Skip to main content
Log in

Centaur and giant planet crossing populations: origin and distribution

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current giant planet region is a transitional zone where transneptunian objects (TNOs) cross in their way to becoming Jupiter Family Comets. Their dynamical behavior is conditioned by the intrinsic dynamical features of TNOs and also by the encounters with the giant planets. We address the Giant Planet Crossing (GPC) population (those objects with 5.2 au \(< q < 30\,\hbox {au}\)) studying their number and their evolution from their sources, considering the current configuration of the Solar system. This subject is reviewed from previous investigations and also addressed by new numerical simulations of the dynamical evolution of scattered disk objects (SDOs). We obtain a model of the intrinsic orbital element distribution of GPCs. The Scattered Disk represents the main source of prograde GPCs and Centaurs, while the contribution from Plutinos lies between one and two orders of magnitude below that from the SD. We obtain the number and size distribution of GPCs from our model, computing 9600 GPCs from the SD with \(D > 100\,\hbox {km}\) and \(\sim 10^8\) with \(D > 1\,\hbox {km}\) in the current population. The contribution from other sources is considered negligible. The mean lifetime in the Centaur zone is 7.2 Myr, while the mean lifetime of SDOs in the GPC zone is of 68 Myr. The latter is dependent on the initial inclination, being the ones with high inclinations the ones that survive the longest in the GPC zone. There is also a correlation of lifetime with perihelion distance, where greater perihelion leads to longer lifetime. The dynamical evolution of observed GPCs is different for prograde and retrograde objects. Retrograde GPCs have lower median lifetime than prograde ones, thus experiencing a comparatively faster evolution. However, it is probable that this faster evolution is due to the fact that the majority of retrograde GPCs have low perihelion values and then, lower lifetimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support given by IALP, CONICET and of Agencia de Promoción Científica and also the FCAGLP for extensive use of their computing facilities. We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their detailed comments and suggestions which helped us to significantly improve this article, and also Tabaré Gallardo for valuable discussion about encounter conditions and Opik encounter probability.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romina P. Di Sisto.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection on Trans-Neptunian Objects.

Guest Editors: David Nesvorny and Alessandra Celletti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Sisto, R.P., Rossignoli, N.L. Centaur and giant planet crossing populations: origin and distribution. Celest Mech Dyn Astr 132, 36 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-020-09971-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-020-09971-7

Keywords

Navigation