Skip to main content
Log in

Age and Geodynamic Conditions of Formation for the Neoproterozoic Gold-Bearing Granitoids in the Eastern Sayan

  • Published:
Geotectonics Aims and scope

Abstract

The paper discusses the results of petrogeochemical and geochronological studies of the Tainsky granitoid stock containing the Tainsky gold deposit in the East Sayan. The Tainsky granitoid stock intrudes through ultrabasites of the Ospa-Kitoi ultrabasitic massif. Granitoids are the part of the ophiolite cover which overlap Archean basement rocks of the Tuva-Mongolian microcontinent of the Archean foundation. Consistent isotopic age values in the range of 850–860 Ma obtained by three independent methods (U–Pb, Re–Os, 40Ar/39Ar) are evidence of the Neoproterozoic age of granitoid magmatism and its genetic relationship with gold–(±copper)–porphyry mineralization. The geological setting, geochemical characteristics, and age of the Tainsky granitoid stock allow us to attribute these rocks to the Neoproterozoic Dunzhugur island arc sequences. Isotopic age values obtained by Rb–Sr and 40Ar/39Ar methods characterized by lower closure temperatures of isotopic systems make it possible to distinguish several tectonothermal events at 650, 435, 339–333, and 280–223 Ma, reflecting difference stages of tectonic evolution of the Eastern Sayan segment of the Central Asian folding belt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M. M. Buslov, “Tectonics and geodynamics of the Central Asian Foldbelt: The role of Late Paleozoic large-amplitude strike-slip faults,” Russ. Geol. Geophys. 52, 52–71 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. I. V. Gordienko, P. A. Roshchektaev, and D. V. Gorokhovsky, “Oka ore district of the Eastern Sayan: Geology, structural–metallogenic zonation, genetic types of ore deposits, their geodynamic formation conditions, and outlook for development,” Geol. Ore Deposits 58, 361–382 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B. B. Damdinov, S. M. Zhmodik, A. V. Travin, D. S. Yudin, and N. A. Goryachev, “New data on the age of gold mineralization in the southeastern part of Eastern Sayan,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 479, 429–432 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. N. L. Dobretsov, “Nappe tectonics of East Sayan,” Geotektonika, No. 1, 39–50 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. L. Dobretsov, V. G. Belichenko, R. G. Boos, et al., Geology and Ore-Bearing Potential of East Sayan (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1989) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. M. Zhmodik, A. G. Mironov, and A. S. Zhmodik, Gold-Concentrating Systems of Ophiolotic Belts: Case Study of the Sayan–Baikal–Muya Belt (Novosibirsk, Geo, 2008) [in Russian].

  7. M. I. Kuzmin and V. V. Yarmolyuk, “Mantle plumes of Central Asia (Northeast Asia) and their role in forming endogenous deposits,” Russ. Geol. Geophys. 55, 120–143 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. B. Kuz’michev, Tectonic History of the Tuvan–Mongolian Massif: Early Baikalian, Late Baikalian, and Early Caledonian Stages (Probel-2000, Moscow, 2004) [in Russian].

  9. Yu. A. Martynov, A. I. Khanchuk, J.-I. Kimura, A. V. Rybin, and A. Yu. Martynov, “Geochemistry and petrogenesis of volcanic rocks in the Kuril island arc,” Petrology 18, 489–513 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. G. Mironov, S. M. Zhmodik, Yu. Ch. Ochirov, A.  A. Borovikov, and V. D. Popov, “The Tainskoe gold deposit (Eastern Sayan, Russia)—A new example of the porphyry gold type,” Geol. Ore Deposits 43, 353–370 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. V. Travin, D. S. Yudin, A. G. Vladimirov, S. V.  Khromykh, N. I. Volkova, A. S. Mekhonoshin, and T. B. Kolotilina, “Thermochronology of the Chernorud granulite zone (Ol’khon Region, Western Baikal area),” Geochem. Int. 11, 1107–1124 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. A. Fedotova and E. V. Khain, Tectonics of the Southern East Sayan and Its Position in the Ural–Mongolian Belt (Nauchnyi mir, Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].

  13. V. B. Khubanov, M. D. Buyantuev, and A. A. Tsygankov, “U–Pb dating of zircons from PZ3–MZ igneous complexes of Transbaikalia by sector-field mass spectrometry with laser sampling: Technique and comparison with SHRIMP,” Russ. Geol. Geophys. 57, 190–205 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. K. Baksi, D. A. Archibald, and E. Farrar, “Intercalibration of 40Ar/39Ar dating standards,” Chem. Geol. 129, 307–324 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. W. L. Griffin, W. J. Powell, N. J. Pearson, and S. Y. O’Reilly, “GLITTER: Data reduction software for laser ablation ICP–MS,” in Laser Ablation ICP-MS in the Earth Sciences, Vol. 40 of Short Course Ser. - Mineral. Assoc. Can., Ed. by P. J. Sylvester (2008), pp. 204–207.

  16. E. V. Khain, E. V. Bibikova, A. Kroner, D. Z. Zhuravlev, E. V. Sklyarov, A. A. Fedotova, and I. R. Kravchenko-Berezhnoy, “The most ancient ophiolite of the Central Asian fold belt: U-Pb and Pb-Pb zircon ages for the Dunzhugur Complex, Eastern Sayan, Siberia, and geodynamic implications,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 199, 311–325 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. B. Kuzmichev, “Neoproterozoic accretion of the Tuva-Mongolian massif, one of the Precambrian terranes in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt,” in Composition and Evolution of Central Asian Orogenic Belt Geology: Evolution, Tectonics, and Models, Ed. by A. Kroner (Borntraeger Sci. Publ., Stuttgart, 2015), pp. 66–92.

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. R. Ludwig, User’s Manual for Isoplot 3.00: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel, No. 4 of Berkeley Geochronol. Center. Spec. Publ. (2003).

  19. H. Martin, “Adakitic magmas: Modern analogues of Archean granitoids,” Lithos 46, 411–429 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Martin, R. H. Smithies, R. Rapp, J.-F. Moyend, and D. Champion, “An overview of adakite, tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite (TTG), and sanukitoid: Relationships and some implications for crustal evolution,” Lithos 79, 1–24 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. W. F. McDonough and S. S. Sun, “The composition of the Earth,” Chem. Geol. 120, 223–253 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. G. Mironov, H. Stein, A. Zimmerman, and S. M. Zhmodik, “Dating of gold occurrences in the Sayan-Baikal Fold Belt, Southern Siberia, Russia,” in Mineral Deposit Research: Meeting the Global Challenge, Proceedings of the Eighth Biennial SGA Meeting, Beijing, China,2005, Ed. by J. Mao and F. P. Bierlein (Springer, Berlin, 2005), Ch. 7, pp. 797–799.

  23. J. Pearce, N. Harris, and A. Tindle, “Trace element discrimination diagram for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks,” J. Petrol. 25, 956–98 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R. L. Rudnick and S. Gao, “Composition of the continental crust,” in Treatise on Geochemistry, Vol. 3: The Crust, Ed. by R. L. Rudnick (Elsevier, 2003), pp. 1–64.

  25. E. Seedorff, J. H. Dilles, J. M. Proffett, Jr., M. T. Einaudi, L. Zurcher, W. J. A. Stavast, D. A. Johnson, and M. D. Barton, “Porphyry deposits: Characteristics and origin of hypogene features,” in Economic Geology One Hundredth Anniversary Volume, Ed. by J. W. Hedenquist, J. F. H. Thompson, R. J. Goldfarb, and J. P. Richards (Soc. Econ. Geol., Littleton, Colo., 2005), pp. 251–298.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the Collective Use Center “Analytical Center of Mineral–Geochemical and Isotope Studies” of Geological Institute, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Ulan Ude) and the Center for Multielement and Isotope Studies of the Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk) for conducting analytical studies.

The authors are sincerely indebted to the reviewer, Prof. M.V. Luchitskaya (Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow), and an anonymous reviewer for commentary that improved the article.

Funding

The studies were carried out under the state task of Geological Institute and Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy (both are of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences) with financing from the Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education, as well as grants from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project nos. 18-05-00489а and 17-05-00936а).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. B. Damdinov.

Additional information

Reviewer: M.V. Luchitskaya

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Damdinov, B.B., Zhmodik, S.M., Khubanov, V.B. et al. Age and Geodynamic Conditions of Formation for the Neoproterozoic Gold-Bearing Granitoids in the Eastern Sayan. Geotecton. 54, 356–365 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S001685212002003X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S001685212002003X

Keywords:

Navigation