Skip to main content
Log in

Stub Column Tests of Cold-Formed Steel Built-Up Square Sections with Intermediate Stiffeners

  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

This paper describes the experimental and theoretical investigation on ultimate strength of cold-formed steel built-up square stub columns under axial compression. In total, fifteen stub columns were tested by varying the cross-sectional dimensions of specimens. Local buckling, distortion, and interaction of these buckling modes were observed. The strengths obtained from the experiment are compared to the design strengths calculated using the effective width method, which is a direct strength method in the North American Specification for cold-formed steel structures. It was observed that the effective width method conservatively predicted the strength of specimens. The reliability analysis was carried out to evaluate the appropriateness of the design standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. W. Yu, Cold-Formed Steel Design, John Wiley and Sons, New York (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Young and J. Chen, “Design of cold-formed steel built-up closed sections with intermediate stiffeners,” J. Struct. Eng., 134, No. 5, 727–737 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Chen, H. Yong, and W. L. Jin, “Stub column tests of thin-walled complex section with intermediate stiffeners,” Thin Wall. Struct., 48, 423–429 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Aruna, S. Sukumar, and V. Karthika, “Study on cold-formed steel built-up square sections with intermediate flange and web stiffeners,” Asian J. Civ. Eng.,16, 919–931 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Aruna, S. Sukumar, and V. Karthika, “Behaviour of cold-formed steel built-up closed columns composed by angle profiles,” Asian J. Civ. Eng.,20, 1037–1048 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. W. Schafer, “Review: The Direct Strength Method of cold formed steel member design,” J. Constr. Steel. Res., 64, 766–778 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Georgieva, L. Schueremans, L. Vandewalle, and L. Pyl, “Design of built-up cold-formed steel columns according to the direct strength method,” Procedia Eng., 40, 119–124 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. AISI S100-2007. North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members Specifications, American Iron and Steel Institute, Washington (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. IS 1608:1995. Mechanical Testing of Metals – Tensile Testing, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi (1995).

  10. AS/NZS 4600:2005. Cold-Formed Steel Structures, Australian/New Zealand Standard, Sydney–Wellington (2005).

  11. ASCE/SEI 7-05. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers Standard (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgment

The financial support of this research work by the Sona College of Technology, Salem, Tamilnadu, India, is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Aruna.

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Prochnosti, No. 1, pp. 117 – 127, March – April, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aruna, G. Stub Column Tests of Cold-Formed Steel Built-Up Square Sections with Intermediate Stiffeners. Strength Mater 52, 281–290 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-020-00176-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-020-00176-9

Keywords

Navigation