Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the Effect of NaClO3 and H2O2 on the Molybdenum Leaching from Molybdenite Concentrate

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, the leaching of molybdenum from molybdenite concentration in the hydrochloric acid medium was investigated and the comparison was made between the effect of the sodium chlorate and hydrogen peroxide as oxidizing agents on the Mo-dissolution rate. Also, the effect of adiabatic temperature was studied on the Mo-dissolution rate. The leaching parameters were studied, and the optimum conditions were determined as temperature 80 °C, time 4 h, L/S ratio 1:20, 20% of HCl concentration, and 500 rpm as agitation. The results showed that sodium chlorate had a better impression than hydrogen peroxide, almost twice higher than it. Undermentioned optimum conditions, 89.3% of Mo-dissolution rate was achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mallem K, et al., Mater Res Bull 110 (2019) 90–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shalchian H, Ferella F, Birloaga I, De Michelis I, and Vegliò F, Hydrometallurgy 190 (2019) 105167.

  3. Basualto C, Talanta 59 (2003) 999.

  4. Xie K, Wang H, and Wang S, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 29 (2019) 2638.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Quijada-maldonado E, et al., Miner. Eng. 145 (2020) 106060.

  6. Javaherian S S, Aghajani H, and Tavakoli H, Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. 0 (2017) 1.

  7. Valdés H, Romero J, Sanchez J, Bocquet S, Rios GM, and Valenzuela F, Chem. Eng. J. 151 (2009) 333–341.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wejman-gibas K, Wieszczycka K, Wojciechowska A, Ochromowicz K, and Pohl P, Sep. Purif. Technol. 158 (2016) 71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang M, and Wang X, Hydrometallurgy 102 (2010) 50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Skrobian M, Havlik T, and Ukasik M, Hydrometallurgy 77 (2005) 109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nosrati A, Quast K, Xu D, Skinner W, Robinson D J, and Mensah J A, Hydrometallurgy 146 (2014) 29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Toquer G, Delchet C, Nemec M, and Grandjean A, J Non-Cryst Solids 357 (2011) 1552.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu Y, Wang W, Wang Q, Xu J, and Wang A, Appl. Clay Sci. 183 (2019).

  14. Kartal S N, Hwang W J, and Imamura Y, Build Environ 42 (2007) 1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ntakamutshi P T, Kime M B, Mwema M E, Ngenda B R, and Kaniki T A, Miner Eng 111 (2017) 47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Panda S, Akcil A, Mishra S, and Erust C, J Hazard Mater (2017).

  17. Norris P R, Laigle L, Ogden T J, and Gould O J P, Miner Eng (2016).

  18. Wang G, Liu Y, Tong L, Jin Z, Chen G, and Yang H, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 29 (2019) 1292.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao Z, Zhang G, Huo G, and Li H, Hydrometallurgy 97 (2009) 233.

  20. Hung L, Hertz A, Hartmann D, Charton F, and Boutin O, J Supercrit Fluids 111 (2016) 97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang J, Yang J, Tang M, Tang C, and Liu W, Hydrometallurgy 96 (2009) 342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zeng L, and Yong C, Hydrometallurgy 101 (2010) 141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Parhi P K, Park K, Kim H, and Park J, Hydrometallurgy 105 (2011) 195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cao Z, Zhong H, Qiu Z, Liu G, and Zhang W, Hydrometallurgy 99 (2009) 2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lasheen T A, Ibrahim M E, Hassib H B, and Helal A S, Hydrometallurgy 146 (2014) 175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao Y, et al., no. xxxx (2019).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Materials Engineering Department, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

    Amir Ganbari Arbat, Erfan Asghari Fesaghandis, Arvin Taghizadeh Tabrizi & Hossein Aghajani

  2. Faculty of Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Hossein Aghajani

Authors
  1. Amir Ganbari Arbat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erfan Asghari Fesaghandis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arvin Taghizadeh Tabrizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hossein Aghajani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arvin Taghizadeh Tabrizi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ganbari Arbat, A., Asghari Fesaghandis, E., Taghizadeh Tabrizi, A. et al. Comparison of the Effect of NaClO3 and H2O2 on the Molybdenum Leaching from Molybdenite Concentrate. Trans Indian Inst Met 73, 2355–2360 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-020-02036-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-020-02036-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation