Research PaperWeld seam morphology and bond strength of infrared and vibration welded SLS parts of polyamide 12 as a function of the layer build-up direction and the welding process
Introduction
The additive manufacturing process of selective laser sintering (SLS) offers the possibility of manufacturing complex parts without tools and thus enables the cost-effective production of individualized products even with a batch size of one. In contrast to this advantage, there is a current limitation of the producible component dimension. This limitation results from the dimensions of the building chamber of commercial SLS systems. Furthermore, a great amount of the cost-intensive polyamide 12 powder is necessary for the manufacturing of large SLS parts. In order to overcome these limitations, reliable joining processes, which enable high mechanical bond properties in assemblies are also indispensable for SLS components. Generally, joining processes can be separated into adhesive joints, mechanical fasteners, and welding processes. Welding is characterized in particular by the ability to produce durable media-tight joints that allow high bond strengths even without the introduction of additives.
In order to be able to exploit the high mechanical properties of SLS parts in SLS assemblies, the production of SLS-SLS connections by means of welding processes shall be analyzed within the scope of this paper. In particular, the effects of the SLS layer build-up direction and the influence of the welding technology on the resulting weld morphology and the bond strength are to be investigated. Infrared and vibration welding are applied as welding methods, which differ in the way of energy input into the joining zone.
The vibration welding process belongs to the friction welding processes. Heating of the joining partners is thereby accomplished by outer friction. The process is characterized by short cycle times combined with a high reproducibility, high energy efficiency, and the suitability to join large components [1].
Linear vibration welding is based on a frictional relative movement of the joining partners [2]. Due to the applied joining pressure during the oscillating movement, a melting (semi-crystalline thermoplastic) or softening (amorphous thermoplastic) of the parts take place [2]. After the end of the welding process, the joining partners cool down under pressure [2].
Fundamental investigations on the vibration welding process [[3], [4], [5]] have shown a characteristic course of the weld path (time-dependent course of the displaced melt layer during the welding process), which is independent of the part geometry, material and process parameters. This resulting course can be divided into four phases. At the beginning of the oscillating vibration movement, the temperature of the joining surfaces continuously rises due to the solid friction. In this phase, surface roughnesses are smoothed by plastic- as well as elastic deformation and a thin melt film is formed locally as soon as the crystalline melting temperature (semi-crystalline thermoplastic) or the glass transition temperature (amorphous thermoplastic) is exceeded. In phase two the melt layer thickness increases steadily until an equilibrium is reached between the energy supplied by vibration and the energy flowing off into the weld bead. The result of this equilibrium is a stable melt layer thickness in phase three. In phase four, the friction-relative movement ends, and the joining partners cool down (passively) under pressure.
In order to achieve high bond strengths, it is necessary to reach the phase of the steady-state melt flow [6,7]. Therefore, the achievement of this third phase is generally regarded as a quality criterion in vibration welding [8]. The occurring energy equilibrium leads to a constant joining zone temperature during the third process phase [4,9,10]. Vibration welding is therefore classified as a self-regulating process.
In infrared welding, the heating of the parts takes place separately before the joining process [11]. The energy required for the melting or the softening of the material is introduced into the joining zone using an infrared emitter. The absorption of the radiation is dependent of the wavelength of the radiator, as well as of the morphological and chemical structure of the polymers [12]. The advantage of infrared welding in comparison to friction welding processes, is the contactless heating that enables a high freedom of the part geometry [13,14].
The infrared welding process can be divided into three process phases, which were described in detail by Heil [12]. In the beginning, the joining partners are heated up using an infrared radiator placed between the joining zones of the parts. The heating takes place contactless and no aligning of the joining partners occurs. For this reason, production-related tolerances can lead to fluctuations in the radiator spacing and thus, to uneven energy transfer. According to Ehrenstein [11], an unevenness greater than 0.2 mm should be avoided in order to achieve a homogeneous plasticization of the part surface. In contrast to other welding processes, there is no squeeze flow during the heating phase due to the pressureless heating. After the formation of a sufficient melt layer, the radiator is removed and the joining partners are contacted during the changeover phase. A minimum changeover time must be ensured in order to limit the cooling of the materials in this phase. The joining and cooling phase begins with the contact of the plasticized joining partners. The joining pressure builds up continuously from the beginning of the contact until the selected joining pressure is reached. The melt is thereby displaced into the welding bead. After a defined cooling time, which is necessary for sufficient stability of the parts, the joining process is completed and the component can be removed from the fixture [12,13].
The morphology of weld joints differs in its structure depending on the welding process. For vibration-welded polyamide, investigations by Chung et al. [15] show a heat-affected zone (HAZ) consisting of a core layer with an amorphous zone and a recrystallized zone and a layer of deformed spherulites, Fig. 1 (left). The recrystallized area is most prominent for low welding pressures [15]. An increase in the weld pressure for a constant amplitude leads to a decrease in the size of the spherulites. The optically amorphous region exhibits no recognizable superstructures, but is still crystalline, as investigations by Chung et al. (PA6) [15] or Stevens (PA66) [16] have shown. The deformed layer originates from material deformation in the rubbery state above the glass transition temperature Tg [15]. Spherulites are only partially melted and are orientated in the flow direction of the squeeze flow. The thickness of the zone of deformed spherulites increases with an increase in weld pressure, whereas the thickness of the core layer decreases [17].
Due to the separation of heating and joining and thus, the reduced molecular movements during the heating phase, weld seams produced by convection or radiation exhibit a different seam formation, Fig. 1 (right), in comparison to weld seams generated by friction based welding. A recrystallized zone is formed in the seam area, which has a mixture of a fine and a large spherulitic structure. Due to the increased cooling rate, the spherulite size decreases with increasing distance to the seam center. The flow zone then constitutes of an area with high orientations and has no recognizable spherulitic structures. Deformed spherulites represent the transition to the base material, analogous to vibration welding [18,19].
Selective laser sintering (SLS) is a powder and beam-based additive manufacturing process that can be divided into three process steps [20]. First, a new layer of powder with a defined thickness is applied to the building platform by a blade or roller. The powder is then heated up to the specific building temperature, which is between the crystallization and melting temperature of the semi-crystalline polymer. In the last step, the cross-section area of the resulting part is melted by a laser, with the surrounding powder serving as a supporting structure. Then the building platform is lowered and the three phases are repeated until the component has been completely generated [21,22].
Compared to other additive manufacturing processes, the SLS process offers high mechanical properties (e.g. tensile strength), which are comparable to injection-molded components [23]. However, the mechanical properties show an anisotropic behavior depending on the part orientation caused by the layerwise build-up. The highest mechanical properties are reached in layer plane direction, which is indicated by an increased tensile strength and elongation at break compared to loads acting perpendicularly on the layers [23]. Due to the pressure-free process and the surrounding powder bed, SLS parts have a complex surface roughness [24] as well as a porous inner structure [24,25] in the range of 3–5 %. In contrast to injection molding, in which the melt cools down below the crystallization temperature within seconds due to the contact with the cold mold, the SLS process has cooling times in the range of hours and days. These are caused by the high heat capacity of the powder and lead to a high crystallinity of SLS parts.
The additive manufacturing of polymer components using the SLS process is increasingly moving into the focus of user applications. Although the SLS process offers high integration possibilities [26], the necessity for joining processes cannot be completely ignored. Joining individual SLS components to assembly groups offers several advantages. On the one hand, part dimensions that are restricted by the given machine space can be extended. On the other hand, dimensional deviations due to thermal deformation in the SLS process can also be avoided by dividing large-volume SLS parts into several joining components [27].
Possible processes for producing joints are mechanical fasteners, gluing, and welding. In the field of additive manufacturing, however, there is hardly any available knowledge about joining. Adhesive bonds between at least one additively manufactured component and a counterpart can be found e.g. in the interior of vehicles [28]. In addition to welding processes, adhesive bonding offers the possibility to realize material- and media-tight joints [11]. However, in order to achieve sufficient bond strengths in adhesive joints, time-consuming as well as expensive pretreatment methods of the individual parts are often necessary [28]. Moreover, adhesives usually contain harmful ingredients and have to be tailored and approved for customer-specific use. Investigations by Fieger et al. [28] on adhesively joined SLS components showed achievable bond strengths of approx. 6 N/mm² for SLS-SLS joints made of PA12. The use of design elements (catching structures, grooves) or surface pretreatments (etching, plasma) increased the achievable strength slightly. However, the maximum achievable bond strength of 11.4 N/mm² was still well below the base material strength, which is in the range of 45−50 N/mm² [23] for SLS components made of PA12.
The common option of connecting SLS parts by using mechanical connectors (e.g. screws, snap fits) is a cost-effective and efficient way of realizing detachable or permanent bonds. However, the anisotropy of the properties of SLS parts can have a negative influence on the durability of load-bearing features [29]. Furthermore, the process-inherent staircase effect can also lead to a restriction of movement in sliders and other kinematic elements [29]. Media tightness can generally not be achieved with mechanical connectors.
Joints between laser-sintered PA12 parts created by hot plate welding have proven to remain mostly unaffected by typical process-related interferences of the SLS process, such as the anisotropy of the part properties [30]. Depending on the selected welding parameters, this joining process can achieve high weld strengths in the range of the base material strength. Heilig et al. [31] were able to show that welding of SLS components is also feasible by the use of ultrasonic welding. The achieved joints showed a high tensile strength. In addition, the investigation revealed that the anisotropy of the part properties influences the resulting weld quality. This influence can be explained by the geometric form of the energy director (ED) that exhibits rounded edges or staircase effects depending on the SLS build-up direction. A variation of the geometry of the ED significantly affects the energy input during the ultrasonic welding process. The energy density used in the SLS manufacturing process, as well as the selected ratio between recycled and new powder material, showed no influence on the resulting bond strength for both welding processes.
In summary, it can be stated that welding offers the possibility of exploiting the high mechanical properties of SLS components to a high degree. Furthermore, media-tight connections can be achieved by welding without the need for additives and health-endangering ingredients. However, only minor knowledge is available about the influence of the SLS process (e.g. complex surface roughness, layer build-up, porosity) on the welding process and the resulting bond qualities (e.g. strength, weld seam morphology). For this reason, first interactions between the layer build-up direction in the SLS manufacturing process and the thermal joining processes infrared welding and vibration welding are investigated within this study. Among other aspects, the resulting joining zone temperature, the weld seam morphology, and the bond strength are analyzed depending on the SLS build-up direction and the welding process. In order to evaluate and classify the SLS joints, comparative welding trials with injection-molded parts are carried out as a reference.
Section snippets
Materials and test specimens
For selective laser sintering, the semi-crystalline thermoplastic polyamide 12 (PA12) has established itself as a standard. In this work, PA12 of the type PA2200 (EOS GmbH, Germany, Krailling) was used. The commercially available polyamide 12 of the type Vestamid L1901 (Evonik Industries AG, Essen, Germany) was used as a reference material in the injection molding (IM) process. Before the IM-process, the material was dried at 80 °C for 12 h according to the manufacturer’s specifications.
The
Melting behavior
The results of the DSC analysis show differences in the melting behavior depending on the manufacturing process, Fig. 4. Injection-molded test specimens made of Vestamid L1901 have a melt peak temperature of 179 °C, whereas SLS specimens made of PA2200 have a slightly increased melt peak temperature of 182 °C. Previous investigations of injection-molded PA2200 showed a melt peak temperature of 178 °C [32], which corresponds to that of injection-molded Vestamid L1901. Consequently, it can be
Conclusion
The conducted investigations show that high weld strengths can be achieved by joining SLS parts by infrared and vibration welding. The resulting bond strength is thereby largely independent of the SLS build-up direction. Vibration welded SLS parts show a high bond strength in the range of the base material strength. SLS joints produced by infrared welding have reduced weld factors in the range of 0.7. This reduced bond quality is expected to be caused by a premature start of the
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Michael Wolf: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Funding acquisition. Jannik Werner: Investigation, Writing - review & editing. Dietmar Drummer: Supervision, Funding acquisition.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Bayerische Forschungsstiftung (BFS) for funding this study within the project FAB-Weld (AZ-1352-18). The authors are also grateful to the companies’ bielomatik GmbH (Neuffen, Germany), BMW AG (Munich, Germany), and Sintermask GmbH (Lupburg, Germany). Further, the authors thank the Evonik Industries AG (Essen, Germany) for providing the injection molding material.
References (38)
- et al.
Laser sintering of polyamides and other polymers
Progess Mater. Sci.
(2012) - et al.
Design guidelines for additive manufactured snap-fit joints
Procedia CIRP
(2016) - et al.
Dependence of mechanical properties of polyamide components on build parameters in the SLS process
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
(2007) Lineares Vibrationsschweißen von Kunststoffen im industriellen Umfeld. Dissertation
(2014)Vibration welding of thermoplastics. Part I: phenomenology of the welding process
Polym. Eng. Sci.
(1988)Vibration welding of thermoplastics. Part II: Analysis of the welding process
Polym. Eng. Sci.
(1988)- et al.
Analysis of vibration welding
Kunststoffe - German Plastics
(1987) Zum Vibrationsschweißen von Polymerwerkstoffen
(1989)Vibration welding of thermoplastics. Part III: strength of polycarbonate butt welds
Polym. Eng. Sci.
(1988)- et al.
The impact strength of butt welded vibration welds related to microstructure and welding history
Polym. Eng. Sci.
(1989)
On-line quality determination in vibration welding
Kunststoffe
Biaxial vibration welding of polypropylene
Annual Technical Conference - ANTEC, Conference Proceedings
Real time temperature measurement of nylon 66 butt-joints during vibration welding
Annual Technical Conference - ANTEC, Conference Proceedings
Handbuch Kunststoff-Verbindungstechnik
Heizstrahlerschweißen thermoplastischer Kunststoffe
Plastics and Composites Welding Handbook
Infrarotschweißen von Kunststoffen mit thermischen Strahlungsemittern
Morphology of PA‐6 vibration welded joints and its effect on weld strength
Polym. Eng. Sci.
Characterisation of nylon 66 vibration welds
Annual Technical Conference - ANTEC, Conference Proceedings
Cited by (4)
Joining laser-sintered with injection-molded parts made of PA12 using infrared welding
2021, Polymer Engineering and Science