Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effective methodology of sustainability assessment of concrete mixtures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainability approach is a key conceptual principle to be considered in cement and concrete production all around the world. This study aims to enhance the methodology of a versatile effective sustainability assessment in a simple manner. The feasibility of proposed methodology is demonstrated on selected field application related to reinforced concrete bridge deck slabs where strength and durability are of prime interest. Various high-performance concrete (HPC) mixtures suitable for effective utilization in science and practice are selected as an example of the sustainability evaluation. The focus is paid to a complex sustainability assessment considering major important indicators: performance, durability, eco-costs and concrete mixtures costs and they are combined efficiently into one complex indicator applied at the early stage of design process. The enhancement in the form of such a general approach allows the consideration of these indicators and its normalization with the reference values is proposed. The results of experimental investigation on twenty-four various HPC mixtures are utilized to demonstrate the feasibility of proposed approach considering concrete’s compressive strength and its resistance against chloride-induced corrosion to serve as both performance and durability indicator. The results indicate the sustainability level of concrete mixtures and demonstrate the optimum possible choice of concrete mixtures with best performance/eco-costs/durability and economy trade off in the view of sustainability assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. (2019) fib Model Code 2020. Structural Concrete 20:860–866. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201970021

  2. Matthews S (2017) fib Model Code 2020—a new development in structural codes. Struct Concr 18:651–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. (2020) Towards a General code for new and existing concrete structures. In: Deputy-convenor fib task group. https://www.gbbbbg.be/fileadmin/gbb/2020_FIB/2_-Bigaj_MC2020_Ghent_23_January_2020_.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2020

  4. Hájek P, Ajdukiewicz AB, Desmyter J et al (2013) fib Bulletin 71. Integrated life cycle assessment of concrete structures. fib. The International Federation for Structural Concrete, Lausanne

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Glavind M, Asprone D, Bleiziffer J et al (2012) fib Bulletin 67. Guidelines for green concrete structures. fib. The International Federation for Structural Concrete, Lausanne

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Teplý B (2014) Interrelation among service life, reliability index, and costs of concrete structures subjected to aggressive exposure. J Perform Constr Facil 28:04014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Opon J, Henry M (2019) An indicator framework for quantifying the sustainability of concrete materials from the perspectives of global sustainable development. J Clean Prod 218:718–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gettu R, Pillai RG, Santhanam M et al (2018) Sustainability-based decision support framework for choosing concrete mixture proportions. Mater Struct 51:165. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1291-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Damineli BL, Kemeid FM, Aguiar PS, John VM (2010) Measuring the eco-efficiency of cement use. Cem Concr Compos 32:555–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2010.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Habert G, Roussel N (2009) Study of two concrete mix-design strategies to reach carbon mitigation objectives. Cement Concr Compos 31:397–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2009.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Purnell P (2012) Material nature versus structural nurture: The embodied carbon of fundamental structural elements. Environ Sci Technol 46:454–461. https://doi.org/10.1021/es202190r

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tikalsky PJ, Taylor P, Hanson S, Ghosh P (2011) Development of performance properties of ternary mixtures: laboratory study on concrete, final report of DTFH61-06-H-00011 Work Plan 12 Pooled Fund Study TPF-5(117)

  13. Favier A, DeWolf C, Scrivener K, Habert G (2018) A sustainable future for the european cement and concrete industry. ETH Zürich, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  14. Scrivener KL, Gartner EM (2018) Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. Cem Concr Res 114:2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2018.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Müller HS (2013) Sustainable structural concrete: from today’s approach to future challenge. Struct Concr 14:299–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201390021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Monkman S, MacDonald M (2018) On carbon dioxide utilization as a means to improve the sustainability of ready-mixed concrete. J Clean Prod 167:365–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lotfi S, Rem P, Deja J, Mróz R (2017) An experimental study on the relation between input variables and output quality of a new concrete recycling process. Constr Build Mater 137:128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Demolish, re-use, recycle and rebuild. Commission and its priorities: policies, information and services: Horizon 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/news/demolish-re-use-recycle-and-rebuild. Accessed 1 Sept 2019

