Abstract
When originally developed, the Koval theory was meant to interpret the core-scale production of oil by a miscible displacement by solvent injection. An essential parameter in the theory is the Koval factor, KV, which combines both the viscosity contrast effect (E) and the heterogeneity effect (HK) as KV = E HK. The Koval method has done an excellent job of interpreting oil recovery; however, the physical origin of this simple model is not clear. To address the physical significance of these factors, this paper explains a novel approach to derive the Koval factor using petrophysical data and vertical equilibrium theory. The study examines core data from 112 vertical production wells from fields located in the United States and Algeria. The heterogeneity factor is estimated from the flow- and storage-capacity relations, according to the Koval theory. Then, using fractional flow theory and assuming vertical equilibrium, we derive a mathematical expression that conveys the physical interpretation of the Koval factor. The results indicate that the physical explanation of the Koval factor is that of a product of the mobility ratio and the heterogeneity of the reservoir. The Koval factor simplifies computations of oil recovery by transforming the original reservoir to one with uniform layers, in vertical equilibrium, and piston-like displacement within each using only the flow and storage capacities. The physical interpretation of the Koval factor could offer new insights to examine previous results obtained from the theory itself.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- C :
-
Storage capacity
- CMG:
-
Computer Modelling Group Ltd.
- CRM:
-
Capacitance resistance model
- E :
-
Viscosity contrast effect
- EOR:
-
Enhanced oil recovery
- f i :
-
Fractional flow of phase i
- F :
-
Flow capacity
- h :
-
Thickness, feet
- H K :
-
Koval heterogeneity factor
- k :
-
Permeability, millidarcies, darcies
- K V :
-
Koval factor
- M° :
-
Endpoint mobility ratio
- N L :
-
Total number of layers
- OOIP:
-
Original oil in place
- P :
-
Pressure, psi
- q :
-
Flow rate, STB/day
- u :
-
Superficial velocity, feet/day
- t D :
-
Dimensionless time
- x :
-
Position, feet
- ϕ :
-
Porosity, fraction
- λ ri :
-
Relative mobility of phase i, cp−1
References
Andonyadis P (2010) Decision support for enhanced oil recovery projects. Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin
Buckley SE, Leverett MC (1942) Mechanism of fluid displacement in sands. Trans Am Inst Min Metall Eng 146:107–116. https://doi.org/10.2118/942107-G
Cao F, Luo H, Lake LW (2015) Oil-rate forecast by inferring fractional-flow models from field data with Koval method combined with the capacitance/resistance model. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 18:534–553. https://doi.org/10.2118/173315-PA
Cronquist C (1968) Waterflooding by linear displacement in Little Creek field, Mississippi. J Petrol Technol 20:525–533. https://doi.org/10.2118/1810-PA
Jain L, Lake LW (2013) Upscaling of miscible floods: an extension to Koval’s theory. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 30 September–2 October 2013. https://doi.org/10.2118/166400-MS
Jain L, Lake LW (2014) Surveillance of secondary and tertiary floods: application of Koval’s theory to isothermal enhanced oil recovery displacement. In: SPE improved oil recovery symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 12–16 April 2014. https://doi.org/10.2118/166400-MS
Jensen J, Lake LW, Corbett PWM, Goggin D (2000) Statistics for petroleum engineers and geoscientists. In: Handbook of petroleum exploration and production. Elsevier, New York
Koval EJ (1963) A method for predicting the performance of unstable miscible displacement in heterogeneous media. Soc Petrol Eng J 3:145–154. https://doi.org/10.2118/450-PA
Lake LW, Johns RT, Rossen WR, Pope GA (2014) Fundamentals of enhanced oil recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson
Mitra S, Leslie W (2003) Three-dimensional structural model of the Rhourde el Baguel field, Algeria. AAPG Bull 87:231–250. https://doi.org/10.1306/07120201114
Mollaei A (2011) Forecasting of isothermal enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and waterflood processes. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
Rashid B, Williams G, Bal A-L, Muggeridge A (2010) Quantifying the impact of permeability heterogeneity on secondary recovery performance. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September 2010. https://doi.org/10.2118/135125-MS
Salazar JJ (2018) Heterogeneity study of the Little Creek field from petrophysical data. Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin
Schmalz JP, Rahme HD (1950) The variation of waterflood performance with variation in permeability profile. Prod Mon 15:9–12
Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading
Werren EG, Shew RD, Adams ER, Stancliffe RJ (1990) Meander-belt reservoir geology, mid-dip Tuscaloosa, Little Creek field, Mississippi. In: McPherson JG, Studlick JRJ, Barwis JH (eds) Sandstone petroleum reservoirs. Casebooks in earth sciences. Springer, New York
Zhao X, Rui Z, Liao X (2016) Case studies on the CO2 storage and EOR in heterogeneous, highly water-saturated, and extra-low permeability Chinese reservoirs. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 29:275–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.12.044
Acknowledgements
Jose J. Salazar would like to thank Arin Raina for his help in the numerical simulation setup. He also acknowledges the Secretariat of Higher Education, Science, Technology, and Innovation of Ecuador (SENESCYT) and the Superior Polytechnic School of the Littoral (ESPOL) as sponsoring entities of his MS studies. Larry W. Lake holds the Shahid and Sharon Chair at The University of Texas at Austin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salazar, J.J., Lake, L.W. The Physical Meaning of the Koval Factor. Math Geosci 52, 1017–1033 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-020-09883-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-020-09883-0