Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancement of adhesion between the polymeric liner and the metallic connector of high-pressure hydrogen storage tank

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Material Forming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of manufacturing of hydrogen fuel tanks due to the application of hydrogen fuels in clean and recyclable energy is one of the most important issues of substituting the petroleum fuels. They consist of two main parts: Plastic liner, as a barrier escape of hydrogen and Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) layer to strengthen tanks. The liner plastic could be manufactured by rotational molding or blow molding. In rotational molding, the metallic boss embedded into the mold directly and stick on the polymer before wrapping step. However, in blow molding, the metallic boss is welded to liner polymer. By comparing these two methods, rotational molding demonstrates better feedback because of its capability in assembling boss and liner part, and also manufacturing the piece simultaneously, without the defect arising from welding. Moreover, improvement in the adhesion capacity of polymer to metal could be obtained by effective surface treatments. Therefore, good knowledge of adhesion concept could be useful in these regards. In this work, the possible treatments on Aluminum (metal) and medium density polyethylene (liner) which could be applied in rotational molding is proposed and the adhesion behavior of them has been compared. These surface treatments are anodizing, flaming, sandblasting with different average size of sand particles, and coating with polyethylene grafted (PEG) (CEA patent n°FR3035173). Despite of the mechanical test results, it was found that the sandblasting treatment (with higher roughness value) combined with PEG coating performed higher adhesion at the interface of metal/polymer in compare with other possible methods in rotational molding. Microstructures of these different surface treatments confirmed the obtained mechanical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Midilli A, Ay M, Dincer I, Rosen M (2005) On hydrogen and hydrogen energy strategies: I: current status and needs. Renew Sust Energ Rev 9(3):255–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balat M (2008) Potential importance of hydrogen as a future solution to environmental and transportation problems. Int J Hydrog Energy 33(15):4013–4029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schlapbach L, Züttel A (2011) Hydrogen-storage materials for mobile applications. In: Materials for sustainable energy: a collection of peer-reviewed research and review articles from nature publishing group: World Scientific, pp 265–270

  4. Levesque S, Ciureanu M, Roberge R, Motyka T (2000) Hydrogen storage for fuel cell systems with stationary applications—I. Transient measurement technique for packed bed evaluation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 25(11):1095–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ifju P, Myers D, Schulz W (2006) Residual stress and thermal expansion of graphite epoxy laminates subjected to cryogenic temperatures. Compos Sci Technol 66(14):2449–2455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ifju P, Myers D, Schulz W (2006) Residual stress and thermal expansion of graphite epoxy laminates subjected to cryogenic temperatures. Compos Sci Technol 66(14):2449–2455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. David E (2005) An overview of advanced materials for hydrogen storage. J Mater Process Technol 162:169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barral K, Barthélémy H (2006) Hydrogen high pressure tanks storages: overview and new trends due to H2 Energy specifications and constraints,. In: Proc. of 16th World Hydrogen Energy Conference, Lyon, France

  9. Barthélémy H (2012) Hydrogen storage–Industrial prospectives. Int J Hydrog Energy 37(22):17364–17372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Popelka A, Krupa I, Novák I, Al-Maadeed MAS, Ouederni M (2016) Improvement of aluminum/polyethylene adhesion through corona discharge. J Phys D: Appl Phys 50(3):035204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fowkes FM (1987) Role of acid-base interfacial bonding in adhesion. J Adhes Sci Technol 1(1):7–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wake W (1978) Theories of adhesion and uses of adhesives: a review. Polymer 19(3):291–308

  13. Ebnesajjad S, Landrock AH (2014) Adhesives technology handbook. William Andrew, Norwich

  14. Chiche A, Pareige P, Creton C (2000) Role of surface roughness in controlling the adhesion of a soft adhesive on a hard surface. C R Acad Sci Ser IV Phys 1(9):1197–1204

  15. Allen K (1993) Some reflections on contemporary views of theories of adhesion. Int J Adhes Adhes 13(2):67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Voyutskiĭ S (1960) The diffusion theory of adhesion. Rubber Chem Technol 33(3):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Shirinbayan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Motaharinejad, V., Delnaud, L., Fouque, M. et al. Enhancement of adhesion between the polymeric liner and the metallic connector of high-pressure hydrogen storage tank. Int J Mater Form 14, 249–260 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-020-01577-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-020-01577-6

Keywords

Navigation