Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Design and planning for accessibility: lessons from Abu Dhabi and Dubai’s neighborhoods

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although Abu Dhabi and Dubai have similar political and planning systems, the two cities’ neighborhoods feature different morphological layouts. Over the course of their formal progression, these neighborhoods have experienced erratic changes in pedestrian accessibility. This study uses traditional methods of cartography and land use mapping coupled with quantitative methods of network analysis (UNA) to analyze the physical design elements that contribute to neighborhood accessibility in each city. Spatial and quantitative analyses reveal that planning practices in both cities achieved their highest accessibility levels in earlier neighborhoods. Since the 1980s, with the emergence of automobile-oriented developments, the two cities have failed to build pedestrian-accessible and connected neighborhoods. While Dubai has stayed with the same planning system since that time, Abu Dhabi in the 2010s reformed its planning system by embracing higher density and more interconnected streets, yet these measures have not resulted in increased accessibility. The study demonstrates that pedestrian accessibility results from an effective interplay between street design, parcel sizes, and land use density and distribution. The paper concludes by calling for the return to old physical ideals of local neighborhood planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alawadi, K. (2014). Urban redevelopment trauma: The story of a Dubai neighbourhood. Built Environment, 40(3), 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alawadi, K. (2017a). Rethinking Dubai’s urbanism: Generating sustainable form-based urban design strategies for an integrated neighborhood. Cities, 60, 353–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alawadi, K. (2017b). Place attachment as a motivation for community preservation: The demise of an old, bustling Dubai community. Urban Studies, 54(13), 2973–2997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alawadi, K. (Ed.). (2018a). Lifescapes beyond bigness. Artifice.

  • Alawadi, K. (2018b). Whatever happened to Dubai's public spaces? International Journal of Middle East Studies, 50(3), 562–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alawadi, K. (2019). A return to the old landscape? Balancing physical planning ideals and cultural constraints in Dubai’s residential neighborhoods. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 34(1), 235–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alawadi, K., & Benkraouda, O. (2018). What happened to Abu Dhabi’s urbanism? The question of regional integration. Journal of Urban Design, 23(3), 367–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alawadi, K., & Benkraouda, O. (2019). The debate over neighborhood density in Dubai: Between theory and practicality. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alawadi, K., & Dooling, S. (2016). Challenges and opportunities for participatory planning approaches within Dubai’s urban context. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 9(3), 276–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alawadi, K., Alameri, H., & Scoppa, M. (2020). Reclaiming Alleyways to improve network connectivity: Lessons from Dubai’s neighborhoods. Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X20931907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alawadi, K., Khanal, A., & Almulla, A. (2018). Land, urban form, and politics: A study on Dubai's housing landscape and rental affordability. Cities, 81, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alawadi, K., & Benkraouda, O. (2019). The debate over neighborhood density in Dubai: Between theory and practicality. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagaeen, S. (2007). Brand Dubai: The instant city; or the instantly recognizable city. International Planning Studies, 12(2), 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/1486372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (2004). Distance in space syntax, Working Paper n. 80, Center for advanced spatial analysis. University College London, http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/publications.

  • Batty, M., & Longley, P. (1994). Fractal cities. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breheny, M. (1996). Centrists, Decentrists and Compromisers. In M. Jenks, E. Burton, & K. William (Eds.), The compact city: A sustainable urban form?. London: E&FN Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condon, P. (2010). Seven rules for sustainable communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, J. (2004, January). Measuring network connectivity for bicycling and walking. In 83rd Annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington, DC (pp. 11–15).

  • Elsheshtawy, Y. (2004). Redrawing boundaries: Dubai, the emergence of a global city. In Y. Elsheshtawy (Ed.), Planning the Middle East City: An urban kaleidoscope in a globalizing world (pp. 169–199). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elsheshtawy, Yasser. (2008). Transitory Sites: Mapping Dubai’s ‘Forgotten’ Urban Spaces. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), 968–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00819.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filion, P. (2018). The Morphology of Dispersed Suburbanism: The Land-use Patterns of the Dominant North American Urban Form. In R. Harris & U. Lehrer (Eds.), The suburban land question: A global survey (pp. 122–144). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L., Sallis, J., Saelens, B., Leary, L., Cain, K., Conway, T., et al. (2009). The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 44(13), 924–933. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities, and the urban condition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, S. L., & Niemeier, D. A. (1997). Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29(7), 1175–1194. https://doi.org/10.1068/a291175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of American Institute of Planners, 25(1), 73–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1989). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(1), 29–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabareen, Y. R. (2006). Sustainable Urban Forms. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x05285119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, C. (2015). The Effects of Spatial Accessibility and Centrality to Land Use on Walking in Seoul, Korea. Cities, 46, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, C. (2016). Spatial access to pedestrians and retail sales in Seoul, Korea. Habitat International, 57, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.07.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, C. (2018). The S + 5Ds: Spatial Access to Pedestrian Environments and Walking in Seoul, Korea. Cities, 77, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.01.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khirfan, L., & Jaffer, Z. (2014). Sustainable Urbanism in Abu Dhabi: Transferring the Vancouver Model. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(3), 482–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotkin, J. (2010). Urban legends: Why suburbs, not dense cities, are the future|Newgeography.com. Retrieved 14 February 2020, from https://www.newgeography.com/content/001722-urban-legends-why-suburbs-not-dense-cities-are-future.

  • Litman, T. (2003). Measuring transportation: traffic, mobility and accessibility. Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE Journal, 73(10), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, Vitality and Urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moudon, A. V. (1997). Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Urban Morphology, 1(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, N., Cerin, E., Leslie, E., duToit, L., Coffee, N., Frank, L., et al. (2007). Neighborhood Walkability and the Walking Behavior of Australian Adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33(5), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peponis, J., Bafna, S., & Zhang, Z. (2008). The connectivity of streets: Reach and directional distance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35(5), 881–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porta, S., Crucitti, P., & Latora, V. (2006). The Network Analysis of Urban Streets: A Primal Approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(5), 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porta, S., & Latora, V. (2007). 11 Multiple centrality assessment: Mapping centrality in networks of urban spaces (p. 101). Urban Sustainability Through Environmental Design: Approaches to Time-People-Place Responsive Urban Spaces.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porta, S., Strano, E., Iacoviello, V., & Messora, R. (2009). Street centrality and densities of retail and services in Bologna, Italy. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36, 450–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratti, C. (2004). Space Syntax: Some Inconsistencies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(4), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salingaros, N. A. (1998). Theory of the urban web. Journal of Urban Design, 3, 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scellato, S., Cardillo, A., Latora, V., & Porta, S. (2006). The Backbone of a City. The European Physical Journal B, 50, 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2006-00066-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoppa, M., Bawazir, K., & Alawadi, K. (2018). Walking the superblocks: Street layout efficiency and the sikkak system in Abu Dhabi. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 359–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoppa, M., Bawazir, K., & Alawadi, K. (2019). Straddling boundaries in superblock cities. Assessing local and global network connectivity using cases from Abu Dhabi, UAE. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 130, 770–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevtsuk, A., & Mekonnen, M. (2012). Urban network analysis. A new toolbox for ArcGIS. Revue internationale de géomatique, 22(2), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.3166/rig.22.287-305.

  • Sevtsuk, A., & Ratti, C. (2010). Does urban mobility have a daily routine? Learning from the aggregate data of mobile networks. Journal of Urban Technology, 17(1), 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevtsuk, A., Kalvo, R., & Ekmekci, O. (2016). Pedestrian accessibility in grid layouts: The role of block, plot and street dimensions. Urban Morphology, 20(2), 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y., & Knaap, G. (2004). Measuring Urban Form: Is Portland Winning the War on Sprawl? Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, M. (2005). Designing the Walkable City. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 131(4), 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, M., & Ben-Joseph, E. (1997). Streets and the shaping of cities and towns. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stangl, P. (2012). The pedestrian route directness test: A new level-of-service model. URBAN DESIGN International, 17(3), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stangl, P., & Guinn, J. M. (2011). Neighborhood design, connectivity assessment and obstruction. Urban Design International, 16(4), 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stretton, H. (1996). Density, efficiency and equality in Australian cities. The compact city: A sustainable urban form, 45–52.

  • Talen, E. (2011). Sprawl Retrofit: Sustainable Urban Form in Unsustainable Places. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(6), 952–978. https://doi.org/10.1068/b37048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Environment. (1996). Policy and Procedure Guidelines, PPG 6.

  • Vragović, I., Louis, E., & Díaz-Guilera, A. (2005). Efficiency of informational transfer in regular and complex networks. Physical Review E, 71(3), 036122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S. M. (2003). The evolution of urban form in Portland and Toronto: Implications for sustainability planning. Local Environment.

  • Wheeler, S. M. (2015). Built Landscapes of Metropolitan Regions: An International Typology. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81(3), 167–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehand, J. W., Gu, K., Conzen, M. P., & Whitehand, S. M. (2014). The Typological Process and the Morphological Period: A Cross-Cultural Assessment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(3), 512–533. https://doi.org/10.1068/b39097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K., Joynt, J., & Hopkins, D. (2010). Adapting to Climate Change in the Compact City: The Suburban Challenge. Built Environment, 36(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.36.1.105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Khalifa University (Grant No. CIRA-2019-053, 8474000184).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sustainable Critical Infrastructure Program, Khalifa University, Masdar Campus, P.O. Box: 127788, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    Khaled Alawadi, Sahar Khaleel & Ouafa Benkraouda

  2. Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    Khaled Alawadi

Authors
  1. Khaled Alawadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sahar Khaleel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ouafa Benkraouda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khaled Alawadi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alawadi, K., Khaleel, S. & Benkraouda, O. Design and planning for accessibility: lessons from Abu Dhabi and Dubai’s neighborhoods. J Hous and the Built Environ 36, 487–520 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09763-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09763-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation