Skip to main content
Log in

Does Capacity Development Increase Demand for Health Services and Rights Among Key Populations Affected by HIV? A Systematic Review of Evidence from Low and Middle-Income Countries

  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Capacity development is a process by which individuals, organizations and societies develop abilities to perform functions, solve problems and achieve objectives. This systematic review sought to document capacity development interventions, the associated outcomes and its effectiveness in increasing demand for rights and health services among key populations (KP) in low and middle-income countries. Twenty papers met our review’s selection criteria. Significant improvements in health service utilization were achieved in most community mobilization and peer-led interventions. Whilst we found ample evidence linking capacity development to uptake of services, there was a striking dearth of research examining the impact of capacity development on demand for rights among KP. There was inadequate contextual data to explain variations in intervention effectiveness across different projects. More evidence is needed on the impact of capacity development on demand for health services and rights among KP. Consensus on parameters of capacity development and priority outcomes is required.

Resumen

El desarrollo de capacidades es un proceso para que personas, organizaciones y sociedades desarrollen sus habilidades a la hora de desempeñar su trabajo, resolver problemas y alcanzar objetivos. Esta revisión sistemática documenta intervenciones en el ámbito de desarrollo de capacidades, los resultados asociados con estas intervenciones y su efectividad para incrementar la exigencia de derechos y servicios de salud por parte de las poblaciones clave en países de renta media y baja. Veinte artículos cumplieron los criterios de selección de nuestra revisión. Estos artículos muestran mejoras significativas en la utilización de servicios de salud propiciadas por la mayoría de las intervenciones de movilización comunitaria e intervenciones con pares. Sin embargo, hay una escasez sorprendente de estudios que examinen el impacto del desarrollo de capacidades en la exigencia por parte de las poblaciones clave del cumplimiento de sus derechos. Asimismo, los datos de contexto encontrados no permiten explicar las diferencias en la efectividad de las intervenciones de desarrollo de capacidades según proyecto o región. Se necesita generar más evidencia sobre el impacto del desarrollo de capacidades sobre la exigencia de servicios y derechos de salud por parte de las poblaciones clave y se requiere un consenso sobre los parámetros para medir el desarrollo de capacidades y los resultados asociados a estas intervenciones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. UNAIDS. Fact sheet—WORLD AIDS DAY 2018. 2017 global HIV statistics. 2018. https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/UNAIDS_FactSheet_en.pdf.

  2. UNAIDS. Miles to go: closing gaps breaking barriers righting injustices. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03542.x.

  3. UNAIDS. UNAIDS terminology guidelines. 2015.

  4. Nu’Man J, King W, Bhalakia A, Criss S. A framework for building organizational capacity integrating planning, monitoring, and evaluation. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007;13(Suppl):S24–S32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Petruney T, Brunie A, Kalema-Zikusoka G, Wamala-Mucheri P, Akol A. Informing the future of capacity building: lessons from an NGO partnership. Dev Pract. 2014;24(3):435–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2014.897687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramos RL, Ferreira-Pinto JB. A model for capacity-building in AIDS prevention programs. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002;14(3):196–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma A, Chiliade P, Michael Reyes E, Thomas KK, Collens SR, Rafael MJ. Building sustainable organizational capacity to deliver HIV programs in resource-constrained settings: stakeholder perspectives. Glob Health Action. 2013;6:22571. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.22571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. United Nations. Definition of basic concepts and terminologies in governance and public administration. E/C. 2006;20194(January):15.

  9. Pan American Health Organization. Improving access of key populations to comprehensive HIV health services: towards a Caribbean Consensus. 2011. https://www.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2012/Access-of-Key-Populations-to-HIV-Health-Care-Consensus-document.pdf.

  10. Sara Fewer JR, Denise Dunning. Economic empowerment strategies for adolescent girls: a research study conducted for the adolescents girls’s advocacy and leadership initiative. 2013.

  11. Restless Development; PACT; UNAIDS. ACT! Advocacy strategy toolkit: a practical toolkit for young people who are passionate about advancing HIV and sexual and reproductive health and rights through national advocacy in the post-2015 Agenda. 2015. https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/advocacy_toolkit_en_0.pdf.

  12. The Global Fund. The global fund: key populations. https://www.theglobalfund.org/en/key-populations/. Accessed 24 June 2019.

  13. Decorby-Watson K, Mensah G, Bergeron K, Abdi S, Rempel B, Manson H. Effectiveness of capacity building interventions relevant to public health practice : a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kennedy CE, Fonner VA, O’Reilly KR, Sweat MD. A systematic review of income generation interventions, including microfinance and vocational skills training, for HIV prevention. AIDS Care - Psychol Socio-Medical Asp AIDS/HIV. 2014;26(6):659–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2013.845287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yankah E, Aggleton P. Effects and effectiveness of life skills education for HIV prevention in young people. AIDS Educ Prev. 2008;20(6):465–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Priego-Hernandez FCJ, Mclean S. The impact of community mobilisation on HIV prevention in middle and low-income countries: a systematic review and critique. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(11):2110–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0748-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journalpmed.1000100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Denison JA, Sweat MD, Kennedy CE, et al. The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0925-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beattie TSH, Mohan HL, Bhattacharjee P, et al. Community mobilization and empowerment of female sex workers in Karnataka State, South India: associations with HIV and sexually transmitted infection risk. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:1516–25. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301911.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Blanchard AK, Mohan HL, Shahmanesh M, et al. Community mobilization, empowerment and HIV prevention among female sex workers in south India. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:234. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-234.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaikwad SS, Bhende A, Nidhi G, Saggurti N, Ranebennur V. How effective is community mobilisation in HIV prevention among highly diverse sex workers in urban settings? The Aastha intervention experience in Mumbai and Thane districts, India. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66:69–77. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2011-200514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guha M, Baschieri A, Bharat S, et al. Risk reduction and perceived collective efficacy and community support among female sex workers in Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra, India: the importance of context. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(2):55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gurnani V, Beattie TS, Bhattacharjee P, et al. An integrated structural intervention to reduce vulnerability to HIV and sexually transmitted infections among female sex workers in Karnataka state, south India. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:755. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-755.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kerrigan D, Telles P, Torres H, Overs C, Castle C. Community development and HIV/STI-related vulnerability among female sex workers in Rio de Janeiro. Brazil. Health Educ Res. 2008;23:137–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuhlmann AS, Galavotti C, Hastings P, Narayanan P, Saggurti N. Investing in communities: evaluating the added value of community mobilization on HIV prevention outcomes among FSWs in India. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(4):752–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0626-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Erausquin JT, Biradavolu M, Reed E, Burroway R, Blankenship KM. Trends in condom use among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India: the impact of a community mobilisation intervention. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(2):49–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Urada LA, Simmons J, Wong B, Tsuyuki K, Condino-Enrera G, Hernandez LI, Simbulan NP, Raj A. A human rights-focused HIV intervention for sex workers in Metro Manila, Philippines: evaluation of effects in a quantitative pilot study. Int J Public Health. 2016;61(8):945–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0875-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Gutiérrez JP, Atienzo EE, Bertozzi SM, McPherson S. Effects of the Frontiers Prevention Project in Ecuador on sexual behaviours and sexually transmitted infections amongst men who have sex with men and female sex workers: challenges on evaluating complex interventions. J Dev Eff. 2013;5(2):158–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2013.780088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gutierrez JP, McPherson S, Fakoya A, Matheou A, Bertozzi SM. Community-based prevention leads to an increase in condom use and a reduction in sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):497. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-497.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Aung PP, Ryan C, Bajracharya A, et al. Effectiveness of an integrated community- and clinic-based intervention on HIV testing, HIV knowledge, and sexual risk behavior of young men who have sex with men in Myanmar. J Adolesc Heal. 2017;60:S45–S53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ruria EC, Masaba R, Kose J, et al. Optimizing linkage to care and initiation and retention on treatment of adolescents with newly diagnosed HIV infection. Aids. 2017;31(January):S253–S260260. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001538.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Okello FO, Stuer F, Kidane A, Wube M. Saving the sick and improving the socio-economic conditions of people living with HIV in Ethiopia through traditional burial groups. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28:549–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czs097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vu L, Burnett-Zieman B, Banura C, et al. Increasing uptake of HIV, sexually transmitted infection, and family planning services, and reducing HIV-related risk behaviors among youth living with HIV in Uganda. J Adolesc Health. 2017;60:S22–S28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.09.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cheng Y, Lou CH, Mueller LM, et al. Effectiveness of a school-based AIDS education program among rural students in HIV high epidemic area of China. J Adolesc Health. 2008;42(2):184–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.07.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dunbar MS, Kang Dufour MS, Lambdin B, Mudekunye-Mahaka I, Nhamo D, Padian NS. The SHAZ! project: results from a pilot randomized trial of a structural intervention to prevent HIV among adolescent women in Zimbabwe. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e113621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journalpone.0113621.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Fiscian VS, Obeng EK, Goldstein K, Shea JA, Turner BJ. Adapting a multifaceted US HIV prevention education program for girls in Ghana. AIDS Educ Prev. 2009;21(1):67–79. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2009.21.1.67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nguyen HT, Tran AV, Nguyen NB, et al. Community mobilization to reduce drug use, Quang Ninh, Vietnam. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(1):189–95. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Shaikh S, Mburu G, Arumugam V, Mattipalli N, Aher A, Mehta S, Robertson J. Empowering communities and strengthening systems to improve transgender health: outcomes from the Pehchan programme in India. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19(Suppl 2):20809. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.3.20809.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. UNAIDS. Invest in advocacy. 2014; (December 2013). 2013. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/presscentre/featurestories/2016/april/20160404_community_advocacy.

  40. Kerrigan D, Fonner V, Stromdahl S, Kennedy C. Community empowerment among female sex workers is an effective HIV prevention intervention: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed evidence from low- and middle-income countries. AIDS Behav. 2013;17:1926–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0458-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kerrigan D, Kennedy CE, Morgan-Thomas R, et al. A community empowerment approach to the HIV response among sex workers: effectiveness, challenges, and considerations for implementation and scale-up. Lancet. 2015;385:172–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60973-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dandona L, Benotsch EG. Evaluation of the Avahan HIV prevention initiative in India. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl 6):I1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-s6-i1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the PITCH programme (Partnership to Inspire, Transform and Connect the HIV Response), which is a strategic partnership between Aidsfonds, Frontline AIDS and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The purpose of this systematic evidence review was to test the PITCH programme Theory of Change. We thank Afya Research Africa for their support with primary article screening. We also thank all participants, including people living with HIV, who generously participated in the research studies and projects we reviewed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Kiragu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kiragu, M., Fonner, V.A., Munyuwiny, S. et al. Does Capacity Development Increase Demand for Health Services and Rights Among Key Populations Affected by HIV? A Systematic Review of Evidence from Low and Middle-Income Countries. AIDS Behav 24, 2268–2281 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02936-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-02936-9

Keywords

Navigation