  19. Müller HS, Haist M, Vogel M (2014) Assessment of the sustainability potential of concrete and concrete structures considering their environmental impact, performance and lifetime. Constr Build Mater 67:321–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Müller HS, Haist M, Moffatt JS, Vogel M (2017) Design, material properties and structural performance of sustainable concrete. Procedia Eng 171:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Teplý B, Vymazal T, Rovnaníková P (2018) Methodology for the quantification of concrete sustainability. MATEC Web Conf. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817401006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hrabová K, Teplý B, Hájek P (2019) Concrete, sustainability and limit states. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vogtländer JG, Brezet HC, Hendriks CF (2001) The virtual Eco-costs’99: a single LCA-based indicator for sustainability and the Eco-costs—Value ratio (EVR) model for economic allocation: A new LCA-based calculation model to determine the sustainability of products and services. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6:157–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. (2019) Eco Costs Data Design-4-Sustainability: inspiration and knowledge by designers for designers. In: Eco costs data design-4-sustainability. http://www.design-4-sustainability.com/ecocosts. Accessed 10 Aug 2019

  25. (2017) The model of the eco-costs/value ratio (EVR). In: The model of the eco-costs/value ratio (EVR). http://www.ecocostsvalue.com/. Accessed 21 July 2019

  26. ASCE (2013). Report card for America’s Infrastructure. Retrieved September 23, 2014,. http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/a/#p/bridges/overview

  27. Hooton R. (2012) Life-365 Service life prediction model and computer program for predicting the service life and life-cycle cost of reinforced concrete exposed to chlorides. Life-365 User Manual 1–80

  28. Novák D, Vořechovský M, Teplý B (2014) FReET: software for the statistical and reliability analysis of engineering problems and FReET-D: degradation module. Adv Eng Softw. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Konecny P, Lehner P (2017) Effect of cracking and randomness of inputs on corrosion initiation of reinforced concrete bridge decks exposed to chlorides. Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale 11:29–37. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.39.04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. (2004) Tex-426-A, estimating concrete strength by the maturity method, http://manuals.dot.state.tx.us/dynaweb/colmates/cnn/@Generic__BookTextView/20016;cs=default;ts%0A=defaul;pt=20016#X. Accessed 22 July 2019

  31. Lehner P, Ghosh P, Konečný P (2018) Statistical analysis of time dependent variation of diffusion coefficient for various binary and ternary based concrete mixtures. Constr Build Mater 183:75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ghosh P, Tran Q (2014) Compressive strength and surface resistivity of HPC mixtures. Int J Eng Sci Manag 4:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ghosh P, Tran Q (2015) Correlation between bulk and surface resistivity of concrete. Int J Concr Struct Mater 9:119–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-014-0094-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Thomas MDA, Bamforth PB (1999) Modelling chloride diffusion in concrete effect of fly ash and slag. Cem Concr Res 29:487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00192-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lehner P, Konečnỳ P (2016) Probabilistic durability evaluation of binary and ternary concrete mixtures considering aging effect. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 11:1992–1997

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article has been prepared as a part of the research project GACR 18-07949S “Probabilistic Modeling of the Durability of Reinforced Concrete Structures Considering Synergic Effect of Carbonation, Chlorides and Mechanical Action” funded by the Czech Science Foundation. Financial support is highly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic

    Petr Konečný & Petr Lehner

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA

    Pratanu Ghosh

  3. Institute of Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic

    Kristýna Hrabová & Břetislav Teplý

Authors
  1. Petr Konečný
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pratanu Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kristýna Hrabová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Petr Lehner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Břetislav Teplý
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petr Konečný.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konečný, P., Ghosh, P., Hrabová, K. et al. Effective methodology of sustainability assessment of concrete mixtures. Mater Struct 53, 98 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01535-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01535-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation