum psidioides, C. fragrans, and C. zeyheri and their liquid partition fractions on the fast-growing model bacterium for tuberculosis, Mycobacterium smegmatis. The species of Combretum were selected based on their frequent uses in African traditional medicine to treat bacterial infections and symptoms related to them, such as cough (Table 1), as well as due to the scarcity or absence of antimycobacterial studies on these particular African species of Combretum. Moreover, the Combretum species chosen have given promising antibacterial and antifungal effects in our previous studies [78,79]. HPLC-DAD fingerprinting of the active extracts was performed, with special emphasis on polyphenols. Ellagitannins were found to occur in a high variety in the studied plants and this compound class was therefore studied in depth. There are a limited number of studies on ellagitannins in Combretum species, despite their predominance in decoctions, macerations, and other common traditional medicinal preparations of these plants. Therefore, ellagitannins (and especially their metabolites, the urolithins) are suggested to be important active ingredients in these preparations. We have used HPLC-DAD and UHPLC/QTOF-MS to elucidate UV absorption maxima, retention times and the molecular masses of ellagitannins and other phenolic compounds. In addition, some dihydrostilbenoid compounds of C. psidioides stem bark were characterized using GC-MS.

2. Results

2.1. Antimycobacterial Effects of Extracts and Fractions

Altogether, 26 extracts and solvent partition fractions from Combretum psidioides, C. padoides and C. zeyheri, used for the treatment of bacterial infections and even cough (C. zeyheri) in African traditional medicine (Table 1), were screened for their growth inhibitory effects against Mycobacterium smegmatis ATCC 14468. M. smegmatis has been found to be rather resistant to rifampicin [83]. Therefore, inhibitory effects against this bacterial strain could indicate that the extracts and fractions also to a certain extent might inhibit rifampicin resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Moreover, M. smegmatis has some virulence genes in common with M. tuberculosis, and thus serves as a good model bacterium [84]. The results regarding the antimycobacterial activity of crude methanol extracts and their solvent partition fractions of the investigated species of Combretum spp. are shown in Table 2 and Table 3.
Combretum psidioides gave the best growth inhibitory effects against M. smegmatis of the three species of Combretum used in this investigation. The lowest MIC of 625 µg/mL was shown by a methanol extract of the stem bark of this species. This extract also gave a large inhibition zone diameter of 29.0 mm (Table 2 and Table 3) as well as a good total antimycobacterial activity of 313.44 mL/g (Table 3). The total antimycobacterial activity is dependent on the extraction yield and the MIC of a plant extract, and is calculated as the ratio between the yield (in mg/g) and the MIC (in mg/mL) [84]. Moreover, we also found that chloroform and butanol extracts of the stem bark of C. psidioides were growth inhibitory against M. smegmatis, both giving MIC values of 2500 µg/mL and inhibition zone diameters of 25.5 and 21.5 mm, respectively (Table 2 and Table 3). In addition, although the MIC of the butanol fraction of C. psidioides was 2500 µg/mL, this extract was the most effective of the investigated extracts and fractions to inhibit the growth of M. smegmatis at lower concentrations and at 312 µg/mL, this extract resulted in an 84% growth inhibition.
Antimycobacterial effects were observed for methanol and butanol extracts of the stem bark of C. padoides, and both showed inhibition zone diameters of 26.5 mm and an activity index of 0.50 in comparison to rifampicin (IZD 52.5 mm) (Table 2). The MIC value of the crude methanol extract was 1250 µg/mL and for the butanol extract 2500 µg/mL (Table 3) and the growth inhibition of both extracts was dose-dependent for concentrations ranging down to 312 µg/mL (Figure 1). For both the crude methanol and butanol extracts, the growth inhibition was stronger at 78 µg/mL when compared to 156 µg/mL (Figure 1). Although the MIC of the butanol extract was higher than the MIC for the methanol extract, the butanol extract gave stronger growth inhibition than the methanol extract at concentrations below 625 µg/mL, and at 78 µg/mL still 51% of the growth was inhibited (Figure 1).
Compared to C. padoides and C. psidioides, C. zeyheri gave only mild antimycobacterial effects and a root butanol extract gave the best effect (IZD 23.0 mm) (Table 2).
In comparison to the plant extracts, rifampicin gave an inhibition zone diameter of 52.5 mm and a MIC of 3.9 µg/mL (Table 2, Table 3, Figure 1).

2.2. Phytochemistry

2.2.1. Combretum Psidioides

Based on the growth inhibitory results of both the methanol and the butanol extracts of the stem bark of C. psidioides, a butanol extract was chosen for phytochemical analysis on its polyphenolic composition using HPLC-DAD and UHPLC/QTOF-MS. Although showing a higher MIC than the methanol extract, the butanol extract was chosen for this analysis since the methanol extract contained a high concentration of condensed tannins that could interfere with the analysis (Figure S1). However, in terms of the ellagitannins and the ellagic acid derivatives composition, the butanol and methanol extracts contained the same compounds (Supplementary Figure S1). The results of the HPLC-DAD and UHPLC/QTOF-MS analysis of the butanol extract of the stem bark of C. psidioides are shown in Table 4. 3′-O-methyl-4-O-(β-d-xylopyranosyl)ellagic acid ( [M-H] at m/z 447.0574) was present at Rt 19.85 min (Table 4, Figure 2d). In addition, three other ellagic acid derivatives were identified at Rt 17.56, 18.93, and 24.92 min, showing two clear UVλ absorbance maxima, the first at 254 and the other at 362–380 nm, which is typical for this class of compounds [85]. UHPLC/QTOF-MS data revealed the molecular masses of three tentatively identified ellagitannins; corilagin at Rt 12.24 min ([M-H] at m/z 633.0750), punicalagin at Rt 14.96 min ([M-H]- at m/z 1083.5410, ) and sanguiin H-4 at Rt 8.21 min ([M-H] at m/z 633.0746) (Table 4, Figure 3a,b). The thirteen unknown ellagitannins could be identified as ellagitannins based on their UVλ absorption spectra, demonstrating three absorption maxima, characteristic for ellagitannins (Table 4, Figure 3c,d). Epigallocatechin gallate (MW 458.0843) at Rt 9.43 min was tentatively identified according to computer compound libraries available and characteristics such as UVλ absorption maxima data as well as HPLC retention time (Table 4, Figure 3e). To the best of our knowledge, this tea polyphenol has not been reported before in the genus Combretum.
Stilbenoid compounds are known to be present in Combretum spp. [61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68]. Stilbenes in the methanol extract of the stem bark of C. psidioides could contribute to the antimycobacterial effects of this extract (MIC 625 µg/mL). Therefore, a GC-MS analysis was made to study the stilbenoid composition of this extract. This analysis resulted in the characterization of combretastatin B-2 (exact calculated mass for C17H20O5, MW 304.13107) and its dihydrostilbene derivatives (Figure 4, Table 4). To the best of our knowledge, combretastatin B-2 has not been described before in C. psidioides, although a number of other bibenzyls were characterized from the heartwood of this plant by Letcher & Nhamo [63].

2.2.2. Combretum Padoides

Since the HPLC-DAD chromatograms of the methanol and butanol extracts of the stembark of C. padoides were almost identical, but with the butanol part showing a slightly cleaner profile (Figure S2), we chose the butanol part for UHPLC/QTOF-MS analysis. In addition, although the MIC was lower for the methanol extract, the IC50 value was lower (<312 µg/mL) for the butanol part, which was also a criterium for choosing this extract for the phytochemical analysis. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 5. Altogether twenty-six ellagitannins were tentatively identified based on their retention times, mass spectrometric data and characteristic UV absorbance spectra (Figure 5). The ellagitannin present in the highest concentration, at Rt 10.90 min, resembled punicalagin, giving a [M-H] molecular ion at m/z 1083.0587. The retention time of this ellagitannin (10.90 min) was, however, not in agreement with the retention time that we have found before for β-punicalagin (Rt 14.95–15.64 min). Thus, this ellagitannin could be punicacortein D, with the molecular formula C48H28O30, identical to punicalagin, but with a shorter retention time in HPLC-DAD, compared to punicalagin [86]. Punicacortein D has been found in only one other species of the family Combretaceae, Combretum aculeatum [86]. However, there is also a possibility that this ellagitannin at Rt 10.90 min would be the α-anomer of punicalagin, which is otherwise identical to β-punicalagin to its mass spectrometric data, but has a shorter HPLC-retention time. Moreover, the α- and β- anomers of punicalagin differ by slight shifts in their UVλ absorbance maxima, due to differences in the position of the OH-group and the H-atom linked to the anomeric C-1 atom [86,87]. However, in our analysis, it was impossible to distinguish α-punicalagin from punicacortein D.
We also found that the stem bark of C. padoides contains high concentrations of another ellagitannin at Rt HPLC-DAD 10.11 min, showing a [M-H] molecular ion at m/z 633.0750, identical to that of corilagin (Table 5), [88]. The retention time of this ellagitannin however was different from that of corilagin, which we have found at Rt 12.52 min in Terminalia laxiflora roots [89] as well as in this investigation in Combretum psidioides stem bark at Rt HPLC-DAD 12.24 min (Table 4). Thus, this ellagitannin is tentatively suggested to be an isomer of corilagin. In addition to the mentioned ellagitannins, we identified the masses of four unknown ellagitannins; an ellagitannin at Rt 7.81 min gave a [M-H] molecular ion at m/z 466.0264, a second one at tR 8.83 min gave a [M-H] molecular ion at m/z 1083.0591, a third one at Rt 11.38 min gave a [M-H] molecular ion at m/z 1083.0581 (co-eluting with punicacortein D or α-punicalagin at Rt 10.90 min) and a fourth ET at Rt 20.25 min showing a [M-H] molecular ion at m/z 1085.0719 (Table 5). When conducting a literature search for possible ellagitannins with molecular masses of 1086 occurring in Combretum spp., we did not find any matches. Instead, we found a reference of an ellagitannin giving a [M-H] molecular ion at m/z 1085, found in strawberry fruits [90]. The molecular structure of this ellagitannin was not elucidated, however.
We found five ellagic acid derivatives, at Rt 18.55, 19.96, 20.24, 21.05, and 26.26 min, in the stem bark of C. padoides, showing two peaks of UV absorbance, one at 254 and the other at 362–380 nm, typical for ellagic acid based molecules (Table 5, Figure 2e,f). To the best of our knowledge, ellagic acid arabinoside (Rt 20.79 min, [M-H] at m/z 433.0391) and methyl ellagic acid xyloside (Rt 21.05 min, [M-H]- at m/z 447.0564) have not been reported before in C. padoides.
Moreover, based on their UV absorption maxima, four gallotannins were identified in the stem bark of C. padoides, as well as their precursor, 1-O-galloyl-β-d-glucose (β-glucogallin, Rt 1.58 min) giving a [M-H] molecular ion at m/z 331.0685) (Table 5). Glucogallin is known from Quercus spp. [91] and from Emblica officinalis [92], but to the best of our knowledge not from Combretum spp.

2.2.3. Combretum Zeyheri

Since the root part of C. zeyheri gave slightly better growth inhibitory effects than the stem bark, this part was chosen for a phytochemical analysis on its polyphenols. Moreover, C. zeyheri has not been analysed before for its polyphenolic composition. Our UHPLC/QTOF-MS analysis of the butanol fraction of the roots demonstrated that a gallotannin at Rt 15.008 min, showing a [M-H] molecular ion at m/z 765.0566 was the main compound in this extract, giving a peak area of 20.08% (at UV 280 nm, Table 6, Figure 2g). C. zeyheri contained more gallotannins and condensed tannins than C. psidioides and C. padoides. Altogether eight gallotannins and three procyanidins were found based on the UVλ absorption maxima spectra of these compounds. UVλ absorption maxima peaks with two shoulders, one at 216 nm and another at 258–278 nm, could be seen for the gallotannins (Figure 2g), whereas the condensed tannins gave two absorption maxima at 212 and at 272–276 nm (Figure 3e). Moreover, fourteen ellagitannins were identified based on their characteristic UVλ absorption maxima spectra as well as retention times. Of these ellagitannins, punicalagin at Rt 15.64 min ([M-H] at m/z 1083.0574) was present in the highest concentrations. In addition, the masses of three unknown ellagitannins were determined; an ellagitannin at Rt 34.99 min ([M-H] at m/z 763.0788), another one containing both ellagic and gallic acid units (ellagigallotannin) at Rt 36.93 min ([M-H] at m/z 765.0566) and a third at Rt 39.96 min ([M-H] at m/z 817.4212). Moreover, five ellagic acid derivatives were present, among which methyl ellagic acid (Rt 29.92 min, ([M-H] at m/z 447.0566), dimethyl-ellagic acid-xyloside (Rt 34.24 min, [M-H] at m/z 461.0741), and 3,3′-Di-O-methyl-4-O-(n′′-O-galloyl-β-d-xylopyranosyl) ellagic acid (Rt 36.26 min, [M-H] at m/z 613.0849) were tentatively identified.

3. Discussion

3.1. Antimycobacterial Effects of the Extracts of the Studied Species of Combretum in Relation to Other Studies on the Antimycobacterial Effects of Combretum spp

A number of studies demonstrate that extracts of Combretum species possess antimycobacterial effects. For example, Combretum comosum was found to give growth inhibitory effects against M. phlei [93]; C. brassii gave antimycobacterial effects against M. tuberculosis (MIC 1250 µg/mL) [94]; extracts from C. platypetalum and C. imberbe gave MIC values of 63–500 µg/mL against M. smegmatis and M. aurum [95]; acetone extracts of the leaves of C. hereroense gave a MIC value of 470 µg/mL against M. smegmatis [96]; acetone extracts of the leaves of C. schumannii gave a MIC value of 313 µg/mL against M. madagascariense and stem bark dichloromethane and root ethanol extracts were effective against M. indicuspranii [28]; C. hartmannianum leaf ethanol extracts showed strong growth inhibition against M. aurum A+ with a MIC value of 190 µg/mL [97] and ethanol extracts of the leaves, bark and root of C. kraussii gave MIC values of 195 µg/mL against M. aurum A+ [98,99].
In our investigation, methanol and butanol extracts of Combretum psidioides, C. padoides, and C. zeyheri were found to give MIC values from 625 to 2500 µg/mL against M. smegmatis. To the best of our knowledge, C. padoides and C. psidioides have not been studied before for their growth inhibitory effects against M. smegmatis. In addition, the roots of C. zeyheri have not been explored before for their antimycobacterial effects.
Contrary to our result, Luo et al. [100] reported that stem bark extracts of C. zeyheri are not antimycobacterial against M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis. However, Luo et al. [100] defined all extracts as not active with MIC values exceeding 125 µg/mL and the MIC results for C. zeyheri were not shown. Moreover, Magwenzi et al. [95] found that a leaf extract of C. zeyheri was not active against Mycobacterium smegmatis. This could be due to differences in growth inhibitory activities between different organs in C. zeyheri, so that the stem bark and roots might contain more and perhaps different active compounds than the leaves, since we have seen that especially butanol and methanol extracts of the stem bark and roots of C. zeyheri give growth inhibitory effects against M. smegmatis. However, an alkaloid enriched leaf extract of C. zeyheri was found to inhibit the growth of M. smegmatis with a MIC value of 125 µg/mL and the growth inhibition was concentration- and time dependent [101]. Moreover, the same authors also discovered that this alkaloid extract of C. zeyheri was a potent inhibitor of efflux pumps in M. smegmatis. Thus, C. zeyheri (and other African Combretum spp.) might contain a number of alkaloids with antimycobacterial properties yet to be explored.

3.2. Ellagitannins in the Species of Combretum and Their Suggested Impact on the Antimycobacterial Effects of These Species

Although some Combretum spp. have been found to be rich in ellagitannins and their derivatives as well as other hydrolysable tannins [13,74,86] (Figure 6), these compound categories and their possible potential role as antimicrobials have not been studied in detail in this genus. This could partly be due to the poor bioavailability of ellagitannins, although they could have potential as topically administered antimicrobials or in the gut as well as in combinations with conventional antibiotics or via their metabolites, the urolithins. Among the few studies available on ellagitannins in Combretum spp. is the study of Jossang et al. [74], who characterized 2,3-(S)-hexahydroxydiphenoyl-d-glucose (MW 482.34), punicalin (MW 782.52), punicalagin (MW 1084.71), and combreglutinin (MW 1236.837) from the leaves of the West-African species, Combretum glutinosum. Combreglutinin is composed of one extra galloyl group compared to punicalagin (Figure 6).
In our study, especially butanol and methanol extracts of the stem bark of C. psidioides and C. padoides and the roots of C. zeyheri, enriched in ellagitannins and gallotannins and their monomers (ellagic acid and gallic acid derivatives), gave good antimycobacterial effects. Thus, the antimycobacterial effects of these extracts are suggested to be partly due to these compound classes, and for the ellagitannins perhaps most likely via their urolithin metabolites [86]. This is supported by Coulidiati et al. [102] who demonstrated that tannins, and especially hydrolysable tannins (ellagitannins and gallotannins), predominate in n-butanol extracts of Combretum sericeum and these compounds were suggested to be responsible for the antimicrobial activity of the extracts.
We found that punicalagin (Figure 6) is present in the stem bark of Combretum psidioides and in the roots of C. zeyheri. To the best of our knowledge, there are no previous reports on the occurrence of punicalagin in the mentioned Combretum species. Previously, apart from C. glutinosum, punicalagin was found in Combretum molle [13] and both the α- and β-punicalagin anomers were characterized in Combretum aculeatum [86]. Punicalagin isolated from the stem bark of C. molle gave growth inhibitory effects against M. tuberculosis typus humanus ATCC 27,294 and against a clinical strain with MIC values of 600 and 1200 µg/mL, respectively [13] and was the first ellagitannin reported to possess antimycobacterial effects. We therefore suggest that part of the antimycobacterial activities of the butanol extracts of C. psidioides stem bark and C. zeyheri roots, reported in this paper, might be due to this ellagitannin, and perhaps in combinations with the other ellagitannins in these extracts. However, again, these activities are in vitro, and further studies should be performed on urolithins resulting from the metabolism of punicalagin, and their effects on mycobacterial strains.
Our study revealed the occurrence of corilagin and sanguiin H-4 in Combretum psidioides and a corilagin like ellagitannin in C. padoides stem bark (Figure 6). To the best of our knowledge, corilagin and/or its isomers and sanguiin H-4 have not been found in Combretum species earlier. Corilagin has been reported to occur in various species of the closely related genera Terminalia [86,103,104] and Lumnitzera (Combretaceae) [105]. Corilagin was found to give good growth inhibitory effects against S. aureus with a MIC value of 25 µg/mL [106], and to inhibit the growth of methicillin resistant S. aureus [107,108]. Moreover, corilagin increased membrane permeability in E. coli and C. albicans [109]. In addition, corilagin gave bactericidal effects in vitro against Klebsiella pneumoniae [110] and inhibited the growth of Acinetobacter baumanii [111]. Interestingly, corilagin was found to potentiate the activity of β-lactam antibiotics 100–2000-fold against methicillin-resistant S. aureus via inhibition of the activity of penicillin binding protein 2 [108,112]. However, in our screenings on the effects of pure corilagin on M. smegmatis growth, we found that this ellagitannin showed only weak growth inhibition (MIC 1000 µg/mL, Table 3). This could imply that the ellagitannins in the Combretum-extracts work together with each other and with other secondary defense compounds to produce antimycobacterial, and perhaps synergistic or additive effects in combinations. Further investigations on the effects of ellagitannins in the Combretum species studied in this investigation and their urolithin metabolites, both alone and in combinations with isoniazid and rifampicin, on the growth of M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis are warranted.
Since traditional medicines with Combretum spp. as ingredients are often prepared as decoctions or macerations, this means that polar ellagitannins and other polyphenols, extracted with hot or cold water are important components in them. Macerations of the stem bark of C. psidioides, enriched with polyphenols, are specifically used for the treatment of diarrhea [34] and decoctions of the roots, leaves and stem bark of C. zeyheri are used for cough that could be related to TB [35,37,38], which implies that these species and preparations contain antibacterial (and antimycobacterial) compounds. Interestingly, we have seen that the chromatographic profiles of butanol and methanol extracts of the studied Combretum spp. resembled those of the corresponding water extracts, with ellagitannins as the main compounds also in water extracts (Figure S3). This could imply that decoctions and macerations of C. psidioides, C. padoides, and C. zeyheri, used in African traditional medicine, would contain ellagitannins with antibacterial (and antimycobacterial) effects (via their urolithins).

3.3. Suggested Antimycobacterial Impact of Ellagic Acid Derivatives in the Species of Combretum Used in This Study

According to the results of the present study, all the investigated species of Combretum are rich sources of ellagic acid derivatives. We found that tentatively identified 3′-O-methyl-4-O-(β-d-xylopyranosyl) ellagic acid was present in large quantities in a butanol extract of C. psidioides stem bark and ellagic acid arabinoside was present in the stem bark of C. padoides (Table 4 and Table 5). Moreover, dimethyl-ellagic acid xyloside and 3,3′-di-O-methyl-4-O-(n′′-O-galloyl-β-d-xylopyranosyl) ellagic acid were tentatively characterized in a butanol extract of the stem bark of C. zeyheri (Table 6). To the best of our knowledge, these ellagic acid derivatives have not previously been found in the mentioned species of Combretum. These ellagic acid derivatives are suggested to contribute to the good antimycobacterial effects presented in this study for Combretum psidioides, C. padoides and C. zeyheri since there are a number of reports on good antimycobacterial effects of ellagic acid derivatives. For example, Kuete et al. [25] reported that 3,4′-di-O-methylellagic-acid-3′-O-β-d-xylopyranoside and 4′-O-galloyl-3,3′-di-O-methylellagic acid 4-O-β-d-xylopyranoside, isolated from the stem bark of Terminalia superba gave promising growth inhibitory effects against Mycobacterium smegmatis and M. tuberculosis H37Rv as well as a clinical strain of M. tuberculosis, showing MIC values between 4.88 and 9.76 µg/mL. Moreover, ellagic acid derivatives, such as 3,3′-di-O-methyl-ellagic acid, has been found to inhibit the synthesis of mycolic acid, an important cell wall constituent in Mycobacterium spp. [113] and pteleoellagic acid and some other ellagic acid derivatives revealed good in silico effects on their docking capacity to enzymes important for the biogenesis of the mycobacterial cell wall [114]. Digalloyl-rhamnopyranosyl ellagic acid and diellagic lactone isolated from the leaves of Terminalia brownii did not show growth inhibitory effects against Mycobacterium intracellulare, but showed good growth inhibition against other bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (IC50 8.8. and 8.4 µg/mL, respectively) [115]. In summary, the above-mentioned findings warrant further studies on the antimycobacterial effects of ellagic acid derivatives in African species of Combretum.

3.4. Stilbenes in Combretum Psidioides and Their Possible Antimycobacterial Effects

The present study demonstrated that the bibenzyl, combretastatin B-2, and some related dihydrostilbene derivatives occurred in a methanolic stem bark extract of Combretum psidioides (Figure 4). Earlier, fourteen phenanthrenes and some bibenzyl derivatives (not including combretastatin B-2) have been characterized from the stem bark of C. psidioides [63], but these compounds were not investigated for their antibacterial effects. Combretastatins and phenanthrenes are known to occur in some other species of Combretum, the most wellknown source being the stem bark of the South African species C. caffrum from which a series of antineoplastic combretastatins, among them combretastatin as well as combretastatins A-1, A-2, A-3, B-1, B-2, B-3, and B-4 have been isolated and characterized [65,116]. Some work has been performed on the antimicrobial effects of stilbenoids and phenanthrenes from Combretum species: Combretastatin B-5 from the leaves of C. woodii gave good antibacterial effects against S. aureus with a MIC of 16 µg/mL [67] and phenanthrenes from C. collinum, C. hereroense and C. apiculatum gave a MIC value of 25 µg/mL against Mycobacterium fortuitum [117]. These results warrant further studies on the antibacterial and antimycobacterial effects of stilbenoids and phenanthrenes from the Combretum species used in this study as well as from African Combretum spp. in general.

3.5. Epigallocatechin Gallate

Our results indicated that the green tea polyphenol, epigallocatechin gallate, was present in a crude methanol extract of the stem bark of C. psidioides (Table 4). This compoud has not been found before in C. psidioides. Interestingly, epigallocatechin gallate has been shown to affect cell wall integrity of M. smegmatis mc2155, and is suggested to be a good prophylactic agent for TB [118]. In addition, it was found that epigallocatechin gallate inhibits the survival of M. tuberculosis within human macrophages [119]. Moreover, (−)-epigallocatechin gallate has been found to repress the expression of transcription factor lasB, involved in the quorum sensing system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa [120]. Our study suggests that more species of Combretum, used for TB in African traditional medicine, should be explored for their contents of epigallocatechin gallate. Epigallocatechin gallate could be one of the effective antimycobacterial compounds in the stem bark of C. psidioides.

3.6. Extraction Yield and Its Impact on the Total Antimycobacterial Activity of the Extracts of the Species of Combretum Used in This Study

When a traditional medicinal plant is evaluated for its usefulness, it is important to measure the total activity of its extract or isolated fractions/compounds [84]. The total activity is a measure of the extraction yield of the extracts/fractions divided to the antimicrobial activity of the extracts/fractions (mg extraction yield/MIC in mg/mL) and indicates the volume in ml to which the active compounds in 1 g of the plant material can be diluted and still inhibits bacterial growth [84].
We found that methanol extraction of the stem bark of C. psidioides results in a high extraction yield of 19.59% (195.9 mg extracted from 1 g plant material) compared to 10.64% and 15.33%, for C. padoides and C. zeyheri, respectively (Figure 7). Thus, the methanol stem bark extract of C. psidioides gives a good total activity of 313.44 mL/g (resulting from dividing the extraction yield to the MIC; 195.9/0.625 = 313.44), and indicates that standardized C. psidioides stem bark extracts could have applications as antimycobacterial phytomedicines. The extraction yields for C. padoides and C. zeyheri obtained in the present study are in agreement with the yields mentioned by Masoko et al. [121]. Moreover, Masoko et al. [121], found that methanol and acetone are suitable solvents for extracting antimicrobials from Combretum spp.
When the extraction yields of different fractions resulting from solvent partition were compared, it was observed that the butanol fraction gave the highest yield of 47.52% for Combretum padoides, and thus resulting in a total antimycobacterial activity of 190.12 mL/g (Table 2, Figure 8). This means that butanol is an optimal solvent for extracting antimycobacterial compounds, such as ellagic acid derivatives and ellagitannins from C. padoides. The total extraction yield when using Soxhlet extraction with methanol was, however, observed to be quite low, 10.61% (Figure 7), resulting in a total antimycobacterial activity of 85.12 mL/g of this extract (Table 2).

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Ethnopharmacological Background Data

The Combretum species were collected from Miombo woodland and riverine forest habitats in Mbeya and Iringa districts in Tanzania in February–March 1999 [32]. Species identification was performed by the botanist Mr. Leonard Mwasumbi, the former superintendent of the Herbarium of the University of Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. Voucher specimens are deposited in the Botanical Museum (H) of the Finnish Museum of Natural History in Helsinki, Finland and at the Herbarium of the University of Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. The Combretum species collected for this study are presented in Table 1 together with data on their ethnopharmacological uses (with special emphasis on cough as a symptom of TB), antimicrobial activity, and their phytochemical composition.

4.2. Extraction

4.2.1. Soxhlet Extraction

For each plant sample, 20 g of dried and milled plant material (roots, stem bark, leaves) was extracted with 500 mL MeOH in a Soxhlet apparatus for 4 h. The extracts were reduced to dryness under vacuum using a rotary evaporator, the temperature of the water bath not exceeding +40 °C. For complete drying, the extracts were then further freeze-dried in a lyophilizer for 1–2 days. The resulting residues were redissolved in MeOH (crude extract) to a final concentration of 50 mg/mL for antimycobacterial screening.

4.2.2. Solvent Fractionation

Lyophilized crude Soxhlet methanol extracts (1500 mg) of different plant organs of the Combretum species were dissolved in 50 mL distilled water for 30 min using an ultrasonic bath. The extracts were centrifuged in order to separate material, which did not dissolve in water (aqueous insoluble fraction). The aqueous part was used for further fractionation starting with 3 × 25 mL CHCl3:EtOH (2:1), whereafter 3 × 25 mL n-BuOH was used. The fractionations thus resulted in CHCl3, n-BuOH, aqueous and aqueous-insoluble fractions. The fractions were evaporated to dryness using a rotary evaporator and re-dissolved in MeOH to stock solutions of 50 mg/mL for antimycobacterial testing.

4.3. Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry

4.3.1. HPLC-UV/DAD Method I

HPLC analyses for qualitative analysis of extracts of Combretum species were performed as described in Fyhrquist et al. [122]. The liquid chromatographic system (Waters 600 E) consisted of a pump and a controller coupled to a 991 PDA detector and a 717 plus automatic sampler under control of Waters Millennium 2000 software. Samples of 20 μL (20 mg/mL inMeOH) were injected. A reversed phase Hypersil BDS-C-18 analytical column (250 mm × 4.6 mm ID 5 μm) was used for the separations. Elution was performed as gradient elution using A) 0.1% formic acid in water and B) 100% acetonitrile. The gradient started with 85% A and ended with 100% B and the length of the runs were 50–60 min. The flow rate was 1 mL/min. UV chromatograms were constructed at 254, 280, and 340 nm. UVλ absorption maxima spectra of the compounds of interest were recorded between 200 and 400 nm using Millennium 2000 software and compared to reference compounds in the computer library.

4.3.2. HPLC-UV/DAD Method II

A second HPLC-method described in Julkunen-Tiitto et al. [123] and Fyhrquist et al., [122], developed especially for the detection of polyphenols, was used. The HPLC-system consisted of a Waters 600 E pump and a controller coupled to a 991 PDA detector and an autosampler under control of Agilent Chemstation software (Waters Corp., Milford, USA). Samples of 10 μL (2 mg/mL in 50% MeOH) were injected. Separations were performed on a reversed phase Hypersil Rp C-18 analytical column (length: 10 mm; ID: 2 mm; particle size 5 µm). Gradient elution was performed by using solvent systems as follows: A) Aqueous 1.5% tetrahydrofuran + 0.25% orthophosphoric acid and B) 100% MeOH. The flow rate was 2 mL/min. UV chromatograms were constructed at 220, 270, 280, 320, and 360 nm. UVλ absorption maxima spectra of compounds, with special emphasis on ellagitannins and ellagic acid derivatives were compared to the Agilent Chemstation library and to literature [88].

4.3.3. UHPLC/Q-TOF MS Method

Ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry was used as a sensitive method to detect molecular masses with four decimal precision. UHPLC-DAD (Model 1200 Agilent Technologies)-JETSTREAM/QTOFMS (Model 6340 Agilent Technologies) equipped with a 2.1 × 60 mm, 1.7 µm C18 column (Agilent technologies) was used for the identification of phenolic compounds based on the method described in Taulavuori et al. [124]. Solvent A was 1.5% tetrahydrofuran and 0.25% acetic acid in HPLC quality water and solvent B was 100% methanol. Gradient runs were as follows: from 0 to 1.5 min, B 0%, from 1.5 to 3 min, 0 to 15% B, from 3 to 6 min, 10 to 30% B, from 6 to 12 min, 30 to 50% B, from 12 to 20 min, 50 to 100% B, and from 20 to 22 min, 100 to 0% B. Negative ion mode were used to acquire the mass spectra depending on the chemical class of the compounds and a mass range from 100 to 2000 m/z was used. The negative mode was found to be favorable for ellagitannins and ellagic acid derivatives. Pfundstein et al., [88] was used as the main reference for ellagitannins, ellagic acid derivatives and gallotannins.
Mass measurement error (mass accuracy) was calculated according to Brenton and Godfrey [125]: Difference between an individual measurement and the true value ΔMi (in ppm, parts per million) = (M measured − M calculated) × 106/M calculated, where M measured is the measured mass in QTOF-MS and M calculated is the exact calculated mass according to the molecular formula of the compound. Negative mode of qtof was used, and thus the mass of the hydrogen atom (1.0078) was subtracted from all the calculated masses.

4.3.4. GC-MS Method

The GC-MS analyses were performed on Hewlett-Packard (HP) 5890 GC coupled to an HP quadrupole mass selective detector operated at ionization voltage of 70 eV (EI-mode). The crude methanol extract of the stem bark of Combretum psidioides was evaporated and analysed on an NB-54 fused silica capillary column (15 m; 0.20 mm i.d.; Nordion, Finland) using an oven temperature programming from 70 °C to 275 °C at 15 °C/min. A GC-MS library (The Wiley® Registry of Mass Spectral Data, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Electronic division, New York, NY, USA) was used for the elucidation of molecular masses of stilbenoid compounds in the extract.

4.4. Assays for Testing Antimycobacterial Activity

4.4.1. Agar Disk Diffusion

An agar disk diffusion method, explained in detail in Fyhrquist et al. [122], was used. Mycobacterium smegmatis ATCC 14,468 was grown for five days at +37 °C on Löwenstein-Jensen agar slants (Becton-Dickinson & Company, USA). 200 µL of bacterial culture containing 1.0 × 108 CFU/mL was inoculated on Petri dishes (∅ = 14 cm, Bibby Sterilin, UK) containing 30 mL Middlebrook 7H10 agar (Difco) supplemented with OADC supplement (Difco) as a top layer and 30 mL base agar (Antibiotic agar No 2, Difco) as a bottom layer. Filter paper disks (∅ = 12.7 mm, Schleicher & Schuell) loaded with 200 µL extracts or fractions (50 and 20 mg/mL, respectively), 200 µL rifampicin (10 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich) and 200 µL MeOH (as negative control) were allowed to dry completely before placing them equidistantly from each other on the petri dishes. Prior to incubation, the petri dishes were kept in +4 °C for 1 h. The petri dishes were incubated at +37 °C for five days. Each extract/fraction was tested in triplicate and three separate experiments were performed. The diameter of zones of inhibition (IZD) were measured with a caliper and the mean of 3 diameters ± SEM was calculated. Activity index (AI) was measured as the percentage of activity compared to rifampicin, as described by Fyhrquist et al. [122].

4.4.2. Microplate Dilution Method

A modified microplate assay based on Collins & Franzblau [126] and described in Fyhrquist et al. [122] was used for measuring minimum inhibitory concentrations of extracts of Combretum spp. Mycobacterium smegmatis ATCC 14468 was incubated for five days at +37 °C on Löwenstein-Jensen agar slants and transferred into Dubos broth after completed incubation. The absorbance of the samples was adjusted to 0.1 at 625 nm (approx. 1.0 × 108 CFU/mL) using Dubos broth supplemented with Dubos broth albumin (Difco) and diluted further to 5.0 × 105 CFU/mL. 100 µL of this inoculum was added to the wells of the microplates (Nunc, Nunclone, Denmark). 100 µL of two-fold dilutions of plant extracts (9.76–5000 µg/mL) and of rifampicin (0.9–1000 µg/mL) in Dubos broth or 100 µL Dubos broth (growth control) were added to the wells of the microplate, so that the final volume in the wells was 200 µL, thus containing 2.5 × 105 CFU/mL. In order to measure eventual absorption at 620 nm by the plant extracts or the antibiotic, solvent partition fractions, extracts and rifampicin, alone without bacteria were used as controls and the absorption produced by these samples was subtracted from the corresponding samples containing bacterial cells. The solvent control, MeOH at 5% or less, did not affect the growth of M. smegmatis. The microplates were incubated for four days at +37 °C, whereafter turbidity of the wells at 620 nm was measured using a Victor (Wallac, Finland) spectrophotometer. The results were calculated as the mean percentage inhibition of the growth control of three replicate samples ± SEM. The smallest concentration of the extracts and of rifampicin inhibiting 90% or more of the growth of M. smegmatis and thus resulting in no visible growth was considered as the MIC.

4.5. Calculation of Total Antimycobacterial Activity

The total activity is a measure of the relation of the exraction yield of a plant extract divided to the MIC of that extract. The total activity indicates the volume into which 1 g of plant extract can be diluted without losing its antibacterial activity [84]. The total antimycobacterial activity for plant extracts in this study was calculated as follows:
Total activity (mL/g) = extraction yield of extract A (mg/1000 mg) divided to the MIC of extract A (in mg/mL).

