Skip to main content
Log in

Inductively Coupled RF Coil for Imaging a 40 µm-Thick Histology Sample in a Clinical MRI Scanner

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A histology coil is a U-shaped radio-frequency (RF) coil that is designed to provide a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of microscopically thin samples. In this work, we demonstrate an inductively coupled histology coil that can be easily integrated with a human MRI scanner, providing a simple method to conduct novel, microscopic imaging experiments in a clinical scanner. All experiments were conducted in a 3T whole-body MRI scanner. The coil consisted of a U-shaped copper foil with tuning capacitors shunting the ends of the “U”. This design maximizes the B1-field efficiency and the homogeneity in the coil’s cavity. For inductive coupling, the histology coil was connected to an untuned single-turn pick-up loop via a coaxial cable. A standard 3T receive-only surface coil, connected to the scanner’s standard receive circuitry, was then inductively coupled to the pick-up loop. Separately, the RF pulse transmitted from the MRI body coil inductively drove the histology coil. In gel phantom imaging, we confirmed a higher (threefold) SNR for the histology coil than for the scanner’s standard surface coil, as well as high B1 homogeneity for the histology coil. Gradient echo images of a 40-µm-thick rat brain slice, at an in-plane resolution of 219 × 219 µm2, could be obtained with SNR > 10 (in the cortex) in about 2 hours. Our work demonstrates the feasibility of imaging microscopically thin tissue slices in a clinical MRI scanner using an inductively coupled histology coil. The method can be applied to multi-modality and multi-orientation imaging of ex-vivo and engineered tissue samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. D. Meadowcroft et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 57, 835 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. M. Hoang et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 71, 1932 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Xu, S. F. Othman and R. L. Magin, J. Biosci. Bioeng. 106, 515 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. S. Zhang and J. Yao, Trends Biotechnol. 36, 403 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. W. Bowtell et al., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 333, 547 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Weber et al., Magn. Reson. Mater. Phy. 24, 137 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. O. Nykanen et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 80, 2702 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Wei et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 78, 1683 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Liu, Magn. Reson. Med. 63, 1471 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Wharton and R. Bowtell, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 18559 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. W. Li et al., Neuroimage 59, 2088 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. W. A. Edelstein et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 3, 604 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. P. Fautz et al., 16th Annual Meeting of ISMRM (Toronto, Canada, 2008), p.1247.

  14. J. L. Mispelter, M. Lupu and A. Briguet, NMR Probeheads for Biophysical and Biomedical Experiments: Theoretical Principles & Practical Guidelines (Imperial College Press, London, 2006), p. 596.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. R. H. Hashemi, W. G. Bradley and C. J. Lisanti, MRI: The Basics (Wolters Kluwer Health, Philadelphia, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S-K. Lee et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 80, 2109 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. S. Hidalgo-Tobon, Concepts Magn. Reson. Part A 36, 223 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bruker Biospin 15.2 T. [cited 2019 07/09]; Available from: https://www.bruker.com/products/mr/preclinicalmri/biospec/technical-details.html.

  19. F. G. Shellock, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12, 30 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S-K. Lee et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 76, 1939 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Richardson et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 72, 1151 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. N. Hanninen et al., Sci. Rep. 7, 9606 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. W. Li et al., NMR Biomed. 30, e3540 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S. H. Hwang and S. K. Lee, Investig. Magn. Reson. Imaging 22, 141 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. H. Kim et al., PLoS One 14, e0220639 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. N. A. Bock et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 54, 1311 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Institute for Basic Science (IBS-R015-D1) and by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2019R1A2C1006448). The authors thank Ms. Hye-Sook Lee for help with the histology samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung-Kyun Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, BP., Kim, HS., Kim, KN. et al. Inductively Coupled RF Coil for Imaging a 40 µm-Thick Histology Sample in a Clinical MRI Scanner. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 77, 87–93 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.77.87

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.77.87

Keywords

Navigation