Skip to main content
Log in

A new method for calculating butterfly abundance trends for small regional areas

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 06 August 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Changes in butterfly populations are routinely monitored using transect counts, for example from the UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme. However, abundance trends are typically only calculated at national and country level in the UK. A new method is presented that estimates species’ trends for smaller regions or datasets, where there may be limited transects. National approaches rely on larger numbers of transects and estimate flight periods either at site level, at the cost of excluding data, or assume a fixed flight period across transects to maximise data usage. The new approach uses butterfly records from all available sources to estimate a parameterised curve representing the flight period and create a so-called Dummy site. Counts from the Dummy site are included with true transect counts in a generalised additive model to estimate annual flight periods as fixed across sites, from which counts and abundance indices are estimated. Inclusion of the Dummy site produces a better overall fit, with greater influence for species with limited transects. Regional indices were often comparable with those produced from a national analysis, but with more realistic indices for some species. Trends were usually similar in magnitude and sign, but for certain species the new approach estimated more robust trends, benefiting from the inclusion of more data through estimating a common regional flight period. The approach is demonstrated for butterflies in Surrey (UK) but has wider relevance, for example to newly-established or small-scale monitoring schemes which may exploit alternative data sources to inform species’ flight period estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 06 August 2020

    In the Original publication of the article, Table 1 was published incorrectly. The correct Table 1 is given in this Correction.

References

  • Agassiz DJL, Beavan SD, Heckford RJ (2013) Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the British Isles. Royal Entomological Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher J, Warren M, Fox R, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Jeffcoate S (2001) The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop TR, Botham MS, Fox R, Leather SR, Chapman DS, Oliver TH (2013) The utility of distribution data in predicting phenology. Methods Ecol Evol 4(11):1024–1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brereton TM, Cruickshanks KL, Risely K, Noble DG, Roy DB (2010) Developing and launching a wider countryside butterfly survey across the United Kingdom. J Insect Conserv 15(1–2):279–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9345-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brereton TM, Botham MS, Middlebrook I, Randle Z, Noble DG, Harris S, Dennis E, Robinson A, Peck K, Roy DB (2019) United Kingdom Butterfly Monitoring Scheme report for 2018. Tech. rep., Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Butterfly Conservation, British Trust for Ornithology and Joint Nature Conservation Committee

  • Cayton HL, Haddad NM, Gross K, Diamond SE, Ries L (2015) Do growing degree days predict phenology across butterfly species? Ecology 96(6):1473–1479. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-0131.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins GA (1995) Butterflies of Surrey. Surrey Wildlife Trust

  • Copp C (2003) Watsonia Vice county boundary project: Completion of the digitised standard of the UK Watsonian Vice county boundary maps

  • Dandy JE (1969) Watsonian Vice-counties of Great Britain. 146, Ray Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis EB, Freeman SN, Brereton T, Roy DB (2013) Indexing butterfly abundance whilst accounting for missing counts and variability in seasonal pattern. Methods Ecol Evol 4(7):637–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis EB, Morgan BJ, Freeman SN, Brereton TM, Roy DB (2016) A generalized abundance index for seasonal invertebrates. Biometrics 72(4):1305–1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2019) UK biodiversity indicators 2019

  • Fox R, Warren MS, Breteton TM (2010) The butterfly Red List for Great Britain: Species status 12

  • Fox R, Harrower CA, Bell JR, Shortall CR, Middlebrook I, Wilson RJ (2019) Insect population trends and the IUCN red list process. J Insect Conserv 23(2):269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac NJ, Jarzyna MA, Keil P, Dambly LI, Boersch-Supan PH, Browning E, Freeman SN, Golding N, Guillera-Arroita G, Henrys PA et al (2020) Data integration for large-scale models of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 35:56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knaus J, Porzelius C, Binder H, Schwarzer G (2009) Easier parallel computing in R with snowfall and sfcluster. R J 1(1):54–59. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2009-004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macgregor CJ, Thomas CD, Roy DB, Beaumont MA, Bell JR, Brereton T, Bridle JR, Dytham C, Fox R, Gotthard K et al (2019) Climate-induced phenology shifts linked to range expansions in species with multiple reproductive cycles per year. Nat Commun 10(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12479-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matechou E, Dennis EB, Freeman SN, Brereton T (2014) Monitoring abundance and phenology in (multivoltine) butterfly species: a novel mixture model. J Appl Ecol 51(3):766–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pannekoek J, van Strien A (2005) TRIM 3 Manual. TRends and Indices for Monitoring data

  • Pollard E, Yates TJ (1993) Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation: the British butterfly monitoring scheme. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert CP, Casella G (2004) Monte Carlo statistical methods, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rothery P, Roy DB (2001) Application of generalized additive models to butterfly transect count data. J Appl Stat 28(7):897–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760120074979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy DB, Asher J (2003) Spatial trends in the sighting dates of British butterflies. Int J Biometeorol 47(4):188–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-003-0170-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roy DB, Rothery P, Breteton T (2007) Reduced-effort schemes for monitoring butterfly populations. J Appl Ecol 44(5):993–1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01340.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmucki R, Pe’er G, Roy DB, Stefanescu C, Van Swaay CA, Oliver TH, Kuussaari M, Van Strien AJ, Ries L, Settele J et al (2015) A regionally informed abundance index for supporting integrative analyses across butterfly monitoring schemes. J Appl Ecol 53:501–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2007) Year in review 2006

  • The R Core Team (2019) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org/

  • Van Swaay C, Dennis E, Schmucki R, Sevilleja C, Balalaikins M, Botham M, Bourn N, Brereton T, Cancela J, Carlisle B, et al. (2019) The EU Butterfly Indicator for Grassland species: 1990–2017: Technical Report. Butterfly Conservation Europe & ABLE/eBMS

  • Willmott K, Bridge M, Clarke HE, Kelly F (2013) Butterflies of Surrey revisited. Surrey Wildlife Trust

  • Wood SN (2017) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Ian Middlebrook for supplying the site indices from the national analysis, to David Roy for comments on an earlier draft of this paper and to the two anonymous reviewers who provided constructive comments of an earlier draft of the paper. The UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme is organized and funded by Butterfly Conservation, the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, British Trust for Ornithology, and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee. The UKBMS is indebted to all volunteers who contribute data to the scheme. With thanks to all recorders who contribute to the Butterflies for the New Millennium, which is run by Butterfly Conservation with support from Natural England.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry E. Clarke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Harry E Clarke is the Surrey County Butterfly Recorder and a Butterfly Conservation volunteer

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clarke, H.E., Dennis, E.B. A new method for calculating butterfly abundance trends for small regional areas. J Insect Conserv 24, 779–790 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-020-00251-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-020-00251-1

Keywords

Navigation