1 Introduction

The heterogeneously catalysed liquid phase hydrogenation of benzaldehyde has been reported over several metals and supports [1,2,3,4]. The hydrogenation product of this reaction, benzyl alcohol, is an important chemical having a wide range of commercial applications, including use as a solvent, inks and paints, and as a precursor in the production of cosmetics and flavourings [1, 5]. Whilst the catalytic hydrogenation of benzaldehyde is a viable route to benzyl alcohol, achieving a high selectivity can be problematic [6].

The observed product distribution is dependent on several factors including metal, support, solvent and reaction conditions [1]. As such, it is essential to acknowledge the full suite of reactions possible during the hydrogenation of benzaldehyde to benzyl alcohol. For example, upon formation, the benzyl alcohol may undergo further reaction in the form of hydrogenolysis to yield toluene. Hydrogenolysis is particularly prevalent over Group VIII metals (Ni, Pd and Pt) [1, 7, 8], and in the presence of reducible oxides, such as titania and zirconia, as they favour interaction with the hydroxyl oxygen [1]. Moreover, in particular with Ni based catalysts, ring hydrogenation is also possible [3, 4], resulting in production of species such as methylcyclohexane, cyclohexylmethanol and cyclohexane [3, 4]. Selection of a suitable metal is, however, a compromise. Whilst not typically employed as a hydrogenation catalyst, supported Au catalysts are reported to result in enhanced performance in terms of selectivity towards benzyl alcohol [1, 9]. Nevertheless, significantly lower hydrogenation rates are observed than for conventional hydrogenation metal catalysts such as Pd and Ni [1, 9]. Depending on the solvent used for the reaction, interactions with the solvent can also occur. This is particularly prevalent for polar solvents such as alcohols [1, 2, 7]. For example, using ethanol, (ethoxymethyl)benzene and (diethoxymethyl)benzene can be produced [1].

For liquid phase heterogeneously catalysed hydrogenation reactions there exists an equilibrium between the catalyst surface and the liquid phase, connecting reactants, intermediates and products. Attenuated total reflection infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopy has received significant interest over the last two decades, where the technique has been used to study a variety of catalytic reactions due to its ability to monitor the adsorbed species in the presence of the solution phase [10, 11]. Whilst the focus of this study is a hydrogenation reaction, there is also significant literature on the reverse reaction, alcohol oxidation [12, 13]. Indeed, ATR-IR studies relating to benzyl alcohol oxidation provide useful spectroscopic markers and insights that are highly relevant to the hydrogenation of benzaldehyde [14, 15].

In recent years several liquid phase reactions over heterogeneous catalysts have been investigated by ATR-IR. Both adsorption and dissociation, oxidation and, hydrogenation studies have been probed. A focus of much of these in situ studies has been the search for reaction intermediates to elucidate reaction mechanisms [10, 11, 15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Here, we focus on the ability of ATR-IR spectroscopy to provide molecular speciation on the solid (catalyst)-liquid interface; a region frequently troubled by mass transport limitations [22].

This communication applies ATR-IR spectroscopy to examine the liquid phase hydrogenation of benzaldehyde, with outcomes rationalised within a range of accessible reaction pathways. Palladium is selected as the metal catalyst and cyclohexane is selected as a reaction solvent. Scheme 1 summarises the chemical pathways associated with this reaction system which are potentially accessible.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Generic reaction scheme for the heterogeneously catalysed hydrogenation of benzaldehyde

Scheme 1 highlights that the primary reaction is hydrogenation of benzaldehyde to afford benzyl alcohol. The benzyl alcohol may then experience hydrogenolysis of the hydroxyl functionality to yield toluene. In addition, the formation of benzene, via either a decarbonylation or a hydrogenolysis pathway, is possible. In order to validate the observed product distribution from the ATR-IR spectroscopic studies the reaction was also performed in a batch reactor.

2 Experimental

2.1 Liquid Phase Ambient Pressure Reactor

Using a Radleys 6 port carousel stirrer hotplate with condenser, the liquid phase hydrogenation of benzaldehyde over a 5% Pd/Al2O3, (Alpha Aesar, 11713) was tested at ambient pressure. 20 mL of cyclohexane (Fischer Scientific, reagent grade) was first degassed under N2, prior to addition of the catalyst (~ 18 mg). Catalyst reduction was performed at 313 K, under H2 flow (20 mL/min) for 60 min. Following reduction and maintaining the temperature at 313 K, the reaction was commenced by the introduction of benzaldehyde (200 μL, 0.07 M, Sigma Aldrich, 99.5%). The addition of the benzaldehyde was taken as time t0. Samples were extracted (approximately 0.25 mL) for gas–liquid chromatography (GLC) measurement (Agilent 6850 GC fitted with a DB-5 capillary column and a flame ionisation detector) at regular intervals over a period of 60 min. An internal standard, n-decane (0.1 M, Sigma Aldrich, purity ≥ 95%) was added to the samples to aid quantification. GC was used to determine the concentration of benzaldehyde, benzyl alcohol and toluene.

Cyclohexane was selected as a reaction solvent on three grounds: (i) it is stable concerning the possibility of further hydrogenation; (ii) it exhibits discrete spectral features in the infrared spectrum that provide access to reagent/product vibrational bands [ν(C=O) of R–(C=O)H, ν(C–O) of R–OH and [ν(C=O) of (CO)ad]; and (iii) the mole fraction for hydrogen in cyclohexane at 1 bar and 298 K is 4.1 × 10−4, which compares favourably with a typical hydrogenation solvent such as methanol (1.6 × 10−4) [23].

2.2 Ambient Pressure ATR-FTIR Reactions

A 10 bounce horizontal ATR heated flow through cell from Pike Technologies, with a 80 × 10 × 4 mm germanium internal reflection element (IRE) was used for the ATR measurements. The ATR cell was mounted in a Bruker Tensor II FTIR spectrometer equipped with a MCT detector. Reference solutions were recorded using 128 scans (acquisition time = approximately 4 min), whereas reaction spectra were recorded using 16 scans (acquisition time = approximately 30 s). The reduced acquisition time associated with the lower number of scans ensures that the analysis of the reaction is as close to ‘real time’ as possible.

The catalyst, 50 mg, was adhered to the Ge IRE using the following procedure. The catalyst was first ground then sonicated in a small volume of water (4 mL) for 3 h to achieve a slurry like paste. A small volume of the slurry was subsequently added dropwise to the IRE, then dried at 333 K in air (using the ATR reactor heater). This addition-drying procedure was repeated until approximately 50 mg of catalyst had been added to the IRE and a uniform coating achieved.

Following the catalyst deposition stage, cyclohexane was flowed through the cell. A flow of hydrogen was then introduced, allowing the catalyst to be reduced prior to the collection of a background spectrum at reaction temperature (313 K), and used for all subsequent measurements.

The ATR flow set-up was a closed loop system comprising a small sample tube containing the reaction solution (40 mL, 0.07 M benzaldehyde in cyclohexane) fitted with a gas bubbler. The solutions was flowed through the ATR cell. A Gilson MiniPuls 3 peristaltic pump maintained a flow rate of 1.1 mL/min. After reduction of the catalyst, a helium degassed solution of benzaldehyde was passed over the catalyst until the FTIR signal stabilised. The H2 flow (20 mL/min) was then switched on, this was taken as the starting point of reaction time, t0. Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of the ATR-IR hydrogenation set-up.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of the ATR-IR hydrogenation set-up

During the gas flow process no obvious loss of catalyst was observed and on inspection of the ATR element post reaction the catalyst film appeared intact. Moreover, infrared spectra recorded over the full reaction coordinate exhibited comparable baseline intensities. These observations indicate the catalyst film to have been relatively unperturbed during the reaction sequence.

Operating the ATR cell in a continuous flow mode was intended to provide the opportunity for multiple regent/catalyst interactions, as would be the case in the batch reactor. However, it is acknowledged that the reported ATR-IR set-up (Fig. 1) does not represent ideal hydrogenation conditions; not least presenting inefficient mixing and a limited supply of dissolved hydrogen. Thus, the described arrangements are providing vibrational spectroscopic information of an established hydrogenation reaction under conditions of constrained hydrogen supply, i.e. a scenario not totally unknown in liquid phase heterogeneously catalysed reactions.

3 Results

3.1 Stirred Batch Reactor

The reaction profile for benzaldehyde hydrogenation in the stirred batch reactor is presented in Fig. 2. Benzaldehyde conversion is complete within 60 min and benzyl alcohol is identified as the primary product (~ 79% yield). However, Fig. 2 also represents a significant mass imbalance that represents ~ 21% on reaction completion. For the experimental arrangement used, no other products were identified. Toluene was readily detectable by the GLC but this molecule was absent from the reaction mixture. Unfortunately, benzene (B.Pt. 353.1 K) could not be resolved from the process solvent (cyclohexane, B.Pt. 353.8 K). However, with reference to Scheme 1, the mass imbalance is tentatively attributed to the coincident formation of benzene as a by-product. Importantly, Fig. 2 establishes that benzaldehyde hydrogenation over this particular catalyst is facile, and that this reaction system is suitable for further investigation by ATR-IR.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Reaction profile for the liquid phase hydrogenation of benzaldehyde (0.2 mL) conducted in the stirred batch reactor over 5 wt% Pd/Al2O3 catalyst (17.4 mg) at 313 K in cyclohexane (20 mL)

3.2 ATR-IR: The Carbonyl Stretch of Benzaldehyde

Figure 3a presents the ATR-IR spectrum in the region 1600–1800 cm−1 as the benzaldehyde/cyclohexane solution is passed over the Pd/Al2O3 catalyst at 313 K in the presence of helium gas. Two peaks are seen about 1700 cm−1. The narrower feature at 1712 cm−1 is assigned to solvated benzaldehyde, whilst the broader band centred at 1691 cm−1 is assigned to benzaldehyde adsorbed to the catalyst surface. In this way, Fig. 3a is sampling the equilibrium between solvated and adsorbed benzaldehyde.

Fig. 3
figure 3

(a) ATR-IR spectrum (1600–1800 cm−1) for the interaction of benzaldehyde in cyclohexane over a 5 wt% Pd/Al2O3 catalyst (50 mg) at 313 K in the presence of flowing helium and after a reduction stage. The helium flow was stopped and replaced with hydrogen gas; the spectrum was monitored as a function of time-on-stream: (b) 4, (c) 30 and (d) 60 min

In a recent study of the oxidation of benzyl alcohol by Campisi et al., the benzaldehyde product was shown to adsorb to the catalyst surface at a similar wavenumber to that reported here [14]. Moreover, in a study conducted by Liu and co-workers examining the hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde over Pt/MIL-101, a comparable shift to that observed in this work is detected upon adsorption of the aldehyde. Other than stating that it was not likely to be the rate determining step, that study did not explicitly consider the adsorption equilibria further [20].

Hydrogen was substituted for helium, initiating the hydrogenation reaction and the IR spectra recorded as a function of time-on-stream (Fig. 3b–d). The introduction of hydrogen gas induces changes in intensity of both of the ν(C=O) bands.

The integrated intensities of both free and adsorbed benzaldehyde bands are presented in Fig. 4, showing the intensity changes as the reaction proceeds (Fig. 4a, b). In addition, total peak area has been plotted, i.e. benzaldehyde (solv) plus benzaldehyde (ads), (Fig. 4c) that is representative of benzaldehyde conversion.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Integrated area of both the liquid phase (1712 cm−1, a) and adsorbed (1691 cm−1, b) carbonyl bands of benzaldehyde. In addition, the total area associated with the carbonyl bands has been plotted (c). Up until, t = 0 min, the reaction system experiences a helium flow, allowing the adsorption system to reach equilibrium before the hydrogenation reaction is commenced

At short reaction times, i.e. t = 4 min, there is the expected decrease in intensity of the adsorbed benzaldehyde peak as it is hydrogenated to product but, somewhat unexpectedly, there is a concomitant increase in intensity of the feature attributed to solvated benzaldehyde. It is proposed that upon introduction of the hydrogen co-feed, hydrogen dissociatively adsorbs onto the catalyst surface, forcing some of the weakly adsorbed benzaldehyde off the surface and into solution. This scenario is indicative of a competitive adsorption system. Thereafter, the hydrogenation reaction proceeds, as evidenced in Fig. 4 by a decline in both free and adsorbed benzaldehyde after 4 min T-o-S. As presented, the ATR-IR measurements are qualitative. Nevertheless, on the assumption that Fig. 4c is indicative of total benzaldehyde conversion, at 60 min this corresponds to ~ 14.5% conversion.

3.3 ATR-IR: The Hydrogenation of Benzaldehyde to Benzyl Alcohol

Section 3.1 establishes benzyl alcohol to be the dominant product in benzaldehyde hydrogenation over this catalyst (Fig. 2). Figure 5 compares the wide-scan ATR-IR spectrum at 60 min T-o-S against the reference spectrum recorded in the absence of flowing hydrogen gas. The blue box in Fig. 5 identifies the formation of benzyl alcohol via the growth of bands at 1011 and 1037 cm−1 that correspond to the (C–O) stretch of benzyl alcohol [24]. The relative weakness of intensity of these bands is consistent with the low benzaldehyde conversion signified in Fig. 4c. It is noted that no features attributable to the presence of toluene were observed throughout the whole reaction coordinate.

Fig. 5
figure 5

ATR-IR spectra (900–2200 cm−1) for the interaction of benzaldehyde in cyclohexane over a 5 wt% Pd/Al2O3 catalyst (50 mg) at 313 K: (a) in the presence of flowing helium (t = 0 min) and (b) in the presence of flowing hydrogen (t = 60 min). The blue box highlights vibrational bands associated with benzyl alcohol

3.4 ATR-IR: CO Formation Confirms the Occurrence of the Decarbonylation Reaction

In Sect. 3.1 it was not possible to directly identify benzene as being responsible for the mass imbalance evident in the reaction profile for the batch reactor (Fig. 2). However, due to the absence of toluene, its presence as a by-product was deduced from inspection of Scheme 1. Here we provide ancillary spectroscopic evidence to support that deduction.

Although benzene provides little in distinguishing vibrational modes for the reaction mixture under investigation, the presence of a decarbonylation pathway should manifest itself in terms of chemisorbed carbon monoxide [20, 25]. Figure 6a presents the ATR-IR spectrum for the helium reference run that is plotted alongside scans recording on increasing exposure to a gaseous hydrogen co-feed, Fig. 6(b–d). Figure 6a is featureless. However, at t = 4 min a broad band is observed with a peak maximum at 1852 cm−1. At t = 60 min, the band has increased in intensity, with the band maximum now positioned at 1929 cm−1 and the peak skewed to lower frequencies. This feature is assigned to carbon monoxide chemisorbed to the palladium crystallites that has formed via the decarbonylation of benzaldehyde. A study conducted by Burgener et al. examining citral hydrogenation over 5% Pd/Al2O3 showed two bands at 1875 and 1912 cm−1 resulting from CO formation under reaction conditions [21].

Fig. 6
figure 6

(a) ATR-IR spectrum (1750–2050 cm−1) for the interaction of benzaldehyde in cyclohexane over a 5 wt% Pd/Al2O3 catalyst (50 mg) at 313 K in the presence of flowing helium and after a reduction stage. The helium flow was stopped and replaced with hydrogen gas; the spectrum was monitored as a function of time-on-stream: (b) 4, (c) 30 and (d) 60 min

Figure 6 is consistent with the presence of a decarbonylation pathway producing benzene as a by-product during the liquid phase hydrogenation of benzaldehyde over Pd/Al2O3. Moreover, if the catalyst was insufficiently reduced, CO binding to Pd+ and Pd2+ would yield bands at approximately 2130 and 2150 cm−1 respectively [26]. As no such bands are observed (spectrum not shown), this confirms that the reduction procedure adopted was satisfactory for the catalyst.

Figure 6 also provides information on the manner of benzene formation from benzaldehyde within this reaction system. There is a degree of ambiguity about terminology in the literature concerning the formation of benzene and CO from benzaldehyde. Specifically, decarbonylation and hydrogenolysis appear to be used interchangeably to describe this reaction [1, 3, 27]. Hydrogenolysis can be defined as a chemical reaction whereby a carbon–carbon or a carbon-heteroatom single bond is cleaved by hydrogen [28]. Conversely, decarbonylation describes the process of removing CO [29], and thus, formation of CO and benzene from benzaldehyde may be defined as such a reaction. Nevertheless, hydrogen is not reported to be necessary for such reactions, with metal catalysts and high temperatures generally being required [30]. The possibility of a hydrogen assisted decarbonylation at low temperatures within the benzaldehyde hydrogenation system is consequently considered here.

The direct detection of CO, as shown in Fig. 6, suggests that it is a decarbonylation reaction which is observed in this instance. However, Fig. 6a shows no CO retention by the catalyst prior to the commencement of a hydrogen flow. Given that the catalyst is in a reduced form at this stage and that the decarbonylation reaction does not have a hydrogen requirement, it would have been expected that CO formation would have been observed at this point. Indeed, it is only when hydrogen is introduced to the ATR-IR cell that production of CO is detected (Fig. 6(b–d). The exclusive occurrence of this pathway in the presence of hydrogen indicates that, in this instance, benzene formation can be more correctly considered to be a hydrogenolytic decarbonylation reaction in order to better reflect its hydrogen requirement.

4 Discussion

The above spectroscopic findings are linked to a reaction scheme that reflects the chemistry observed during the benzaldehyde hydrogenation reaction in the ATR-IR cell (Scheme 2). Highlighted by blue boxes in Scheme 2 are the species detectable by ATR-IR spectroscopy. Entities both in the liquid phase and adsorbed on the surface are identified. Scheme 2 illustrates that, whilst under the designated reaction conditions (Sect. 2.2), hydrogenation to afford benzyl alcohol is achieved, the subsequent hydrogenolysis of the benzyl alcohol to furnish toluene is not observed. In parallel to the hydrogenation process, hydrogenolytic decarbonylation of the benzaldehyde to form benzene and CO is observed, as evidenced by the binding of CO to the surface of the catalyst under a flow of hydrogen (Fig. 6).

Scheme 2
scheme 2

Postulated reaction scheme for the hydrogenation of benzaldehyde showing the interface at the surface-liquid equilibrium. Species highlighted in blue are detectable by ATR-IR spectroscopy

Finally, the porosity and accessibility of the catalyst thin film employed in the ATR-IR experiments will be briefly considered. SEM images of an alumina supported catalyst deposited on a Ge IRE in a similar manner to that adopted in this work estimate the depth of the catalyst bed to be ~ 100 μm [31]. The approximate penetration depth of the evanescent wave of a 45° Ge crystal is 0.6–0.7 μm [10], a value insufficient to penetrate the surface of the catalyst layer. However, under the stated conditions, as revealed by SEM [31], the catalyst layer is expected to form as a cracked and open structure that will support efficient liquid exchange. Figure 3 shows signals from both BA(solv) and BA(ad), i.e. the IR beam is interrogating both the solvent and catalyst surface. This scenario indicates that H2(solv) to be accessible to the catalyst surface and that hydrogen supply at the liquid/ solid interface is not expected to present significant mass transport limitations for the ATR-IR measurements considered here.

5 Conclusions

The liquid phase hydrogenation of benzaldehyde over a 5 wt% Pd/Al2O3 catalyst was examined primarily by ATR-IR spectroscopy. The following conclusions can be drawn.

  • ATR-IR spectroscopy of solvated benzaldehyde present over the catalyst under a constant flow of helium revealed the presence of two carbonyl features that are assigned to solvated and adsorbed benzaldehyde. In this way, the ATR-IR methodology is sampling the important equilibrium between the liquid phase and the catalyst surface.

  • No hydrogenolysis to afford toluene was observed. This outcome was validated by application of a batch benzaldehyde reaction under comparable reaction conditions to the ATR-IR cell reaction.

  • The introduction of solvated hydrogen to the liquid feed-stream led to the observation of benzyl alcohol and CO as reaction products. The decarbonylation reaction of benzaldehyde to afford CO and benzene was hydrogen assisted, rendering the process a hydrogenolytic decarbonylation step.