Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adaptive governance in a complex social-ecological context: emergent responses to a native forest insect outbreak

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In contrast to traditional structures of state-centric bureaucratic administration, hybrid networks of state and non-state actors are believed to possess the advantages of greater adaptability in the face of environmental change as well as greater legitimacy in contested socio-political settings. Between 1998 and 2016, pine forests throughout the western United States experienced the largest and most destructive outbreak of the native mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) on record, with most of the affected forests located on lands owned and managed by the U.S. government as national forests. Socio-political responses to this event in many geographies included the emergence of local to regional hybrid networks that provided direction and resources for responding to the disturbance event. In this study, we analyze the ability of governance networks to adapt in the face of the insect outbreak across four regional geographies: The Black Hills region of South Dakota and Wyoming; northern Colorado; northeastern Washington; and southwestern Montana. Specifically, we ask what factors accounted for divergent governance responses in the four cases and to what extent the emergent governance dynamics in each case facilitated lasting, long-term adaptation. Our results highlight governance trajectories as products of their respective histories and of feedback cycles among socio-political, institutional, and technological variables. By analyzing the origin, characteristics, and persistence of institutional change, this research contributes a comparative perspective on the adaptive potential of networks as functions of influences from multiple spatial and temporal scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abers RN, Keck ME (2013) Practical authority: agency and institutional change in Brazilian water politics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams J (2019) The emergence of network governance in US National Forest administration: causal factors and propositions for future research. For Policy Econ 106:101977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams J, Huber-Stearns H, Bone C et al (2017) Adaptation to a landscape-scale mountain pine beetle epidemic in the era of networked governance: the enduring importance of bureaucratic institutions. Ecol Soc 22:22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams J, Huber-Stearns H, Gosnell H et al (2019) Tracking a governance transition: identifying and measuring indicators of social forestry on the Willamette National Forest. Soc Nat Resour. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1605434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Brown K, Fairbrass J et al (2003) Governance for sustainability: towards a ‘thick’ analysis of environmental decisionmaking. Environ Plan A 35:1095–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almstedt Å, Reed MG (2013) Introducing a framework for good and adaptive governance: an application to fire management planning in Canada’s boreal forest. For Chron 89:664–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage D (2008) Governance and the commons in a multi-level world. Int J Commons 2:7–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartley T (2007) Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. Am J Sociol 113:297–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville GL (1995) The forestry problem: adaptive lurches of renewal. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (eds) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 37–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentz BJ, Régnière J, Fettig CJ et al (2010) Climate change and bark beetles of the western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. Bioscience 60:602–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beunen R, Patterson JJ (2019) Analysing institutional change in environmental governance: exploring the concept of ‘institutional work’. J Environ Plan Manag 62:12–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwat SA, Humphreys D, Jones N (2017) Forest governance in the Anthropocene: challenges for theory and practice. For Policy Econ 79:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkenholtz T (2012) Network political ecology: method and theory in climate change vulnerability and adaptation research. Prog Hum Geogr 36:295–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bril-Mascarenhas T, Maillet A, Mayaux P-L (2017) Process tracing: inducción, deducción e inferencia causal. Rev Cienc Política 37:659–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Brondizio ES, Ostrom E, Young OR (2009) Connectivity and the governance of multilevel social-ecological systems: the role of social capital. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34:253–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler WH, Schultz CA (eds) (2019) A new era for collaborative forest management: policy and practice insights from the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmel E (2017) “Bringing the social back in:” governance analysis as a mode of enquiry. In: Paul R, Mölders M, Bora A, et al. (eds) Society, regulation and governance: new modes of shaping social change?. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 38–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin BC, Gosnell H, Cosens BA (2014) A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions. Ecol Soc 19:56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng AS, Gerlak AK, Dale L, Mattor K (2015) Examining the adaptability of collaborative governance associated with publicly managed ecosystems over time: insights from the Front Range Roundtable, Colorado, USA. Ecol Soc 20:35. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07187-200135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosens BA (2013) Legitimacy, adaptation, and resilience in ecosystem management. Ecol Soc 18:3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05093-180103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell S, Mattor KM, Morris JL et al (2020) Adaptive capacity in social–ecological systems: a framework for addressing bark beetle disturbances in natural resource management. Sustain Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00736-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creeden EP, Hicke JA, Buotte PC (2014) Climate, weather, and recent mountain pine beetle outbreaks in the western United States. For Ecol Manag 312:239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullingham CI, Cooke JE, Dang S et al (2011) Mountain pine beetle host-range expansion threatens the boreal forest. Mol Ecol 20:2157–2171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis EJ, Reed MG (2013) Multi-level governance of British Columbia’s mountain pine beetle crisis: the roles of memory and identity. Geoforum 47:32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Koning J (2014) Unpredictable outcomes in forestry—governance institutions in practice. Soc Nat Resour 27:358–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duit A, Galaz V (2008) Governance and complexity—emerging issues for governance theory. Governance 21:311–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00402.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H (2005) Institutional change, climate risk, and rural vulnerability: cases from Central Mexico. World Dev 33:1923–1938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen SH, Nightingale AJ, Eakin H (2015) Reframing adaptation: the political nature of climate change adaptation. Glob Environ Change 35:523–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fettig CJ, Gibson KE, Munson AS, Negrón JF (2014) Cultural practices for prevention and mitigation of mountain pine beetle infestations. For Sci 60:450–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint C, Qin H, Ganning JP (2012) Linking local perceptions to the biophysical and amenity contexts of forest disturbance in Colorado. Environ Manage 49:553–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman JF (2015) Black Hills forestry: a history. University Press of Colorado, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey UJ (2017) A synthesis of key factors for sustainability in social–ecological systems. Sustain Sci 12:507–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0395-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (2014) Political order and political decay: from the Industrial Revolution to the globalization of democracy. Farrar Straus, and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud R, Kumaraswamy A, Karnøe P (2010) Path dependence or path creation? J Manag Stud 47:760–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillette NE, Wood DL, Hines SJ et al (2014) The once and future forest: consequences of mountain pine beetle treatment decisions. For Sci 60:527–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosnell H, Kennedy RE, Harris T, Abrams J (2019) A land systems science approach to assessing forest governance and characterizing the emergence of social forestry in the Western Cascades of Oregon. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab666b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham RT, Asherin LA, Battaglia MA et al (2016) Mountain pine beetles: a century of knowledge, control attempts, and impacts central to the Black Hills. USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassel A (2010) Multi-level governance and organized interests. In: Enderlein H (ed) Handbook on multi-level governance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 153–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrfahrdt-Pähle E, Pahl-Wostl C (2012) Continuity and change in social-ecological systems: the role of institutional resilience. Ecol Soc 17(2):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoberg G (2001) The emerging triumph of ecosystem management: the transformation of federal forest policy. In: Davis C (ed) Environmental politics and western public lands. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 55–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntjens P, Lebel L, Pahl-Wostl C et al (2012) Institutional design propositions for the governance of adaptation to climate change in the water sector. Glob Environ Change 22:67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis DS, Kulakowski D (2015) Long-term history and synchrony of mountain pine beetle outbreaks in lodgepole pine forests. J Biogeogr 42:1029–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly EC, Charnley S, Pixley JT (2019) Polycentric systems for wildfire governance in the Western United States. Land Use Policy 89:104214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-006-0007-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koontz TM, Gupta D, Mudliar P, Ranjan P (2015) Adaptive institutions in social-ecological systems governance: a synthesis framework. Environ Sci Policy 53:139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laatsch J, Ma Z (2015) Strategies for incorporating climate change into public forest management. J For 113:335–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin K, Cashore B, Bernstein S, Auld G (2012) Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sci 45:123–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood M, Davidson J, Curtis A et al (2010) Governance principles for natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 23:986–1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802178214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan JA, Macfarlane WW, Willcox L (2010) Whitebark pine vulnerability to climate-driven mountain pine beetle disturbance in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Ecol Appl 20:895–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubell M (2015) Collaborative partnerships in complex institutional systems. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 12:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch BD (2012) Vulnerabilities, competition and rights in a context of climate change toward equitable water governance in Peru’s Rio Santa Valley. Glob Environ Change 22:364–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney J, Thelen K (2010a) A theory of gradual institutional change. In: Mahoney J, Thelen K (eds) Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney J, Thelen K (eds) (2010b) Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier C, Abrams JB (2018) Navigating social forestry—a street-level perspective on National Forest management in the US Pacific Northwest. Land Use Policy 70:432–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore M-L, Tjornbo O (2012) From coastal timber supply area to Great Bear Rainforest: exploring power in a social–ecological governance innovation. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05194-170426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris JL, Cottrell S, Fettig CJ et al (2018) Bark beetles as agents of change in social–ecological systems. Front Ecol Environ 16:S34–S43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moseley C, Charnley S (2014) Understanding micro-processes of institutionalization: stewardship contracting and national forest management. Policy Sci 47:69–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan DP (2008) Combining structural forms in the search for policy tools: incident command systems in U.S. crisis management. Governance 21:205–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00395.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naess LO, Bang G, Eriksen S, Vevatne J (2005) Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. Glob Environ Change 15:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negrón JF, Allen KK, Ambourn A et al (2017) Large-scale thinnings, ponderosa pine, and mountain pine beetle in the Black Hills, USA. For Sci 63:529–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19:354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Lebel L, Knieper C, Nikitina E (2012) From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: toward adaptive water governance in river basins. Environ Sci Policy 23:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson P, Skocpol T (2002) Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. In: Katznelson I, Milner HV (eds) Political science: the state of the discipline. W.W Norton and The American Political Science Association, New York, pp 693–721

