Abstract
Several tests of mental rotation ability have been used to investigate its development and the origins of sex differences. One of the most used tests is the mental rotation test (MRT) by Vandenberg and Kuse. A limitation of the MRT is that it is a pen-and-paper test with 2D images of 3D objects. This is a challenge to the ecological validity of the MRT because mental rotation typically involves physical 3D objects that are also physically manipulated. The purpose of the present study was to compare mental rotation ability as evaluated by the MRT to three new tasks with physical objects (toy bricks) that were physically manipulated. The different tasks allowed us to vary the processing demands on mental rotation while standardizing other aspects of the tasks. Fifty-nine females and twenty-eight males completed the LMR and HMR conditions (low- and high-mental rotation demands, respectively) of the brick building task (BBT), a visual search task, and the MRT. As demands on mental rotation for the BBT increased, performance decreased and a sex difference, with males outperforming females, increased. There were correlations between all tasks, but they were larger between the versions of the BBT with the MRT. The results suggest that spatial skill is an assembly of interrelated subskills and that the sex difference is sensitive to the demands on mental rotation and dimensionality crossing. The benefits of the BBT are that it is ecologically valid, avoids dimensionality crossing, and the demands on mental rotation can be manipulated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arendasy M, Sommer M, Hergovich A, Feldhammer M (2011) Evaluating the impact of depth cue salience in working three-dimensional mental rotation tasks by means of psychometric experiments. Learn Individ Differ 21(4):403–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.04.002
Becker J, Berkley K, Geary N, Hampson E, Herman J, Young E (2008) Sex differences in the brain: from genes to behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Beltz AM, Berenbaum SA (2013) Cognitive effects of variations in pubertal timing: Is puberty a period of brain organization for human sex-typed cognition? Horm Behav 63(5):823–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.04.002
Beltz AM, Hampson E, Berenbaum SA (2015) Oral contraceptives and cognition: a role for ethinyl estradiol. Horm Behav 74(Supplement C):209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.06.012
de Bruin N, Bryant DC, MacLean JN, Gonzalez CLR (2016) Assessing visuospatial abilities in healthy aging: a novel visuomotor task. Front Aging Neurosci 8:7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00007
Felix MC, Parker JD, Lee C, Gabriel KI (2011) Real three-dimensional objects: effects on mental rotation. Percept Mot Skills 113(1):38–50. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.22.PMS.113.4.38-50
Gogos A (2013) Natural and synthetic sex hormones: Effects on higher-order cognitive function and prepulse inhibition. Biol Psychol 93(1):17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.02.001
Griksiene R, Ruksenas O (2011) Effects of hormonal contraceptives on mental rotation and verbal fluency. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36(8):1239–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.03.001
Gurvich C, Hoy K, Thomas N, Kulkarni J (2018) Sex differences and the influence of sex hormones on cognition through adulthood and the aging process. Brain Sci 8(9):163. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8090163
Hampson E (1995) Spatial cognition in humans: possible modulation by androgens and estrogens. J Psychiatry Neurosci 20:397–404
Hampson E, Levy-Cooperman N, Korman JM (2014) Estradiol and mental rotation: relation to dimensionality, difficulty, or angular disparity? Horm Behav 65(3):238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.12.016
Hampson E (2018) Regulation of cognitive function by androgens and estrogens. Curr Opin Behav Sci 23:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.03.002
Hausmann M, Slabbekoorn D, Van Goozen SH, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Gunturkun O (2000) Sex hormones affect spatial abilities during the menstrual cycle. Behav Neurosci 114:1245–1250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.114.6.1245
Hawes Z, LeFevre J-A, Xu C, Bruce CD (2015) Mental rotation with tangible three-dimensional objects: a new measure sensitive to developmental differences in 4- to 8-year-old children. Mind Brain Edu 9(1):10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12051
Hier DB, Crowley WF (1982) Spatial ability in androgen-deficient men. N Engl J Med 306(20):1202–1205. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198205203062003
Horan PF, Rosser RA (1984) A multivariable analysis of spatial abilities by sex. Dev Rev 4(4):387–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(84)90023-6
Hoyek N, Collet C, Fargier P, Guillot A (2012) The use of the vandenberg and kuse mental rotation test in children. J Individ Differ 33:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000063
Janowsky JS (2006) Thinking with your gonads: testosterone and cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 10(2):77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.010
Jansen P, Heil M (2009) Gender differences in mental rotation across adulthood. Exp Aging Res 36(1):94–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730903422762
Jansen P, Schmelter A, Quaiser-Pohl C, Neuburger S, Heil M (2013) Mental rotation performance in primary school age children: are there gender differences in chronometric tests? Cogn Dev 28(1):51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.08.005
Kolb B, Whishaw I (1985) Fundamentals of human neuropsychology, 2nd edn. W.H. Freeman & Co., New York
Kolb B, Whishaw IQ (2000) An introduction to brain and behavior. Worth, New York
Kolb B, Whishaw IQ (2003) Fundamentals of human neuropsychology, 5th edn. Worth Publishers, New York
Kolb B, Gibb R (2011) Brain plasticity and behaviour in the developing brain. J Canad Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Journal de L’Academie Canadienne de Psychiatrie de L’enfant et de L’adolescent 20(4):265–276
Lauer JE, Lourenco SF (2016) Spatial processing in infancy predicts both spatial and mathematical aptitude in childhood. Psychol Sci 27(10):1291–1298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616655977
Larson P, Rizzo A, Buckwalter J, Van Rooyen A, Kratz K, Neumann U, Van der zaag C (1999) Gender issues in the use of virtual environments. CyberPsychol Behav 2(2):113–123. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1999.2.113
Linn M, Petersen A (1985) Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Dev 56:1479–1498. https://doi.org/10.2307/113046
Lubinski D (2010) Spatial ability and stem: a sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personal Individ Differ 49(4):344–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.022
McWilliams W, Hamilton CJ, Muncer SJ (1997) On mental rotation in three dimensions. Percept Mot Skills 85(1):297–298. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1997.85.1.297
Neubauer AC, Bergner S, Schatz M (2010) Two- vs. three-dimensional presentation of mental rotation tasks: sex differences and effects of training on performance and brain activation. Intelligence 38(5):529–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.06.001
Parsons TD, Larson P, Kratz K, Thiebaux M, Bluestein B, Buckwalter J, Rizzo AA (2004) Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial rotation in a virtual environment. Neuropsychologia 42(4):555–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.08.014
Peters M (2005) Sex differences and the factor of time in solving vandenberg and kuse mental rotation problems. Brain Cogn 57(2):176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.052
Peters M, Battista C (2008) Applications of mental rotation figures of the shepard and metzler type and description of a mental rotation stimulus library. Brain Cogn 66(3):260–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2007.09.003
Peters M, Laeng M, Latham K, Jackson M, Zaiyouna R, Richardson C (1995) A redrawn vanderberg and kuse mental rotations test: difference versions and factors that affect performance. Brain Cogn 28(1):39–58. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1995.1032
Puts DA, McDaniel MA, Jordan CL, Breedlove SM (2007) Spatial ability and prenatal androgens: meta-analyses of congenital adrenal hyperplasia and digit ratio (2D:4D) studies. Arch Sex Behav 37(1):100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9271-3
Robert M, Chevrier E (2003) Does men’s advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen? Mem Cognit 31(7):1136–1145. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196134
Rosenberg L, Park S (2002) Verbal and spatial functions across the menstrual cycle in healthy young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 27(7):835–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4530(01)00083-X
Shepard RN, Metzler J (1971) Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171(3972):701–703. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3972.701
Shepard S, Metzler D (1988) Mental rotation: effects of dimensionality of objects and type of task. J Exp Psychol 14:3–11. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.14.1
Stone KD, Bryant DC, Gonzalez CLR (2013) Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles? Exp Brain Res 224(3):455–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3325-z
Uttal DH, Cohen CA (2012) Spatial thinking and STEM education. When, why, and how? Psychol Learn Motiv Adv Res Theory 57:147–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394293-7.00004-2
Vandenberg SG, Kuse AR (1978) Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Percept Mot Skills 47(2):599–604. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
Voyer D, Voyer S, Bryden MP (1995) Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychol Bull 117:250–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250
Voyer D, Doyle RA (2010) Item type and gender differences on the mental rotations test. Learn Individ Differ 20(5):469–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.010
Waber D (1976) Sex differences in cognition: a function of maturation rate? Science 192(4239):572–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257795
Wai J, Lubinski D, Benbow CP (2009) Spatial ability for STEM domains: aligning over fifty years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. J Educ Psychol 101:817–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016127
Wharton W, Hirshman E, Merritt P, Doyle L, Paris S, Gleason C (2008) Oral contraceptives and androgenicity: Influences on visuospatial task performance in younger individuals. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 16(2):156–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.16.2.156
Wierenga LM, Bos MG, Schreuders E, van Kamp F, Peper JS, Tamnes CK, Crone EA (2018) Unraveling age, puberty and testosterone effects on subcortical brain development across adolescence. Psychoneuroendocrinology 91:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.02.034
Winner E, von Karolyi C, Malinsky D, French L, Seliger C, Ross E, Weber C (2001) Dyslexia and visual-spatial talents: compensation vs deficit model. Brain Lang 76(2):81–110. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2392
Zhang X, Koponen T, Räsänen P, Aunola K, Lerkkanen M-K, Nurmi J-E (2014) Linguistic and spatial skills predict early arithmetic development via counting sequence knowledge. Child Dev 85(3):1091–1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12173
Acknowledgements
The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Grant no. 14367) supported this research with a Tier II Canada Research Chair and a Discovery Grant awarded to Claudia Gonzalez.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Communicated by Melvyn A. Goodale.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aguilar Ramirez, D.E., Blinch, J. & Gonzalez, C.L.R. An evaluation of visuospatial skills using hands-on tasks. Exp Brain Res 238, 2269–2277 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05894-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05894-9