Skip to main content
Log in

Post-breakup deformations in the Bay of Bengal: Response of crustal strata to the sediment load

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Passive continental margins are tectonically inactive, but a few of them including the East India Passive Margin (EIPM) show evidences for post-breakup deformations. This unusual process prompted us to investigate the post-rift deformations on EIPM and adjacent deep-water region for understanding the possible mechanisms. Seismic reflection images of the Bay of Bengal reveal a post-rift deformation with a manifestation of extensional faults in Krishna–Godavari (K–G) basin and on flanks of the 85°E Ridge. In K–G basin, one of the rift-related faults reactivated during the Early Miocene time (~16 Ma), while on flanks of the 85°E Ridge new normal faults originated at about 6.8 Ma. From detailed analysis of fault throws, it is observed that the fault in K–G basin recorded a cumulative throw of about 900 m between the basement and Early Miocene horizon (~16 Ma), later the fault was reactivated at 6.8 Ma and continued the activity progressively until 0.3 Ma before cessation. The fault system on the margin spatially extends for about 300 km between offshore extensions of the Pranahita–Godavari graben and Nagavali–Vamshadhara shear zone. The faults on 85°E Ridge, initiated at 6.8 Ma and continued until 0.8 Ma, have cumulative throws of about 60 and 110 m on western and eastern flanks of the ridge, respectively. Back-stripping analysis of the fault from the K–G basin discloses two distinct phases of subsidence history: (i) during the first phase (120–23 Ma) the basement subsided at a rate of 46–18 m/Myr due to thermal cooling of the lithosphere, (ii) during the second phase (23 Ma–Present) rapid subsidence rate (69.56 m/Myr) of basement is noticed as a consequence of deposition of copious amounts of Bengal Fan sediments. The thick sedimentary strata exerted vertical load on underlying heterogeneous crust that led to build excessive internal stress and release through weak zones (lying at intersecting planes of heterogeneous crustal blocks). The stress, thus released through fault planes has caused the deformation of crust as well as overlying sedimentary strata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen P A and Allen J R 2013 Basin analysis: Principles and application to petroleum play assessment; Wiley, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastia R, Radhakrishna M, Das S, Kale A S and Catuneanu O 2010 Delineation of the 85°E ridge and its structure in the Mahanadi offshore basin, Eastern Continental Margin of India (ECMI), from seismic reflection imaging; Mar. Petrol. Geol. 27 1841–1848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas S and Majumdar R K 1997 Seismicity tectonics of the Bay of Bengal: Evidence for intraplate deformation of the northern Indian plate; Tectonophys. 269 323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borissova I, Coffin M F, Charvis P and Operto S 2003 Structure development of a microcontinent: Elan Bank in the southern Indian Ocean; Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 4 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouilhol P, Jagoutz O, Hanchar J M and Udas F O 2013 Dating the India–Eurasia collision through arc magmatic records; Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 366 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brune J N, Curray J R, Dorman L and Raitt R 1992 A proposed super-thick sedimentary basin, Bay of Bengal; Geophys. Res. Lett. 19 565–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull J M and Scrutton R A 1992 Seismic reflection images of intraplate deformation, central Indian Ocean, and their tectonic significance; J. Geol. Soc. London 149 955–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull J M, DeMets C, Krishna K S, Sanderson D J and Merkouriev S 2010 Reconciling plate kinematic and seismic estimates of lithospheric convergence in the central Indian Ocean; Geology 38 307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran J R 1990 Himalayan uplift, sea level, and the record of Bengal Fan sedimentation at the ODP Leg 116 sites; In: Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program (eds) Cochran J R and Stow D A V et al., College Station, Texas, Scientific Results 116 397–414.

  • Curray J R and Moore D G 1971 Growth of the Bengal deep-sea fan and denudation in the Himalayas; Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 82 563–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curray J R, Emmel F J, Moore D G and Raitt R W 1982 Structure, tectonics and geological history of the northeastern Indian Ocean; In: The Ocean basin and Margins 6, The Indian Ocean (eds) Narin A E and Stehli F G, Plenum, New York, pp. 399–450.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Curray J R and Munasinghe T 1991 Origin of the Rajmahal Traps and the 85°E Ridge: Preliminary reconstructions of the trace of the Crozet hotspot; Geology 19 1237–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curray J R 1994 Sediment volume and mass beneath the Bay of Bengal; Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 125 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curray J R, Emmel F J and Moore D G 2002 The Bengal Fan: Morphology, geometry, stratigraphy, history and processes; J. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 19 1191–1223, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0264-8172(03)00035-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldholm O, Thiede J and Taylor E 1989 Evolution of the Vøring Volcanic Margin; Proc. Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results 104 1033–1065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaina C, Müller R D, Brown B and Ishihara T 2003 Micro-continent formation around Australia; In: Evolution and dynamics of the Australian Plate (eds) Hillis R R and Müller R D, Geol. Soc. Am. 372 405–416.

  • Gaina C, Müller R D, Brown B, Ishihara T and Ivanov S 2007 Breakup and early seafloor spreading between India and Antarctica; Geophys. J. Int. 170 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopala Rao D, Krishna K S and Sar D 1997 Crustal evolution and sedimentation history of the Bay of Bengal since the Cretaceous; J. Geophys. Res. 102 17,747–17,768, https://doi.org/10.1029/96jb01339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grall C, Steckler M S, Pickering J L, Goodbred S, Sincavage R, Paola C, Akhter S H and Spiess V 2018 A base-level stratigraphic approach to determining Holocene subsidence of the Ganges–Meghna–Brahmaputra Delta plain; Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 499 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkin C, Kusznir N, Tugend J, Manatschal G and McDermott K 2019 Evaluating magmatic additions at a magma-poor rifted margin: An East Indian case study; Geophys. J. Int. 217 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haupert I, Manatschal G, Decarlis A and Unternehr P 2016 Upperplate magma-poor rifted margins: Stratigraphic architecture and structural evolution; Mar. Pet. Geol. 69 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Seismological Centre, On-line Bulletin, http://www.isc.ac.uk, Internatl. Seismol. Cent., Thatcham, United Kingdom, 2016, http://doi.org/10.31905/D808B830.

  • Ismaiel M, Krishna K S, Srinivas K, Mishra J and Saha D 2017 Internal structure of the 85°E ridge, Bay of Bengal: Evidence for multiphase volcanism; J. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 80 254–264, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.11.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismaiel M, Krishna K S, Srinivas K, Mishra J and Saha D 2019 Crustal architecture and Moho topography beneath the eastern Indian and Bangladesh margins – new insights on rift evolution and the continent–ocean boundary; J. Geol. Soc. London, https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2018-131.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna K S, Ramana M V, Gopala Rao D, Murthy K S R, Rao M M M, Subrahmanyam V and Sarma K V L N S 1998 Periodic deformation of oceanic crust in the central Indian Ocean; J. Geophys. Res. 103 17,859–17,875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna K S, Gopala Rao D, Subba Raju L V, Chaubey A K, Shcherbakov V S, Pilipenko A I and Radhakrishna Murthy I V 1999 Paleocene on-axis hotspot volcanism along the Ninetyeast Ridge: An interaction between the Kerguelen hot spot and the Wharton spreading center; Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.) 108 255–267.

  • Krishna K S, Bull J M and Scrutton R A 2001 Evidence for multiphase folding of the central Indian Ocean lithosphere; Geology 29 715–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna K S 2003 Structure and evolution of the Afanasy Nikitin seamount, buried hills and 85°E Ridge in the northeastern Indian Ocean; Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 209 379–394, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0012-821x(03)00081-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna K S, Michael L, Bhattacharyya R and Majumdar T J 2009a Geoid and gravity anomaly data of conjugate regions of Bay of Bengal and Enderby Basin: New constraints on breakup and early spreading history between India and Antarctica; J. Geophys. Res. 114 B03102, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jb005808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna K S, Bull J M and Scrutton R A 2009b Early (pre-8 Ma) fault activity and temporal strain accumulation in the central Indian Ocean; Geology 37 227–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna K S, Abraham H, Sager W W, Pringle M, Frey F A, Gopala Rao D and Levchenko O V 2012 Tectonics of the Ninetyeast Ridge derived from the spreading records of the contiguous oceanic basins and age constraints of the ridge; J. Geophys. Res. 117 B04101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jb008805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna K S, Ismaiel M, Srinivas K, Gopala Rao D, Mishra J and Saha D 2016 Sediment pathways and emergence of Himalayan source material in the Bay of Bengal; Curr. Sci. 110 363–372, https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v110/i3/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael L and Krishna K S 2011 Dating of the 85°E Ridge (northeastern Indian Ocean) using marine magnetic anomalies; Curr. Sci. 100 1314–1322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra A A 2018 Normal faulting related to differential compaction on the 85°E Ridge in the Bay of Bengal, India; Atlas of Structural Geological Interpretation from Seismic Images, pp. 107–111, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119158332.ch19.

  • Molnar P and Tapponnier P 1977 The collision between India and Eurasia; Sci. Am. 236 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar P, England P and Martinod J 1993 Mantle dynamics, the uplift of the Tibetan Plateau, and the Indian monsoon; Rev. Geophys. 31 357–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller R D, Yatheesh V and Shuhail M 2014 The tectonic stress field evolution of India since the Oligocene; Gondwana Res. 28 612–624.

  • Najman Y and Appel E et al. 2010 Timing of India-Asia collision: Geological, biostratigraphic, and palaeomagnetic constraints; J. Geophys. Res. 115 B12416, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jb007673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemčok M, Sinha S T, Stuart C J, Welker C, Choudhuri M, Sharma S P, Misra A A, Sinha N and Venkatraman S 2012 East Indian margin evolution and crustal architecture: Integration of deep reflection seismic interpretation and gravity modelling; In: Conjugate Divergent Margins (eds) Mohriak W U, Danforth A, Post P J, Brown D E, Tari G C, Nemčok M and Sinha S T, Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ. 369 477–496, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP369.6.

  • Powell C M, Roots S R and Veevers J J 1988 Pre-breakup continental extension in east Gondwana land and the early opening of the eastern Indian Ocean; Tectonophys. 155 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishna M, Subrahmanyam C and Damodharan T 2010 Thin Oceanic crust below Bay of Bengal inferred from 3-D gravity interpretation; Tectonophys. 493 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishna M, Srinivasa Rao G, Nayak S, Bastia R and Twinkle D 2012 Early Cretaceous fracture zones in the Bay of Bengal and their tectonic implications: Constraints from multi-channel seismic reflection and potential field data; Tectonophys. 522–523 187–197, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.11.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai A K, Tripathy S and Sahu S C 2015 The May 21st, 2014 Bay of Bengal earthquake: Implications for intraplate stress regime; Curr. Sci. 108 1706–1712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reston T J 2009 The structure, evolution and symmetry of the magma-poor rifted margins of the North and Central Atlantic: A synthesis; Tectonophys. 468 6–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts A M, Kusznir N J, Yielding G and Styles P 1998 2D flexural backstripping of extensional basins: The need for a sideways glance; Pet. Geosci. 4 327–338, https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo.4.4.327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royer J-Y and Gordon R G 1997 The motion and boundary between the Capricorn and Australian plates; Science 277 1268–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandwell D T, Müller R D, Smith W H F, Garcia E and Francis R 2014 New global marine gravity model from CryoSat-2 and Jason-1 reveals buried tectonic structure; Science 346 65–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer D S 1985 Total tectonic subsidence: A parameter for distinguishing crust type at the U.S. Atlantic Continental Margin; J. Geophys. Res. 90 7751–7769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sclater J G and Christie P A F 1980 Continental stretching: An explanation of the Post-Mid-Cretaceous subsidence of the Central North Sea Basin; J. Geophys. Res. 85, 3711–3739, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB085iB07p03711.

  • Sinha S T, Nemcok M, Choudhuri M, Sinha N and Rao Pundarika D 2015 The role of break-up localization in microcontinent separation along a strike-slip margin: The East India–Elan Bank case study; Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ. 431, https://doi.org/10.1144/sp431.5.

  • Sreejith K M, Radhakrishna M, Krishna K S and Majumdar T J 2011 Development of negative gravity anomaly of the 85°E Ridge, northeastern Indian Ocean – A process oriented modelling approach; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 120 605–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas K, Krishna K S, Ismaiel M, Mishra J and Saha D 2017 An island chain lost in the Bay of Bengal; Curr. Sci. 112 1095–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steckler M S and Watts A B 1978 Subsidence of the Atlantic-type continental margin off New York; Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 41 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talwani M, Desa M A, Ismaiel M and Krishna K S 2016 The tectonic origin of the Bay of Bengal and Bangladesh; J. Geophys. Res. 121 4836–4851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veevers J J 2009 Palinspastic (pre-rift and -drift) fit of India and conjugate Antarctica and geological connections across the suture; Gondwana Res. 16 90–108.

  • Wagreich M and Schmid H P 2002 Backstripping dip-slip fault histories: Apparent slip rates for the Miocene of the Vienna Basin; Terra Nova 14 163–168, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3121.2002.00404.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissel J K, Anderson R N and Gellar C A 1980 Deformation of the Indo-Australian plate; Nature 287 284–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh R B, Manatschal G and Minshull T A 2001 Evolution of magma-poor continental margins from rifting to seafloor spreading; Nature 413 150–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie X and Heller P L 2009 Plate tectonics and basin subsidence history; Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 121 55–64, https://doi.org/10.1130/B26398.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are greatly indebted to D K Pande and S V Rao, former Directors (Exploration), ONGC and Ajay K Dwivedi Director (Exploration), ONGC for their keen interest and immense support for R&D collaborative project between CSIR-NIO and ONGC-KDMIPE. The present work is carried out when the authors, KSK and MI are serving at Centre for Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Hyderabad. MI is thankful to DST, New Delhi, for awarding the INSPIRE Faculty position.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K S Krishna.

Additional information

Communicated by N V Chalapathi Rao

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krishna, K.S., Ismaiel, M., Srinivas, K. et al. Post-breakup deformations in the Bay of Bengal: Response of crustal strata to the sediment load. J Earth Syst Sci 129, 159 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-020-01436-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-020-01436-7

Keywords

Navigation