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice EW, Qin H, Flint CG (2018) Mountain pine beetles and ecological imaginaries: the social construction of forest insect disturbance. In: Urquhart J, Marzano M, Potter C (eds) The human dimensions of forest and tree health: global perspectives. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 77–107

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raffa KF, Aukema BH, Bentz BJ et al (2008) Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: the dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. Bioscience 58:501–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romme WH, Knight DH, Yavitt JB (1986) Mountain pine beetle outbreaks in the Rocky Mountains: regulators of primary productivity? Am Nat 127:484–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safranyik L, Carroll AL, Régnière J et al (2010) Potential for range expansion of mountain pine beetle into the boreal forest of North America. Can Entomol 142:415–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambaraju KR, Carroll AL, Aukema BH (2019) Multiyear weather anomalies associated with range shifts by the mountain pine beetle preceding large epidemics. For Ecol Manag 438:86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sample VA, Halofsky JE, Peterson DL (2014) US strategy for forest management adaptation to climate change: building a framework for decision making. Ann For Sci 71:125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoon M (2013) Governance in transboundary conservation: how institutional structure and path dependence matter. Conserv Soc 11:420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz CA, Sisk TD, Noon BR, Nie MA (2013) Wildlife conservation planning under the United States Forest Service’s 2012 planning rule. J Wildl Manag 77:428–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinn JE (2016) Adaptive environmental governance of changing social-ecological systems: empirical insights from the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Glob Environ Change 40:50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Six DL, Biber E, Long E (2014) Management for mountain pine beetle outbreak suppression: does relevant science support current policy? Forests 5:103–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöstedt M (2015) Resilience revisited: taking institutional theory seriously. Ecol Soc 20:23. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08034-200423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spies TA, White EM, Kline JD et al (2014) Examining fire-prone forest landscapes as coupled human and natural systems. Ecol Soc 19:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steelman TA (2010) Implementing innovation: fostering enduring change in environmental and natural resource governance. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen-Adams MM, Abrams JB, Huber-Stearns HR et al (2020) Local-level emergence of network governance within the U.S. Forest Service: a case study of mountain pine beetle outbreak from Colorado, USA. For Policy Econ 118:102204 (in press)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens SL, Collins BM, Biber E, Fulé PZ (2016) US federal fire and forest policy: emphasizing resilience in dry forests. Ecosphere 7:e01584

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern MJ, Martin CA, Predmore SA, Morse WC (2014) Risk tradeoffs in adaptive ecosystem management: the case of the US Forest Service. Environ Manage 53:1095–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi K, Elmqvist T, Hatakeyama M et al (2014) Using sustainability science to analyse social–ecological restoration in NE Japan after the great earthquake and tsunami of 2011. Sustain Sci 9:513–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0257-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake TJ, Schultz CA (2017) Policy, practice, and partnerships for climate change adaptation on US national forests. Clim Change 144:257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn J, Cortner H (2005) George W. Bush’s healthy forests: reframing the environmental debate. University Press of Colorado, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellstead A, Rayner J, Howlett M (2014) Beyond the black box: forest sector vulnerability assessments and adaptation to climate change in North America. Environ Sci Policy 35:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RK (2006) Collaboration in context: rural change and community forestry in the Four Corners. Soc Nat Resour 19:53–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkel G (2014) When the pendulum doesn’t find its center: environmental narratives, strategies, and forest policy change in the US Pacific Northwest. Glob Environ Change 27:84–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise RM, Fazey I, Smith MS et al (2014) Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Glob Environ Change 28:325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyborn C, Yung L, Murphy D, Williams DR (2015) Situating adaptation: how governance challenges and perceptions of uncertainty influence adaptation in the Rocky Mountains. Reg Environ Change 15:669–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2013) Case study research: design and methods, 5th edn. Sage, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2002) The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. MIT press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank the interviewees in our case study geographies who generously contributed their time and insights to our work. Special thanks to Autumn Ellison for her contributions to the Montana case study. Thanks to Michael Coughlan for his work creating the Fig. 1 map.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant no. 1414041.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, 180 E. Green St, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Jesse Abrams

  2. Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, 180 E. Green St, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Jesse Abrams

  3. Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA

    Heidi Huber-Stearns, Michelle Steen-Adams & Cassandra Moseley

  4. U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR, USA

    Michelle Steen-Adams

  5. Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA

    Emily Jane Davis

  6. Department of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada

    Chris Bone

  7. Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA

    Michael F. Nelson

Authors
  1. Jesse Abrams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heidi Huber-Stearns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michelle Steen-Adams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Emily Jane Davis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chris Bone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael F. Nelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Cassandra Moseley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesse Abrams.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human Subjects Research and Informed Consent

The human subjects component of this research was approved and overseen by the University of Oregon Institutional Advisory Board, protocol no. 05152014.024. All participants provided their informed consent prior to the commencement of research activities.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handled by Eefje Cuppen, Universiteit Leiden Instituut Bestuurskunde, Netherlands.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abrams, J., Huber-Stearns, H., Steen-Adams, M. et al. Adaptive governance in a complex social-ecological context: emergent responses to a native forest insect outbreak. Sustain Sci 16, 53–68 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00843-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00843-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation