Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

When farmers are pulled in too many directions: comparing institutional drivers of food safety and environmental sustainability in California agriculture

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aspirations to farm ‘better’ may fall short in practice due to constraints outside of farmers’ control. Yet farmers face proliferating pressures to adopt practices that align with various societal visions of better agriculture. What happens when the accumulation of external pressures overwhelms farm management capacity? Or, worse, when different visions of better agriculture pull farmers toward conflicting management paradigms? This article addresses these questions by comparing the institutional manifestations of two distinct societal obligations placed on California fruit and vegetable farmers: to practice sustainable agriculture and to ensure food safety. Drawing on the concept of constrained choice, I define and utilize a framework for comparison comprising five types of institutions that shape farm management decisions: rules and standards, market and supply chain forces, legal liability, social networks and norms, and scientific knowledge and available technologies. Several insights emerge. One, farmers are expected to meet multiple societal obligations concurrently; when facing a “right-versus-right” choice, farmers are likely to favor the more feasible course within structural constraints. Second, many institutions are designed to pursue narrow or siloed objectives; policy interventions that aim to shift farming practice should thus anticipate and address potential conflicts among institutions with diverging aspirations. Third, farms operating at different scales may face distinct institutional drivers in some cases, but not others, due to differential preferences for universal versus place-specific policies. These insights suggest that policy interventions should engage not just farmers, but also the intersecting institutions that drive or constrain their farm management choices. As my framework demonstrates, complementing the concept of constrained choice with insights from institutional theory can more precisely reveal the dimensions and mechanisms that bound farmer agency and shape farm management paradigms. Improved understanding of these structures, I suggest, may lead to novel opportunities to transform agriculture through institutional designs that empower, rather than constrain, farmer choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An illustrative example is provided by Liu et al.’s (2018) review on adoption of Best Management Practices. Out of 121 peer reviewed papers, the authors identified only 7 that addressed “macro factors”, including just 2 that directly evaluated the “roles of policies, markets, business, or agencies,” and concluded that such factors are “rarely investigated.”.

  2. On the types of ethical problems that may occur in agriculture, see James (2003).

  3. The literature on the role of standards—and the various systems through which compliance with standards is monitored and approved—in shaping food systems and value chains is both deeper and more wide-ranging than can be fully addressed here. For the purposes of this framework, I focus on standards through a regulatory lens. However, it should be noted that standards may also operate at normative and cultural-cognitive levels, inasmuch as they “reflect much more fundamental social/technical relations that are essential to the establishment and regulation of social and ethical behavior in capitalist markets” (Busch 2000). See also Busch (2020), Hatanaka and Busch (2008), Hatanaka et al. (2012), and Verbruggen and Havinga (2017).

Abbreviations

CDC:

US Centers for Disease Control

CDFA:

California Department of Food and Agriculture

FDA:

US Food and Drug Administration

FSMA:

US Food Safety Modernization Act

LGMA:

Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement

USDA:

US Department of Agriculture

References

  • Ahnström, Johan, Jenny Höckert, Hanna L. Bergeå, Charles A. Francis, Peter Skelton, and Lars Hallgren. 2009. Farmers and nature conservation: What is known about attitudes, context factors and actions affecting conservation? Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 24: 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170508002391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, Miguel A. 2009. Agroecology, small farms, and food sovereignty. Monthly Review 61 (3): 102–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, Miguel A. 2018. Berkeley: The betrayal of an agricultural legacy. Food First. https://foodfirst.org/betrayalofanagriculturallegacy/. Accessed 18 Oct 2019.

  • Altieri, Miguel A., Peter M. Rosset, and Clara I. Nicholls. 1997. Biological control and agricultural modernization: Towards resolution of some contradictions. Agriculture and Human Values 14: 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007499401616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Colin Ray, Janneke Bruil, Michael Jahi Chappell, Csilla Kiss, and Michel Patrick Pimbert. 2019. From transition to domains of transformation: Getting to sustainable and just food systems through agroecology. Sustainability 11 (19): 5272. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Molly. 2019. The importance of vision in food system transformation. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 9: 55–60. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2019.09A.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, Rachel. 2014. Farmers’ guide to reducing the legal risks of a food safety incident. Farm Commons. https://farmcommons.org/resources/farmers-guide-reducing-legal-risks-food-safety-incident. Accessed 16 June 2020.

  • Ayars, J.E., A. Fulton, and B. Taylor. 2015. Subsurface drip irrigation in California—Here to stay? Agricultural Water Management 157: 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Christopher M., Christy Getz, Sibella Kraus, Maywa Montenegro, and Kaelin Holland. 2012. The social dimensions of sustainability and change in diversified farming systems. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-05226-170441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, Carmen, Elizabeth Ransom, and Vaughan Higgins. 2013. Private agri-food standards: Contestation, hybridity and the politics of standards. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 20: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, A.P., L. Toma, J. Willock, and C. Hall. 2013. Comparing a “budge” to a “nudge”: Farmer responses to voluntary and compulsory compliance in a water quality management regime. Journal of Rural Studies 32: 448–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartel, Robyn, and Elaine Barclay. 2011. Motivational postures and compliance with environmental law in Australian agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies 27: 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batie, Sandra S. 2009. Green payments and the US Farm Bill: information and policy challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1890/080004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battershill, Martin R.J., and Andrew W. Gilg. 1997. Socio-economic constraints and environmentally friendly farming in the Southwest of England. Journal of Rural Studies 13: 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(96)00002-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, Julie. 2006. Agency and institutions: the enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization 13 (5): 653–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508406067008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, Julie, and Silvia Dorado. 2010. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal 53 (6): 1419–1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgart-Getz, Adam, Linda Stalker Prokopy, and Kristin Floress. 2012. Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature. Journal of Environmental Management 96: 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baur, Patrick, Laura Driscoll, Sasha Gennet, and Daniel S. Karp. 2016. Inconsistent food safety pressures complicate environmental conservation for California produce growers. California Agriculture 70: 142–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baur, Patrick, Christy Getz, and Jennifer Sowerwine. 2017. Contradictions, consequences and the human toll of food safety culture. Agriculture and Human Values 34: 713–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9772-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beretti, Melanie, and Diana Stuart. 2008. Food safety and environmental quality impose conflicting demands on Central Coast growers. California Agriculture 62: 68–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, Jogn C., and Terence J. Centner. 1989. Agricultural nuisances and right to farm laws: Implications of changing liability rules. The Review of Regional Studies 19: 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, Daniel, Allison Borchers, and Todd Hubbs. 2016. U.S. farmland ownership, tenure, and transfer. EIB-161. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

  • Brennan, Eric B., and Richard F. Smith. 2005. Winter cover crop growth and weed suppression on the central coast of California. Weed Technology 19: 1017–1024. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-04-246R1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Eric B., and Richard F. Smith. 2017. Cover crop frequency and compost effects on a legume–rye cover crop during eight years of organic vegetables. Agronomy Journal 109: 2199–2213. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2016.06.0354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broad Leib, Emily M., and Margot J. Pollans. 2019. The new food safety. California Law Review 107: 1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodt, Sonja, Karen Klonsky, Louise Jackson, and Stephen B. Brush, and Sean Smukler. 2009. Factors affecting adoption of hedgerows and other biodiversity-enhancing features on farms in California, USA. Agroforestry Systems 76: 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9168-8.

  • Brodt, Sonja, Karen Klonsky, and Laura Tourte. 2006. Farmer goals and management styles: Implications for advancing biologically based agriculture. Agricultural Systems 89: 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Sandy, and Christy Getz. 2008. Towards domestic fair trade? Farm labor, food localism, and the ‘family scale’ farm. GeoJournal 73: 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-008-9192-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, William Paul. 1988. Private interests, public policy, and American agriculture. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, Daniel, Christina Getz, and Julie Guthman. 1997. From farm to table: The organic vegetable commodity chain of northern California. Sociologia Ruralis 37: 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, Lawrence. 2000. The moral economy of grades and standards. Journal of Rural Studies 16: 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(99)00061-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, Lawrence. 2007. Performing the economy, performing science: from neoclassical to supply chain models in the agrifood sector. Economy and Society 36: 437–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140701428399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, Lawrence. 2020. Contested terrain: The ongoing struggles over food labels, standards and standards for labels. In Labelling the economy: Qualities and values in contemporary markets, ed. Brice Laurent and Alexandre Mallard, 33–58. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978–981–15–1498–2_2.

  • Buzby, Jean C., and Paul D. Frenzen. 1999. Food safety and product liability. Food Policy 24: 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(99)00070-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzby, Jean C., Paul D. Frenzen, and Barbara Rasco. 2001. Product liability and food safety: The resolution of food poisoning lawsuits. In Interdisciplinary food safety research, ed. Neal H. Hooker and Elsa A. Murano, 232. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420039092-11.

  • Calo, Adam. 2018. How knowledge deficit interventions fail to resolve beginning farmer challenges. Agriculture and Human Values 35: 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9832-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calo, Adam, and Kathryn Teigen De Master. 2016. After the incubator: Factors impeding land access along the path from farmworker to proprietor. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 6: 111–127. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2016.062.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvin, Linda. 2007. Outbreak linked to spinach forces reassessment of food safety practices. Amber Waves 5: 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, Liz. 2014. Diversity, flexibility, and the resilience effect: Lessons from a social-ecological case study of diversified farming in the northern Great Plains, USA. Ecology and Society 19 (3): 45. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06736-190345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, Liz, Maywa Montenegro de Wit, Marcia S. DeLonge, Adam Calo, Christy Getz, Joanna Ory, Katherine Munden-Dixon, et al. 2019a. Securing the future of US agriculture: The case for investing in new entry sustainable farmers. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 7: 17. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.356.

  • Carlisle, Liz, Maywa Montenegro de Wit, Marcia S. DeLonge, Alastair Iles, Adam Calo, Christy Getz, Joanna Ory, et al. 2019b. Transitioning to sustainable agriculture requires growing and sustaining an ecologically skilled workforce. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellari, Elena, Claudio Soregaroli, Thomas J. Venus, and Justus Wesseler. 2018. Food processor and retailer non-GMO standards in the US and EU and the driving role of regulations. Food Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.02.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • [CDC] US Centers for Disease Control. 2006. Multistate outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 infections linked to fresh spinach (FINAL UPDATE). https://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2006/spinach-10-2006.html. 16 June 2020.

  • [CDC] US Centers for Disease Control. 2012. Multistate Outbreak of Listeriosis Linked to Whole Cantaloupes from Jensen Farms, Colorado (FINAL UPDATE). https://www.cdc.gov/listeria/outbreaks/cantaloupes-jensen-farms/. Accessed 16 June 2020.

  • [CDFA] California Department of Food and Agriculture. 2020. Healthy soils program. The Office of Environmental Farming and Innovation. https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/oefi/healthysoils/. Accessed 16 June 2020.

  • Claassen, Roger, Andrea Cattaneo, and Robert Johansson. 2008. Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice. Ecological Economics 65: 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coglianese, Cary, and David Lazer. 2003. Management-based regulation: Prescribing private management to achieve public goals. Law & Society Review 37: 691–730. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0023-9216.2003.03703001.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constance, Douglas H. 2009. 2008 AFHVS presidential address. Agriculture and Human Values 26: 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-008-9187-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constance, Douglas H., Jin Young Choi, and Holly Lyke-Ho-Gland. 2008. Conventionalization, bifurcation, and quality of life: certified and non-certified organic farmers in Texas. Southern Rural Sociology 23: 208–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Craig. 2007. US Agriculture conservation policy and programs: History, trends, and implications. In US Agricultural Policy and the 2007 Farm Bill, ed. Kaush Arha, Barton H. Thompson, Tim Josling, and Daniel A. Sumner, 113–146. Stanford, CA: Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University.

  • Crohn, David M., and Mary L. Bianchi. 2008. Research priorities for coordinating management of food safety and water quality. Journal of Environmental Quality 37: 1411–1418. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, Graeme S., David H.M. Cumming, and Charles L. Redman. 2006. Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: Causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecology and Society 11 (1): 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarnezki, Jason J., Margot J. Pollans, and Sarah Main. 2018. Eco-Labeling. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3230440. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. 10.2139/ssrn.3230440.

  • Davies, Ben B., and Ian D. Hodge. 2006. Farmers’ preferences for new environmental policy instruments: Determining the acceptability of cross compliance for biodiversity benefits. Journal of Agricultural Economics 57: 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00057.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Keuckelaere, Ann, Liesbeth Jacxsens, Philip Amoah, Gertjan Medema, Peter McClure, Lee-Ann Jaykus, and Mieke Uyttendaele. 2015. Zero risk does not exist: Lessons learned from microbial risk assessment related to use of water and safety of fresh produce. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLind, Laura B., and Philip H. Howard. 2008. Safe at any scale? Food scares, food regulation, and scaled alternatives. Agriculture and Human Values 25: 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-007-9112-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doremus, Holly. 2003. A policy portfolio approach to biodiversity protection on private lands. Environmental Science & Policy 6: 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00036-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doremus, Holly. 2010. The Endangered Species Act: Static law meets dynamic world new directions in environmental law. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy 32: 175–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, Brian M., Daniel Press, and Marc Los Huertos. 2008. Agricultural nonpoint source water pollution policy: The case of California’s Central Coast. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 128: 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.05.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drevno, Ann. 2016. Governing water quality in California’s Central Coast: The case of the conditional agricultural waiver. Journal of Science Policy & Governance 8 (1).

  • Drevno, Ann. 2018. Central Coast growers’ trust in water quality regulatory process needs rebuilding. California Agriculture 72: 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, Alison J., Paul H. Zedler, Jeb A. Barzen, and Deana L. Knuteson. 2017. The Capacity-Building Stewardship Model: assessment of an agricultural network as a mechanism for improving regional agroecosystem sustainability. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09146-220145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, Antoinette M., and Philippe V. Baret. 2017. Why working conditions are a key issue of sustainability in agriculture? A comparison between agroecological, organic and conventional vegetable systems. Journal of Rural Studies 56: 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, Dan. 2013. FDA: Criminal case shows food safety is paramount. USA Today, September 27.

  • [FDA] US Food and Drug Administration. 2011. Fresh Strawberries From Washington County Farm Implicated In E. coli O157 Outbreak In NW Oregon. Recall -- State / Local Press Release. https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm267667.htm. Accessed on 19 January 2017.

  • Feola, G., A.M. Lerner, M. Jain, M.J.F. Montefrio, and K.A. Nicholas. 2015. Researching farmer behaviour in climate change adaptation and sustainable agriculture: Lessons learned from five case studies. Journal of Rural Studies 39: 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.03.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbach, Kelly, and Rachael Freeman Long. 2017. Determinants of field edge habitat restoration on farms in California’s Sacramento Valley. Journal of Environmental Management 189: 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Martinez, Marian, Andrew Fearne, Julie A. Caswell, and Spencer Henson. 2007. Co-regulation as a possible model for food safety governance: Opportunities for public–private partnerships. Food Policy 32: 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Martinez, Marian, Paul Verbruggen, and Andrew Fearne. 2013. Risk-based approaches to food safety regulation: What role for co-regulation? Journal of Risk Research 16: 1101–1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2012.743157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gennet, Sasha, Jeanette Howard, Jeff Langholz, Kathryn Andrews, Mark D. Reynolds, and Scott A. Morrison. 2013. Farm practices for food safety: An emerging threat to floodplain and riparian ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1890/120243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, J.R. 2011. Conventionalization, civic engagement, and the sustainability of organic agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies 27: 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. 2003. The quality “turn” and alternative food practices: reflections and agenda. Journal of Rural Studies 19: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00043-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubernot, Diane, Marianne Fatica, Cerise Robinson, Sheila Merriweather, Tami Cloyd, and Gary Weber. 2016. A summary of foodborne illness outbreaks investigated by FDA’s coordinated outbreak response and evaluation network, August 2011 to December 2015. In International Association for Food Protection 2016 Annual Meeting. St. Louis, MI. https://iafp.confex.com/iafp/2016/webprogram/Paper11553.html. Accessed on 21 July 2016.

  • Guthman, Julie. 2004. The trouble with ‘organic lite’ in California: a rejoinder to the ‘conventionalisation’ debate. Sociologia Ruralis 44: 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00277.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, Julie. 2016. Going both ways: More chemicals, more organics, and the significance of land in post-methyl bromide fumigation decisions for California’s strawberry industry. Journal of Rural Studies 47: 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, Julie. 2017. Life itself under contract: rent-seeking and biopolitical devolution through partnerships in California’s strawberry industry. The Journal of Peasant Studies 44: 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1217843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez-Rodriguez, E., and A. Adhikari. 2018. Preharvest farming practices impacting fresh produce safety. Microbiology Spectrum. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.PFS-0022-2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Jill Lindsey, and Christy Getz. 2015. Farm size and job quality: Mixed-methods studies of hired farm work in California and Wisconsin. Agriculture and Human Values 32: 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9575-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, John. 2018. New idea in soil health: Pay farmers for their actions. Western FarmPress, March 20. https://www.westernfarmpress.com/land-management/new-idea-soil-health-pay-farmers-their-actions. Accessed 26 Mar 2018.

  • Hassanein, Neva. 2011. Matters of scale and the politics of the Food Safety Modernization Act. Agriculture and Human Values 28: 577–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-011-9338-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka, Maki, and Lawrence Busch. 2008. Third-party certification in the global agrifood system: An objective or socially mediated governance mechanism? Sociologia Ruralis 48: 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00453.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka, Maki, Jason Konefal, and Douglas H. Constance. 2012. A tripartite standards regime analysis of the contested development of a sustainable agriculture standard. Agriculture and Human Values 29: 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-011-9329-7.

