Abstract
Catalytic hydrogenation is one of the backbones of the chemical industry. Controlling the reaction behaviour of the activated hydrogen species over oxide-supported metal catalysts is essential. Aside from the expected addition to substrates, the activated hydrogen species would also destroy the active structures. Here we show that, with the assistance of alkali cations, the atomically dispersed Ru(iii) on Al2O3 exhibits enhanced performance in the hydrogenation of a broad range of substrates. The alkali cations facilitate the hydrogenation mediated by heterolytic hydrogen species, which not only restrain the hydride species from migrating to interfacial oxygen, thus suppressing the reduction and aggregation of ruthenium, but also stabilize the negatively charged transition states and intermediates through enhanced Columbic attraction. Distinctively, an inverse H/D isotope effect related to H2 splitting as the rate-determining step over the atomically dispersed ruthenium-catalysed hydrogenation is predicted and confirmed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. The DFT structures can be found in Supplementary Data 1. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Liu, L. & Corma, A. Metal catalysts for heterogeneous catalysis: from single atoms to nanoclusters and nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 118, 4981–5079 (2018).
Halpern, J. The catalytic activation of hydrogen in homogeneous, heterogeneous, and biological systems. Adv. Catal. 11, 301–370 (1959).
Hansen, T. W., DeLaRiva, A. T., Challa, S. R. & Datye, A. K. Sintering of catalytic nanoparticles: particle migration or Ostwald ripening? Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1720–1730 (2013).
Yang, X. F. et al. Single-atom catalysts: a new frontier in heterogeneous catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1740–1748 (2013).
Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. & Gates, B. C. Atomically dispersed supported metal catalysts. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 3, 545–574 (2012).
Liu, P., Qin, R., Fu, G. & Zheng, N. Surface coordination chemistry of metal nanomaterials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 2122–2131 (2017).
Qin, R., Liu, P., Fu, G. & Zheng, N. Strategies for stabilizing atomically dispersed metal catalysts. Small Methods 2, 1700286–1700307 (2018).
Jones, J. et al. Thermally stable single-atom platinum-on-ceria catalysts via atom trapping. Science 353, 150–154 (2016).
Li, Z. et al. Well-defined materials for heterogeneous catalysis: from nanoparticles to isolated single-atom sites. Chem. Rev. 120, 623–682 (2020).
Su, L. L. et al. Creating mesopores in ZSM-5 zeolite by alkali treatment: a new way to enhance the catalytic performance of methane dehydroaromatization on Mo/HZSM-5 catalysts. Catal. Lett. 91, 155–167 (2003).
Wei, H. et al. Remarkable effect of alkalis on the chemoselective hydrogenation of functionalized nitroarenes over high-loading Pt/FeOx catalysts. Chem. Sci. 8, 5126–5131 (2017).
Zhao, B. et al. Direct transformation of syngas to aromatics over Na-Zn-Fe5C2 and hierarchical HZSM-5 tandem catalysts. Chem 3, 323–333 (2017).
Mross, W. D. Alkali doping in heterogeneous catalysis. Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 25, 591–637 (1983).
Doebereiner, J. Neue beiträge zur geschichte der chemischen dynamik des platins. Ann. Phys. 140, 94–96 (1845).
Nielsen, A. Review of ammonia catalysis. Catal. Rev. 4, 1–26 (1971).
Urquhart, A. J., Keel, J. M., Williams, F. J. & Lambert, R. M. Electrochemical promotion by potassium of rhodium-catalyzed Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: XP spectroscopy and reaction studies. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 10591–10597 (2003).
Williams, F. J., Palermo, A., Tracey, S., Tikhov, M. S. & Lambert, R. M. Electrochemical promotion by potassium of the selective hydrogenation of acetylene on platinum: reaction studies and XP spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 5668–5672 (2002).
Panagiotopoulou, P. Methanation of CO2 over alkali-promoted Ru/TiO2 catalysts: II. Effect of alkali additives on the reaction pathway. Appl Catal. B 236, 162–170 (2018).
