Skip to main content
Log in

The TST3D Method for Automated Structural Interpretation in Horizontal Wellbores

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Horizontal wells dominate the development of unconventional shale reservoirs. Using real time drilling data to steer in a target zone is the key to economic success. Today structural interpretation in unconventional horizontal wells is a manual process that is time-consuming, tedious, and error-prone, especially because gamma-ray (GR) logs are commonly the only available logging-while-drilling data. For the first time, a method named TST3D is developed to automate interpretation of subsurface structure. TST3D (true stratigraphic thickness in three-dimensional space) automates structural interpretation using pattern recognition. Given an initial structural model, TST3D automatically computes true stratigraphic thickness (TST) as the shortest distance from each wellbore survey location to the initial surface, then matches GR patterns in the horizontal well to those seen in a vertical pilot well in TST domain. TST3D inserts fold hinges, bends the structure, then recomputes the modeled GR response, progressively matching the pilot well log signature, from heel to toe in the horizontal well. There are three assumptions in the current version of TST3D: constant layer thickness across the drilled interval, GR variation follows stratigraphic layering, and no faults are present in the drilled section. Those assumptions are reasonable in most shale plays. The TST3D method can be applied in either a post-drill mode for structural interpretation or real-time mode for aiding geosteering. Field tests in different shale plays and complex well trajectories demonstrate that TST3D runs quickly: a structural model of a 10,000-ft horizontal section can be computed in minutes, and a real-time update of 100 ft of new data takes less than a minute. Automating the geosteering correlation process would allow well placement engineers to cover multiple wells simultaneously, increasing the efficiency of the team while potentially improving service quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azike O (2011) Multi-well real-time 3D structural modeling and horizontal well placement: an innovative workflow for shale gas reservoirs. In: Presented at the SPE eastern regional meeting, Columbus, Ohio, USA, 17–19 August, SPE-148609-MS, 102118/148609-MS

  • Bateman R, Hepp V (1981) Application of true vertical depth, true stratigraphic thickness and true vertical thickness log displays. In: Presented at the SPWLA annual logging symposium, Mexico City, Mexico, 23–26 June

  • Berg CR, Newson AC (2013) Geosteering using true stratigraphic thickness. In: Presented at the unconventional resources technology conference, Denver Colorado, USA, 12–14 August, URTeC-1590259-MS

  • Ellis D, Singer J (2008) Well logging for earth scientists. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths R (2009) Well placement fundamentals. Schlumberger, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesso W, Kashikar S (1996) The principles and procedures of geosteering. In: IADC/SPE 35051

  • Liang X, Wang L, Zhang J, Xian C, Wang G, Liu X, Zhao C (2015) An integrated approach to ensure horizontal wells 100% in the right positions of the sweet section to achieve optimal stimulation: a shale gas field study in the sichuan basin, China. In: Presented at the international petroleum exhibition and conferences, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 9–12 November, SPE-177474-MS, 102118/177474-MS

  • Moghaddamjoo A (1989) Constraint optimum well-log signal segmentation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 27(5):633–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passey Q, Bohacs K, Esch W, Klimentidis R, Sinha S (2010) From oil-prone source rock to gas-producing shale reservoir-geologic and petrophysical characterization of unconventional shale-gas reservoirs. In: SPE 131350

  • Scholle P, Bebout D, Moore C (1983) Carbonate depositional environments: AAPG Memoir 33. American Association of Petroleum Geologists. ISBN-10: 0891813101

  • Scholle P, Spearing D (1982) Sandstone depositional environments. AAPG Memoir 31. American Association of Petroleum Geologists. ISBN:9780891813071

  • Stoner M (2007) Technical geosteering finds the sweet spot. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 27:71–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Tearpock D, Bischke R (2003) Applied subsurface geological mapping, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Bayer W, Wunderle M, Bansal A (2016) Normalizing gamma-ray logs acquired from a mixture of vertical and horizontal wells in the haynesville shale. Petrophysics 57(6):638–643

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Schlumberger for the permission to publish our work. We would like to thank Neil Hurley, Ridvan Akkurt, and Shu Zhang for their technical discussion and contribution in the early stage of the development of TST3D. Thanks to Farid Toghi for providing the illustrative dataset of TST3D work steps.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tuanfeng Zhang.

Additional information

The original paper was presented to the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 23–25 July 2018, Houston, Texas, USA.

Abbreviations

Abbreviations

GR:

Gamma ray measurements, GAPI

LWD:

Logging while drilling

MD:

Measured depth (ft)

TVD:

True vertical depth (ft)

TST:

True stratigraphic thickness (ft)

MLT:

Measured log thickness (ft)

TVT:

True vertical thickness (ft)

TVDT:

True vertical depth thickness (ft)

THL:

True horizontal length (ft)

TD:

Total depth (ft)

\(\phi \) :

Wellbore deviation (\(\circ \))

\(\alpha \) :

Angle difference between the bedding azimuth and the wellbore section azimuth (\(\circ \))

\(\theta \) :

Bedding dip (\(\circ \))

N :

Total number of the measurement samples in a TST split panel interval

ARE:

Average relative error for the mismatch between the GR measurements and the models in TST domain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, T., McCormick, D., Nandlal, A. et al. The TST3D Method for Automated Structural Interpretation in Horizontal Wellbores. Math Geosci 53, 925–944 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-020-09868-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-020-09868-z

Keywords

Navigation