Skip to main content
Log in

Porosity and permeability of the overburden from wireline logs: a case study from offshore Malaysia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the framework of a \({{\hbox {CO}}}_{2}\) storage feasibility study, we evaluate porosity and permeability of shale formations constituting the overburden of a hydrocarbon reservoir, where the gas is stored. These properties are required to perform fluid-flow simulations and analyze possible leakages from the reservoir to the surface. In this process, calibration with well logs is essential. Standard log-interpretation procedures on shales may induce errors, since the shale part is discarded due to its apparent negligible permeability compared to the clastic part. In this study, it is the “shale effect” that we consider by introducing its contribution to porosity and therefore to permeability, so that new expressions are developed to obtain porosity from density and traveltimes that consider this effect. Indeed, shales have non-zero porosity and finite permeability even if the flow rates are several orders of magnitude smaller than those in sandstones. Moreover, calibration does not mean to honour one single log profile but the interpretation should be compatible with all the profiles available. We obtain clay content, porosity and permeability from two wells offshore Malaysia using the linear and Stieber relations between gamma ray and shale volume. The results of using these relations are quite similar. However, the analysis shows that the density logs yield too small values of porosity. Instead, the sonic log gives a better estimate of porosity that honours the P-wave velocity. The verification is performed by using the Krief–Gassmann equations to obtain the P-wave velocity, either from the density-log or from sonic-log derived porosities. This is also confirmed by comparison to porosity obtained from the neutron log.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Backeberg NR, Iacoviello F, Rittner M, Mitchell TM, Jones AP, Day R, Wheeler J, Shearing PR, Vermeesch P, Striolo A (2017) Quantifying the anisotropy and tortuosity of permeable pathways in clay-rich mudstones using models based on X-ray tomography. Sci Rep 7:14838. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14810-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown K, Whittaker S, Wilson M, Srisang W, Smithson H, Tontiwachwuthikul P (2017) The history and development of the IEA GHG Weyburn-Midale CO2 monitoring and storage project in Saskatchewan, Canada (the world largest CO2 for EOR and CCS program). Petroleum 3:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch A, Bertier P, Gensterblum Y, Rother G, Spiers CJ, Zhang M, Wentinck HJM (2016) On sorption and swelling of CO\(_2\) in clays. Geomech Geophys Geo-energ Geo-resour 2(2):111–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Carcione JM (2014) Wave fields in real media. Theory and numerical simulation of wave propagation in anisotropic, anelastic, porous and electromagnetic media, Elsevier (Third edition, extended and revised)

  • Carcione JM, Gurevich B, Cavallini F (2000) A generalized Biot–Gassmann model for the acoustic properties of shaley sandstones. Geophys Prosp 48:539–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carcione JM, Picotti S, Gei D, Rossi G (2006) Physics and seismic modeling for monitoring CO2 storage. Pure Appl. Geophys. 163:175–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carcione JM, Gei D, Yu T, Ba J (2018) Effect of clay and mineralogy on permeability. Geophys Pure Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02117-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman PC (1961) L’ écoulement des gaz á travers les milieux poreux, Bibliothéque des Sciences et Techniques Nucléaires, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

  • Clavier C, Hoyle W, Meunier D (1971) Quantitative interpretation of thermal neutron decay time logs: Part I. Fundamentals and techniques. J Pet Technol 23:743–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain ER (2018) Crain’s petrophysical handbook. www.spec2000.net

  • Ellis DV, Singer JM (2008) Well logging for earth scientists. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang Y, Wang C, Elsworth D, Ishibashi T (2017) Seismicity-permeability coupling in the behavior of gas shales, CO\(_2\) storage and deep geothermal energy. Geomech Geophys Geo-energ Geo-resour. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-017-0051-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Janjuhah HT, Salim AMA, Ghosh DG (2017) Sedimentology and reservoir geometry of the Miocene carbonate deposits in Central Luconia, Offshore, Sarawak, Malaysia. J Appl Sci 17(4):153–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozeny J (1927) Über kapillare leitung desWassers im Boden: Sitzungsberichte derWienerAkademie desWissenschaften 136:271–306

  • Kuila U, Prasad M (2013) Specific surface area and pore-size distribution in clays and shales. Geophys Prosp 61:341–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larionov VV (1969) Radiometry of boreholes (in Russian). NEDRA, Moscow

  • Masoudi R, Jalil MAA, Press D, Lee K-H, Phuat C, Anis L, Darman N, Othman M (2011) An integrated reservoir simulation-geomechanical study of feasibility of CO2 storage in M4 carbonate reservoir, Malaysia, International Petroleum Technology ConferenceIPTC 15029

  • Ngo VT, Lu VD, Le VM (2018) A comparison of permeability prediction methods using core analysis data for sandstone and carbonate reservoirs. Geomech Geophys Geo-energ Geo-resour 4(2):129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picotti S, Carcione JM, Gei D, Rossi G, Santos JE (2012) Seismic modeling to monitor CO2 geological storage—the Atzbach-Schwanenstadt gas field. J Geophysics Res Solid Earth 117(6):B06103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picotti S, Carcione JM, Ba J (2018) Rock-physics templates for seismic \(Q\). Geophysics 84(1):MR13–MR23

    Google Scholar 

  • Savioli GB, Santos JE, Carcione JM, Gei D (2016) A model for CO2 storage and seismic monitoring combining multiphase fluid flow and wave propagation simulators. The Sleipner-field case. Comput Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-016-9607-y

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Singh KK, Singh DN, Ranjith PG (2015) Laboratory simulation of flow through single fractured granite. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:987–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieber SJ (1970) Pulsed neutron capture log evaluation—Louisiana Gulf Coast: Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Fall Meeting Proceedings, SPE 2961

  • Tiab D, Donaldson EC (2012) Petrophysics. Theory and practice of measuring reservoir rock and fluid transport properties, 3rd edn. Gulf Professional Publishing

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Petronas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José M. Carcione.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carcione, J.M., Gei, D., Picotti, S. et al. Porosity and permeability of the overburden from wireline logs: a case study from offshore Malaysia. Geomech. Geophys. Geo-energ. Geo-resour. 6, 48 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-020-00172-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-020-00172-y

Keywords

Navigation