Skip to main content
Log in

Fingerprinting Based Indoor Localization Considering the Dynamic Nature of Wi-Fi Signals

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current localization techniques in outdoors cannot work well in indoors. Wi-Fi fingerprinting technique is an emerging localization technique for indoor environments. However in this technique, the dynamic nature of WiFi signals affects the accuracy of the measurements. In this paper, we use affinity propagation clustering method to decrease the computation complexity in location estimation. Then, we use the least variance of Received Signal Strength (RSS) measured among Access Points (APs) in each cluster. Also we assign lower weights to altering APs for each point in a cluster, to represent the level of similarity to Test Point (TP) by considering the dynamic nature of signals in indoor environments. A method for updating the radio map and improving the results is then proposed to decrease the cost of constructing the radio map. Simulation results show that the proposed method has 22.5% improvement in average in localization results, considering one altering AP in the layout, compared to the case when only RSS subset sampling is considered for localization because of altering APs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. He, S., & Chan, S.-H. G. (2016). Wi-Fi fingerprint-based indoor positioning: Recent advances and comparisons. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 18(1), 466–490.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Munoz, D., Lara, F. B., Vargas, C., & Enriquez-Caldera, R. (2009). Position location techniques and applications. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harroud, H., Ahmed, M., & Karmouch, A. (2003). Policy-driven personalized multimedia services for mobile users. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2(1), 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Molina, B., Olivares, E., Palau, C. E., & Esteve, M. (2018). A multimodal fingerprint-based indoor positioning system for airports. IEEE Access, 6, 10092–10106.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rodriguez, M. D., Favela, J., Martínez, E. A., & Muñoz, M. A. (2004). Location-aware access to hospital information and services. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 8(4), 448–455.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Misra, P., & Enge, P. (1999). Special issue on global positioning system. Proceedings of the IEEE, 87(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Raquet, J., & Martin, R. K. (2008). Non-GNSS radio frequency navigation. In IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP) (pp. 5308–5311).

  8. Vo, Q. D., & De, P. (2016). A survey of fingerprint-based outdoor localization. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 18(1), 491–506.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bahl, P., & Padmanabhan, V. N. (2000). RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In INFOCOM 2000. Nineteenth annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies. Proceedings. (pp. 775–784).

  10. Moghtadaiee, V., & Dempster, A. G. (2014). Indoor location fingerprinting using FM radio signals. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 60(2), 336–346.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, Y., Dashti, M., Rahman, M. A. A., & Zhang, J. (2014). Indoor localization using smartphone inertial sensors. In Positioning, navigation and communication (WPNC). (pp. 1–6).

  12. Alikhani, N., Amirinanloo, S., Moghtadaiee, V., & Ghorashi, S. A. (2017). Fast fingerprinting based indoor localization by Wi-Fi signals. In International conference on computer and knowledge engineering (ICCKE) (pp. 241–246).

  13. Khalajmehrabadi, A., Gatsis, N., & Akopian, D. (2017). Modern WLAN fingerprinting indoor positioning methods and deployment challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 19(3), 1974–2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. He, S., Ji, B., & Chan, S.-H. G. (2016). Chameleon: Survey-free updating of a fingerprint database for indoor localization. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 15(4), 66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  15. He, S., Lin, W., & Chan, S.-H. G. (2017). Indoor localization and automatic fingerprint update with altered AP signals. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 16(7), 1897–1910.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Han, S., Zhao, C., Meng, W., & Li, C. (2015). Cosine similarity based fingerprinting algorithm in WLAN indoor positioning against device diversity. In International conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 2710–2714).

  17. Wang, B., Chen, Q., Yang, L. T., & Chao, H.-C. (2016). Indoor smartphone localization via fingerprint crowdsourcing: Challenges and approaches. IEEE Wireless Communications, 23(3), 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frey, B. J., & Dueck, D. (2007). Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science, 315(5814), 972–976.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Fu, Y., Chen, P., Yang, S., & Tang, J. (2018). An indoor localization algorithm based on continuous feature scaling and outlier deleting. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(2), 1108–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Huang, J., Millman, D., Quigley, M., Stavens, D., Thrun, S., & Aggarwal, A. (2011). Efficient, generalized indoor wifi graphslam. In International conference on robotics and automation (ICRA) (pp. 1038–1043).

  21. Yoo, S., Kim, E., & Kim, H. (2014). Exploiting user movement direction and hidden access point for smartphone localization. Wireless Personal Communications, 78(4), 1863–1878.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ferris, B. D., Fox, D., & Lawrence, N. (2007). WiFi-SLAM using Gaussian process latent variable models.

  23. Yin, J., Yang, Q., & Ni, L. M. (2008). Learning adaptive temporal radio maps for signal-strength-based location estimation. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 7(7), 869–883.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Atia, M. M., Noureldin, A., & Korenberg, M. J. (2013). Dynamic online-calibrated radio maps for indoor positioning in wireless local area networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 12(9), 1774–1787.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fallah, M., & Pourahmadi, V. (2018). Graph-based iterative measurement-denoising and radio-map generation for semi-supervised indoor localisation. IET Communications, 12(7), 848–853.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cormen, T. H., Leiserson, C. E., Rivest, R. L., & Stein, C. (2009). Introduction to algorithms. New York: MIT Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Roos, T., Myllymäki, P., Tirri, H., Misikangas, P., & Sievänen, J. (2002). A probabilistic approach to WLAN user location estimation. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 9(3), 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kushki, A., Plataniotis, K. N., & Venetsanopoulos, A. N. (2007). Kernel-based positioning in wireless local area networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 6, 689–705.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Vahideh Moghtadaiee gratefully acknowledges the support provided by the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Ali Ghorashi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alikhani, N., Moghtadaiee, V. & Ghorashi, S.A. Fingerprinting Based Indoor Localization Considering the Dynamic Nature of Wi-Fi Signals. Wireless Pers Commun 115, 1445–1464 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07636-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07636-0

Keywords

Navigation