Farmers′ preferences for reductions in flood risk under monetary and non-monetary payment modes☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2019.100151Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Abstract

We use a split-sample choice experiment to investigate the effects of alternative payment modes on the purchase of flood insurance among smallholder irrigation farmers in Ghana. Results show that insurance up-take is lower for insurance premium payments required in labour than comparable premiums required in harvest and money. The marginal willingness-to-pay for a one-year reduction in flood frequency is about 6 h in labour time, 30 kg in rice and 144 Ghana Cedis (US$37) per annum. The price elasticities of demand for flood insurance indicate an inelastic demand for insurance premiums under these three payment modes. In addition to revealing strong preferences for flood risk reduction among farmers in this region, these results imply that subsidy policies may be inadequate in increasing the purchase of weather insurance under these three payment modes.

Keywords

Flood insurance
payment mode
choice experiment
and random-parameter error-components

JEL classification

C25
G22
O13
Q51
Q54

Cited by (0)

☆

Vondolia acknowledges a travel grant from Terje and Valerie Stalder Jacobsens Foundation at UiT- The Arctic University of Norway. We thank an anonymous reviewer and the editor for constructive comments and suggestions. We are also grateful to Emmanuel K. Adadey and Seth Vondolia for facilitating data collection in Ghana.

© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.