Abstract
This paper presents an extension of the Geostatistical model under preferential sampling in order to accommodate possible local repulsion effects. This local repulsion can be caused by the researcher in charge of collecting data who, after observing the stochastic process of interest in a specific location, avoids collecting new samples near this place. Proceeding in this way, the resulting sampling design would in practice include a repulsion window centered on each sampling location, even though the researcher was planning the sample preferentially. This perturbation in the Geostatistical model under preferential sampling can be modeled through a discrete nonhomogeneous stochastic process over a partition composed of M subregions of the study area, where only one sample lies in each subregion. Simulations and an application to real data are performed under the Bayesian approach and the effects of this perturbation on estimation and prediction are then discussed. The results obtained corroborate the idea that the proposed methodology corrects the distortions caused by this perturbation, thus mitigating the effects on inference and spatial prediction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banerjee S, Carlin B, Gelfand A (2004) Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial statistics. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York
Benes V, Bodlák K, Møller J, Waagepetersen RP (2003) Application of log gaussian cox processes in disease mapping. In: The ISI International Conference on Environmental Statistics and Health, no. 141, 95. Univ Santiago de Compostela
Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York
Diggle PJ, Lophaven S (2006) Bayesian geostatistical design. Scand J Stat 33:53–64
Diggle P, Ribeiro P Jr (2007) Model based geostatistics. Springer, New York
Diggle PJ, Menezes R, Su T-L (2010) Geostatistical inference under preferential sampling. J R Stat Soc 59:191–232
Diggle PJ, Tawn J, Moyeed R (1998) Model-based geostatistics. J R Stat Soc 47:299–350
Dinsdale D, Salibian-Barrera M (2018) Methods for preferential sampling in geostatistics. J R Stat Soc. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12286
Fernández JA, Real C, Couto JA, Aboal JR, Carballeira A (2005) The effect of sampling design on extensive bryomonitoring surveys of air pollution. Sci Total Environ 337(1–3):11–21
Ferreira GS, Gamerman D (2015) Optimal design in geostatistics under preferential sampling. Bayesian Anal 10:711–735
Fuentes M (2002) Spectral methods for nonstationary spatial processes. Biometrika 89:197–210
Fuentes M, Smith RL (2001) A new class of nonstationary spatial models. In: Technical report, North Carolina State University, Raleigh
Gelfand AE, Sahu SK, Holland DM (2012) On the effect of preferential sampling in spatial prediction. Environmetrics 23:565–578
Giorgi E, Sesay SS, Terlouw DJ, Diggle PJ (2015) Combining data from multiple spatially referenced prevalence surveys using generalized linear geostatistical models. J R Stat Soc 178:445–464
Haas TC (1995) Local prediction of a spatio-temporal process with an application to wet sulfate deposition. J Am Stat Assoc 90:1189–1199
Heikkinen J, Arjas E (1998) Non-parametric bayesian estimation of a spatial poisson intensity. Scand J Stat 25:435–450
Heikkinen J, Arjas E (1999) Modeling a poisson forest in variable elevations: a nonparametric bayesian approach. Biometrics 55:738–745
Higdon D, Swall J, Kern J (1999) Non-stationary spatial modeling. In: Bernardo JM, Berger JO, Dawid AP, Smith AFM (eds) Bayesian statistics, vol 6. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 761–768
Lee A, Szpiro A, Kim S, Sheppard L (2015) Impact of preferential sampling on exposure prediction and health effect inference in the context of air pollution epidemiology. Environmetrics 26:255–267
Møller J, Syversveen AR, Waagepetersen RP (1998) Log Gaussian cox processes. Scand J Stat 25:451–482
Møller J, Waagepetersen RP (2007) Modern statistics for spatial point processes. Scand J Stat 34:643–684
Oliveira ICL (2015) Amostragem preferencial em processos espaciais discretos: Casos bernoulli e poisson. Master dissertation—Department of Statistical Methods—Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Pan Y, Ren X, Gao B, Liu Y, Gao Y, Hao X, Chen Z (2015) Global mean estimation using a self-organizing dual-zoning method for preferential sampling. Environ Monitor Assess 187:1–10
Pati D, Reich BJ, Dunson DB (2011) Bayesian geostatistical modelling with informative sampling locations. Biometrika 98:35–48
Ribeiro PJ Jr, Diggle PJ et al (2001) Geor: a package for geostatistical analysis. R News 1:14–18
Rue H, Martino S, Chopin N (2009) Approximate bayesian inference for latent gaussian models by using integrated nested laplace approximations. J R Stat Soc 71:319–392
Sampson PD, Guttorp P (1992) Nonparametric estimation of nonstationary spatial covariance structure. J Am Stat Assoc 87:108–119
Schmidt AM, O’Hagan A (2003) Bayesian inference for non-stationary spatial covariance structure via spatial deformations. J R Stat Soc 65:743–758
Shaddick G, Zidek JV (2014) A case study in preferential sampling: long term monitoring of air pollution in the UK. Spatial Stat 9:51–65
Simpson D, Illian JB, Lindgren F, Sørbye SH, Rue H (2016) Going off grid: computationally effcient inference for log-gaussian cox processes. Biometrika 103:49–70
Waagepetersen R (2004) Convergence of posteriors for discretized log gaussian cox processes. Stat Prob Lett 66:229–235
Zidek JV, Shaddick G, Taylor CG (2014) Reducing estimation bias in adaptively changing monitoring networks with preferential site selection. Ann Appl Stat 8:1640–1670
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Bryan F. J. Manly
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferreira, G.d.S. Geostatistics under preferential sampling in the presence of local repulsion effects. Environ Ecol Stat 27, 549–570 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-020-00458-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-020-00458-0