Technical Communication
An elastoplastic solution for spherical cavity undrained expansion in overconsolidated soils

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103759Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, a novel elastoplastic solution is developed for the undrained expansion of a spherical cavity in overconsolidated soils, with the aim of providing a mechanical model for the interpretation of cone penetration tests in overconsolidated soils. The well-established unified hardening (UH) model is adopted in the present solution to represent the unique mechanical behaviors of the overconsolidated soil during cavity expansion. The problem considered is formulated as a system of first order partial differential equations in terms of a Lagrangian description; these equations are solved as an initial value problem with the code developed based on the Runge-Kutta algorithm. The results, including the expansion-pressure curves, the distributions of the stress components, and the evolution of the potential strength during cavity expansion are presented to show the expansion responses in overconsolidated soils. The results reveal that the unique expansion responses in overconsolidated soil during cavity expansion, such as the development of a negative excess pore water pressure, the strain-hardening and softening behavior, the peak strength and the decay of the potential strength during cavity expansion could be well represented by the present solution.

Introduction

Cavity expansion theory, which primarily concerns the changes in the stress, porewater pressure and displacement caused by cavity expansion, has versatile applications in modeling a variety of geotechnical problems (Yu, 2000). With appropriate assumptions and abstractions, cavity expansion theory can be applied to interpret the cone penetration and pressuremeter tests (Salgado et al., 1997, Burns and Mayne, 1998, Cudmani and Osinov, 2001, Chang et al., 2001, Russell and Khalili, 2002, Mo et al., 2016, Agaiby and Mayne, 2018); model pile installation effects (Carter et al., 1986, Chai et al., 2005, Randolph, 2003, Randolph et al., 1979, Li et al., 2017, Li et al., 2017, Rezania et al., 2017), determine the end-bearing and shaft capacities of driven piles, and predict the effects of tunneling (Yu and Rowe, 1999, Mo and Yu, 2016, Vrakas and Anagnostou, 2014, Vrakas and Anagnostou, 2015, Liang et al., 2020).

Cavity expansion theory has been well developed during the past few decades, by either developing new solution techniques (Collins et al., 1992, Chen and Abousleiman, 2012, Chen and Abousleiman, 2013, Vrakas, 2016, Cao et al., 2001, Zhuang and Yu, 2019) or applying advanced soil models in cavity expansion solutions (Collins and Stimpson, 1994, Collins and Yu, 1996, Russell and Khalili, 2006, Zhou et al., 2018, Li et al., 2016, Chen and Abousleiman, 2016, Chen and Liu, 2019, Chen et al., 2019, Sivasithamparam and Castro, 2018, Chen et al., 2020, Mo and Yu, 2017, Li et al., 2017, Yang et al., 2020). For the spherical cavity expansion problem, Collins and Yu (Collins and Yu, 1996) presented a general analytical framework that is applicable to any isotropic critical soil model and cavity with an arbitrary initial cavity radius. Recently, Mo and Yu (Mo and Yu, 2017) further examined the spherical cavity expansion problem in both clay and sand with the advanced unified state parameter model of Yu (Yu, 1998). Nearly at the same time, Li et al. (Li et al., 2017) also developed a semi-analytical solution using a simple unified hardening parameter-based critical state model (UH model) of Yao et al. (Yao et al., 2008) for the drained expansion of a spherical cavity in clay and sand. Although the cavity expansion theory has been well developed at present, no elastoplastic solution has been developed, especially for cavity expansion in overconsolidated soils (Sully et al., 1999). It is well known that most natural clays show overconsolidated and unsaturated properties due to the changes in the deposition environment (Gao et al., 2019). Compared with normally consolidated soils, overconsolidated soils exhibit some apparently unique features, such as a lower void ratio, higher peak strength, strain hardening and softening behavior during loading. However, although the available solutions based on the modified Cam-clay (MCC) model can reflect the general expansion responses, they are incapable of representing the unique behavior of overconsolidated soil in the expansion process. As a consequence, the available MCC model-based solutions would result in inaccurate predictions for the cone penetration tests and pile installation effects in overconsolidated soils. Therefore, it is of great significance to develop an elastoplastic solution for cavity expansion to accurately interpret the cone penetration tests and pile installation effects in overconsolidated soils.

In this study, a novel elastoplastic solution is presented for the undrained expansion of a spherical cavity in overconsolidated soils. The behavior of the overconsolidated soil is properly modeled by the well-established UH model of Yao et al. (Yao et al., 2012, Yao et al., 2009), which could reasonably represent the strain hardening/softening, shear dilatancy, and peak strength of the overconsolidated soils. The problem considered is formulated as a system of first-order differential equations following the analytical framework of Chen and Abousleiman (Chen and Abousleiman, 2012) and is solved as an initial value problem with the code developed based on the Runge-Kutta algorithm. The analytical framework of the present solution is similar to but simpler than the general approach presented by Collins and Yu (Collins and Yu, 1996). Notably, the present solution is different from the previous solution of Li et al. (Li et al., 2017); which was developed for the drained expansion of a spherical cavity in clay and sand, as the soil model and drainage condition are totally different. The key contribution of the present solution lies in that the UH model of Yao et al. (Yao et al., 2012, Yao et al., 2009), which is capable of representing the unique behavior of overconsolidated soil, is used to develop the solution; thus, the solution could better model the undrained expansion responses in overconsolidated soils. The expansion response results of soils with different overconsolidation ratios are presented to show the expansion responses in different overconsolidated soils. In particular, the expansion-pressure curves, the distributions of the stress components, and the effective stress paths calculated from the present solution are selectively compared with those generated from the available MCC model-based solution to highlight the unique expansion responses in overconsolidated soil. The results show that the proposed solution can properly reflect the development of the negative excess pore water pressure, strain-hardening and softening behaviors, and the decay of the potential strength of overconsolidated soil during cavity expansion.

Section snippets

UH model for overconsolidated soils

To derive the elastoplastic solution for cavity expansion in overconsolidated soil, a suitable soil model should be first selected to represent the behaviors of the overconsolidated soil during expansion. The mechanical behavior of overconsolidated soils can be reasonably modeled by the bounding surface model of Dafalias (Dafalias, 1986) or the UH model of Yao et al. (Yao et al., 2012, Yao et al., 2009). Although the peak strength and the strain softening behavior of the overconsolidated soil

Constitutive matrix

Due to the spherical symmetry of the spherical cavity expansion problem, the shear stresses and strains must remain zero during the entire process of cavity expansion. Hence, the problem considered only involves the radial and tangential stresses σr',σθ' and the corresponding radial and tangential strains εr,εθ. Since the soil around the cavity yields immediately after the cavity expands in terms of the UH model, the total strain increment of the soil particle consists of the elastic part and

Validation and comparisons

To validate the solution developed in this study, a numerical model was developed by ABAQUS software, in which the UH model of Yao et al. (Yao et al., 2012) is implemented as a user-defined soil model. As shown in Fig. 4, a half numerical model is constituted by taking advantage of the symmetry of the spherical cavity, which is a three-dimensional model in nature. Hence, displacement boundary condition must be imposed on the symmetry plane to fix the rigid movement of the model. The geometry of

Parametric analysis

In this section, parametric analyses are conducted to show the unique expansion responses in overconsolidated soils. The expansion responses investigated include the distributions of the two stress components, excess pore water pressures and overconsolidation ratios, the effective stress paths and yield loci of the soil at the cavity wall during cavity expansion, the variations in the stress ratio and the overconsolidation ratio with the deviatoric strains as well as the variations in the

Summary and conclusions

This paper develops an elastoplastic solution for spherical cavity expansion in overconsolidated soils under undrained conditions. The UH model, which could properly model the unique mechanical behaviors of overconsolidated soils, is employed to develop the solution. By considering the undrained expansion condition, the problem investigated is formulated as a system of first order partial differential equations in terms of a Lagrangian description, which is solved as an initial value problem

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Haohua Chen: Software, Writing - original draft, Methodology. Lin Li: Validation, Methodology, Conceptualization, Data curation. Jingpei Li: Supervision. De’an Sun: .

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41772290).

References (49)

  • S.L. Chen et al.

    Exact drained solution for cylindrical cavity expansion in modified Cam Clay soil

    Géotechnique

    (2013)
  • S.L. Chen et al.

    Drained and undrained analyses of cylindrical cavity contractions by bounding surface plasticity

    Can. Geotech. J.

    (2016)
  • S.L. Chen et al.

    Undrained cylindrical cavity expansion in anisotropic critical state soils

    Géotechnique

    (2019)
  • H.H. Chen et al.

    Elastoplastic solution to drained expansion of a cylindrical cavity in anisotropic critical-state soils

    J. Eng. Mech.

    (2020)
  • I.F. Collins et al.

    Cavity expansion in sands under drained loading conditions

    Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech.

    (1992)
  • I.F. Collins et al.

    Similarity solutions for drained and undrained cavity expansions in soils

    Géotechnique

    (1994)
  • I.F. Collins et al.

    Undrained cavity expansion in critical state soils

    Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech.

    (1996)
  • M.R. Coop et al.

    Field studies of an instrumented model pile in clay

    Géotechnique

    (1989)
  • R. Cudmani et al.

    The cavity expansion problem for the interpretation of cone penetration and pressuremeter tests

    Can. Geotech. J.

    (2001)
  • Y.F. Dafalias

    Bounding surface plasticity, I: mathematical foundation and hypoplasticity

    J. Eng. Mech.

    (1986)
  • H. De Chaunac et al.

    Numerical analysis of the set-up around the shaft of a closed-ended pile driven in clay

    Géotechnique

    (2017)
  • Y. Gao et al.

    Hydromechanical behavior of unsaturated soil with different initial densities over a wide suction range

    Acta Geotech.

    (2019)
  • L. Li et al.

    Analysis of time-dependent bearing capacity of a driven pile in clayey soils by total stress method

    Int. J. Geomech.

    (2017)
  • L. Li et al.

    A semi-analytical approach for time-dependent load-settlement response of a jacked pile in clay strata

    Can. Geotech. J.

    (2017)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text