Mahata, N., Raghavan, K. V. & Vishwanathan, V. Influence of alkali promotion on phenol hydrogenation activity of palladium alumina catalysts. Appl Catal. A 182, 183–187 (1999).
Bonzel, H. P. Alkali-promoted gas adsorption and surface reactions on metals. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2, 866–872 (1984).
Wu, Q. H., Thissen, A. & Jaegermann, W. XPS and UPS study of Na deposition on thin film V2O5. Appl. Surf. Sci. 252, 1801–1805 (2005).
Lang, N. D., Holloway, S. & Nørskov, J. K. Electrostatic adsorbate-adsorbate interactions: the poisoning and promotion of the molecular adsorption reaction. Surf. Sci. 150, 24–38 (1985).
Ertl, G., Lee, S. B. & Weiss, M. Adsorption of nitrogen on potassium promoted Fe(111) and (100) surfaces. Surf. Sci. 114, 527–545 (1982).
Xie, J. et al. Promoted cobalt metal catalysts suitable for the production of lower olefins from natural gas. Nat. Commun. 10, 167–176 (2019).
Huo, C. F. et al. The mechanism of potassium promoter: enhancing the stability of active surfaces. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 7403–7406 (2011).
Chen, I. W. & Chen, F. L. Effect of alkali and alkaline-earth metals on the resistivity to coke formation and sintering of nickel alumina catalysts. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 29, 534–539 (1990).
Yang, M. et al. A common single-site Pt(ii)–O(OH)x-species stabilized by sodium on ‘active’ and ‘inert’ supports catalyzes the water–gas shift reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 3470–3473 (2015).
Yang, M. et al. Catalytically active Au–O(OH)x-species stabilized by alkali ions on zeolites and mesoporous oxides. Science 346, 1498–1501 (2014).
Zugic, B., Zhang, S., Bell, D. C., Tao, F. F. & Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. Probing the low-temperature water-gas shift activity of alkali-promoted platinum catalysts stabilized on carbon supports. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 3238–3245 (2014).
Berkessel, A., Schubert, T. J. S. & Müller, T. N. Hydrogenation without a transition-metal catalyst: on the mechanism of the base-catalyzed hydrogenation of ketones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 8693–8698 (2002).
Funke, H., Chukalina, M. & Scheinost, A. C. A new FEFF-based wavelet for EXAFS data analysis. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 14, 426–432 (2007).
Chin, S. Y., Williams, C. T. & Amiridis, M. D. FTIR studies of CO adsorption on Al2O3- and SiO2-supported Ru catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 871–882 (2006).
Stará, I., Zeze, D., Matolı́n, V., Pavluch, J. & Gruzza, B. AES and EELS study of alumina model catalyst supports. Appl. Surf. Sci. 115, 46–52 (1997).
Langell, M. A. & Bernasek, S. L. High-energy-electron-loss spectroscopy of WO3(100) and NaxWO3(100) single-crystal surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 23, 1584–1593 (1981).
Kielwein, M. et al. High-energy electron-energy-loss study of sodium-tungsten bronzes. Phys. Rev. B 51, 10320–10335 (1995).
Senga, R. & Suenaga, K. Single-atom electron energy loss spectroscopy of light elements. Nat. Commun. 6, 7943 (2015).
Moliner, M. et al. Reversible transformation of Pt nanoparticles into single atoms inside high-silica chabazite zeolite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15743–15750 (2016).
Serna, P. & Gates, B. C. Zeolite-supported rhodium complexes and clusters: switching catalytic selectivity by controlling structures of essentially molecular species. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 4714–4717 (2011).
Liu, P. et al. Photochemical route for synthesizing atomically dispersed palladium catalysts. Science 352, 797–801 (2016).
Bauer, C. F. & Whitmore, D. H. Characterization of paramagnetic hole-centers in Al2O3 and Al2O3: Fe by optical and EPR absorption. J. Solid State Chem. 11, 38–52 (1974).
Turner, T. J. & Crawford, J. H. V centers in single crystal Al2O3. Solid State Commun. 17, 167–169 (1975).
Yao, H. & Shelef, M. Surface interactions in the system Re/γ-Al2O3. J. Catal. 44, 392–403 (1976).
Michel, C. et al. Role of water in metal catalyst performance for ketone hydrogenation: a joint experimental and theoretical study on levulinic acid conversion into gamma-valerolactone. Chem. Commun. 50, 12450–12453 (2014).
Shaik, S., Wu, W., Dong, K., Song, L. & Hiberty, P. C. Identity hydrogen abstraction reactions, X• + H−X' → X−H + X'• (X = X' = CH3, SiH3, GeH3, SnH3, PbH3): a valence bond modeling. J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 8226–8235 (2001).
Cheng, T. Y. & Bullock, R. M. Isotope effects on hydride transfer reactions from transition metal hydrides to trityl cation. An inverse isotope effect for a hydride transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 3150–3155 (1999).
Hewitt, J. T., Concepcion, J. J. & Damrauer, N. H. Inverse kinetic isotope effect in the excited-state relaxation of a Ru(ii)–aquo complex: revealing the impact of hydrogen-bond dynamics on nonradiative decay. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12500–12503 (2013).
Hascall, T. et al. Mechanistic and theoretical analysis of the oxidative addition of H2 to six-coordinate molybdenum and tungsten complexes M(PMe3)4X2 (M = Mo, W; X = F, Cl, Br, I): an inverse equilibrium isotope effect and an unprecedented halide dependence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 11402–11417 (1999).
Xu, C. et al. Interfacing with silica boosts the catalysis of copper. Nat. Commun. 9, 3367 (2018).
Van Vliet, E. D., Reitano, E. M., Chhabra, J. S., Bergen, G. P. & Whyatt, R. M. A review of alternatives to di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate-containing medical devices in the neonatal intensive care unit. J. Perinatol. 31, 551–560 (2011).
Takagi, Y., Naito, T. & Nishimura, S. The hydroxide-blacks of ruthenium and rhodium as catalysts for the hydrogenation of organic compounds. I. Their catalytic activity and selectivity in the hydrogenation of some aromatic compounds. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 38, 2119–2122 (1965).
Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal-amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994).
Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for open-shell transition metals. Phys. Rev. B 48, 13115–13118 (1993).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comp. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).
Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).
Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192 (1976).
Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000).
Gutiérrez, G., Taga, A. & Johansson, B. Theoretical structure determination of γ-Al2O3. Phys. Rev. B 65, 012101 (2001).
Pinto, H. P., Nieminen, R. M. & Elliott, S. D. Ab initio study of γ-Al2O3 surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 70, 125402 (2004).
Krokidis, X. et al. Theoretical study of the dehydration process of boehmite to γ-alumina. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 5121–5130 (2001).
Digne, M., Sautet, P., Raybaud, P., Euzen, P. & Toulhoat, H. Use of DFT to achieve a rational understanding of acid–basic properties of γ-alumina surfaces. J. Catal. 226, 54–68 (2004).
Menéndez-Proupin, E. & Gutiérrez, G. Electronic properties of bulk γ-Al2O3. Phys. Rev. B 72, 035116 (2005).
Ching, W. Y., Ouyang, L., Rulis, P. & Yao, H. Ab initio study of the physical properties of γ-Al2O3: lattice dynamics, bulk properties, electronic structure, bonding, optical properties, and ELNES/XANES spectra. Phys. Rev. B 78, 014106 (2008).
Ferreira, A. R. et al. Direct comparison between two γ-alumina structural models by DFT calculations. J. Solid State Chem. 184, 1105–1111 (2011).
Dabbagh, H. A., Taban, K. & Zamani, M. Effects of vacuum and calcination temperature on the structure, texture, reactivity, and selectivity of alumina: experimental and DFT studies. J. Mol. Catal. A 326, 55–68 (2010).
Ionescu, A., Allouche, A., Aycard, J.-P., Rajzmann, M. & Hutschka, F. Study of γ-alumina surface reactivity: adsorption of water and hydrogen sulfide on octahedral aluminum sites. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 9359–9366 (2002).
Ionescu, A., Allouche, A., Aycard, J.-P., Rajzmann, M. & Le Gall, R. Study of γ-alumina-supported hydrotreating catalyst: I. adsorption of bare MoS2 sheets on γ-alumina surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 8490–8497 (2003).
Knözinger, H. & Ratnasamy, P. Catalytic aluminas: surface models and characterization of surface sites. Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 17, 31–70 (1978).
Wolverton, C. & Hass, K. C. Phase stability and structure of spinel-based transition aluminas. Phys. Rev. B 63, 024102 (2000).
Morterra, C. & Magnacca, G. A case study: surface chemistry and surface structure of catalytic aluminas, as studied by vibrational spectroscopy of adsorbed species. Catal. Today 27, 497–532 (1996).
Digne, M., Sautet, P., Raybaud, P., Euzen, P. & Toulhoat, H. Hydroxyl groups on γ-alumina surfaces: a DFT study. J. Catal. 211, 1–5 (2002).
Tang, W., Sanville, E. & Henkelman, G. A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 084204 (2009).
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Key R&D Program of China (grant nos. 2017YFA0207302, 2017YFA0207303), the NSF of China (grant nos. 21890752, 21731005, 21721001, 21573178, 21773192, 91845102) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant no. 20720180026) for financial support. N.F.Z. acknowledges support from the Tencent Foundation through the XPLORER PRIZE. We also thank the XAFS station (BL14W1) of the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.X.Q. and L.Y.Z. were responsible for most of the investigations, methodology development, data collection and analysis, and writing the original manuscript. P.X.L., Y. G., K.L.L., C.F.X., Y.Z. and L.G. assisted with the data collection and analysis. N.F.Z. and G.F. were responsible for the conceptualization, funding and resources acquisition, supervising the project, and revising and editing the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 The atomic scale EELS of Ru(Na)-R.
The poor signal-to-noise ratio of the spectra was due to the difficulty to acquire the atomic-scale EELS of light element. The EELS in (b) is collected at the spots shown in (a). The broad peaks at ~23 eV in (b) is corelated to the bulk plasmon excitation of alumina33. Small bumps at ~23 eV located near the maxima of the spectra as highlighted in (c), should be related to the single-electron transition from the O 2p level that is perturbed by the vicinal Na ions34. The presence of both surface- and bulk-plasmon loss makes it difficult to identify these bumps straightforwardly. (d) Small bump highlighted at ~31.5 eV is attributed to the Na L2,3 edge signal, indicating the presence of Na ions nearby Ru species35. It should be noted that, due to the low intensities of the signals, Na was identified only with an approximate level of accuracy and that the assignment is supported by the literature36.
Extended Data Fig. 2 The computational models and XANES.
(a) Ru(H) and (b) Ru(Na), and (c) the comparison between the experimental XANES of Ru(Na)-R and calculated XANES of the theoretical Ru(Na) model. The inset shows the derivative XANES of both experimental and calculated XANES. The three peaks, A, B and C, correspond to the electronic transfer to the empty d (A) and p (B and C) orbitals, respectively, verifying that the theoretical model matches the experimental result very well.
Extended Data Fig. 3 The schematic diagram of the coulomb interaction.
The interaction takes place between the surface Na+ (or H+) with activated hydrogen species and corresponding electrostatic potential energy (a, b) II(II’) and (c, d) III(III’). The Ru(Na) surface displays a stronger Na+···Ha− attraction than that between H+ and Ha− on Ru(H), indicating that the surface Na+ can stabilize the hydride species. During the H transfer from Ru to O, the Ru(III) would be reduced to Ru(I) while the Ha− would be oxidized into Ha+. From viewpoint of electrostatic interaction, such a redox process is unfavorable because the attraction interaction between Ha− and Na+(H+) is replaced by the repulsion between Ha+ and Na+(H+) that is highlighted as the light red bars in (b) and (d). Considering Na+ is electronically more positive than H+, the presence of Na+ favors the formation Ha− while disfavors the formation of Ha+, nicely explaining why the introduction of Na+ can improve the reduced-sintering resistance of the atomically dispersed Ru catalysts.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Schematics of the interaction between surface Na+ and O in substrates during the hydrogenation catalysis.
The Bader charge (a.u.), bond length (Å) and electrostatic interaction energy (eV) of Na1 and the O1 illustrate the attraction between the surface Na1 and the O1 of hydrogenation intermediates and TSs, which favors the step-wise hydrogenation involved with Ru(Na).
Extended Data Fig. 5 The schematic diagram of isotopic effect.
(a) and (b) are inverse isotopic effect and normal kinetic isotopic effect for the rate-determining step of the hydrogenation reaction catalyzed by Ru(Na) and Ru(0001), respectively. The inverse kinetic isotopic effect (iKIE) is expected when (ΔZPE)TS is bigger than (ΔZPE)IS. Moreover, when the (ΔZPE)FS is also larger than (ΔZPE)IS, the inverse equilibrium isotope effect (iEIE) is also present.
Extended Data Fig. 6 The energy profiles of DMO hydrogenation on Ru(Na) (red) and Ru(H) (black) from DFT calculations.
The first step of DMO hydrogenation involves a transition state (ts3 or ts3’) by adding the H of Ru-Hδ− to the C of C = O of DMO and a hydrogenated intermediate (v or v’). The second step (>HC-O- to >HC-OH) is proceeded through a transition state (ts4 or ts4’) by adding the H of O-Hδ+ to the O of >HC-O- of hydrogenated intermediate (v or v’). For Ru(Na), the energy barriers of the first and second step of DMO hydrogenation were calculated to be 0.50 eV (ts3) and 1.00 eV (ts4), respectively. In comparison, Ru(H) need to overcome barriers of 1.10 eV (ts3’) and 0.43 eV (ts4’), respectively. From viewpoint of the effective barrier (1.00 eV vs 1.10 eV), DMO hydrogenation on Ru(Na) is expected more favorable than that on Ru(H).
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Methods, Figs. 1–38, Tables 1–7, References 1–17.
Supplementary Data 1
The coordinate of DFT structures.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 1
Acetone hydrogenation turnover rate, Fourier-transform EXAFS, Wavelet transform EXAFS.
Source Data Fig. 2
XPS, FTIR, EPR and DFT energies of H2 activation and ruthenium reduction.
Source Data Fig. 3
DFT energies of acetone hydrogenation, Arrhenius plots and isotopic effect.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2
Experimental and calculated XANES.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3
Electrostatic potential energies.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6
Energies of DMO hydrogenation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qin, R., Zhou, L., Liu, P. et al. Alkali ions secure hydrides for catalytic hydrogenation. Nat Catal 3, 703–709 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-020-0481-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-020-0481-6
This article is cited by
-
Enriching the surface oxygen as efficient anchoring site of highly dispersed Ru for enhanced hydrogenolysis activity
Nano Research (2023)
-
Effects of water adsorption on active site-dependent H2 activation over MgO nanoflakes
Nano Research (2023)
-
ZIF-8@ZIF-67 Derived Co/NPHC Catalysts for Efficient and Selective Hydrogenation of Nitroarenes
Catalysis Letters (2023)
-
Potassium-promoted single-atom Co-N-C catalyst for direct dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene
Nano Research (2023)
-
Self-reduction synthesis of supported ultrafine Pd nanoparticles with high activity and stability in hydrogenation
Science China Materials (2023)