Elsevier

Structures

Volume 27, October 2020, Pages 1274-1288
Structures

Performance of concrete beams reinforced with GFRP bars under monotonic loading

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.020Get rights and content

Abstract

The use of GFRP bars in concrete structures has emerged as an alternative to conventional RC due to the corrosion of steel in aggressive environments. Although many studies were reported on concrete beams reinforced with GFRP bars, still the full potentiality of GFRP reinforced concrete is yet to be known. This study reports experimental, analytical and numerical investigations carried out on concrete beams reinforced with TMT and GFRP bars under monotonic loading. Experimental studies were carried out on concrete beams of size 100 × 200 × 1500 mm reinforced with TMT (10 mm and 12 mm dia.) and GFRP bars (10 mm and 13 mm dia.). The deflection of GFRP reinforced concrete beams corresponding to service load is found to be 2.75 times the deflection of TMT reinforced concrete beams. Widely used analytical/empirical models were compiled to predict the load deflection behaviour of beams. The analytical models were primarily based on effective moment of inertia to account for beams stiffness after cracking. Nonlinear finite element (FE) analysis has been carried out on concrete beams reinforced with TMT and GFRP bars. FE models were developed by employing the appropriate constitutive relationship of concrete, TMT and GFRP bars. The integrity of all the elements has been ensured by applying the appropriate constraint conditions. Average load–deflection plots obtained from experiments were compared with computed load–deflection of analytical and numerical studies. From the load–deflection behaviour, it is observed that (i) numerical prediction is stiffer and (ii) the analytical models incorporated with tension stiffening aspects predicted the deflections close to experimental observations.

Introduction

Reinforced concrete is very commonly employed material in the construction of civil infrastructure, airport construction, bridges, buildings etc. Due to rapid increase in infrastructure in many countries/cities, high demand for reinforced concrete is expected. Corrosion is a crucial problem in steel reinforcement which deteriorates the material when it reacts with the environment [1], [2]. An experimental Glass Fibre Reinforced Plastic (GFRP) rebar has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional steel reinforcement with excellent results in terms of corrosion resistance. GFRP rebars are usually composed of glass fibres reinforced with a thermosetting resin and manufactured using a pultrusion process. Its advantages include high longitudinal strength and tensile strength, high stiffness to weight ratio, resistance to corrosion and chemical attack, light weight, controllable thermal expansion and damping characteristics and electromagnetic neutrality. Fibre Reinforced Plastic (FRP) bars exhibit linear elastic behavior up to failure (brittleness), which affects the ductility of the concrete members. Further, the failure modes of FRP-reinforced concrete (FRP-RC) members vary significantly with the amount of reinforcement. Most design codes and guides suggest over-reinforcing of FRP reinforced members to ensure plastic deformation of the compressed concrete and to enhance ductility. Although, the GFRP (Glass Fibre Reinforced Plastic) rebar has some advantages with regard to corrosion, its usage in the construction industry is still a big question mark due to its low modulus of elasticity and serviceability aspects of structural elements. Due to low modulus of elasticity, the concrete members reinforced with FRP bars undergo large deflections and wider cracks which affect its serviceability. Hence, the design of such structures should be governed by their serviceability limit state (deflection and cracking) rather than their ultimate limit state. Further, it was observed that surface configuration may play a significant role with respect to cracking performance and consequently crack width. Recently, some studies were reported combining steel bars with FRP bars (hybrid system) in reinforcing concrete structures, which overcome the ductility and serviceability problems of purely FRP reinforced structures. This hybrid system ensures the ductility of structure due to the contribution of additional steel reinforcement and enhanced load carrying capacity due to FRP bars.

For the last two decades, several studies were reported on the flexural response of FRP RC beams [3]. In the case of serviceability, and specifically for deflections, several researchers [4], [5], [6], [7] proposed coefficients to modify Branson’s equation used in steel design codes [8], while others [9], [10] proposed a modified equivalent moment of inertia derived from curvatures. These approaches were adopted in several design guideline proposals for FRP RC [3], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17] carried out several investigations on concrete beams reinforced with steel, FRP, aramid FRP and combination of both steel and FRP or aramid FRP or glass FRP under flexural loading. From their studies, it was reported that (i) the addition of steel reinforcing bars to heavily aramid FRP-reinforced concrete sections significantly enhanced the ductility and reduced the crack widths and spacing, (ii) higher flexural strength was realized for the case of hybrid-reinforced beams (combination of steel and glass FRP) compared to steel or glass FRP reinforced beams, (iii) the combination of steel and GFRP reinforced beam yielded higher ductility, and (iv) all hybrid-reinforced beams (steel + GFRP) failed due to concrete crushing after yielding of steel reinforcement and GFRP bars were effective in maintaining the flexure capacity of the beams and to enhance their serviceability aspects. Bischoff and Gross [18], [19] mentioned that the abrupt loss of stiffness at cracking affects the post-cracking behavior and deflection. Mousavi et al. [20] investigated the deflection of GFRP-RC beams and described that (i) the low elastic modulus of GFRP bars responsible for the abrupt loss of concrete stiffness and (ii) the bond-dependent coefficient and the modulus of elasticity of the FRP bars are the main factors affecting the behavior of the GFRP-RC beams. Refai et al. [21] carried out studies on concrete beams reinforced with hybrid bars (combination of GFRP and steel) by varying the reinforcement ratio and the ratio of steel to GFRP bars. The experimental responses were compared against the codal provisions of ACI-440.1R-06. New bond coefficient was proposed to predict the crack width and new deformability factor was proposed to predict the deformation of hybrid beams. Doo-Yeol et al. [22] performed flexural studies on ultra-high-performance fiber reinforced concrete beams reinforced with GFRP bars and reported that the crack width criteria of ACI 440.1R and CAN/CSA S806 at serviceability limit state and deformability requirement by CAN/CSA-S6 [23] were satisfied. Ibrahim [24] performed nonlinear finite element analysis of concrete deep beams reinforced with GFRP bars for prediction of load–deflection behaviour, failure load, failure mode, crack propagation, GFRP strain and concrete strain distribution. Amr El-Nemr et al. [25] investigated the flexural behaviour and serviceability performance of concrete beams reinforced with different types of GFRP bars by considering the various aspects such as (i) variation in modulus of elasticity (46.4–69.3 GPa), (ii) surface profile (sand-coated and helically-grooved), and (iii) reinforcement ratio. It was reported that the cracking behavior of the tested beams with sand-coating of GFRP bars enhanced the bond performance in concrete more than the helically grooved profile. Further, it was also reported that ACI 440.1R-06 and ACI 440.1R-15 underestimated the deflection, while ISIS M-03 and CSA S806-12 provided conservative deflection values at 0.30 of nominal moment capacity.

GFRP was used as concrete bridge deck reinforcement for the Sierrita de la Cruz Creek Bridge located 40 km northwest of Amarillo, Texas in 2000 by replacing the original bridge which was structurally deficient and corroded [26]. The Crowchild Trail Bridge, located in Calgary, Alberta, utilized ribbed-deformed GFRP C-Bar as reinforcement in the barrier walls and deck slab [27]. The Joffre Bridge, located in Sherbrooke, Quebec, over the St-Francois River, contains GFRP bars as reinforcement in the 45 MPa concrete in the sidewalks and the traffic barriers [28].

Although lot of work has been reported on GFRP reinforced concrete beams, still its usefulness is yet to be recognized. This paper reports the studies carried out on concrete beams reinforced with Thermo Mechanical Treated (TMT) bars and GFRP bars with respect to experimental, analytical and numerical. This paper is organized in three major sections, (i) first section deals with the experimental studies, (ii) various analytical models are compiled in section two to predict the load–deflection behavior of GFRP reinforced concrete beams, and (iii) numerical investigations on concrete beams reinforced with TMT and GFRP in section three. The deflections obtained from experiments are compared with analytical and numerical predictions.

Section snippets

Experimental investigation

The type of cement used was 53 grade Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). As per ACI 211-4R-08 [29], mix proportion was designed as 1:2.68:3.76 (cement:fine aggregate:coarse aggregate) with water cement ratio of 0.55. All the test specimens were cast using a design concrete mix with a target of 28 days compressive strength of concrete as 40 MPa. The fine aggregate used was natural sand having a 4.75 mm nominal maximum size. The coarse aggregate used was a mixture of 20 mm and 12 mm maximum size.

Prediction of load-deflection behaviour using various analytical models

Analytical solutions will always be useful to estimate the response of structures/components. Several models were proposed in the literature to predict the load–deflection consistency of GFRP reinforced concrete beams.

It is well known fact that beam’s stiffness will change after cracking. To account the change in stiffness, effective moment of inertia (Ie) is to be determined. ACI codes of practice significantly contributed by modifying the parameters, especially the effective moment inertia in

Finite element modeling and analysis

Reinforced concrete is a complex material to be modeled in finite element domain. To predict the realistic behavior of reinforced concrete beams, it is essential to consider several aspects in the modeling. The aspects include: (i) compression behaviour of concrete (ii) tensile behavior of concrete (iii) stress vs. crack width of concrete (iv) fracture energy (v) damage parameters (vi) constitutive relationship of reinforcing material. In order to reduce time and effort of experiments, it is

Summary and conclusions

Experimental investigations were carried out on concrete beams reinforced with GFRP and TMT bars under static loading. All the investigations were carried out under four point bending. Flexural tests were carried out on eleven numbers of concrete beams of dimensions 1500 × 200 × 100 mm reinforced with GFRP (10 mm diameter or 13 mm diameter) bars and TMT (10 mm diameter or 12 mm diameter) bars. The average values of ultimate load carrying capacity for beams with GFRP (13 mm dia.) and TMT (12 mm

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (43)

  • M. Pecce et al.

    Experimental response and code models of GFRP RC beams in bending

    J Comp Const

    (2000)
  • H.A. Toutanji et al.

    Flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars

    ACI Struct J

    (2000)
  • ACI 318-05/ACI 381R-05. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary, Detroit, Michigan (USA),...
  • S.S. Faza et al.

    Pre and post-cracking deflection behaviour of concrete beams reinforced with fiber-reinforced plastic rebars

  • P.H. Bischoff

    Reevaluation of deflection prediction for concrete beams reinforced with steel and fiber reinforced polymer bars

    ASCE J Struct Eng

    (2005)
  • CAN/CSA-S806-02. Design and construction of building components with fiber-reinforced polymers, Mississauga, Ontario,...
  • ACI 440.1R-06. Guide for the design and construction of concrete reinforced with FRP Bars. Farmington Hills, Michigan...
  • M.A. Aiello et al.

    Structural performances of concrete beams with hybrid (Fiber reinforced polymer steel) reinforcements

    ASCE J Comp Const

    (2002)
  • H.Y. Leung et al.

    Flexural behavior of concrete beams internally reinforced with GFRP rods and steel rebars

    Struct Survey

    (2003)
  • W. Qu et al.

    Flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid (GFRP and steel) bars

    ASCE J Comp Const

    (2009)
  • M.A. Safan

    Flexural behavior and design of steel-GFRP reinforced concrete beams

    ACI Mater J

    (2013)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Flexural behavior of hollow self compacted mortar ferrocement beam reinforced by GFRP bars

      2022, Case Studies in Construction Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, the failure mechanisms of FRP-reinforced concrete (FRP-RC) members depend on the degree of reinforcement. Most design specifications and guidelines recommend over-reinforcing FRP-reinforced elements to ensure plastic deformation of the concrete and to improve the strength of the structure's ductility [10]. Fiberglass wire mesh possesses exceptional corrosion resistance, high tensile strength, and non-magnetization properties.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text