Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Implications of Bond-Slip in Inelastic Dynamic Responses of Degrading Structural Systems

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of bond-slip behavior, shown by pinched hysteretic curves in the inelastic response of degrading structural systems, is investigated in this paper. Inelastic response spectra are calculated and compared for deteriorating structures with and without manifestation of bond-slip. The response spectra are generated by using a smooth hysteretic model with distinct degrading parameters that are calibrated to the generic inelastic envelopes. In addition to the ductility demands, degraded residual strengths and stiffness of structural systems after an earthquake are considered as the relevant response measures. These measures can serve as design parameters for structures that should remain functional after an extreme event. Based on the response spectra analyses, it is found that nonlinear responses of degrading structural systems with bond-slip develop larger ductility demands and greater loss of strength and stiffness than the responses without bond-slip. Numerical results show that, ductility demand is increased up to 25–100% with consideration of slip in the model, as well as residual strength and stiffness decreased up to almost half.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feng Q, Visintin P, Oehlers DJ (2016) Deterioration of bond-slip due to corrosion of steel reinforcement in reinforced concrete. Mag Concr Res 68(15):768–781. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.15.00217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ni X, Cao S, Li Y, Liang S (2019) Stiffness degradation of shear walls under cyclic loading: experimental study and modelling. Bull Earthq Eng 17(9):5183–5216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00682-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pu W, Wu X, Kasai K (2018) Estimation of the displacement of viscously damped pinching hysteretic structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. J Earthq Eng 22(1):172–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1217809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martinelli E, Falcone R, Faella C (2017) Inelastic design spectra based on the actual dissipative capacity of the hysteretic response. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 97:101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lumantarna E, Lam N, Wilson J, Griffith M (2010) Inelastic displacement demand of strength-degraded structures. J Earthq Eng 14(4):487–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460903336910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Athanatopoulou AM, Manoukas GE, Throumoulopoulos A (2016) Parametric study of inelastic seismic response of reinforced concrete frame buildings. In: Zembaty Z, De Stefano M (eds) Seismic behaviour and design of irregular and complex civil structures, vol II. Springer, Cham, pp 171–180

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdelnaby AE, Elnashai AS (2014) Performance of degrading reinforced concrete frame systems under the Tohoku and Christchurch earthquake sequences. J Earthq Eng 18(7):1009–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2014.923796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Badri RK, Moghadam AS, Nekooei M (2016) The influence of deterioration parameters on the response of low-rise symmetric and asymmetric RC buildings. Int J Civ Eng 14(8):547–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0038-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ergun S, Demir A (2015) Effect of hysteretic models on seismic behavior of existing RC structures. J Perform Constr Facil 29(6):04014160. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeynalian M, Ronagh HR, Dux P (2012) Analytical description of pinching, degrading, and sliding in a bilinear hysteretic system. J Eng Mech 138(11):1381–1387. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Erberik MA, Sucuoğlu H, Acun B (2012) Inelastic displacement response of RC systems with cyclic deterioration—an energy approach. J Earthq Eng 16(7):937–962. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2012.685210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li G, Yu L, Dong Z (2019) Simplified collapse analysis model for RC frames with cyclic deterioration behaviors. J Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1700849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li C, Kunnath S, Zhai C (2018) Influence of early-arriving pulse-like ground motions on ductility demands of single-degree-of-freedom systems. J Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1466744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vahdani R, Gerami M, Vaseghi-Nia MA (2019) The spectra of relative input energy per unit mass of structure for iranian earthquakes. Int J Civ Eng 17(7):1183–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0377-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahboubi S, Shiravand MR (2019) Proposed input energy-based damage index for RC bridge piers. J Bridge Eng 24(1):04018103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu B, Yang L, Li B (2015) P-Δ effect on probabilistic ductility demand and cumulative dissipated energy of hysteretic system under bidirectional seismic excitations. J Eng Mech 141(4):04014141. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ou Y-C, Song J, Wang P-H, Adidharma L, Chang K-C, Lee GC (2014) Ground motion duration effects on hysteretic behavior of reinforced concrete bridge columns. J Struct Eng 140(3):04013065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heidari A, Pahlavan Sadegh S, Raeisi J (2019) Investigating the effect of soil type on non-linear response spectrum using wavelet theory. Int J Civ Eng 17(12):1909–1918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00394-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Katsanos EI, Sextos AG (2015) Inelastic spectra to predict period elongation of structures under earthquake loading. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(11):1765–1782. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zeynalian M, Mokhtari M (2018) A new displacement-control analytical hysteresis model for structural systems. Int J Civ Eng 16(6):671–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0139-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu Y, Kang D, Gao L, Su Y, Yang Y (2018) Seismic behavior of bolted endplate connection between steel reinforced concrete (SRC) wall and SRC beam for use in high-rise buildings. Int J Civ Eng 16(11):1561–1572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0296-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ASCE/SEI-41-06 (2007) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Structural Engineering Institute, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. FEMA-P440A (2009) Effects of strength and stiffness degradation on seismic response. Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP), New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sivaselvan MV, Reinhorn AM (2000) Hysteretic models for deteriorating inelastic structures. J Eng Mech 126(6):633–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ray T, Reinhorn A (2012) Enhanced smooth hysteretic model with degrading properties. Journal of Structural Engineering 140 (1)

  26. Ray T (2013) Modeling of multidimensional nonlinear elastic and inelastic structural systems. Ph.D., University at Buffalo, SUNY

  27. Park YJ, Reinhorn AM, Kunnath SK (1987) IDARC: inelastic damage analysis of reinforced concrete frame-shear-wall structures. Technical report NCEER, vol NCEER-87-0008. University at Buffalo, SUNY

  28. Khoeilar AR, Zirakian T, Boyajian D, Maalouf S, Dermendjian N (2015) Case study on retrofit of steel plate shear walls using low yield point steel infill plates. J Steel Struct Constr 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-0437.1000106

  29. Essa ASAT, Badr MRK, El-Zanaty AH (2014) Effect of infill wall on the ductility and behavior of high strength reinforced concrete frames. HBRC J 10(3):258–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li M, Lam F (2015) Lateral behavior of cross laminated timber shear walls under reversed cyclic loads. In: Tenth pacific conference on earthquake engineering, Sydney

  31. Reinhorn AM, Barron R, Sivaselan MV, Ray T (2012) NSPECTRA Ver 3.0. http://civil.eng.buffalo.edu/nspectra

  32. Ramirez OM, Constantinou MC, Whittaker AS, Kircher CA, Chrysostomou CZ (2002) Elastic and inelastic seismic response of buildings with damping systems. Earthq Spectra 18(3):531–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. NEHRP (2000) NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, Report nos. FEMA 368 and 369. Bulding Seismic Safety Council, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

  34. Pavlou EA, Constantinou MC (2004) Response of elastic and inelastic structures with damping systems to near-field and soft-soil ground motions. Eng Struct 26(9):1217–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mohammad AF, Faggella M, Gigliotti R, Spacone E (2018) Effects of bond-slip and masonry infills interaction on seismic performance of older R/C frame structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 109:251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.02.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, New Mexico State University, 3035 South Espina Street, 211 Hernandez Hall, Las Cruces, NM, 88003, USA

    Nabila Sultana & Tathagata Ray

Authors
  1. Nabila Sultana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tathagata Ray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tathagata Ray.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sultana, N., Ray, T. Implications of Bond-Slip in Inelastic Dynamic Responses of Degrading Structural Systems. Int J Civ Eng 18, 1039–1052 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00522-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00522-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation