Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influential factors and spatial suitability of the method of limestone tablets in karst carbon cycle study in China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Carbonates and Evaporites Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As an intuitive way, the method of limestone tablets (MLT) is often used in dissolution rate calculation and carbon cycle research of carbonate rocks. To clarify the influential factors and spatial suitability of MLT in karst carbon cycle study, 30 MLT test sites in China from north to south were collected and the tablets’ dissolution rate (TDR) was analyzed. The results showed that the influence of precipitation on the TDR is more significant than that of the temperature, especially in the impact on the underground tablets. Three typical river basins, i.e., the Nanchuan River karst basin of northern China (NKB), Qingliangsigou loess basin of northern China (QLB), and Wujiang River karst basin of southern China (WKB) were collected as the key research areas to reveal the regional factors of lithology, soil physical–chemical properties, and land use that affect TDR. The results show that the higher the acid insolubility of rocks, the lower is the dissolution rate. Soil CO2 displayed a positive correlation with TDR in both the northern and southern karst areas of China. Because soil inorganic carbon (SIC) always causes carbon deposits on the tablet surface which made the calculated results of carbon sink inaccurate, the MLT is not suitable for carbon cycle research in the loess area where high SIC is contained. The hydrochemical runoff method may be better selected. In the arid and semi-arid karst basin of northwestern and northern China, the high SIC area should be avoided during carbon sink study with MLT.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cao J, Yuan D, Groves C, Huang F, Yang H, Lu Q (2012) Carbon fluxes and sinks: the consumption of atmospheric and soil CO2 by carbonate rock dissolution. Acta Geol Sin Engl 86(4):963–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbel J (1959) Erosion en terrain calcaire. Ann Geogr 68:97–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covington MD, Vaughn KA (2019) Carbon dioxide and dissolution rate dynamics within a karst underflow-overflow system, Savoy Experimental Watershed, Arkansas, USA. Chem Geol 527:0009–2541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Waele J, Plan L, Audra P (2009) Recent developments in surface and subsurface karst geomorphology: an introduction. Geomorphology 106(1–2):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellaway M, Smith DI, Gillieson DS (1990) Karst water chemistry-limestone ranges, western Australia. Helictite 28:5–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlani S, Cucchi F, Forti F, Rossi A (2009) Comparison between coastal and inland Karst limestone lowering rates in the northeastern Adriatic Region (Italy and Croatia). Geomorphology 104:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gams I (1981) Comparative research of limestone solution by means of standard tablets. In: Proceedings of the 8th international congress of speleology bowling green, vol 1. Kentucky, pp 273–275

  • Gams I (1986) International comparative measurements of surface solution by means of standard limestone tablets. In: Zbornik Ivana Rakovca. SAZU, Ljubljana, pp 361–386

  • Han G, Liu C (2004) Water geochemistry controlled by carbonate dissolution: a study of the river waters draining karst-dominated terrain, Guizhou Province, China. Chem Geol 204:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • High C, Hanna GK (1970) A method for the direct measurement of erosion of rock surfaces. Br Geomorphol Res Group Tech Bull 5:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Q, Qin X, Liu P, Kang Z, Tang P (2015) Applicability of karst carbon sinks calculation methods in semi-arid climate environment. J Jilin Univ Earth Sci Ed 45(1):240–246 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Q, Qin X, Liu P, Zhang L, Su C (2016) The impact of human activities to δ13CDIC of karst groundwater and carbon sink in the upper and middle reaches of Wujiang river. Quat Sci 36(6):1358–1369 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin Z, Dong Y, Wang Y, Wei X, Wang Y, Cui B, Zhou W (2014) Natural vegetation restoration is more beneficial to soil surface organic and inorganic carbon sequestration than tree plantation on the Loess Plateau of China. Sci Total Environ 485:615–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, He Y, Li Z (2017) The promoting effect of soil carbonic anhydrase on the limestone dissolution rate in SW China. Carbonates Evaporites 32(2):147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Liu C, Li J, Lang Y, Ding H, Li L (2010) Geochemistry of dissolved inorganic carbon and carbonate weathering in a small typical karstic catchment of Southwest China: isotopic and chemical constraints[J]. Chem Geol 277(3–4):301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang Y, Wang W, Duan G (2007) Discussion on the result of field corrosion test around Erdos Basin. Carsologica Sin 4:315–320 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z (2011) “Method of maximum potential dissolution” to calculate the intensity of karst process and the relevant carbon sink: with discussions on methods of solute load and carbonate-rock-tablet test. Carsologica Sin 30(4):379–382 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo M, Zhou H, Liang Y, Chen Z, Chen R, Lin X, Jakada H (2018) Horizontal and vertical zoning of carbonate dissolution in China. Geomorphology 322:66–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordt LC, Wilding LP, Drees LR (2000) Pedogenic carbonate transformations in leaching soil system: implication for the global C cycle. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Eswaran H, Stewart BA (eds) Global climate change and pedogenic carbonates. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Plan L (2005) Factors controlling carbonate dissolution rates quantified in a field test in the Austrian alps. Geomorphology 68(3–4):201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren M, Liu Z (1983) Introduction to karstology. Commercial Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Renforth P, Manning D, Lopez-Capel E (2009) Carbonate precipitation in artificial soils as a sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide. Appl Geochem 24(9):1757–1764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori F, Lal R, Ebinger MH, Eaton JA (2007) Changes in soil carbon and nutrient pools along a chronosequence of poplar plantations in the Columbia Plateau, Oregon, USA. Agric Ecosyst Environ 122:325–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao M, Zhang L, Liu P, Shao T, Cao J, Qin X, Zhang C (2019) Mineral dissolution and carbon sink effect in a typical small watershed of the Loess area. Earth Environ 47(5):575–585 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone J, Evans J, Fifield L, Allan G, Cresswell R (1998) Cosmogenic chlorine-36 production in calcite by muons. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 62:433–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trudgill ST (1975) Measurements of erosional weight loss of rock tablets. Br Geomorphol Res Group Tech Bull 17:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Trudgill S, High CJ, Hanna FK (1981) Improvement to the micro-erosion meter. Br Geomorphol Res Group Tech Bull 29:3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan G, Wang S (2000) Effects of the atmospheric CO2 in karst area of southern and loess area of northern China. Quat Sci 20(4):305–315 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Ding Z (2017) Spatial changes in grain size of loess deposits in the Chinese loess plateau and implications for palaeoenvironment. Quat Sci 37(5):934–944 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan D (1993) China karstology. Geology Press, Beijing, pp 1–30 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C (2011) Carbonate rock dissolution rates in different land uses and their carbon sink effect. Chin Sci Bull 56(35):3759–3765

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41671213), the Geological Survey Project of China Geological Survey (DD20190502, DD20160305), and the Shandong Provincial Geological Exploration Project (Lukanzi [2016] No. 79).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Liankai Zhang or Pengyu Liu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shao, M., Zhang, L., Liu, P. et al. Influential factors and spatial suitability of the method of limestone tablets in karst carbon cycle study in China. Carbonates Evaporites 35, 85 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-020-00613-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-020-00613-5

Keywords

Navigation