Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cooperation and conflicts during prey capture in colonies of the colonial spider Parawixia bistriata (Araneae: Araneidae)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
acta ethologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intraspecific aggregations and colonial structures in orb-weaver spiders can reduce the per capita amount of silk to be spun, allow the use of habitats which are unavailable for solitary species, and increase protection and foraging efficiency. However, conflicts between colony members can occur during web construction, repair, and prey capture, contributing to group dissociation under conditions of low prey availability and/or in specific stages of spider maturation. While small juveniles are benefited by the joint action of many spiders during prey immobilization, older and large individuals are able to capture all available prey by themselves. For those large individuals, interactions with neighbours may compromise the amount of available resources. In this context, we evaluated the frequency of foraging events involving cooperative hunting and conflicts between residents and intruders in very young and older juveniles of Parawixia bistriata, a colonial orb-weaver spider. We recorded foraging behaviour in natural conditions and identified the main groups of insects intercepted at the webs and captured by the spiders. We then used two prey types (Lepidoptera and Orthoptera), with distinct behaviours when intercepted, in an experiment to test the influence of prey type and mass on cooperative and aggressive interactions. Most captures occurred without the participation of other individuals, and the main prey types were small Diptera and Coleoptera. Cooperative behaviour seems to occur especially between young spiderlings, but depending on prey type and size, it also occurs in late instars. The frequency of conflicts was similar in both periods of observation (November and December), with young and older individuals in colonies. Our results indicate that prey type is an important factor determining the frequency of interactions during foraging events in colonies of P. bistriata and that large spiders usually obtain success in conflicts. We suggest that these conflicts over large items may constitute a relevant variable involved in colony dissociation before spiders’ maturation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alves-Costa CP, Gonzaga MO (2001) Prey capture and spatial distribution of Philoponella vittata (Araneae, Uloboridae) in host webs. Ethol Ecol Evol 3:239–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Avilés L (1997) Causes and consequences of cooperation and permanent sociality in spiders. In: the evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids (eds. J. Choe and B. Crespi). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Bertani R, Fukushima C, Martins R (2008) Sociable widow spiders? Evidence of subsociality in Latrodectus Walckenaer, 1805 (Araneae, Theridiidae). J Ethol 26:299–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford G, Rypstra AL (1992) Foraging behavior of the communal spider, Philoponella republicana (Araneae: Uloboridae). J Ins Behav 5:321–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JL (1964) The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. Wilson Bull 76:160–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB (1996) Coloniality in the cliff swallow: the effect of group size on social behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Campón FF (2007) Group foraging in the colonial spider Parawixia bistriata (Araneidae): effect of resource levels and prey size. Anim Behav 74:1551–1562

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos L, Hénault Y, Legal L (2005) Foraging strategies of Eriophora edax (Araneae, Araneidae): a nocturnal orb-weaving spider. J Arachnol 33:509–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark CW, Mangel M (1986) The evolutionary advantages of group foraging. Theor Populat Biol 30:45–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel S, Schuette P, Christianson D (2014) Effects of predation risk on group size, vigilance, and foraging behavior in an African ungulate community. Behav Ecol 25:773–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz C, Tanikawa A, Miyashita T, Amarpuri G, Jain D, Dhinojwala A, Blackledge TA (2018) Supersaturation with water explains the unusual adhesion of aggregate glue in the webs of the moth-specialist spider, Cyrtarachne akirai. R Soc Open Sci 5:181296 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181296

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois F, Giraldeau L-A (2003) The forager’s dilemma: food sharing and food defense as risk-sensitive foraging options. Am Natur 162:768–779

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois F, Giraldeau L-A, Grant JWA (2003) Resource defense in a group-foraging context. Behav Ecol 14:2–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Endo T (1989) How to avoid becoming a prey: predatory encounters between an orb-weaving spider, Araneus pinguis (Karsch) (Araneae: Araneidae) and flying insects. Ecol Res 4:361–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HG, Gobbi N (1988a) Communication and synchronized molting in a colonial araneid spider, Eriophora bistriata. Experientia 44:720–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler HG, Gobbi N (1988b) Cooperative prey capture by an orb-web spider. Naturwissenschaften 75:208–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan W, Liu S, Yang X, Li D, Lei C (2015) Prey interception drives web invasion and spider size determines successful web takeover in nocturnal orb-web spiders. Biol Open 4:326–1329

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazda SK, Connor RC, Edgar RK, Cox F (2005) A division of labour with role specialization in group-hunting bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) off Cedar Key, Florida. Proc Royal Soc B 272:135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg JL, Grant JWA, Lefebvre L (2001) Effects of the temporal predictability and spatial clumping of food on the intensity of competitive aggression in the Zenaida dove. Behav Ecol 12:490–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant JWA (1993) Whether or not to defend? The influence of resource distribution. Mar Behav Physiol 23:137–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Guevara J, Gonzaga MO, Vasconcellos-Neto J, Avilés L (2011) Sociality and resource use: insights from a community of social spiders in Brazil. Behav Ecol 22:630–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Guindre-Parker S, Rubenstein R (2018) Multiple benefits of alloparental care in a flutuating environment. R Soc Open Sci 5:172406

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge MA, Uetz GW (1995) A comparison of agonistic behaviour of colonial web-building spiders from desert and tropical habitats. Anim Behav 50:963–972

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman CR, Avilés L (2017) Rain, predators, and spider sociality: a manipulative experiment. Behav Ecol 28:589–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Nuñez G, García JA, López JA, Lachaud JP (2001) Prey analysis in the diet of some ponerine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and web-building spiders (Araneae) in coffee plantations in Chiapas, Mexico. Sociobiology 37:723–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi HW (1992) Spiders of the orb-weaver genus Parawixia in America (Araneae: Araneidae). Bull Mus Comp Zool 153:1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd NJ, Elgar M (1997) Costs and benefits of facultative aggregating behaviour in the orb-spinning spider Gasteracantha minax Thorell (Araneae: Araneidae). Austral Ecol 22:256–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubin YD (1974) Adaptive advantages and the evolution of colony formation in Cyrtophora (Araneae: Araneidae). Zool J Linnean Soc 54:321–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Majolo B, Vizioli AB, Schino G (2008) Costs and benefits of group living in primates: group size effects on behaviour and demography. Anim Behav 76:1235–1247

    Google Scholar 

  • Masumoto T (1998) Cooperative prey capture in the communal web spider, Philoponella raffrayi (Araneae, Uloboridae). J Arachnol 26:392–396

    Google Scholar 

  • McReynolds CN (2000) The impact of habitat features on web features and prey capture of Argiope aurantia (Araneae, Araneidae). J Arachnol 28:169–179

    Google Scholar 

  • McReynolds CN, Polis GA (1987) Ecomorphological factors influencing prey use by two sympatric species of orb-web spiders, Argiope aurantia and Argiope trifasciata (Araneidae). J Arachnol 15:371–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Murakami Y (1983) Factors determining the prey size of the orb-web spider, Argiope amoena (L. Koch) (Argiopidae). Oecologia 57:72–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nentwig W (1982) Why do only certain insects escape from a spider’s web? Oecologia 53:412–417

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Packer C, Ruttan L (1988) The evolution of cooperative hunting. Am Natur 132:159–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Paiva LV, Araújo GM, Pedroni F (2007) Structure and dynamics of a woody plant community of a tropical semi-deciduous seasonal forest in the “Estação Ecológica do Panga”, municipality of Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Bras Bot 30:365–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekár S, Hrušková M, Lubin Y (2005) Can solitary spiders (Araneae) cooperate in prey capture? J Anim Ecol 74:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekár S, Coddington JA, Blackledge TA (2011) Evolution of stenophagy in spiders (Araneae): evidence based on the comparative analysis of spider diets. Evolution 66:776–806

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (Austria) Available from: http://www.R-project.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayor LS, Uetz GW (1990) Trade-offs in foraging success and predation risk with spatial position in colonial spiders. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayor LS, Uetz GW (2000) Age-related sequential web building in the colonial spider Metepeira incrassata (Araneidae): an adaptive spacing strategy. Anim Behav 59:1251-12-59

  • Sandoval CP (1987) Aspectos da ecologia e socialidade de uma aranha colônia, Eriophora bistriata (Rengger, 1936) (Araneidae). Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuck-Paim C (1999) Ecologia comportamental de Nephilengys cruentata (Araneae, Tetragnathidae): uso do espaço. Universidade de São Paulo, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza ALT, Gonzaga MO, Vasconcellos-Neto J (2007) Prey capture behaviour in the social spider Anelosimus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae): responses to prey size and type. Ethol 113:856–861

    Google Scholar 

  • Trabalon M, Bagnères AG, Hartmann N, Vallet AM (1996) Change in cuticular compounds composition during the gregarious period and after dispersal of the young in Tegenaria atrica (Araneae, Agelenidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 26:77–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trabalon M (2013) Chemical communication and contact cuticular compounds in spiders. In: Spider Ecophysiology (ed. W. Nentwig). Springer, Berlin

  • Uetz GW (1989) The ricochet effect and prey capture in colonial spiders. Oecologia 81:154–159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW, Hieber CS (1994) Group size and predation risk in colonial web-building spiders: analysis of attack abatement mechanisms. Behav Ecol 5:326–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW, Boyle J, Hieber CS, Wilcox RS (2002) Anti-predator benefits of group living in colonial web-building spiders the “early warning” effect. Anim Behav 63:445–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward A, Webster M (2016) Sociality: the behaviour of group-living animals. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward PI, Enders MM (1985) Conflict and cooperation in the group feeding of the social spider Stegodyphus mimosarum. Behaviour 94:167–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenseleers T, Bacon JP, Alves DA, Couvillon MJ, Kärcher M, Nascimento FS, Nogueira-Neto P, Ribeiro M, Robinson EJH, Tofilski A, Ratnieks FLW (2013) Bourgeois behavior and freeloading in the colonial orb web spider Parawixia bistriata (Araneae, Araneidae). Am Nat 182:120–129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wise DH (1983) Competitive mechanisms in a food-limited species: relative importance of interference and exploitative interactions among labyrinth spiders (Araneae: Araneidae). Oecologia 58:1–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wise DH, Barata JL (1983) Prey of two syntopic spiders with diferent web structures. J Arachnol 11:271–281

    Google Scholar 

  • World Spider Catalog (2019) Version 19.5. Natural History Museum Bern. http://wsc.nmbe.ch. Accessed 26 May 2019

  • Yip EC, Levy T, Lubin Y (2017) Bad neighbors: hunger and dominance drive spacing and position in an orb-weaving spider colony. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71:128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2357-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zöttl M, Frommen JG, Taborsky M (2013) Group size adjustment to ecological demand in a cooperative breeder. Proc R Soc B 280:20122772

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project was supported by Duratex S.A., Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação de Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) - Finance Code 001, Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia dos Hymenoptera Parasitoides da Região Sudeste (HYMPAR/Sudeste - CNPq/CAPES/Fapesp), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (Proc. APQ-02104-14, CRA-30058/12, APQ-03202-13; APQ-02474-15), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (Proc. 311823/2017-3; 403733/2012-0; 445832/2014-2; 465562/2014-0; 441225/2016-0). Camila Vieira was funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) Proc. 88882.314749/2019-01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação de Recursos Naturais, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil

    Adilson Quero, Lino A. Zuanon & Camila Vieira

  2. Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil

    Marcelo O. Gonzaga

Authors
  1. Adilson Quero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lino A. Zuanon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Camila Vieira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marcelo O. Gonzaga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo O. Gonzaga.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quero, A., Zuanon, L.A., Vieira, C. et al. Cooperation and conflicts during prey capture in colonies of the colonial spider Parawixia bistriata (Araneae: Araneidae). acta ethol 23, 79–87 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-020-00342-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-020-00342-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation