Abstract
Geophagy, the intentional consumption of soil, has been observed in humans and numerous other animal species. Geophagy has been posited to be adaptive, i.e., consumed soil protects against gastrointestinal distress and/or supplements micronutrients. We conducted a field experiment in the Budongo Forest, Uganda, to investigate geophagic behaviors, including soil preference, the quantity of soil eaten, and competition for access to preferred soils. We placed pairs of artificial tree stumps at two existing geophagy sites. One stump contained soil from the surrounding area, Sonso, that could supplement bioavailable iron. The other stump contained soil from a neighboring community, Waibira, that was richer in clay minerals, which could provide protection from plant secondary compounds. We monitored activity and engagement with the stumps for 10 days using camera traps. After 5 days, we reversed the type of soil that was in the stumps at both sites (i.e., a crossover design). Only Colobus guereza (black-and-white colobus monkeys) interacted with the stumps. These monkeys used visual and olfactory cues to select between the two soils and exclusively ate the clay-rich soil, consuming 9.67 kg of soil over 4.33 h. Our findings lend the greatest plausibility to the protection hypothesis. Additionally, monkeys competed for access to the stumps, and 13% of the videos captured aggression, including pushing, excluding, and chasing other individuals from the experimental stumps. Nine episodes of vigilance and flight behavior were also observed. Given that intentionally ingested soil is a valuable resource that may confer health benefits, geophagy sites should be conserved and protected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biro D, Inoue-Nakamura N, Tonooka R et al (2003) Cultural innovation and transmission of tool use in wild chimpanzees: evidence from field experiments. Anim Cogn 6:213–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0183-x
Bocian CM (1997) Niche separation of black-and-white colobus monkeys (Colobus angolensis and C. guereza) in the Ituri Forest. Doctoral dissertation, the City University of New York
Bono AEJ, Whiten A, van Schaik C et al (2018) Payoff- and sex-biased social learning interact in a wild primate population. Curr Biol 28:2800–2805.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.015
Botting J, Whiten A, Grampp M, van de Waal E (2018) Field experiments with wild primates reveal no consistent dominance-based bias in social learning. Anim Behav 136:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.11.025
Caselli CB, Ayres PHB, Castro SCN et al (2018) The role of extragroup encounters in a Neotropical, cooperative breeding primate, the common marmoset: a field playback experiment. Anim Behav 136:137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.12.009
Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM (1982) How vervet monkeys perceive their grunts: field playback experiments. Anim Behav 30:739–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(82)80146-2
Cheney DL, Seyfarth R, Smuts B (1986) Social relationships and social cognition in nonhuman primates. Science 234:1361–1366. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3538419
Chivers DJ, Hladik CM (1980) Morphology of the gastrointestinal tract in primates: comparisons with other mammals in relation to diet. J Morphol 166:337–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051660306
Color M (2010) Munsell soil color charts: with genuine Munsell color chips. Grand Rapids, MI
Cords M (1990) Vigilance and mixed-species association of some East African forest monkeys. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178323
Davies AG, Baillie IC (1988) Soil-eating by red leaf monkeys (Presbytis rubicunda) in Sabah, northern Borneo. Biotropica 20:252. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388241
DeGabriel JL, Moore BD, Foley WJ, Johnson CN (2009) The effects of plant defensive chemistry on nutrient availability predict reproductive success in a mammal. Ecology 90:711–719
Dominy NJ, Davoust E, Minekus M (2004) Adaptive function of soil consumption: an in vitro study modeling the human stomach and small intestine. J Exp Biol 207:319–324
Doyle JR, Blais JM, Holmes RD, White PA (2012) A soil ingestion pilot study of a population following a traditional lifestyle typical of rural or wilderness areas. Sci Total Environ 424:110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.043
Fashing PJ (2001) Male and female strategies during intergroup encounters in guerezas (Colobus guereza): evidence for resource defense mediated through males and a comparison with other primates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:219–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650100358
Fashing PJ, Dierenfeld ES, Mowry CB (2007) Influence of plant and soil chemistry on food selection, ranging patterns, and biomass of Colobus guereza in Kakamega Forest, Kenya. Int J Primatol 28:673–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-006-9096-2
Fischer J, Noser R, Hammerschmidt K (2013) Bioacoustic field research: a primer to acoustic analyses and playback experiments with primates: bioacoustic field methods. Am J Primatol 75:643–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22153
Fragaszy D, Pickering T, Liu Q et al (2010) Bearded capuchin monkeys’ and a human’s efficiency at cracking palm nuts with stone tools: field experiments. Anim Behav 79:321–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.11.004
Gibson RS, Bailey KB, Gibbs M, Ferguson EL (2010) A review of phytate, iron, zinc, and calcium concentrations in plant-based complementary foods used in low-income countries and implications for bioavailability. Food Nutr Bull 31:S134–S146. https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265100312S206
Gilardi J, Duffey S, Munn C, Tell L (1999) Biochemical functions of geophagy in parrots: detoxification of dietary toxins and cytoprotective effects. J Chem Ecol 25:897–922. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020857120217
Goltenboth R (1976) Non human primates (apes, monkeys and prosimians). In: Kloes HG, Lang EM (eds) The handbook of zoo medicine. Van Norstrand Reihold, New York, pp 46–85
González R, de Medina FS, Martínez-Augustin O et al (2004) Anti-inflammatory effect of diosmectite in hapten-induced colitis in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 141:951–960. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0705710
Gruber T, Muller MN, Strimling P et al (2009) Wild chimpanzees rely on cultural knowledge to solve an experimental honey acquisition task. Curr Biol 19:1806–1810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.060
Gruber T, Zuberbühler K, Neumann C (2016) Travel fosters tool use in wild chimpanzees. eLife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16371
Hambidge KM (1432S) Micronutrient bioavailability: dietary reference intakes and a future perspective. Am J Clin Nutr 91:1430S–1432S. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2010.28674B
Harris TR (2006) Between-group contest competition for food in a highly folivorous population of black and white colobus monkeys (Colobus guereza). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:317–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0261-6
Harris TR, Chapman CA (2007) Variation in diet and ranging of black and white colobus monkeys in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Primates 48:208–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-006-0036-8
Hauser MD (1998) Functional referents and acoustic similarity: field playback experiments with rhesus monkeys. Anim Behav 55:1647–1658. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0712
Hladik CM (1977) A comparative study of the feeding strategies of two sympatric species of leaf monkeys: Presbytis senex and Presbytis entellus. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Primate ecology: studies of feeding and ranging behaviour in lemurs, monkeys and apes. Academic Press, London, pp 324–353
Hladik CM, Gueguen L (1974) Géophagie et nutrition minérale chez les primates sauvages. CR Acad Sci Paris Ser D 279:1393–1396
Hobaiter C, Samuni L, Mullins C et al (2017) Variation in hunting behaviour in neighbouring chimpanzee communities in the Budongo forest, Uganda. PLOS ONE 12:e0178065. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178065
Huebl L, Akello G, Kutalek R et al (2016) Geophagy in Northern Uganda: perspectives from consumers and clinicians. Am J Trop Med Hyg 95:1440–1449. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.15-0579
Johns T (1986) Detoxification function of geophagy and domestication of the potato. J Chem Ecol 12:635–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01012098
Klein N, Fröhlich F, Krief S (2008) Geophagy: soil consumption enhances the bioactivities of plants eaten by chimpanzees. Naturwissenschaften 95:325–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-007-0333-0
Kreulen DA (1985) Lick use by large herbivores: a review of benefits and banes of soil consumption. Mammal Rev 15:107–123
Krishnamani R (1994) Diet composition of the bonnet macaque (Macaca radiata) in a tropical dry evergreen forest of southern India. Trop Biodivers 2:285–302
Krishnamani R, Mahaney WC (2000) Geophagy among primates: adaptive significance and ecological consequences. Anim Behav 59:899–915. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1376
Lamon N, Neumann C, Gier J et al (2018) Wild chimpanzees select tool material based on efficiency and knowledge. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 285:20181715. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1715
Laska M (2000) “Microsmatic” primates revisited: olfactory sensitivity in the squirrel monkey. Chem Senses 25:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/25.1.47
Laska M, Freyer D (1997) Olfactory discrimination ability for aliphatic esters in squirrel monkeys and humans. Chem Senses 22:457–465. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/22.4.457
Link A, Galvis N, Fleming E, Di Fiore A (2011) Patterns of mineral lick visitation by spider monkeys and howler monkeys in Amazonia: are licks perceived as risky areas? Am J Primatol 73:386–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20910
Mahaney WC, Watts D, Hancock RGV (1990) Geophagia by mountain gorillas (Gorilla gorilla beringei) in the Virunga Mountains, Rwanda. Primates 31:113–120
Marler P (1969) Colobus guereza: territoriality and group composition. Science 163:93–95. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.163.3862.93
Marsh LK, Chapman CA, Arroyo-Rodríguez V et al (2013) Primates in fragments 10 years later: once and future goals. In: Marsh LK, Chapman CA (eds) Primates in fragments. Springer New York, New York, pp 505–525
Matsuzawa T (1994) Field experiments on use of stone tools by chimpanzees in the wild. In: Wrangham RW, McGrew WC, de Waal FBM, Heltne PG (eds) Chimpanzee cultures. Harvard University Press, pp 351–370
Nevo O, Heymann EW (2015) Led by the nose: olfaction in primate feeding ecology: olfaction in primate feeding ecology. Evol Anthropol Issues News Rev 24:137–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21458
Newton-Fisher NE, Notman H, Reynolds V (2002) Hunting of mammalian prey by Budongo Forest chimpanzees. Folia Primatol (Basel) 73:281–283. https://doi.org/10.1159/000067454
Oates JF (1978) Water-plant and soil consumption by guereza monkeys (Colobus guereza): a relationship with minerals and toxins in the diet? Biotropica 10:241. https://doi.org/10.2307/2387676
Papaioannou D, Katsoulos PD, Panousis N, Karatzias H (2005) The role of natural and synthetic zeolites as feed additives on the prevention and/or the treatment of certain farm animal diseases: a review. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 84:161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.05.030
Pebsworth PA, Bardi M, Huffman MA (2012) Geophagy in chacma baboons: patterns of soil consumption by age class, sex, and reproductive state. Am J Primatol 74:48–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.21008
Pebsworth PA, Hillier S, Wendler R et al (2019a) Geophagy among East African chimpanzees: consumed soils provide protection from plant secondary compounds and bioavailable iron. Environ Geochem Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-019-00366-8
Pebsworth PA, Huffman MA, Lambert JE, Young SL (2019b) Geophagy among nonhuman primates: a systematic review of current knowledge and suggestions for future directions. Am J Phys Anthropol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23724
Reynolds V, Lloyd AW, English CJ et al (2015) Mineral acquisition from clay by Budongo Forest chimpanzees. PLOS ONE 10:e0134075. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134075
Reynolds V, Pascual-Garrido A, Lloyd AW et al (2019) Possible mineral contributions to the diet and health of wild chimpanzees in three East African forests. Am J Primatol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22978
Rode KD, Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, McDowell LR (2003) Mineral resource availability and consumption by colobus in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Int J Primatol 24:541–573. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023788330155
Said SA, Shibl AM, Abdullah ME (1980) Influence of various agents on adsorption capacity of kaolin for Pseudomonas aeruginosa toxin. J Pharm Sci 69:1238–1239
Sarabian C, MacIntosh AJJ (2015) Hygienic tendencies correlate with low geohelminth infection in free-ranging macaques. Biol Lett 11:20150757. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0757
Sarabian C, Ngoubangoye B, MacIntosh AJJ (2020) Divergent strategies in faeces avoidance between two cercopithecoid primates. R Soc Open Sci 7:191861. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191861
Schel AM, Candiotti A, Zuberbühler K (2010) Predator-deterring alarm call sequences in Guereza colobus monkeys are meaningful to conspecifics. Anim Behav 80:799–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.07.012
Setz E, Enzweiler J, Solferini V et al (1999) Geophagy in the golden-faced saki monkey (Pithecia pithecia chrysocephala) in the Central Amazon. J Zool 247:91–103
Sirianni G, Wittig RM, Gratton P et al (2018) Do chimpanzees anticipate an object’s weight? A field experiment on the kinematics of hammer-lifting movements in the nut-cracking Taï chimpanzees. Anim Cogn 21:109–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1144-0
Stambolic-Robb A (1997) Geophagy amongst free-ranging Sumatran orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) of Gunung Leuser National Park, and rehabilitated Bornean orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus) of Sungai Wain Forest, Indonesia. Master’s thesis, York University
Ta CAK, Pebsworth PA, Liu R et al (2018) Soil eaten by chacma baboons adsorbs polar plant secondary metabolites representative of those found in their diet. Environ Geochem Health 40:803–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-017-0025-4
Treves A (1999) Within-group vigilance in red colobus and redtail monkeys. Am J Primatol 48:113–126
Wakibara JV, Huffman MA, Wink M et al (2001) The adaptive significance of geophagy for Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) at Arashiyama, Japan. Int J Primatol 22:495–520. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010763930475
Young SL (2010) Pica in pregnancy: new ideas about an old condition. Annu Rev Nutr 30:403–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.012809.104713
Young SL, Wilson MJ, Hillier S et al (2010) Differences and commonalities in physical, chemical and mineralogical properties of Zanzibari geophagic soils. J Chem Ecol 36:129–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-009-9729-y
Young SL, Sherman PW, Lucks JB, Pelto GH (2011) Why on earth? Evaluating hypotheses about the physiological functions of human geophagy. Q Rev Biol 86:97–120. https://doi.org/10.1086/659884
Zuberbühler K (2000) Causal cognition in a non-human primate: field playback experiments with Diana monkeys. Cognition 76:195–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00079-2
Acknowledgments
We thank the Budongo Conservation Field Station staff, field assistants, and in particular, Caroline Asiimwe, Geoffrey Muhanguzi, Bosco Chandia, Jacob Alio, and William Agani for field assistance. We also thank the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland who provided core funding and the Uganda Wildlife Authority, the Ugandan Council of Science and Technology, and the National Forestry Authority for the opportunity to conduct research in Uganda. Additionally, we thank associate editor of Primates, Michael Huffman, and two anonymous reviewers.
Funding
T. G. was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grants CR13I1_162720 and P300PA_164678).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No competing interests to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Pebsworth, P.A., Gruber, T., Miller, J.D. et al. Selecting between iron-rich and clay-rich soils: a geophagy field experiment with black-and-white colobus monkeys in the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda. Primates 62, 133–142 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-020-00845-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-020-00845-y