5. Conclusions

The results of the present study confirm the antimycobacterial potential of butanol, methanol, and watersoluble extracts of the stem bark of Combretum padoides and C. psidioides and the stem bark and roots of C. zeyheri. The traditional use of decoctions and macerations of C. zeyheri for the treatment of cough [81] is justified by these results. The results from this study also suggest that standardized ethanol and water-based extracts of C. padoides and C. psidioides could be used for the treatment of tuberculosis, although these species are not mentioned to be used for this purpose in African traditional medicine.
The growth inhibitory effects of the butanol, methanol and watersoluble extracts of the Combretum species in this study are suggested to be partly due to ellagitannins and ellagic acid derivatives, which are abundantly present in these extracts. However, the therapeutic use of ellagitannins for TB is likely to be limited to their metabolic products, the urolithins, since there is so far only one report on the occurrence of intact ellagitannins in the plasma of rats after a prolonged intake of ET rich foods [127].
The ellagic acid derivatives, and especially the glycosides that we have found in the Combretum species studied, could have an interesting potential as new anti-TB drug scaffolds, since some ellagic acid derivatives, such as dimethyl ellagic acid xyloside, that was found in the roots of C. zeyheri in this investigation, have been found to possess promising antimycobacterial effects, amongst others as inhibitors of the synthesis of mycolic acid [113].
The results from this study indicate that extracts of Combretum psidioides, C. padoides, and C. zeyheri should be tested against other mycobacteria, and especially Mycobacterium tuberculosis, since moderate MIC values against M. smegmatis could imply good MIC values against M. tuberculosis. The activity guided isolation of active compounds from the butanol extracts, with special emphasis on ellagic acid derivatives, remains to be performed. Moreover, urolithins resulting from the metabolic conversion of the ellagitannins punicalagin, corilagin, and saguiin H-4, should be tested for their antimycobacterial effects.
Lastly, the potential of ellagitannins and ellagic acid derivatives, and other phenolic compounds from the investigated species of Combretum spp. should be tested as antibiotic adjuvants to enhance the effects of rifampicin, isoniazid, and other conventional anti-TB drugs.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/9/8/459/s1, Figure S1: (A) HPLC-DAD chromatogram of a methanol extract of the stem bark of Combretum psidioides. Rt 7.4, ellagitannin; Rt 7.9, ellagitannin; Rt 8.3, Sanguiin H-4; Rt 10.159, di-galloyl-glucose; Rt 10.9, ellagitannin; Rt 12.4, corilagin; Rt 15.2, punicalagin; Rt 18.0, ellagic acid derivative; Rt 20.2, 3′-O-methyl-4-O-(β-d-xylopyranosyl); Rt 25.6, ellagitannin; Rt 29.447, ellagitannin; Rt 30.9, ellagitannin; Rt 32.4, ellagitannin; Rt 33.0, ellagitannin; Rt 35.5, ellagitannin; Rt 38.8, hexagalloylglucose; (B) HPLC-DAD chromatogram of a butanol extract of the stem bark of Combretum psidioides. Rt 7.7, ellagitannin; Rt 8.3, Sanguiin H-4; Rt 10.022, di-galloyl-glucose; Rt 10.776, ellagitannin; Rt 12.244, corilagin; Rt 14.966, punicalagin; Rt 17.565, ellagic acid derivative; Rt 19.846, 3′-O-methyl-4-O-(β-d-xylopyranosyl); Rt 24.922, ellagic acid derivative; Rt 28.605, ellagitannin; Rt 31.560, ellagitannin; Rt 34.6, ellagitannin; Rt 38.299, hexagalloylglucose. Figure S2: (A) HPLC-DAD chromatograms a methanol extract of the stem bark of Combretum padoides. Rt 7.4, ellagitannin; Rt 8.45, ellagitannin; Rt 9.765, ellagitannin; Rt 10.898, α-Punicalagin anomer or Punicacortein D; Rt 11.69, ellagitannin; Rt 12.437, ellagitannin; Rt 15.246, ellagitannin; Rt 20.23, ellagitannin; Rt 20.447, Ellagic acid arabinoside; Rt 21.4, 3′-O-methyl-4-O-(β-d-xylopyranosyl) ellagic acid; Rt 29.435, ellagitannin; Rt 32.427, ellagitannin; Rt 35.560, ellagitannin; (B) HPLC-DAD chromatograms a butanol extract of the stem bark of Combretum padoides. Rt 7.4, ellagitannin; Rt 8.45, ellagitannin; Rt 9.768, ellagitannin; Rt 10.903, α-Punicalagin anomer or Punicacortein D; Rt 11.7, ellagitannin; Rt 12.451, ellagitannin; Rt 15.263, ellagitannin; Rt 20.22, ellagitannin; Rt 20.40, Ellagic acid arabinoside; Rt 21.4, 3′-O-methyl-4-O-(β-d-xylopyranosyl) ellagic acid; Rt 29.4, ellagitannin; Rt 32.4, ellagitannin; Rt 35.5, ellagitannin. Figure S3: (A) HPLC-DAD chromatogram of a butanol extract of the stem bark of Combretum zeyheri. Rt 8.475 min, corilagin derivative; Rt 10.904, ellagitannin; Rt 12.458, ellagitannin; Rt 15.259, gallotannin; Rt 15.66, punicalagin; Rt 17.630, ellagitannin; Rt 20.554, ellagic acid derivative; Rt 24.066, ellagic acid derivative; Rt 26.641, ellagitannin; Rt 29.9, methyl-ellagic acid xyloside; (B) HPLC-DAD chromatogram of a water-soluble extract of the stem bark of Combretum zeyheri. Rt 8.475 min, corilagin derivative; Rt 10.904, ellagitannin; Rt 12.458, ellagitannin; Rt 15.266, gallotannin; Rt 15.671, punicalagin; Rt 17.638, ellagitannin; Rt 20.6, ellagic acid derivative; Rt 24.051, ellagic acid derivative; Rt 26.661, ellagitannin; Rt 29.275, methyl-ellagic acid xyloside. The water-soluble extract contains a high concentration of procyanidines, forming the bump shape of the HPLC-chromatogram.

Author Contributions

All authors have read and agree to the published version of this manuscript. P.F. planned and designed the experiments for the antimycobacterial testing and collected the plant material from Tanzania. P.F., S.H., and E.Y.A.S. performed the antimycobacterial tests. E.Y.A.S. contributed to this manuscript. P.F. supervised S.H. and E.Y.A.S. for these in vitro tests. R.J.-T. provided her expertise in mass-spectrometric analysis and molecular structure elucidation and contributed to this manuscript. I.L. provided his expertise in GC-MS analysis as well as his contribution for this manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ekhaga Foundation (Stockhom, Sweden), grant number 2017-07.

Acknowledgments

The first and second authors are grateful for the project funding provided by the Ekhaga foundation. The support for this research, such as the infrastructure given by Division of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, University of Helsinki and Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, is greatly acknowledged. Open access funding provided by University of Helsinki is greatly acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2018; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018; p. 243. [Google Scholar]
  2. Semenya, S.S.; Marouy, A. Medicinal Plants used for the treatment of Tuberculosis by Bapedi Traditional Healers in three districts of the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 10, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Shenoi, S.; Friedland, G. Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A New Face to an Old Pathogen. Annu. Rev. Med. 2009, 60, 307–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Control–Surveillance, Planning, Financing: WHO Report 2008; WHO/HTM/TB/2008.393; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008; Available online: http://www.who.int/tb/publications/2008/en/ (accessed on 31 March 2008).
  5. Houben, R.M.G.J.; Dodd, P.J. The Global Burden of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Re-Estimation Using Mathematical Modeling. PLoS Med. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Egwaga, S.M. The impact of HIV on transmission of tuberculosis in Tanzania. Tuberculosis 2003, 83, 66–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ballell, L.R.; Field, A.; Duncan, K.; Young, R.J. New small molecule synthetic antimycobacterials. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 2153–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Vitoria, M.; Granich, R.; Gilks, C.F.; Gunneberg, C.; Hosseini, M.; Were, W.; Raviglione, M.; De Cock, K.M. The Global Fight against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2009, 131, 844–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wells, C.D.; Cegielsky, J.P.; Nelson, L.J.; Laserson, K.F.; Holtz, T.H.; Finlay, A.; Castro, K.G.; Weyer, K. HIV-infection and Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis- The Perfect Storm. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 196 (Suppl. 1), S86–S107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Matteelli, A.; Roggi, A.; Carvalho, A.C.C. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: Epidemiology and management. Clin. Epidemiol. 2014, 6, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Connolly, L.E.; Edelstein, P.H.; Ramakrishnan, L. Why is long-term therapy required to cure tuberculosis? PLoS Med. 2007, 4, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kandel, T.R.; Mfenyana, K.; Chandia, J.; Yogeswaran, P. The prevalence of and reasons for interruption of antituberculosis treatment by patients at Mbekweni Health Centre in the King Sabata Dalidyebo (KSD) district in the Eastern Cape Province. S. Afr. Fam. Pract. 2008, 50, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Asres, K.; Bucar, F.; Edelsbrunner, S.; Kartnig, T.; Höger, G.; Thiel, W. Investigations on Antimycobacterial Activity of Some Ethiopian Medicinal Plants. Phytother. Res. 2001, 15, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jassal, M.; Bishai, W.R. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2009, 9, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Koul, A.; Arnoult, E.; Lounis, N.; Guillemont, J.; Andries, K. The challenges of new drug discovery for tuberculosis. Nature 2011, 469, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rogoza, L.N.; Salakahutdinov, N.F.; Tolstikov, G.A. Anti-tubercular activity of natural products: Recent developments. In Opportunity, Challenge and Scope of Natural Products in Medicinal Chemistry; Research Signpost: Trivandrum, India, 2011; pp. 103–120. [Google Scholar]
  17. Payne, D.J.; Gwynn, M.N.; Holmes, D.J.; Pompliano, D.L. Drugs for bad bugs: Confronting the challenges of antibacterial discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Copp, B.R.; Pearce, N.A. Natural product growth inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007, 24, 278–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Madikizela, B.; Ndhlala, A.R.; Finnie, J.F.; Van Staden, J. Antimycobacterial, anti-inflammatory and genotoxicity evaluation of plants used for treatment of tuberculosis and related symptoms in South Africa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 153, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chinsembu, K.C. Tuberculosis and nature’s pharmacy of putative anti-tuberculosis agents. Acta Trop. 2016, 153, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ibekwe, N.N.; Nvau, J.B.; Oladosu, P.O.; Usman, A.M.; Ibrahim, K.; Boshoff, H.I.; Dowd, C.S.; Orisadipe, A.T.; Aiyelaagbe, O.; Adesomoju, A.A.; et al. Some Nigerian Anti-Tuberculosis Ethnomedicines: A Preliminary Efficacy-Assessment. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 155, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mitscher, L.A.; Baker, W.R. A search for novel Chemotherapy against tuberculosis amongst natural products. Pure Appl. Chem. 1998, 70, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Okunade, A.L.; Elvin-Lewis, M.P.F.; Lewis, W.H. Natural antimycobacterial metabolites: Current status. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 1017–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Iwu, M.M. Handbook of African Medicinal Plants; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1993; p. 464. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuete, V.; Tabopda, T.K.; Ngameni, B.; Nana, F.; Tshikalange, T.E.; Ngadjui, B.T. Antimycobacterial, antibacterial and antifungal activities of Terminalia superba (Combretaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2010, 76, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Breedenkamp, C.L. Combretaceae. In Seed Plants of Southern Africa: Families and Genera; Strelitzia; Leistner, O.A., Ed.; National Botanical Institute: Pretoria, South Africa, 2000; Volume 10, pp. 228–229. [Google Scholar]
  27. McGaw, L.J.; Rabe, T.; Sparg, S.G.; Jäger, A.K.; Eloff, J.N.; van Staden, J. An investigation of the biological activity of Combretum species. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2001, 75, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mbwambo, Z.H.; Mushi, N.F.; Nondo, R.S.O.; Kidukuli, A.W.; Mwangomo, D.T. Antibacterial, antioxidant, cytotoxic and preliminary phytochemical screening of extracts from Combretum schumannii Engl. J. Med. Plants Res. 2013, 7, 2483–2488. [Google Scholar]
  29. Klopper, R.R.; Catelain, C.; Bänninger, V.; Habashi, C.; Steyn, H.M.; De Wet, B.C.; Arnold, T.H.; Gautier, L.; Smith, G.F.; Spichiger, R. Checklist of the Flowering Plants of Sub-Saharan Africa. South African Botanical Diversity Network Report; No. 42. SABONET: Pretoria, South Africa, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  30. Matu, E.N. Combretum coccineum and Combretum padoides. In Plant Resources of Tropical Africa; Schmelzer, G.H., Gurib-Fakim, A., Arroo, R., Eds.; Medicinal Plants 2; PROTA Foundation: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wickens, G.E. Flora of Tropical East Africa. Combretaceae; East African Community: Arusha, Tanzania, 1973; p. 99. [Google Scholar]
  32. Fyhrquist, P. Traditional Medicinal Uses and Biological Activities of Some Plant Extracts of African Combretum Loefl., Terminalia L., and Pteleopsis Engl. Species (Combretaceae). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  33. Watt, J.M.; Breyer-Brandwijk, M.G. The Medicinal and Poisonous Plants of Southern and Eastern; Africa. E. and S. Livingstone Ltd.: London, UK, 1962; p. 194. [Google Scholar]
  34. Haerdi, F. Die Eingeborenen-Heilpflanzen des Ulanga-Distriktes Tanganjikas (Ostafrika). Acta Trop. Suppl. 1964, 8, 1–278. [Google Scholar]
  35. Drummond, R.B.; Coates-Palgrave, K. Common Trees of the Highweld; ISBN: Rhodesia, Zimbabwe, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kerharo, J. La Pharmacopée Sénégalaise Traditionelle-Plantes Médicinales et Toxiques; Vigot Freres Edn.: Paris, France, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kokwaro, O. Medicinal Plants of East Africa; East African Literature: Nairobi, Kenya, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hedberg, I.; Hedberg, O.; Madati, P.; Mshigeni, K.E.; Mshiu, E.N. Inventory of plants used in traditional medicine in Tanzania. I. Plants of the families Acanthaceae-Cucurbitaceae. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1982, 6, 29–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chhabra, S.C.; Mahunnah, R.L.A.; Mshiu, E.N. Plants used in traditional medicine in Eastern Tanzania. II. Angiosperms (Capparidaceae-Ebenaceae). J. Ethnopharmacol. 1989, 25, 339–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Van Wyk, B.; Van Wyk, P. Field Guide to Trees of Southern Africa; Penguin Random House South Africa: Pretoria, South Africa, 1997; 525p. [Google Scholar]
  41. Neuwinger, H.D. African Traditional Medicine. A Dictionary of Plant Use and Applications; Medpharm Scientific Publishers: Stuttgart, Germany, 2000; 589p. [Google Scholar]
  42. Asres, K.; Mazumder, A.; Bukar, F. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of extracts of Combretum molle. Ethiop. Med. J. 2006, 44, 269. [Google Scholar]
  43. De Morais Lima, G.D.; de Sales, I.R.F.; Caldas Filho, M.R.D.; de Jesus, N.Z.T.; de Sousa Falcão, H.; Barbosa-Filho, J.M.; Cabral, A.G.S.; Lopes Souto, A.; Tavares, J.F.; Batista, L.M. Bioactivities of the genus Combretum (Combretaceae): A Review. Molecules 2012, 17, 9142–9206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Rogers, C.B.; Verotta, L. Chemistry and Biological Properties of the African Combretaceae. In Chemistry, Biological and Pharmacological Properties of African Medicinal Plants; Hostettman, K., Chinyanganga, F., Maillard, M., Wolfender, J.L., Eds.; University of Zimbabwe Publications: Harare, Zimbabwe, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  45. Pegel, K.A.; Rogers, C.B. The characterization of mollic acid-3β-d-xyloside and its genuine aglycone mollic acid, two novel 1α-hydroxycycloartenoids from Combretum molle. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1985, 1, 1711–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rogers, C.B. New mono- and bidesmosidic triterpenoids isolated from Combretum padoides leaves. J. Nat. Prod. 1989, 52, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Carr, J.D.; Rogers, C.B. Chemosystematic studies of the genus Combretum (Combretaceae). I. A convenient method of identifying species of this genus by a comparison of the polar constituents extracted from leaf material. S. Afr. J. Bot. 1987, 53, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kilonda, A.; Lohohola, O.; Toppet, S.; Compernolle, F. Acetylation products of pentacyclic triterpene glucosides from Combretum psidioides. Arkivoc (Iv) 2003, 4, 3–21. [Google Scholar]
  49. Katerere, D.R.; Gray, A.I.; Nash, R.J.; Waigh, R.D. Antimicrobial activity of pentacyclic triterpenes isolated from African Combretaceae. Phytochemistry 2003, 63, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Angeh, J.E.; Huang, X.; Swan, G.E.; Möllman, U.; Sattler, I.; Eloff, J.N. Novel antibacterial triterpenoid from Combretum padoides (Combretaceae). Arkivoc (Ix) 2007, 2007, 113–120. [Google Scholar]
  51. Adnyana, I.K.; Tezuka, Y.; Banskota, A.H.; Xiong, Q.; Tran, K.Q.; Kadota, S. Quadranosides I-V, New Triterpene Glucosides from the Seeds of Combretum quadrangulare. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 496–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Adnyana, I.K.; Tezuka, Y.; Banskota, A.H.; Tran, K.Q.; Kadota, S. Three New Triterpenoids from the Seeds of Combretum quadrangulare and Their Hepatoprotective Activity. J. Nat. Prod. 2001, 64, 360–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pietrovski, E.F.; Rosa, K.A.; Facundo, V.A.; Rios, K.; Marques, M.C.A.; Santos, A.R.S. Antinociceptive properties of the ethanolic extract and of the triterpene 3β,6β,16β-trihydroxylup-20(29)-ene obtained from flowers of Combretum leprosum in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2006, 83, 90–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Runyoro, D.K.B.; Srivastava, S.K.; Darokar, M.P.; Olipa, N.D.; Cosam, C.J.; Mecky, I.N.M. Anticandidiasis agents from a Tanzanian plant, Combretum Zeyheri. Med. Chem. Res. 2013, 22, 1258–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Katerere, D.R.; Gray, A.I.; Kennedy, A.R.; Nash, R.J.; Waigh, R.D. Cyclobutanes from Combretum albopunctatum. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Banskota, A.H.; Tezuka, Y.; Tran, K.Q.; Tanaka, K.; Saiki, I.; Kadota, S. Thirteen Novel Cycloartane-Type Triterpenes from Combretum quadrangulare. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Moosophon, P.; Kanokmedhakul, S.; Kanokmedhakul, K. Diarylpropanes and an Arylpropyl Quinone from Combretum griffithii. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 2216–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Moosophon, P.; Kanokmedhakul, S.; Kanokmedhakul, K.; Buayairaksa, M.; Noichan, J.; Poopasit, K. Antiplasmodial and Cytotoxic Flavans and Diarylpropanes from the Stems of Combretum griffithii. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 1298–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Martini, N.D.; Katerere, D.R.P.; Eloff, J.N. Biological activity of five antibacterial flavonoids from Combretum erythrophyllum (Combretaceae). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 93, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Hattas, D.; Hjältén, J.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R.; Scogings, P.F.; Rooke, T. Differential phenolic profiles in six African savanna woody species in relation to antiherbivore defence. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 1796–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Letcher, R.M.; Nhamo, L.R. Chemical constituents of the Combretaceae. Part I. Substituted phenanthrenes and 9,10-dihydrophenanthrenes from the heartwood of Combretum apiculatum. J. Chem. Soc. (C) 1971, 1, 3070–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Letcher, R.M.; Nhamo, L.R.; Gumiro, I.T. Chemical constituents of the Combretaceae. Part II. Substituted phenanthrenes 9,10-dihydrophenanthrenes and a substituted bibenzyl from the heartwood of Combretum molle. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1972, 1, 206–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Letcher, R.M.; Nhamo, L.R. Chemical constituents of the Combretaceae. Part III. Substituted phenanthrenes 9,10-dihydrophenanthrenes, and bibenzyls from the heartwood of Combretum psidioides. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1972, 1, 2941–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Letcher, R.M.; Nhamo, L.R. Chemical constituents of the Combretaceae. Part IV. Phenanthrene derivatives from the heartwood of Combretum hereroense. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1973, 1, 1179–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pettit, G.R.; Singh, S.B.; Niven, M.L.; Hamel, E.; Lin, C.M.; Alberts, D.S.; Garcia-Kendall, D. Antineoplastic agents, 122. Constituents of Combretum caffrum. J. Nat. Prod. 1987, 50, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pettit, G.R.; Singh, S.B.; Niven, M.L.; Schmidt, J.M. Cell growth inhibitory dihydrophenanthrene and phenanthrene constituents of the African tree Combretum caffrum. Can. J. Chem. 1988, 66, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Eloff, J.N.; Famakin, J.O.; Katerere, D.R.P. Isolation of an antibacterial stilbene from Combretum woodii (Combretaceae) leaves. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 4, 1684–5315. [Google Scholar]
  68. Mushi, N.F.; Innocent, E.; Kidukuli, A.W. Cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities of substituted phenanthrenes from the roots of Combretum adenogonium Steud Ex, A. Rich (Combretaceae). J. Intercult. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 4, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ogan, A.U. The alkaloids in the leaves of Combretum micranthum. Studies on West African medicinal plants. VII. Planta Med. 1972, 21, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Welch, C.R. Chemistry and Pharmacology of Kinkéliba (Combretum micranthum), a West African Medicinal Plant. Ph.D. Thesis, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2014; 177p. [Google Scholar]
  71. Brookes, K.B.; Doudoukina, O.V.; Katsoulis, L.C.; Veale, D.J.H. Uteroactive constituents from Combretum kraussii. S. Afr. J. Chem. 1999, 52, 127–132. [Google Scholar]
  72. Asami, Y.; Ogura, T.; Otake, N.; Mishimura, T.; Xinsheng, Y.; Sakurai, T.; Nagasawa, H.; Sakuda, S.; Tatsuta, K. Isolation and Synthesis of a New Bioactive Ellagic Acid Derivate from Combretum yunnanensis. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 729–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Samdumu, F.B. Characterization of Antimicrobial Compounds from Combretum paniculatum, a Plant with Proven Anti-HIV Replication Activity. Ph.D. Thesis, Phytomedicine Programme, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2007; 119p. [Google Scholar]
  74. Jossang, A.; Pousset, J.L.; Bodo, B. Combreglutinin, a hydrolyzable tannin from Combretum glutinosum. J. Nat. Prod. 1994, 57, 732–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Traore, C.M.L. Assessment on Mali’s Medicinal Combretaceae. Pharmacy Thesis, University of Bamako, Bamako, Mali, 1999; 165p. [Google Scholar]
  76. Elegami, A.A.; El-Nima, E.I.; Tohami, M.E.; Muddathir, A.K. Antimicrobial activity of some species of the family Combretaceae. Phytother. Res. 2002, 16, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Perdomo, R.T.; Defende, C.P.; da Silva Mirowski, P.; Freire, T.V.; Weber, S.S.; Garcez, W.S.; da Rosa Guterres, Z.; de Fátima Cepa Matos, M.; Garcez, F.R. Myricitrin from Combretum lanceolatum Exhibits Inhibitory Effect on DNA-Topoisomerase Type II and Protective Effect Against In Vivo Doxorubicin-Induced Mutagenicity. J. Med. Food 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Fyhrquist, P.; Mwasumbi, L.; Hæggström, C.-A.; Vuorela, H.; Hiltunen, R.; Vuorela, P. Ethnobotanical and antimicrobial investigation of some species of Terminalia and Combretum (Combretaceae) growing in Tanzania. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2002, 79, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Fyhrquist, P.; Mwasumbi, L.; Haeggström, C.-A.; Vuorela, H.; Hiltunen, R.; Vuorela, P. Antifungal activity of selected species of Terminalia, Pteleopsis and Combretum (Combretaceae) collected in Tanzania. Pharm. Biol. 2004, 42, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Eloff, J.N. The antibacterial activity of 27 southern African members of the Combretaceae. S. Afr. J. Sci. 1999, 95, 148–152. [Google Scholar]
  81. Schmelzer, G.H. Combretum zeyheri. In Plant Resources of Tropical Africa; Schmelzer, G.H., Gurib-Fakim, A., Arroo, R., Eds.; Medicinal Plants 2; PROTA Foundation: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  82. Mämmelä, P.; Savolainen, H.; Lindroos, L.; Kangas, J.; Vartiainen, T. Analysis of oak tannins by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 891, 75–83. [Google Scholar]
  83. Piddock, L.J.V.; Williams, K.J.; Ricci, V. Accumulation of rifampicin by Mycobacterium aurum, Mycobacterium smegmatis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemoth. 2000, 45, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Tyagi, J.S.; Sharma, D. Mycobacterium smegmatis and tuberculosis. Trends Microbiol. 2002, 10, 68–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Eloff, J.N. A proposal on expressing the antibacterial activity of plant extracts—A small first step in applying scientific knowledge to rural primary health care in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2000, 96, 116–118. [Google Scholar]
  86. Campo, M.; Pinelli, P.; Romani, A. Hydrolyzable Tannins from Sweet Chestnut Fractions obtained by a Sustainable and Eco-friendly Industrial Process. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 11, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Diop, E.H.A.; Queiroz, E.F.; Marcourt, L.; Kicka, S.; Rudaz, S.; Diop, T.; Soldati, T.; Wolfender, J.E. Antimycobacterial activity in a single-cell infection assay of ellagitannins from Combretum aculeatum and their bioavailable metabolites. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019, 238, 111832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Oudane, B.; Boudemagh, D.; Bounekhel, M.; Sobhi, W.; Vidal, M.; Broussy, S. Isolation, characterization, antioxidant activity, and protein precipitating capacity of the hydrolyzable tannin punicalagin from pomegranate yellow peel (Punica granatum). J. Mol. Struct. 2018, 1156, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pfundstein, B.; Desouky, S.K.L.; Hull, W.E.; Haubner, R.; Erben, G.; Owen, R.W. Polyphenolic compunds in the fruits of Egyptian medicinal plants (Terminalia bellerica, Terminalia chebula and Terminalia horrida): Characterization, quantitation and determination of antioxidant capacities. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 1132–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Salih, E.; Kanninen, M.; Sipi, M.; Luukkanen, O.; Hiltunen, R.; Vuorela, H.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R.; Fyhrquist, P. Tannins, flavonoids and stilbenes in extracts of African savanna woodland trees Terminalia brownii, Terminalia laxiflora and Anogeissus leiocarpus showing promising antibacterial potential. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 108, 370–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kosinska, A.; Diering, S.; Prim, D.; Héritier, J.; Andlauer, W. Phenolic compounds profile of strawberry fruits of Charlotte cultivar. J. Berry Res. 2013, 3, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Puppala, M.; Ponder, J.; Suryanarayana, P.; Reddy, G.B.; Petrash, J.M.; La Barbera, D.V. The isolation and characterization of β-glucogallin as a novel aldose reductase inhibitor from Emblica officinalis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Breytenbach, J.C.; Malan, S.F. Pharmacochemical properties of Combretum zeyheri. S. Afr. J. Sci. 1989, 85, 372–374. [Google Scholar]
  94. Malcolm, S.A.; Sofowora, E.A. Antimicrobial activities of selected Nigerian folk remedies and their constituent plants. Antimicrobial properties of Balanites. Lloydia 1969, 32, 512–517. [Google Scholar]
  95. Uba, A.; Ibrahim, K.; Agbo, E.B.; Makinde, A.A. In vitro inhibition of Mycobacterium smegmatis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis by some Nigerian Medicinal Plants. East Cent. Afr. J. Pharm. Sci. 2003, 6, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Magwenzi, R.; Nyakunu, C.; Mukanganyama, S. The Effect of selected Combretum species from Zimbabwe on the growth and drug efflux systems of Mycobacterium aurum and Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2014, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Masoko, P.; Nxumalo, K.M. Validation of Antimycobacterial Plants used by Traditional Healers in Three Districts of Limpopo Province (South Africa). Evid.-Based Compl. Alt. 2013, 2013, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Eldeen, I.M.S.; van Staaden, J. Cyclooxygenase inhibition and antimycobacterial effects of extracts from Sudanese medicinal plants. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2008, 74, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Eldeen, I.M.S.; Van Staaden, J. Antimycobacterial activity of some trees used in South African traditional medicine. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2007, 73, 248–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Luo, X.; Pires, D.; Aínsa, J.A.; Gracia, B.; Mulhovo, S.; Duarte, A.; Anes, E.; Ferreira, M.-J.U. Antimycobacterial evaluation and preliminary phytochemical investigation of selected medicinal plants traditionally used in Mosambique. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 137, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Nyambuya, T.; Mautsa, R.; Mukanganyama, S. Alkaloid extracts from Combretum zeyheri inhibit the growth of Mycobacterium smegmatis. BMC Complem. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Coulidiati, T.H.; HMillogo-Kone ALamien-Meda MYougbare-Ziebrou, J. Millogo-Rasolodimby and O. G. Nacoulma. Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Two Combretum Species from Burkina Faso. Res. J. Med. Plant 2011, 5, 42–53. [Google Scholar]
  103. Silva, O.; Gomes, E.T.; Wolfender, J.L.; Marston, A.; Hostettman, K. Application of high performance liquid chromatography coupled with ultraviolet spectroscopy and electrospray mass spectrometry to the characterization of ellagitannins from Terminalia macroptera roots. Pharm. Res. 2000, 17, 1396–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Silva, O.; Viegas, S.; de Mello-Sampayo, C.; Joao, P.; Costa, M.; Serrano, R.; Cabrita, J.; Gomes, E.T. Anti-Helicobacter pylori activity of Terminalia macroptera root. Fitoterapia 2012, 83, 872–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Lin, T.-C.; Hsu, F.-L.; Cheng, J.-T. Antihypertensive activity of corilagin and chebulinic acid, tannins from Lumnitzera racemosa. J. Nat. Prod. 1993, 56, 629–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Guo, J.S.; Wang, S.X.; Li, X.; Zhu, T.R. Studies on the antibacterial constituents of Geranium sibiricum L. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 1987, 22, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
  107. Hatano, T.; Kusuda, M.; Inada, K.; Ogawa T-o Shiota, S.; Tsuchiya, T.; Yoshida, T. Effects of tannins and related polyphenols on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 2047–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Shiota, S.; Shimizu, M.; Sugiyama, J.; Morita, Y.; Mizushima, T.; Tsushiya, T. Mechanisms of action of Corilagin and Tellimagrandin I that remarkably potentiate the activity of β-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphyloccus aureus. Microbiol. Immunol. 2004, 48, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Li, N.; Luo, M.; Fu, Y.; Zu, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhang, L.; Yao, L.; Zhao, C.; Sun, Y. Effect of Corilagin on Membrane Permeability of Esherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans. Phytother. Res. 2013, 10, 1517–1523. [Google Scholar]
  110. Anokwuru, C.P.; Sinisi, A.; Samie, A.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O. Antibacterial and antioxidant constituents of Acalypha wilkensiana. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 1180–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Miyasaki, Y.; Rabenstein, J.D.; Rhea, J.; Crouch, M.-L.; Mocek, U.M.; Kittel, P.E.; Morgan, M.A.; Nichols, W.S.; Van Benschoten, M.M.; Hardy, W.D.; et al. Isolation and Characterization of Antimicrobial Compounds in Plant Extracts against Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Shimizu, M.; Shiota, S.; Mizushima, T.; Ito, H.; Hatano, T.; Yoshida, T.; Tsuchiya, T. Marked potentiation of activity of beta-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by corilagin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 3198–3201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Kondo, Y.; Toida, T.; Kusano, G.; Imai, J. Specific inhibition of formation of acid fastness in mycobacteria by 3,3′-di-O-methylellagic acid. Experientia 1979, 35, 599–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Shilpi, J.A.; Ali, M.T.; Saha, S.; Hasan, S.; Gray, A.I.; Seidel, V. Molecular docking studies on InhA, MabA and PanK enzymes from Mycobacterium tuberculosis of ellagic acid derivatives from Ludwigia adscendens and Trewia nudiflora. Silico Pharmacol. 2015, 3, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Machumi, F.; Midiwo, J.O.; Jacob, M.R.; Khan, S.I.; Tekwani, B.L.; Zhang, J.; Walker, L.A.; Muhammad, I. Phytochemical, Antimicrobial and Antiplasmodial Investigations of Terminalia brownii. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2013, 8, 761–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Pettit, G.R.; Singh, S.B. Isolation, structure and synthesis of combretastatin A2, A3 and B2. Can. J. Chem. 1987, 65, 2390–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Katerere, D.R.; Gray, A.I.; Nash, R.J.; Waigh, R.D. Phytochemical and antimicrobial investigations of stilbenoids and flavonoids isolated from three species of Combretaceae. Fitoterapia 2012, 83, 932–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sun, T.; Qin, B.; Gao, M.; Yin, Y.; Wang, C.; Zang, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Xin, Y.; Jiang, T. Effects of epigallocatechin gallate on the cell-wall structure of Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2 155. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 2122–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Anand, P.K.; Kaul, D.; Sharma, M. Green tea polyphenol inhibits Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival within human macrophages. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2006, 38, 600–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Vandeputte, O.M.; Kiendrebeogo, M.; Rajaonson, S.; Diallo, B.; Mol, A.; El Jaziri, M.; Baucher, M. Identification of Catechin as One of the Flavonoids from Combretum albiflorum Bark Extract That Reduces the Production of Quorum-Sensing Controlled Virulence Factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Masoko, P.; Picard, J.; Eloff, J.N. The antifungal activity of twenty-four Southern African Combretum species (Combretaceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2007, 73, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Fyhrquist, P.; Laakso, I.; Garcia Marco, S.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R.; Hiltunen, R. Antimycobacterial activity of ellagitannin and ellagic acid derivative rich crude extracts and fractions of five selected species of Terminalia used for treatment of infectious diseases in African traditional medicine. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2014, 90, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Julkunen-Tiitto, R.; Rousi, M.; Bryant, J.; Sorsa, S.; Keinänen, M.; Sikanen, H. Chemical diversity of several Betulaceae species: Comparison of phenolics and terpenoids in northern birch stems. Trees 1996, 11, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Taulavuori, K.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R.; Hyöky, V.; Taulavuori, E. Blue mood for superfood. J. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2013, 8, 791–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Brenton, A.G.; Godfrey, A.R. Accurate Mass Measurement: Terminology and Treatment of Data. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 21, 1821–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Collins, L.A.; Franzblau, S.G. Microplate Alamar Blue Assay versus BACTEC 460 System for High-Troughput Screening of Compounds against Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium. Antimyc. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 1004–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Garcia-Muñoz, C.; Vaillant, F. Metabolic Fate of Ellagitannins: Implications for Health, and Research Perspectives for Innovative Functional Foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 54, 1584–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dose-response bars as percentage inhibition of growth of (A) the crude methanol extract and (B) the butanol extract of C. padoides, and (C) rifampicin. Tests were performed in triplicates ±SD.
Figure 1. Dose-response bars as percentage inhibition of growth of (A) the crude methanol extract and (B) the butanol extract of C. padoides, and (C) rifampicin. Tests were performed in triplicates ±SD.
Antibiotics 09 00459 g001
Figure 2. UVλ absorption spectra of ellagic acid derivatives (af) and a gallotannin (g) in the investigated species of Combretum. (ac) C. zeyheri at Rt 18.514, 20.747 and 29.914 min; (d) C. psidioides at Rt 19.800 min; (ef), C. padoides at Rt 20.707 and 21.047 min; (g) the main compound in C. zeyheri, a gallotannin at Rt 15.000 min.
Figure 2. UVλ absorption spectra of ellagic acid derivatives (af) and a gallotannin (g) in the investigated species of Combretum. (ac) C. zeyheri at Rt 18.514, 20.747 and 29.914 min; (d) C. psidioides at Rt 19.800 min; (ef), C. padoides at Rt 20.707 and 21.047 min; (g) the main compound in C. zeyheri, a gallotannin at Rt 15.000 min.
Antibiotics 09 00459 g002
Figure 3. UVλ absorption maxima of (a) punicalagin, (b) corilagin and (c,d) two unknown ellagitannins as well as (e) epigallocatechin gallate in a butanol extract of Combretum psidioides stem bark.
Figure 3. UVλ absorption maxima of (a) punicalagin, (b) corilagin and (c,d) two unknown ellagitannins as well as (e) epigallocatechin gallate in a butanol extract of Combretum psidioides stem bark.
Antibiotics 09 00459 g003
Figure 4. (A) Combretastatin B-2 characterized from a methanol extract of the stem bark of Combretum psidioides using GC-MS. (A) Combretastatin B-2 in a GC-chromatogram and (B) mass spectrum of combretastatin B-2 with m/z 304 as base ion.
Figure 4. (A) Combretastatin B-2 characterized from a methanol extract of the stem bark of Combretum psidioides using GC-MS. (A) Combretastatin B-2 in a GC-chromatogram and (B) mass spectrum of combretastatin B-2 with m/z 304 as base ion.
Antibiotics 09 00459 g004
Figure 5. UVλ absorption spectra of ellagitannins in a butanol stem bark extract of Combretum padoides. (a) A corilagin like ET; (b,c) unknown ellagitannins; (d) punicalagin like ET (either α-punicalagin or punicacortein D); (e) an unknown ellagitannin.
Figure 5. UVλ absorption spectra of ellagitannins in a butanol stem bark extract of Combretum padoides. (a) A corilagin like ET; (b,c) unknown ellagitannins; (d) punicalagin like ET (either α-punicalagin or punicacortein D); (e) an unknown ellagitannin.
Antibiotics 09 00459 g005
Figure 6. Ellagitannins and ellagic acid arabinoside from the studied species of Combretum.
Figure 6. Ellagitannins and ellagic acid arabinoside from the studied species of Combretum.
Antibiotics 09 00459 g006
Figure 7. Percentage of extraction yields of crude methanol extracts resulting from Soxhlet extraction of the stem bark of Combretum padoides and C. psidioides and the roots of C. zeyheri. Results are presented as the mean of three extractions ± SD.
Figure 7. Percentage of extraction yields of crude methanol extracts resulting from Soxhlet extraction of the stem bark of Combretum padoides and C. psidioides and the roots of C. zeyheri. Results are presented as the mean of three extractions ± SD.
Antibiotics 09 00459 g007
Figure 8. Percentage of exraction yield resulting from solvent partition of crude methanolic extracts of the species of Combretum used in this investigation. C. padoides stem bark (textured grey bars), C. zeyheri roots (violet texture) and C. psidioides stem bark (marble texture). Wi, water insoluble fraction; Ws, aqueous fraction; BuOH, butanol fraction; CHCl3, chloroform fraction.
Figure 8. Percentage of exraction yield resulting from solvent partition of crude methanolic extracts of the species of Combretum used in this investigation. C. padoides stem bark (textured grey bars), C. zeyheri roots (violet texture) and C. psidioides stem bark (marble texture). Wi, water insoluble fraction; Ws, aqueous fraction; BuOH, butanol fraction; CHCl3, chloroform fraction.
Antibiotics 09 00459 g008
Table 1. Summary of applications in traditional medicine and antimicrobial activity as well as identified compounds of the species of Combretum used in this study.
Table 1. Summary of applications in traditional medicine and antimicrobial activity as well as identified compounds of the species of Combretum used in this study.
Combretum SpeciesUses of Plant Species in TMWay of Preparation in Traditional MedicineAntibacterial and Antimycobacterial EffectsIdentified Compounds
C. padoides Engl. & Diels, Thicket bush-willow
(P. Fyhrquist & L. Mwasumbi Voucher 1697070)
Leaves and roots:
For treatment of snakebites, wounds, hookworms, bloody diarrhea, malaria and conjunctivitis [30,37,41].
Water extracts of leaves for snakebites and root decoctions for hookworms. Crushed leaves for wounds [30,37,41].Extracts of the leaves gave excellent inhibitory effects against E. coli and E. aerogenes at 0.8 mg/mL [80]; Stem bark extracts gave good antibacterial and antifungal effects [78,79].
1α,23β-dihydroxy-12-oleanen-29-oic-acid-23β-O-α-4-acetylrhamnopyranoside and 1,22-dihydroxy-12-oleanen-30-oic acid from leaves gave antibacterial effects against S. aureus and E. coli [50].
Crude MeOH extract of stem bark and its BuOH fraction inhibit Mycobacterium smegmatis (AI is 50.5% of the inhibitory effect of rifampicin, MIC 1250–2500 µg/mL, IZD 26.5 mm). *
Leaves contain rhamnose based mono- and bi-desmosidic triterpenoids [46,47], leaves contain oleanane-type triterpenoid glycoside, 1α,23β-dihydroxy-12-oleanen-29-oic-acid-23β-O-α-4-acetylrhamnopyranoside and two known triterpenoids; 1,22-dihydroxy-12-oleanen-30-oic acid and 24-ethylcholesta-7,22,25-trien-O-β-d-glucopyranoside [50].
Punicalagin and a corilagin derivative and twenty-four other unknown ellagitannins, five gallotannins and five ellagic acid derivatives; ellagic acid arabinoside and methyl ellagic acid xyloside in an antimycobacterial BuOH extract of stem bark. *
C. psidioides Welw.
Velvet bush-willow
C. psidioides, continued
(P. Fyhrquist & L. Mwasumbi Voucher 1697037)
Leaves and roots:
Aphrodisiac, diarrhea, malaria, back pain, galactogogue [34].
Leaves and roots used for diarrhea, muscle pain, oedema [78].
Decoctions of roots, leaf extracts or leaves mixed with maize porridge (Ugali) for treatment of diarrhea and oedema [78].Broad-spectrum antibacterial profile in our earlier investigation [78] as well as some antifungal effects [79].
Crude methanol extract and its butanol and CHCl3 fractions were growth inhibitory against Mycobacterium smegmatis (MIC 625-2500 µg/mL). *
Substituted phenanthrenes and bibenzyls from heartwood and stem bark [63]; Oleanane and ursane pentacyclic triterpene glucosides from root bark [48].
Combretastatin B-2 was tentatively identified in a methanol extract of the stem bark. Sixteen ellagitannins including corilagin and its isomer and punicalagin, six gallotannins including 1,6-di-O-galloyl-β-d-glucose, epigallocatechin gallate, four ellagic acid derivatives and protocatechuic acid were identified in a butanol extract of the stem bark. *
C. zeyheri Sond., Large-fruited bush-willow
(P. Fyhrquist & L. Mwasumbi Voucher 1697020)
Leaves, roots and stem bark:
Wounds, cough (TB?), malaria, diarrhea, inflammation, scorpion sting, back pain, dysentery, hook worms, tooth ache, eye lotion [35,37,38].
Diarrhea, cancer (stomach tumors)
[78].
Smoke of burnt leaves inhaled for cough (TB?), water extracts of dried leaves for colic, crushed leaves for rheumatism and joint pain [35]; hot water decoctions of roots for diarrhea, dysentery and ankylostomiasis [37]; Pounded roots cooked in porridge for hookworms and dysentery, ground roots cooked and applied to wounds, root decoctions for stomach-ache, cough, pneumonia, vomiting, stomach ulcers and diarrhea, leaf infusions for cough, stem bark infusion for leprosy [80].
Roots, leaves and stem bark made into decoctions or mixed in maize porridge for diarrhea and stomach tumors [78].
Stem bark and leaf extracts inhibitory against several bacteria [81,82]; Fruit, stem bark and root extracts show good antibacterial potential.
Triterpenoids from leaves evaluated for anti-Candida effects; terminolic acid was found to be the most active compound. SAR: oleanane and ursane type triterpenoids were the most active ones [54].
We found that extracts of stem bark and roots inhibit the growth of Mycobacterium smegmatis, the BuOH fraction of the roots being especially active (IZ 23 mm).*
Triterpenoids and saponins from the leaves [47]; Three unidentified antimicrobial compounds were isolated from the leaves and stem bark [82]; Ursolic acid, maslinic acid, 2α,3β-dihydroxyurs-
12-en-28-oic acid, 6β-hydroxymaslinic acid and terminolic acid from leaves [54].
A root butanol extract contained six ellagic acid derivatives including methyl-ellagic acid xyloside, di-methyl-ellagic acid xyloside and 3,3′-Di-O-methyl-4-O-(n′′-O-galloyl-β-d-xylopyranosyl) ellagic acid, fifteen ellagitannins including punicalagin and nine gallotannins including hexagalloylglucose.*
Our results presented in this paper *; AI, activity index in % activity of rifampicin; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; IZD, inhibition zone diameter in mm; TB, tuberculosis; TM, traditional medicine. In brackets the voucher numbers of the collected specimen used in this study. Plant uses for symptoms related to TB marked with bold text.
Table 2. Antimycobacterial effects of extracts and their solvent partition fractions of species of Combretum collected in Tanzania by the first author in spring 1999. Results obtained with an agar diffusion method. Activity index (AI) in relation to rifampicin.
Table 2. Antimycobacterial effects of extracts and their solvent partition fractions of species of Combretum collected in Tanzania by the first author in spring 1999. Results obtained with an agar diffusion method. Activity index (AI) in relation to rifampicin.
Combretum Species, Extracts and FractionsM. Smegmatis ATCC 14468AI
C. padoides SCr26.5 ± 0.50.50
C. padoides WI18.0 ± 2.00.34
C. padoides BuOH26.5 ± 0.50.50
C. padoides CHCl317.5 ± 0.50.33
C. zeyheri SCr 1220.5 ± 0.50.39
C. zeyheri WI0.00.00
C. zeyheri Ws17.0 ± 3.00.32
C. zeyheri BuOH19.0 ± 2.00.36
C. zeyheri CHCl314.0 ± 0.00.27
C. zeyheri SCr 4321.0 ± 0.00.40
C. zeyheri WS18.5 ± 0.50.35
C. zeyheri WI17.5 ± 0.50.33
C. zeyheri BuOH20.5 ± 0.50.39
C. zeyheri CHCl30.00.00
C. zeyheri RCr 3316.0 ± 0.80.30
C. zeyheri WS0.00.00
C. zeyheri WI16.0 ± 1.60.30
C. zeyheri BuOH23.0 ± 1.60.44
C. zeyheri CHCl314.0 ± 0.00.27
C. psidioides SCr29.00 ± 0.50.53
C. psidioides BuOH21.5 ± 2.00.41
C. psidioides WI0.00.00
C. psidioides CHCl325.5 ± 0.70.48
C. psidioides L Cr0.00.00
Rifampicin52.5 ± 0.51.00
R, roots; S, stem bark; F, fruits; L, leaves; Cr, crude methanol extract; WS, aqueous fraction; WI, aqueous insoluble fraction; BuOH, butanol fraction; CHCl3, chloroform fraction. 12, 43 and 33 are different individuals of C. zeyheri. Two hundred µL extracts/fractions (50 mg/mL) and rifampicin (10 mg/mL) were applied on filter paper discs. Diameter of inhibition zones (IZD) in mm as mean of triplicates (n = 3) ± SEM of three experiments. Most promising results indicated by bold text and the best result underlined.
Table 3. Minimum inhibitory concentrations and total antimycobacterial activities of crude methanol extracts of Combretum spp. and their solvent partition fractions against Mycobacterium smegmatis. Pure compounds, such as corilagin and ellagic acid, representative for compounds occurring in the extracts were also tested.
Table 3. Minimum inhibitory concentrations and total antimycobacterial activities of crude methanol extracts of Combretum spp. and their solvent partition fractions against Mycobacterium smegmatis. Pure compounds, such as corilagin and ellagic acid, representative for compounds occurring in the extracts were also tested.
ExtractsM. Smegmatis ATCC 14468Total Activity (mL/g)
C. psidioides stem bark:
crude methanol extract625 (IC94)313.44
butanol soluble fraction2500 (IC95)98.76
chloroform soluble fraction2500 (IC90)22.89
C. padoides stem bark:
crude methanol extract1250 (IC93)85.12
butanol soluble fraction2500 (IC97)190.12
Pure compounds:
Corilagin *1000 (IC94)
Ellagic acid **500 (IC98)
Rifampicin3.90 (IC91)
In brackets the mean percentage of the bacterial growth inhibited by indicated concentration and resulting in no visible growth (IC, inhibitory concentration). * In butanol extract of C. psidioides; ** Not present in the extracts as such but as ellagic acid glycosidic derivatives. The total antimycobacterial activity (mL/g) is and indication on the degree to which 1 g of an extract can be diluted without losing its antimycobacterial activity and is calculated as: extraction yield in mg extracted material/mg plant powder divided to the MIC of the extract [83].
Table 4. Polyphenolic profile of a butanol extract of the stem bark of Combretum psidioides. Data recorded using HPLC-DAD and UHPLC coupled to quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry. Combretastatin B-2 was identified using GC-MS*.
Table 4. Polyphenolic profile of a butanol extract of the stem bark of Combretum psidioides. Data recorded using HPLC-DAD and UHPLC coupled to quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry. Combretastatin B-2 was identified using GC-MS*.
CompoundsMolecular FormulaRt HPLC-DAD or GC* (min)Rt UHPLC (min)Measured [M-H] (m/z) or * GC-MSExact Mass (calc.)ppm ValueUVλmax (in MeOH)Peak Area % (280 nm)
Gallic acidC7H6O51.6361.334169.0149170.02138.2834216, 2729.2848
Flavonoid? 1.933 210, 224, 2780.1800
Protocatechuic acidC7H6O43.7182.733153.0196154.02646.5352210, 218, 260, 2944.6595
O-hydroxycinnamic acid like 4.628 210, 230, 280, 3100.7723
Unknown ellagitannin 7.187 214, 258, 376
Unknown ellagitannin 7.731 216, 260, 3784.0268
Sanguiin H-4C27H22O188.2084.448633.0746634.07984.1070216, 258, 3765.7862
Gallotannin 8.979 258, 2180.1717
Epigallocatechin gallateC22H18O119.427 458.0843 210, 2760.5409
Unknown ellagitannin 9.673 216, 258, 3782.5987
1,6-Di-O-galloyl-β-d-GlucoseC20H20O1410.0224.700483.0801484.08466.8312216, 2762.7681
Unknown ellagitannin 10.406 214, 252, 3840.1968
Unknown ellagitannin 10.778 216, 260, 3744.4198
Galloylglucose 10.975 216, 2762.0395
Unknown ellagitannin 11.178 214, 260, 3810.0556
Unknown ellagitannin 11.454 218, 256, 3780.8819
CorilaginC27H22O1812.244 633.0750634.07984.7388215, 258, 3805.7058
Epigallocatechin like (flavan-3-ol) 13.391 210, 282, 3200.5197
Combretastatin B-2C17H20O5*13.489 *304304.13116.9049
Galloylglucose 14.281 216, 2764.2740
β-PunicalaginC48H28O3014.9565.4271083.15411084.065425.6045218, 256, 3806.9297
Epigallocatechin like 17.368 210, 284
Ellagic acid derivative 17.565 254, 3803.3214
Gallotannin 17.591 216, 282
Ellagic acid derivative 18.935 254, 3620.3382
3′-O-methyl-4-O-(β-d-xylopyranosyl)
ellagic acid (main compound)
C20H16O1219.8468.201447.0574448.06363.5790254, 3648.4825
Gallotannin (not PGG) 21.184 939.1000 214, 2800.1463
Unknown ellagitannin 21.815 218, 248, 3680.5505
Ellagic acid derivative 24.922 254,3623.1564
Unknown ellagitannin 26.444 210, 264, 3980.0953
Unknown ellagitannin 27.163 218, 254, 3600.3147
Unknown ellagitannin 28.605 218, 256, 3622.0192
Unknown ellagitannin 31.560 216, 256, 3601.8907
Unknown ellagitannin 3.688 218, 256, 3600.9801
HexagalloylglucoseC48H36O3038.299 1092.1278 218, 2800.1879
Rt (min), retention times obtained from HPLC-DAD and UHPLC-DAD; [M-H], base ion at negative mode. Percentage peak area from HPLC-DAD chromatograms was acquired at 280 nm. PGG, pentagalloylglucose. * results obtained with GC-MS.
Table 5. Polyphenolic profile of a butanol extract of the stem bark of Combretum padoides. Data recorded using HPLC-DAD and UHPLC coupled to quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry.
Table 5. Polyphenolic profile of a butanol extract of the stem bark of Combretum padoides. Data recorded using HPLC-DAD and UHPLC coupled to quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry.
CompoundsMolecular FormulaRt HPLC-DAD (min)Rt UHPLC (min)Measured [M-H] (m/z)Exact Mass (calc.)ppm ValueUVλmax (in MeOH)Peak Area % (280 nm)
1-O-galloyl-β-d-glucose (syn. β-glucogallin)C13H16O101.577 331.0685332.07387.5514216, 2760.1894
Gallic acidC7H6O51.7631.306169.0157170.021313.0167216, 2721.2354
Ellagitannin 3.245 215, 260, 3801.8848
Ellagitannin 7.8153.170466.0264 214, 258, 3803.1453
Ellagitannin 8.408 216, 258, 3761.4324
Ellagitannin 8.8293.3871083.0591 216, 256, 3748.3917
Gallotannin 9.370 216, 2522.6083
Ellagitannin 9.740 210, 258, 3800.7464
Corilagin derivativeC27H22O1810.1143.768633.0750634.07984.7388216, 258, 37910.9106
Ellagitannin 10.413 220, 256, 3740.4238
α-Punicalagin anomer or Punicacortein DC48H28O3010.9033.8531083.05871084.06541.0156216, 260, 37614.9380
Ellagitannin 11.3823.9031083.0581 216, 258, 3763.9407
Ellagitannin 11.764 216, 258, 3800.1157
Ellagitannin 12.073 218, 258, 3784.6576
Ellagitannin 12.385 224, 256, 3740.7334
Ellagitannin 12.619 210, 260, 3820.2170
Ellagitannin 12.858 214, 256, 3782.7210
Unknown 13.373 214, 248, 2920.1398
Flavonoid; Ampelopsine like 13.643 210, 2800.5307
Ellagitannin 14.054 218, 258, 3680.1152
Ellagitannin 14.500 220, 260, 3760.8036
Flavonoid 15.137 210, 276, 3700,9277
Ellagitannin 15.693 216, 256, 3805.3916
Ellagitannin 16.015 210, 256, 3640.2770
Ellagitannin 16.219 216, 260, 3780.7760
Ellagitannin 16.849 216, 284, 3820.3067
Ellagitannin 17.668 218, 260, 3780.8513
Gallotannin 17.975 218, 2800.2328
Ellagic acid derivative 18.556 254, 3800.4644
Stilbene like compound? 18.809 210, 235, 3820.9999
Gallotannin 18.991 210, 2800.4259
Ellagic acid derivative 19.960 254, 3620.2292
Ellagitannin 20.2534.5021085.0719 210, 254, 3620.5726
Ellagic acid arabinosideC19H14O1220.7928.316433.0391434.0480-2.5402254, 3621.6928
3′-O-methyl-4-O-(β-d-xylopyranosyl)
ellagic acid
C20H16O1221.0558.616447.0564448.06361.3421254, 3684.4746
Gallotannin (not PGG) 22.163 214, 2840.1343
Ellagic acid derivative 26.258 254, 3601.5195
Ellagitannin 28.596 216, 254, 3620.1066
Ellagitannin 30.121 216, 254, 3621.5374
Ellagitannin 33.134 216, 256, 3602.2061
Ellagitannin 36.269 218, 256, 3620.8344
Rt (min), retention times obtained from HPLC-DAD and UHPLC-DAD; [M-H], base ion at negative mode. Percentage peak area was acquired from HPLC-DAD chromatograms at 280 nm.
Table 6. Polyphenolic profile of a butanol extract of the roots of Combretum zeyheri. Data recorded using HPLC-DAD and UHPLC coupled to quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry.
Table 6. Polyphenolic profile of a butanol extract of the roots of Combretum zeyheri. Data recorded using HPLC-DAD and UHPLC coupled to quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry.
CompoundsMolecular FormulaRt HPLC-DAD (min)Rt UHPLC (min)Measured [M-H] (m/z)Exact Mass (calc.)ppm ValueUVλmax (in MeOH)Peak Area % (280 nm)
Gallic acidC7H6O51.7601.173169.0140170.02132.9583216, 2721.1995
Gallic acid derivative 2.191 216, 2740.6905
Protocatechuic acidC7H6O43.8652.593153.0198154.0264 218, 220, 260, 2940.1245
Cinnamic acid like 7.025 0.1205
Gallotannin or gallic acid derivative 8.516 216, 2743.3768
Corilagin isomer 8.835 216, 254, 3742.8165
Gallotannin 9.325 216, 2580.1997
Ellagitannin 10.080 218, 258, 3780.0607
Gallotannin 10.481 216, 2753.2150
Ellagitannin 11.190 216, 256, 3780.2296
Gallotannin 11.486 216, 2772.2688
Ellagitannin 11.984 220, 256, 3780.3862
Ellagitannin 12.804 216, 256, 3802.2389
Eriodictyol like 13.899 210, 2792.2785
Ellagitannin 14.531 222, 258, 3800.1015
Gallotannin 15.0085.352647.0894 216, 27620.0817
PunicalaginC48H28O3015.6455.4851083.05741084.0654−0.1847216, 256, 3814.3927
Batatasin like 16.068 210, 2720.0939
Ellagitannin 16.562 256, 3720.0601
Salidrosid and arbutin like 17.497 217, 274, 276, 2980.7553
Ellagic acid derivative 18.5595.718435.1310 254, 3800.4557
Lignan? 19.014 210, 2722.3806
Lignan? 19.462 210, 2740.0977
Lignan? 20.178 210, 2763.1006
Ellagic acid derivative 20.7735.818581.1903 254, 3620.4712
Procyanidin B-3 like 23.022 212, 2742.8707
Ellagic acid derivative 24.6938.033435.1310 250, 3661.4412
Ellagitannin 26.230 210, 254, 3601.2651
Lignan? 26.778 210, 2741.3692
Procyanidin B-3 like 27.670 212, 2761.0954
Stilbene or lignan? 27.956 212, 2640.8470
Procyanidin B-3 like 28.803 212, 2721.2008
Methyl-ellagic acid xylosideC20H16O1229.9228.582447.0566448.06361.7895210, 2741.5613
Ellagitannin 31.578 0.0677
Ellagitannin 32.116 216, 256, 3660.1269
Ellagitannin 33.103 216, 256, 3600.7444
Di-methyl-ellagic acid xylosideC21H18O1234.2439.931461.0741462.07925.8559251, 3660.9611
Ellagitannin 34.99810.192763.0788 226, 268, 3700.2394
3,3′-Di-O-methyl-4-O-(n′′-O-galloyl-β-d-xylopyranosyl) ellagic acidC28H22O1636.25712.312613.0849614.09004.4039218, 256, 3580.2287
Gallotannin or ellagitannin according to the UV abs max 36.93112.829727.0566; 765.0566 216, 252, 3661.1001
HexagalloylglucoseC48H36O3039.583 1092.1278 216, 2785.0497
Ellagitannin 39.95613.994817.4212 210, 252, 3630.4127
Gallotannin Ellagitannin? 44.41417.000725.4118 216, 2740.3647
Rt (min), retention times obtained from HPLC-DAD and UHPLC-DAD; [M-H], base ion at negative mode. Percentage peak area was acquired from HPLC-DAD chromatograms at 280 nm.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fyhrquist, P.; Salih, E.Y.A.; Helenius, S.; Laakso, I.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R. HPLC-DAD and UHPLC/QTOF-MS Analysis of Polyphenols in Extracts of the African Species Combretum padoides, C. zeyheri and C. psidioides Related to Their Antimycobacterial Activity. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9080459

AMA Style

Fyhrquist P, Salih EYA, Helenius S, Laakso I, Julkunen-Tiitto R. HPLC-DAD and UHPLC/QTOF-MS Analysis of Polyphenols in Extracts of the African Species Combretum padoides, C. zeyheri and C. psidioides Related to Their Antimycobacterial Activity. Antibiotics. 2020; 9(8):459. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9080459

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fyhrquist, Pia, Enass Y. A. Salih, Satu Helenius, Into Laakso, and Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto. 2020. "HPLC-DAD and UHPLC/QTOF-MS Analysis of Polyphenols in Extracts of the African Species Combretum padoides, C. zeyheri and C. psidioides Related to Their Antimycobacterial Activity" Antibiotics 9, no. 8: 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9080459

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop