Skip to main content
Log in

Complexity and characterization aspects of edge-related domination for graphs

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For a connected graph \(G = (V, E)\), a subset F of E is an edge dominating set (resp. a total edge dominating set) if every edge in \(E-F\) (resp. in E) is adjacent to at least one edge in F, the minimum cardinality of an edge dominating set (resp. a total edge dominating set) of G is the edge domination number (resp. total edge domination number) of G, denoted by \(\gamma '(G)\) (resp. \(\gamma '_t(G)\)). In the present paper, we study a parameter, called the semitotal edge domination number, which is squeezed between \(\gamma '(G)\) and \(\gamma '_t(G)\). A semitotal edge dominating set is an edge dominating set S such that, for every edge e in S, there exists such an edge \(e'\) in S that e either is adjacent to \(e'\) or shares a common neighbor edge with \(e'\). The semitotal edge domination number, denoted by \(\gamma ^{'}_{st}(G)\), is the minimum cardinality of a semitotal edge dominating set of G. In this paper, we prove that the problem of deciding whether \(\gamma ^{'}(G)=\gamma ^{'}_{st}(G)\) or \(\gamma _t^{'}(G)=\gamma ^{'}(G)\) is NP-hard even when restricted to planar graphs with maximum degree 4. We also characterize trees with equal edge domination and semitotal edge domination numbers (Pan et al. in The complexity of total edge domination and some related results on trees, J Comb Optim, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-020-00596-y, we characterized trees with equal edge domination and total edge domination numbers).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arumugam S, Velammal S (1998) Edge domination in graphs. Taiwan J Math 2:173–179

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlhaus E, Johnson D, Papadimitriou C, Seymour P, Yannakakis M (1994) The complexity of multiterminal cuts. SIAM J Comput 23(4):864–894

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998a) Domination in graphs: advanced topics. Marcel Dekker, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes TW, Hedetniemi ST, Slater PJ (1998b) Fundermentals of domination in graphs. Marcel Dekker, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Horton JD, Kilakos K (1993) Minimum edge dominatting sets. SIAM J Discrete Math 6(3):375–387

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Karp RM (1972) Reducibility amongcombinatorial problems. In: Miller RE, Thatcher JW (eds) Complexity of compute computations. Plenum Press, New York, pp 85–104

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kilakos K (1998) On the complexity of edge domination, Master’s Thesis, University of New Brunswick, New Brunswick, Canada

  • Kulli VR, Patwari DK (1991) On the edge domination number of a graph. In: Proceedings of the symposium on graph theory and combinatorics, Cochin. Publication, vol 21. Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Trivandrum, pp 75–81

  • Lru CL (1968) Introduction to combinatorial mathematics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell S, Hedetniemi ST (1977) Edge domination in trees. Congr Numer 19:489–509

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Muddebihal MH, Sedamkar AR (2013) Characterization of trees with equal edge domination and end edge domination numbers. Int J Math Comput Appl Res 3:33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan Z, Yang Y, Li XY, Xu S-J (2020) The complexity of total edge domination and some related results on trees. J Comb Optim. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-020-00596-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan A, Madhukar K, Nagavamsi P, Pandu Rangan C, Chang MS (1995) Edge domination on bipartite permutation graphs and cotriangulated graphs. Inf Process Lett 56:165–171

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Topp J (1993) Graphs with unique minimum edge domination sets and graph with unique maximum independent sets of vertices. Discrete Math 121:199–210

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu B (2006) Two classes of edge domination in graphs. Discrete Appl Math 154:1541–1546

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yannakakis M (2006) Edge-deletion problems. SIAM J Appl Math 154:1541–1546

    Google Scholar 

  • Yannakakis M, Gavril F (1980) Edge dominating sets in graphs. SIAM J Appl Math 38:364–372

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu EQ, Liu CJ (2019) On the semitotal domination number of line graphs. Discrete Appl Math 254:295–298

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the referees for their remarkable suggestions and comments on our manuscript. This work was funded in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants Nos. 11571155, 11201205, 11901263).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shou-Jun Xu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, Z., Li, X. & Xu, SJ. Complexity and characterization aspects of edge-related domination for graphs. J Comb Optim 40, 757–773 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-020-00622-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-020-00622-z

Keywords

Navigation