Kuramoto model in the presence of additional interactions that break rotational symmetry

V. K. Chandrasekar, M. Manoranjani, and Shamik Gupta
Phys. Rev. E 102, 012206 – Published 10 July 2020

Abstract

The Kuramoto model serves as a paradigm to study the phenomenon of spontaneous collective synchronization. We study here a nontrivial generalization of the Kuramoto model by including an interaction that breaks explicitly the rotational symmetry of the model. In an inertial frame (e.g., the laboratory frame), the Kuramoto model does not allow for a stationary state, that is, a state with time-independent value of the so-called Kuramoto (complex) synchronization order parameter zreiψ. Note that a time-independent z implies r and ψ are both time independent, with the latter fact corresponding to a state in which ψ rotates at zero frequency (no rotation). In this backdrop, we ask: Does the introduction of the symmetry-breaking term suffice to allow for the existence of a stationary state in the laboratory frame? Compared to the original model, we reveal a rather rich phase diagram of the resulting model, with the existence of both stationary and standing wave phases. While in the former the synchronization order parameter r has a long-time value that is time independent, one has in the latter an oscillatory behavior of the order parameter as a function of time that nevertheless yields a nonzero and time-independent time average. Our results are based on numerical integration of the dynamical equations as well as an exact analysis of the dynamics by invoking the so-called Ott-Antonsen ansatz that allows to derive a reduced set of time-evolution equations for the order parameter.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 26 March 2020
  • Revised 16 May 2020
  • Accepted 23 June 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.012206

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nonlinear Dynamics

Authors & Affiliations

V. K. Chandrasekar1, M. Manoranjani1, and Shamik Gupta2,3

  • 1Centre for Nonlinear Science and Engineering, School of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur-613 401, Tamil Nadu, India
  • 2Department of Physics, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Educational and Research Institute, Belur Math, Howrah 711202, India
  • 3Regular Associate, Quantitative Life Sciences Section, ICTP - The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Strada Costiera 11, 34151 Trieste, Italy

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 102, Iss. 1 — July 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×