  • Havinga, Tetty. 2006. Private Regulation of Food Safety by Supermarkets. Law & Policy 28: 515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2006.00237.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimlich, Ralph E., and Roger Claassen. 1998. Agricultural conservation policy at a crossroads. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 27: 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500001738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henao, Olga L., Timothy F. Jones, Duc J. Vugia, and Patricia M. Griffin. 2015. Foodborne diseases active surveillance network—2 decades of achievements, 1996–2015. Emerging Infectious Diseases 21: 1529–1536. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2109.150581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, Mary K., and Harvey S. James. 2005. The ethics of constrained choice: How the industrialization of agriculture impacts farming and farmer behavior. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18: 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-0631-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, Mary K., and Harvey S. James. 2016. Power, fairness and constrained choice in agricultural markets: A synthesizing framework. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29: 945–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-016-9641-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henke, Christopher. 2008. Cultivating science, harvesting power: Science and industrial agriculture in California. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, Vaughan, Jacqui Dibden, and Chris Cocklin. 2008a. Building alternative agri-food networks: Certification, embeddedness and agri-environmental governance. Journal of Rural Studies 24: 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, Vaughan, Jacqui Dibden, and Chris Cocklin. 2008b. Neoliberalism and natural resource management: Agri-environmental standards and the governing of farming practices. Geoforum 39: 1776–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, Vaughan, Melanie Bryant, Marta Hernández-Jover, Connar McShane, and Luzia Rast. 2016. Harmonising devolved responsibility for biosecurity governance: The challenge of competing institutional logics. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48 (6): 1133–1151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16633471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Philip H. 2016. Concentration and power in the food system: Who controls what we eat? Contemporary food studies: Economy, culture and politics. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

  • Hughes, Thomas. 1987. The evolution of large technological systems. In The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of Technology, ed. Wiebe Bijker, Thomas Hughes, and Trevor Pinch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Huttunen, Suvi. 2019. Revisiting agricultural modernisation: Interconnected farming practices driving rural development at the farm level. Journal of Rural Studies 71: 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.09.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • [IPES-Food] International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems. 2016. From uniformity to diversity: A paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agroecological systems. International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems.

  • [IPES-Food] International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems. 2017. Too big to feed: Exploring the impacts of mega-mergers, concentration and concentration of power in the agri-food sector. International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems.

  • James, Harvey S. 2003. On Finding Solutions to Ethical Problems in Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16: 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026371324639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, Harvey S., and Mary K. Hendrickson. 2008. Perceived economic pressures and farmer ethics. Agricultural Economics 38: 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00305.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaine, Geoff, Justine Young, Ruth Lourey, and Suzie Greenhalgh. 2017. Policy choice framework: Guiding policy makers in changing farmer behavior. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09135-220202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karp, Daniel S., Patrick Baur, Edward R. Atwill, Kathryn De Master, Sasha Gennet, Alastair Iles, Joanna L. Nelson, Amber R. Sciligo, and Claire Kremen. 2015. The unintended ecological and social impacts of food safety regulations in California’s Central Coast Region. BioScience 65: 1173–1183. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karp, Daniel S., Sasha Gennet, Christopher Kilonzo, Melissa Partyka, Nicolas Chaumont, Edward R. Atwill, and Claire Kremen. 2015. Comanaging fresh produce for nature conservation and food safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112: 11126–11131. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508435112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karp, Daniel S., Rebekah Moses, Sasha Gennet, Matthew S. Jones, Shimat Joseph, Leithen K. M’Gonigle, Lauren C. Ponisio, William E. Snyder, and Claire Kremen. 2016. Agricultural practices for food safety threaten pest control services for fresh produce. Journal of Applied Ecology 100000: 10000. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, Christopher R. 1994. Agricultural production contracts: Drafting considerations. Hamline Law Review 18: 397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klonsky, Karen, and Catherine Greene. 2005. Widespread adoption of organic agriculture in the US: Are market-driven policies enough? In American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, July 24–27. Providence, RI. Selected Paper 132570. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.19382.

  • Kloppenburg, Jr., Jack, Sharon Lezberg, Kathryn De Master, George Stevenson, and John Hendrickson. 2000. Tasting food, tasting sustainability: Defining the attributes of an alternative food system with competent, Ordinary people. Human Organization 59: 177–186. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.59.2.8681677127123543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowler, Duncan, and Ben Bradshaw. 2007. Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32: 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowler, Duncan, Benjamin Bradshaw, and Elizabeth Holmes. 2014. Conservation agriculture: Farmer adoption and policy issues. In Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics, ed. Paul B. Thompson and David M. Kaplan, 385–393. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0929-4_74.

  • Kremen, Claire, Alastair Iles, and Christopher Bacon. 2012. Diversified farming systems: An agroecological, systems-based alternative to modern industrial agriculture. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-05103-170444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronberg, Scott L., and Julie Ryschawy. 2019. Integration of crop and livestock production in temperate regions to improve agroecosystem functioning, ecosystem services, and human nutrition and health1. In Agroecosystem diversity, ed. Gilles Lemaire, Paulo César De Faccio Carvalho, Scott Kronberg, and Sylvie Recous, 247–256. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811050-8.00015-7.

  • Kross, Sara M., Katherine P. Ingram, Rachael F. Long, and Meredith T. Niles. 2018. Farmer perceptions and behaviors related to wildlife and on-farm conservation actions. Conservation Letters 11: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, Dayton M., Patrick Sullivan, Roger Claassen, and Linda Foreman. 2007. Profiles of US farm households adopting conservation-compatible practices. Land Use Policy 24: 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langholz, Jeff A., and Michele Jay-Russell. 2013. Potential role of wildlife in pathogenic contamination of fresh produce. Human-Wildlife Interactions 7: 140–157. https://doi.org/10.26077/e5gg-r037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Tingting, Randall J.F. Bruins, and Matthew T. Heberling. 2018. Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of best management practices: A review and synthesis. Sustainability 10: 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, R., K. Garbach, and L. Morandin. 2017. Hedgerow benefits align with food production and sustainability goals. California Agriculture 71: 117–119. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.2017a0020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowell, K., J. Langholz, and D. Stuart. 2010. Safe and sustainable: Co-managing for food safety and ecological health in California’s Central Coast Region. San Francisco, CA: The Nature Conservancy of California and the Georgetown University Produce Safety Project.

  • Lubell, Mark, and Allan Fulton. 2007. Local diffusion networks act as pathways to sustainable agriculture in the Sacramento River Valley. California Agriculture 61: 131–137. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v061n03p131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubell, Mark, and Allan Fulton. 2008. Local policy networks and agricultural watershed management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18: 673–696. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyson, Thomas A., G. W. Stevenson, and Rick Welsh, ed. 2008. Food and the mid-level farm: renewing an agriculture of the middle. Food, Health, and the Environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Macaulay, Luke, and Van Butsic. 2017. Ownership characteristics and crop selection in California cropland. California Agriculture 71: 221–230. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.2017a0041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElwain, Sean. 2015. The misnomer of right to farm: How right-to-farm statutes disadvantage organic farming. Washburn Law Journal 55: 223–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, Martha. 2013. What food is to be kept safe and for whom? Food-safety governance in an unsafe food system. Laws 2: 401–427. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws2040401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mench, Joy A. 2008. Farm animal welfare in the U.S.A.: Farming practices, research, education, regulation, and assurance programs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 113: 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercado, Geovana, Carsten Nico Hjortsø, and Benson Honig. 2018. Decoupling from International Food Safety Standards: How small-scale indigenous farmers cope with conflicting institutions to ensure market participation. Agriculture and Human Values 35 (3): 651–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-018-9860-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Albie, Marcia S. DeLonge, and Liz Carlisle. 2017. Triggering a positive research and policy feedback cycle to support a transition to agroecology and sustainable food systems. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 41: 855–879. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1331179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Jane, Peter Gaskell, Julie Ingram, Janet Dwyer, Matt Reed, and Christopher Short. 2017. Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour. Agriculture and Human Values 34: 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9705-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montenegro de Wit, Maywa, and Alastair Iles. 2016. Toward thick legitimacy: Creating a web of legitimacy for agroecology. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene. https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000115.

  • Moon, K., and C. Cocklin. 2011. Participation in biodiversity conservation: Motivations and barriers of Australian landholders. Journal of Rural Studies 27: 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Jesse, and Heather Haddon. 2018. Effects of E. coli Outbreak in Lettuce Ripple Through U.S. Food-Supply Chain. Wall Street Journal, May 30, sec. Business.

  • Niles, Meredith T., Mark Lubell, and Margaret Brown. 2015. How limiting factors drive agricultural adaptation to climate change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 200: 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.11.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niles, Meredith T., Mark Lubell, and Van R. Haden. 2013. Perceptions and responses to climate policy risks among California farmers. Global Environmental Change 23: 1752–1760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olimpi, Elissa M., Patrick Baur, Alejandra Echeverri, David Gonthier, Daniel S. Karp, Claire Kremen, Amber Sciligo, and Kathryn T. De Master. 2019. Evolving food safety pressures in California’s Central Coast Region. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 3: 100000. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opie, John. 1987. The law of the land: two hundred years of American farmland policy. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oteros-Rozas, Elisa, Adriana Ruiz-Almeida, Mateo Aguado, José A. González, and Marta G. Rivera-Ferre. 2019. A social–ecological analysis of the global agrifood system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 10000: 10000. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912710116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, J.A., R.M. Hoekstra, T. Ayers, R.V. Tauxe, C.R. Braden, and F.J. Angulo. 2013. Attribution of foodborne illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths to food commodities by using outbreak data, United States, 1998–2008. Emerging Infectious Disease 19: 407–415. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1903.111866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Jason, Julia DeNiro, Melanie Lewis Ivey, and Doug Doohan. 2016. Are small and medium scale produce farms inherent food safety risks? Journal of Rural Studies 44: 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto, Ivette, John Vandermeer, and Angus Wright. 2019. Nature’s matrix: Linking agriculture, biodiversity conservation and food sovereignty, 2nd ed. Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollans, Margot J. 2015. Regulating farming: Balancing food safety and environmental protection in a cooperative governance regime. Wake Forest Law Review 50 (2): 399–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollans, Margot J. 2016. Drinking water protection and agricultural exceptionalism. Ohio State Law Journal 77 (6): 1195–1260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, J.C., and Z. Leviston. 2014. Predicting pro-environmental agricultural practices: The social, psychological and contextual influences on land management. Journal of Rural Studies 34: 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, L.S., K. Floress, D. Klotthor-Weinkauf, and A. Baumgart-Getz. 2008. Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63: 300–311. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.5.300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, Christopher M., Claudia Bieling, Nora Fagerholm, Berta Martin-Lopez, and Tobias Plieninger. 2016. The farmer as a landscape steward: Comparing local understandings of landscape stewardship, landscape values, and land management actions. Ambio 45: 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0694-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehber, Erkan. 2018. Contract Farming In Practice: An overview. Research Report 7. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.290069.

  • Reimer, Adam P., Aaron W. Thompson, and Linda S. Prokopy. 2012a. The multi-dimensional nature of environmental attitudes among farmers in Indiana: Implications for conservation adoption. Agriculture and Human Values 29: 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-011-9308-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, Adam P., Riva C.H. Denny, and Diana Stuart. 2018. The impact of federal and state conservation programs on farmer nitrogen management. Environmental Management 62: 694–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1083-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, Adam P., Aaron W. Thompson, Linda S. Prokopy, J. Gordon Arbuckle, Ken Genskow, Douglas Jackson-Smith, Gary Lynne, Laura McCann, Lois Wright Morton, and Pete Nowak. 2014. People, place, behavior, and context: A research agenda for expanding our understanding of what motivates farmers’ conservation behaviors. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 69: 57A–61A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.69.2.57A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, Adam P., D.K. Weinkauf, and Linda S. Prokopy. 2012b. The influence of perceptions of practice characteristics: An examination of agricultural best management practice adoption in two indiana watersheds. Journal of Rural Studies 28: 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.09.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G.Philip, Katherine L. Gross, Stephen K. Hamilton, Douglas A. Landis, Thomas M. Schmidt, Sieglinde S. Snapp, and Scott M. Swinton. 2014. Farming for ecosystem services: An ecological approach to production agriculture. BioScience 64: 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosset, Peter M., and Miguel A. Altieri. 2017. Agroecology: Science and politics. Black Point, NS: Fernwood Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhl, James B. 2000. Farms, their environmental harms, and environmental law. Ecology Law Quarterly 27: 263–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, Jeffrey, Terry Sunderland, Jaboury Ghazoul, Jean-Laurent Pfund, Douglas Sheil, Erik Meijaard, Michelle Venter, et al. 2013. Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 8349–8356. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210595110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schewe, Rebecca L., and Diana Stuart. 2017. Why don’t they just change? Contract farming, informational influence, and barriers to agricultural climate change mitigation. Rural Sociology 82: 226–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.Richard. 2013. Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities, 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selinske, Matthew J., Benjamin Cooke, Nooshin Torabi, Mathew J. Hardy, Andrew T. Knight, and Sarah A. Bekessy. 2017. Locating financial incentives among diverse motivations for long-term private land conservation. Ecology and Society 22: 7. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09148-220207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, Laurel A., Rachael F. Long, Michele T. Jay-Russell, Xunde Li, Edward R. Atwill, Richard M. Engeman, and Roger A. Baldwin. 2018. Impact of field-edge habitat on mammalian wildlife abundance, distribution, and vectored foodborne pathogens in adjacent crops. Crop Protection 108: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Debra. 2011. An analysis of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act: Protection for consumers and boon for business. Food and Drug Law Journal 66: 353–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, Diana. 2008. The illusion of control: industrialized agriculture, nature, and food safety. Agriculture and Human Values 25: 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-008-9130-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, Diana. 2009. Constrained choice and ethical dilemmas in land management: Environmental quality and food safety in California agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22: 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9129-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, Diana. 2010. Coastal ecosystems and agricultural land use: New challenges on California’s central coast. Coastal Management 38: 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920750903363190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, Diana, and Sean Gillon. 2013. Scaling up to address new challenges to conservation on US farmland. Land Use Policy 31: 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, Diana, and Rebecca L. Schewe. 2016. Constrained choice and climate change mitigation in US agriculture: Structural barriers to a climate change ethic. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29: 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-016-9605-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Rebecca, and David Zilberman. 2017. Diffusion of drip irrigation: The case of California. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 39: 16–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppw026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Courtney Irene Powell. 2014. In food we trust: the politics of purity in American food regulation. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, Patricia H., William Ocasio, and Michael Lounsbury. 2012. The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidgren, Kristine A. 2017. Why a Federal Court Dismissed the DMWW Lawsuit. Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation. https://www.calt.iastate.edu/blogpost/why-federal-court-dismissed-dmww-lawsuit. Accessed 16 June 2020.

