Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are good fighters also good singers? The relationship between acoustic traits and fight success in the treefrog Pithecopus nordestinus (Phyllomedusidae)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
acta ethologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Morphological characteristics are known to be important predictors of victory in aggressive disputes in the animal world. Among anurans, however, acoustic communication also plays an important role in intrasex conflicts. Although there is evidence for the influence of spectral parameters of calls (e.g., fundamental and dominant frequencies) in anuran disputes, the role that temporal parameters (e.g., duration and repetition rate) play in success during physical conflicts is still poorly understood. We describe the behavior of male frogs in agonistic interactions and investigate the functions of the different types of calls emitted in different social contexts. We also evaluate how body characteristics (mass and body size) and bioacoustic characteristics (repetition rate of the calls) influence success in physical conflicts of Pithecopus nordestinus (Anura: Phyllomedusidae). Agonistic disputes involved gradation in the emission of calls, visual displays, and physical clashes. The fighting call increased in proportion during clashes, indicating a function associated with aggression/intimidation. The uneasiness call (new subcategory herein defined) was only performed by losers during physical clashes, suggesting a meaning of submission or restlessness. No differences were found in any of the morphological parameters between winners and losers of physical disputes. On the other hand, the repetition rate of the aggressive call was positively related to success in fights and proved to be a good predictor of success in fights between males of P. nordestinus. Our results contribute to understanding the influence of temporal parameters of calls on success in physical disputes of this Neotropical treefrog.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arak A (1983) Sexual selection by male–male competition in Natterjack toad choruses. Nature 306:261–262. https://doi.org/10.1038/306261a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnott G, Elwood RW (2009) Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Anim Behav 77:991–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastos PR, Alcantara MB, Morais AR, Lingnau R, Signorelli L (2011) Vocal behaviour and conspecific call response in Scinax centralis. Herpetol J 21:43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Bee MA, Reichert MS, Tumulty J (2016) Assessment and recognition of competitive rivals in anurans. Adv Stud Behav 48:161–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman M, Olofsson M, Wiklund MO (2010) Contest outcome in a territorial butterfly: the role of motivation. Proc R Soc B 277:3027–3033 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0646

  • Borges-Leite MJ, Rodrigues JFM, Borges-Nojosa DM (2014) Herpetofauna of a coastal region of northeastern Brazil. Herpetol Notes 7:405–413. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-06032015001715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briffa M, Hardy ICW (2013) Introduction to animal contests. In: Hardy ICW, Briffa M (eds) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister SJ, Ophir AG, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W (2002) information transfer during cricket frog contests. Anim Behav 64:715–725. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.4012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldart VM, Iop S, Cechin SZ (2014) Social interactions in a neotropical stream frog reveal a complex repertoire of visual signals and the use of multimodal communication. Behaviour 151:719–739. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldas FLS, Silva BD, De-Carvalho CB, Santos RAD, Santana DA, Gomes FFA, Faria RG (2012) Phyllomedusa nordestina (Northeast Orange-legged leaf frog). Physical attack. Herpetol Rev 43:635

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldas FLS, Silva BD, Santos RAD, Santana DA, Gomes FFA, Faria RG (2016) Autoecology of Phyllomedusa nordestina (Anura: Hylidae) in areas of the Caatinga and Atlantic Forest in the State of Sergipe, Brazil. North-West J Zool 12:271–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramaschi U (2006) Redefinição do Grupo de Phyllomedusa hypochondrialis, com redescrição de P. megacephala (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926), revalidação de P. azurea Cope, 1862 e descrição de uma nova espécie (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Arquivos do Museu Nacional 64:159–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho RMR, Peixoto PEC, Benson WW (2016) Territorial clashes in the Neotropical butterfly Actinote pellenea (Acraeinae): do disputes differ when contests get physical? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2042-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias MT, Santos TG, Maragno FP, Oliveira VF, Lima C, Cechin SZ (2017) Breeding biology, territoriality, and reproductive site use by Phyllomedusa iheringii (Anura: Phyllomedusidae) from the South American Pampa in Brazil. Salamandra 53:257–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn DW, Charlotte JK, Anayra G, Lamas C, Pereira RAS (2014) Mortal combat and competition for oviposition sites in female pollinating fig wasps. Behav Ecol 26:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson ML, Reichert MS, Halliday TR (2013) Contests in amphibians. In: Hardy ICW, Briffa M (eds) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press, pp 228–257

  • Ferreira-Silva C, Oliveira DB, Oliveira HF, Ávila RW (2016) Spatial and temporal distribution in two anuran communities in the Chapada do Araripe, Northeastern Brasil. Biota Neotrop 16:e0166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giasson LOM, Haddad CFB (2006) Social interactions in Hypsiboas albomarginatus (Anura: Hylidae) and the significance of acoustic and visual signals. J Herpetol 40:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafe TU (2005) Anuran choruses as communication networks. In: Mcgregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press

  • Guimarães LD, Bastos RP (2003) Vocalizações e interações acústicas em Hyla raniceps (Anura, Hylidae) durante a atividade reprodutiva. Iheringia Ser Zool 93:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halloy M, Espinoza RE (2000) Territorial encounters and threat displays in the Neotropical frog Phyllomedusa sauvagii (Anura: Hylidae). Herpetological Natural History 7:175–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann MT, Giasson LOM, Hartmann PA, Haddad CFB (2005) Visual communication in Brazilian species of anurans from the Atlantic forest. J Nat Hist 39:1675–1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hödl W, Amézquita A (2001) Visual signaling in anuran amphibians. In: Ryan MJ (ed) Anuran communication. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 121–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosken DJ, House CM (2011) Sexual selection. Curr Biol 21:62–65 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.053

  • Instituto de Pesquisa e Estratégia Econômica do Ceará (IPECE) (2016) Perfil Básico Municipal—Groaíras (2016). http://www.ipece.ce.gov.br/perfil_basico_municipal/2016/Groairas.pdf. Accessed 29 Sept 2017

  • Jansen M, Köhler J (2008) Intraspecific combat behavior of Phyllomedusa boliviana (Anura: Hylidae) and the possible origin of visual signaling in nocturnal treefrogs. Herpetol Rev 39:290–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones MC, Dixon JR, Forstner MRJ (2011) Is bigger always better? Mate selection in the Houston toad (Bufo houstonensis). J Herpetol 45:455–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1982) Territorial defence in the great tit (Parus major): do residents always win? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes RS, Peixoto PEC (2013) Males of the dragonfly Diastatops obscura fight according to predictions from game theory models. Anim Behav 85:663e669

    Google Scholar 

  • Mângia S, Camurugi F, Pereira EA, Carvalho P, Röhr DL, Folly H, Santana DJ (2019) Release calls of four species of Phyllomedusidae (Amphibia, Anura). Herpetozoa 32:77–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marden JH, Waage JK (1990) Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition. Anim Behav 39:954–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Márquez R, Pargana JM, Crespo EG (2001) Acoustic competition in male Pelodytes ibericus (Anura: Pelodytidae): interactive playback tests. Copeia 4:1142–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins M, Pombal J Jr, Haddad CFB (1998) Escalated aggressive behaviour and facultative parental care in the nest building gladiator frog, Hyla faber. Amphibia-Reptilia 19:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda DB, Garey MV, Monteiro-Filho ELA, Hartmann MT (2008) Sinalização visual e biologia reprodutiva de Dendropsophus werneri (Anura: Hylidae) em área de Mata Atlântica no estado do Paraná, Brasil. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 48:335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morais AR, Batista VG, Gambale PG, Signorelli L, Bastos RP (2012) Acoustic communication in a neotropical frog (Dendropsophus minutus): vocal repertoire, variability and individual discrimination. Herpetol J 22:249–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Narvaes P, Rodrigues MT (2005) Visual communication, reproductive behavior, and home range of Hylodes dactylocinus (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Phyllomedusa 4:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira FFR (2017) Mating behaviour, territoriality and natural history notes of Phyllomedusa ayeaye Lutz, 1966 (Hylidae: Phyllomedusinae) in southeastern Brazil. J Nat Hist 51:657–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2017.1296196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira FFR, Nogueira PAG, Eterovick PC (2012) Natural history of Phyllomedusa megacephala (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926) (Anura: Hylidae) in southeastern Brazil, with descriptions of its breeding biology and male territorial behavior. J Nat Hist 46:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2011.626127?journalCode=tnah20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osiejuk ST, Jakubowska A (2017) Song duration mediates responses of territory owner in a songbird species with a small song repertoire. Acta ethol 20:137–145

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and evolution of fighting behaviour. Anim Behav 29:223–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert MS, Gerhardt HC (2011) The role of body size on the outcome, escalation and duration of contests in the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor. Anim Behav 82:1357e1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichert MS, Gerhardt HC (2013) Gray tree frogs, Hyla versicolor, give lower-frequency aggressive calls in more escalated contests. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:795–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MJ (1998) Energy, calling and selection. Integr Comp Biol 28:885–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Sá FP, Zina J, Haddad CBF (2016) Sophisticated communication in the Brazilian torrent frog Hylodes japi. PLoS One 11:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Santana DJ, Mângia S, Silveira-Filho RR, Barros LCS, Andrade I, Napoli MF, Juncá F, Garda AA (2015) Anurans from the Middle Jaguaribe river region, Ceará State, Northeastern Brazil. Biota Neotrop 15:e20150017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott JP, Fredericson E (1951) The causes of fighting in mice and rats. Physiol Zool 24:273–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senar JC, Camerino M, Metcalfe NB (1989) Agonistic interactions in siskin flocks: why are dominants sometimes subordinate? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taigen TL, Wells KD (1985) Energetics of vocalization by an anuran amphibian (Hyla versicolor). J Comp Physiol 155:163–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00685209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tárano Z, Herrera EA (2003) Female preferences for call traits and male mating success in the Neotropical frog Physalaemus enesefae. Ethology 109:121–134. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00848.x/abstract

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo LF, Araújo OGS, Guimarães LD, Lingnau R, Haddad CBF (2007) Visual and acoustic signaling in three species of Brazilian nocturnal tree frogs (Anura, Hylidae). Phyllomedusa 6:61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo LF, Martins IA, Brusch DP, Passos MI, Alexandre C, Haddad CBF (2014) The anuran calling repertoire in the light of social context. Acta Ethol 18:87–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-014-0194-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira MC, Peixoto PEC (2013) Winners and losers: a meta-analysis of functional determinants of fighting ability in arthropod contests. Funct Ecol 27:305–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilaça TRA, Silva RSS, Solé M (2011) Vocalization and territorial behaviour of Phyllomedusa nordestina Caramaschi, 2006 (Anura: Hylidae) from southern Bahia, Brazil. J Nat Hist 45:1823–1834. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2011.561018?journalCode=tnah20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster MS, Robinson SK (1999) Courtship disruptions and male mating strategies: examples from female-defense mating systems. Am Nat 154:717–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD (1977) The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 25:666–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD (1988) The effect of social interations on anuran vocal behaviour. In: Fritzsch B, Ryan MJ, Wilezynski W, Hetherington TE, Walkowiak W (eds) The evolution of amphibian auditory system. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 433–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD (2007) The ecology and behaviour of amphibians. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1148p

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD, Schwartz JJ (2006) The behavioral ecology of anuran communication. In: Narins PM, Feng AS, Fay RR, Popper AN (eds) (orgs.)Hearing and sound communication in amphibians, vol 28. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, pp 44–86

  • Wogel H, Abrunhosa PA, Pombal JP Jr (2002) Atividade reprodutiva de Physalaemus signifer (Anura, Leptodactylidae) em ambiente temporário. Iheringia Ser Zool 92:57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wogel H, Abrunhosa PA, Pombal JP Jr (2004) Vocalization and agressive behavior of Phyllomedusa rohdei (Anura: Hyllidae). Hepertol Rev 35:239–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi A (1975) A selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53:205–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Elvis Franklin, Manassés Vasconcelos, Victor Paula, Efigênia Cordeiro, and Naiane Martins for their collaboration with field activities. We also thank Diva Borges-Nojosa, Milena Wachlevski, and an anonymous referee for critical review of the manuscript and relevant comments.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Course of Ecology and Natural Resources, Department of Biology, Federal University of Ceará, Pici Campus, Fortaleza, CE, 60440-900, Brazil

    Ana C. Brasileiro, Frede Lima-Araujo & Paulo Cascon

  2. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação (PPGEC), Laboratório de Ecologia e Comportamento Animal (LECA), Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), Mossoró, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

    Daniel C. Passos

Authors
  1. Ana C. Brasileiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frede Lima-Araujo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel C. Passos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paulo Cascon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel C. Passos.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All national guidelines applicable to the care and use of animals were followed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brasileiro, A.C., Lima-Araujo, F., Passos, D.C. et al. Are good fighters also good singers? The relationship between acoustic traits and fight success in the treefrog Pithecopus nordestinus (Phyllomedusidae). acta ethol 23, 51–60 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-020-00337-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-020-00337-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation