Skip to main content
Log in

A numerical investigation on the seismic isolation potential of rubber/soil mixtures

  • Technical Papers
  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the use of granular soils mixed with tire derived aggregates (TDA) as an underlying soil layer for surface foundations. The benefit of this geotechnical seismic isolation (GSI) scheme is threefold: the seismic force and displacement are significantly reduced; the construction is similar to that of a regular compacted granular fill and the re-use of scrap tires has an assertive environmental impact. These features highlight the rubber/soil mixtures (RSM) as a promising seismic isolation technique for infrastructure and large-scale structures. The seismic isolation capabilities of a rubber-soil foundation layer are investigated, using well defined material properties, and the direct analysis method of the soil-structure system, in the form of a simple oscillator on a soil profile. The influence of the RSM layer on the fundamental variables of the seismic response, namely the base shear and the total drift displacement of the structure on deformable soil, is examined. The structure’s overall stability is studied by means of monotonic lateral load analysis and incremental dynamic analysis, varying the slenderness of the structure and the synthesis of the mixture. The effectiveness and capabilities of the RSM isolation scheme are presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambraseys NN and Douglas J (2003), “Near-Field Horizontal and Vertical Earthquake Ground Motions,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 23: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasopoulos I, Gazetas G, Loli M, Apostolou M and Gerolymos N (2010), “Soil Failure Can Be Used for Seismic Protection of Structures,” Bull Earthq Eng, 8(2): 309–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apostolou M, Gazetas G and Garini E (2007), “Seismic Response of Slender Rigid Structures with Foundation Uplifting,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27(7): 642–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D4767-11 (2011), Standard Test Method for Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, www.astm.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D6270-08 (2008), Standard Practice for Use of Scrap Tires in Civil Engineering Applications, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay S, Sengupta A and Reddy GR (2015), “Performance of Sand and Shredded Rubber Tire Mixture as a Natural Base Isolator for Earthquake Protection,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 14(4): 683–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0053-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardet JP, Ichii K and Lin CH (2000), EERA: A Computer Program for Equivalent-Linear Earthquake Site Response Analyses of Layered Soil Deposits, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertero V (1980), “Strength and Deformation Capacities of Buildings under Extreme Environments,” in Karl S. Pister, editor, Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics A Volume Honoring Egor R. Popov, 188–237, Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolisetti C and Whittaker AS (2015), “Site Response, Soil-Structure Interaction and Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction for Performance Assessment of Buildings and Nuclear Structures,” Technical Report MCEER-15-0002, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.

  • Bowles JE (1988), Foundation Analysis and Design, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray J and Rodriguez-Marek A (2004), “Characterization of Forward-Directivity Ground Motions in the Near-Fault Region,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24(2004): 815–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet S, de la Llera JC and Kausel E (2016), “NonLinear Modeling of Seismic Isolation Systems Made of Recycled Tire-Rubber,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 85: 134–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellano MG, Colato GP, Infanti S and Borella R (2012), “Seismic Isolation of Continuous Bridges Through Curved Surface Sliders Combined with Shock Transmission Units,” Proceedings of the 15th WCEE, Lisbon, Portugal.

  • CEN (2010), Materials Produced from End of Life Tyres — Specification of Categories Based on Their Dimension(s) and Impurities and Methods for Determining Their Dimension(s) and Impurities, European Committee for Standardization, CEN/TS 14243:2010, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra A and Chintanapakdee C (2001), “Comparing Response of SDF Systems to Near-Fault and Far-Fault Earthquake Motions in the Context of Spectral Regions,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30: 1769–1789. (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.92)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK (1995), Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca J, Riaz A, Bernal-Sanchez J, Barreto D, McDougall J, Miranda-Manzanares M, Marinelli A and Dimitriadi V (2019), “Particle-Scale Interactions and Energy Dissipation Mechanisms in Sand-Rubber Mixtures,” Géotechnique Letters9: 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.18.00221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazetas G (1991), “Formulas and Charts for Impedances of Surface and Embedded Foundations,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 117(9): 1363–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazetas G (2015), “4th Ishihara Lecture: Soil-Foundation-Structure Systems Beyond Conventional Seismic Failure Thresholds,” Soil Dynam Earthq Eng, 68: 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelagoti F, Kourkoulis R, Anastasopoulos I and Gazetas G (2012), “Rocking Isolation of Low-Rise Frame Structures Founded on Isolated Footings,” Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 41(7): 1177–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerolymos N, Apostolou M and Gazetas G (2005), “Neural Network Analysis of Overturning Response Under Near-Fault Type Excitation,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 4(2): 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-005-0004-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hataf N and Rahimi MM (2006), “Experimental Investigation of Bearing Capacity of Sand Reinforced with Randomly Distributed Tire Shreds,” Construction and Building Materials, 20(10): 910–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillerborg A, Modeer M and Petersson PE (1976), “Analysis of Crack Formation and Crack Growth in Concrete by Means of Fracture Mechanics and Finite Elements,” Cement and Concrete Research, 6: 773–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK (1989), “Introduction to Theories of Plasticity Part 1: Stress-Strain Relations,” Engineering Publications, Blacksburg Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jirásek M and Rolshoven S (2003), “Comparison of Integral-Type Nonlocal Plasticity Models for Strain-Softening Materials,” International Journal of Engineering Science, 41(13–14): 1553–1602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanmohammadi M and Mohsenzadeh V (2018), “Effects of Foundation Rocking and Uplifting on Displacement Amplification Factor,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 17(3): 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0459-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL (1996), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazari M, Sanavia L and Schrefler BA (2015), “Local and Non-Local Elasto-Viscoplasticity in Strain Localization Analysis of Multiphase Geomaterials,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 39: 1570–1592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Shin H and Lee JS (2014), “Behavior of Sand-Rubber Particle Mixtures: Experimental Observations and Numerical Simulations,” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech, 38: 1651–1663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makris M and Roussos Y (2000), “Rocking Response of Rigid Blocks under Near-Source Ground Motions,” Geotechnique, 50(3): 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavronicola E, Komodromos P and Charmpis DC (2010), “Numerical Investigation of Potential Usage of Rubber-Soil Mixtures as a Distributed Seismic Isolation Approach,” in B.H.V. Topping, J.M. Adam, F.J. Pallarés, R. Bru, M.L. Romero, editors, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Computational Structures Technology, Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mergos PE and Kawashima K (2005), “Rocking Isolation of a Typical Bridge pier on Spread Foundation,” J Earthq Eng, 9: 395–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddas Tafreshi SN and Norouzi AH (2012), “Bearing Capacity of a Square Model Footing on Sand Reinforced with Shredded Tire — An Experimental Investigation,” Construction and Building Materials, 35: 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.092i

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddas Tafreshi SN, Joz Darabi N and Dawson A (2018), “Cyclic Loading Response of Footing on Multi-Layered Rubber-Soil Mixtures,” Geomechanics and Engineering, 14(2): 115–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mylonakis G and Gazetas G (2000), “Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction: Beneficial or Detrimental?” J Earthq Eng, 4(3): 277–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeim F and Kelly JM (1999), Design of Seismic Isolated Structures: From Theory to Practice, Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pistolas GA (2015), “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Implementation of Recycled Materials Mixtures in the Foundation of Structures for the Improvement of Seismic Behavior,” PhD Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistolas GA, Anastasiadis A and Pitilakis K (2014), “Mechanical Shear Strength Properties of Sand/Granulated Rubber Mixtures,” Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Geotechnical Mechanics, Athens, Greece, paper XIV. 10. (in Greek)

  • Pistolas GA, Anastasiadis A and Pitilakis K (2018a), “Dynamic Behavior of Granular Soil Materials Mixed with Granulated Rubber: Effect of Rubber Content and Granularity on the Small-Strain Shear Modulus and Damping Ratio,” Geotech Geol Eng, 36: 1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0391-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistolas GA, Anastasiadis A and Pitilakis K (2018b), “Dynamic Behavior of Granular Soil Materials Mixed with Granulated Rubber: Influence of Rubber Content and Mean Grain Size Ratio on Shear Modulus and Damping Ratio for a Wide Strain Range,” Innov. Infrastruct. Solut., 3: 47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-018-0156-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje EM, Faraj F, Russell S and Bray JD (2004), “Empirical Relationships for Frequency Content Parameters of Earthquake Ground Motions,” Earthquake Spectra, 20(1): 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAC/FEMA (2000), “Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings”, Report No. FEMA-350, SAC Joint Venture, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shariatmadari N, Karimpour-Fard M and Shargh A (2018), “Undrained Monotonic and Cyclic Behavior of Sand-Ground Rubber Mixtures,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 17(3): 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0461-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen W, Zhu S, Zhu H and Xu Y (2016), “Electromagnetic Energy Harvesting from Structural Vibrations During Earthquakes,” Smart Structures and Systems, 18(3): 449–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simulia (2012), “Abaqus User’s Manual,” Dassault Systèmes, Providence, RI, USA.

  • Skinner RI, Robinson WH and McVerry GH (1993), An Introduction to Seismic Isolation, Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluys LJ, de Borst R and Mühlhaus HB (1993), “Wave Propagation, Localisation and Dispersion in Softening Solids,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, 30(9): 1153–1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spyrakos CC, Maniatakis CA and Taflambas J (2014), “A Critical Evaluation of Near-Field Seismic Records in Greece,” WIT Transactions on State of the Art in Science and Engineering, WIT Press, 80. doi: https://doi.org/10.2495/978-1-84566-000-0/01

  • Stewart JP, Fenves GL and Seed RB (1999), “Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction in Buildings II: Empirical findings,” Journal Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125: 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JP, Kwok AO, Hashash YMA, Matasovic N, Pyke R, Wang Z and Yang Z (2008), “Benchmarking of Nonlinear Geotechnical Ground Response Analysis Procedures,” Report PEER 2008/04, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trifunac MD and Todorovska MI (1998), “Nonlinear Soil Response as a Natural Passive Isolation Mechanism-The 1994 Northridge, California Earthquake,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 17(1): 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang HH (2008), “Seismic Isolation by Rubber-Soil Mixtures for Developing Countries,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37(2): 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang HH (2009), “Geotechnical Seismic Isolation,” Earthquake Engineering: New Research, New York, U.S. Nova Science Publishers Inc, 55–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang HH and Pitilakis K (2019), “Mechanism of Geotechnical Seismic Isolation System: Analytical Modeling,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 122: 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang HH, Lo SH, Xu X and Sheikh MN (2012), “Seismic Isolation for Low-to-Medium-Rise Buildings Using Granulated Rubber-Soil Mixtures: Numerical Study,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41: 2009–2024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tselentis GA and Zahradnik J (2000), “The Athens Earthquake of 7 September 1999,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90(5): 1143–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuda M, Kawasaki T, Yagai T and Hamajima T (2008), “Improvement of Levitation Force Characteristics in Magnetic Levitation Type Seismic Isolation Device Composed of HTS Bulk and Permanent Magnet,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 97: 012104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veletsos AS and Meek JW (1974), “Dynamic Behavior of Building-Foundation Systems”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 3(2): 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veletsos AS and Nair VV (1975), “Seismic Interaction of Structures on Hysteretic Foundations,” Journal of Structural Engineering, 101: 109–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde K, Gardoni P and Fujino Y (2000), “Base Isolation System with Shape Memory Alloy Device for Elevated Highway Bridges,” Engineering Structures, 22(3): 222–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf JP (1985), Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction, Prentice-Hall, Engl. Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong W and Li Y (2013), “Seismic Isolation Using Granulated Tire-Soil Mixtures for Less-Developed Regions: Experimental Validation,” Earthquake Eng Struct. Dyn., 42: 2187–2193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaghmaei-Sabegh S and Tsang HH (2011), “An Updated Study on Near-Fault Ground Motions of the 1978 Tabas, Iran, Earthquake (Mw = 7.4),” Scientia Iranica A, 18(4): 895–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshioka H, Ramallo JC and Spencer BF Jr (2002), “‘Smart’ Base Isolation Strategies Employing Magnetorheological Dampers,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128(5). ISSN 0733–9399/2002/5-540-551.

  • Zienkiewicz OC, Bicanic N and Shen FQ (1989), “Earthquake Input Definition and the Transmitting Boundary Conditions,” in Doltsinis I.S., editor, Advances in Computational Nonlinear Mechanics, International Centre for Mechanical Sciences (Courses and Lectures), vol. 300, Springer, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. A. Pistolas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pistolas, G.A., Pitilakis, K. & Anastasiadis, A. A numerical investigation on the seismic isolation potential of rubber/soil mixtures. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 19, 683–704 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-020-0589-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-020-0589-3

Keywords

Navigation