  • Uematsu, Hiroki, and Ashok K. Mishra. 2012. Organic farmers or conventional farmers: Where’s the money? Ecological Economics 78: 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Huylenbroeck, G., V. Vandermeulen, E. Mettepenningen, and A. Verspecht. 2007. Multifunctionality of agriculture: A review of definitions, evidence and instruments. Living Reviews in Landscape Research 1: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veissier, Isabelle, Andrew Butterworth, Bettina Bock, and Emma Roe. 2008. European approaches to ensure good animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 113: 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen, Paul, and Tetty Havinga. 2017. Hybridization of food governance: An analytical framework. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivant, Anne-Laure, Dominique Garmyn, Pierre-Alain Maron, Virginie Nowak, and Pascal Piveteau. 2013. Microbial diversity and structure are drivers of the biological barrier effect against Listeria monocytogenes in soil. PLoS ONE 8: e76991. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, Matthew, Alvin D. Sokolow, and Rachel Elkins. 2001. County right-to-farm ordinances in California: An assessment of impact and effectiveness. AIC Issues Brief 15. Davis: Agricultural Issues Center, University of California.

  • Walker, Richard. 2004. The conquest of bread: 150 years of agribusiness in California. New York: New Press. Distributed by Norton.

  • Wang, Siyun, Daniel Weller, Justin Falardeau, Laura K. Strawn, Fernando O. Mardones, Aiko D. Adell, and Andrea I. Moreno Switt. 2016. Food safety trends: From globalization of whole genome sequencing to application of new tools to prevent foodborne diseases. Trends in Food Science & Technology 57(Part A): 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.09.016.

  • Warner, Keith Douglass. 2008. Agroecology as participatory science emerging alternatives to technology transfer extension practice. Science, Technology & Human Values 33: 754–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907309851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C.R., R. Burton, O. Buchanan, and R.V. Birnie. 2016. Limited adoption of short rotation coppice: The role of farmers’ socio-cultural identity in influencing practice. Journal of Rural Studies 45: 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild Farm Alliance. 2016. Co-managing farm stewardship with food safety GAPs and conservation practices: A grower’s and conservationist’s handbook. Watsonville: Wild Farm Alliance.

  • Willett, Walter, Johan Rockström, Brent Loken, Marco Springmann, Tim Lang, Sonja Vermeulen, Tara Garnett, et al. 2019. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet 393: 447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollaeger, Heidi M., Kristin L. Getter, and Bridget K. Behe. 2015. Consumer preferences for traditional, neonicotinoid-free, bee-friendly, or biological control pest management practices on floriculture crops. HortScience 50: 721–732. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.50.5.721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, Timothy A., and Debra Tropp. 2015. CSAs and the battle for the local food dollar. Journal of Food Distribution Research 46: 17. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.209984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrell, Richard, and Michael C. Appleby. 2000. Stewardship of natural resources: Definition, ethical and practical aspects. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12: 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009534214698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worster, Donald. 1994. Nature’s economy: A history of ecological ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiannas, Frank. 2009. Food safety culture: Creating a behavior-based food safety management system. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Jennie Durant, Lisa Kelley, Amber Sciligo, Daniel Suarez, Michael Polson, Alastair Iles, Kathryn De Master, and my colleagues in Nancy Peluso’s Land Lab for invaluable feedback, suggestions, and advice during the many stages and versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Baur.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baur, P. When farmers are pulled in too many directions: comparing institutional drivers of food safety and environmental sustainability in California agriculture. Agric Hum Values 37, 1175–1194 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10123-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10123-8

Keywords

Navigation