Skip to main content
Applied Biological Chemistry
Download PDF
Download ePub

Chemical composition and antioxidant capacity of black pepper pericarp

Applied Biological Chemistry volume 63, Article number: 35 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Piper nigrum L. is a widely used spice because of its flavour and health effects. It is prepared as black and white pepper, according to the harvest time and inclusion of the outer skin. Pepper pericarp is usually considered waste when making white pepper. In this study, bioactive and flavour compounds and minerals in the pericarp of black pepper were determined to identify its applications. The pericarp contained total phenol, total flavonoid and piperine contents of 1421.95 ± 22.35 mg GAE/100 g, 983.82 ± 8.19 mg CE/100 g and 2352.19 ± 68.88 mg/100 g, respectively. There were higher levels of total phenols and total flavonoids in the pericarp compared with black pepper and white pepper. Piperine content was lower in the pericarp than in black pepper. The principal monoterpene compounds in the pericarp were α-pinene (9.2%), 2-β-pinene (14.3%), δ-3-carene (21.5%) and dl-limonene (18.8%), and the primary sesquiterpenes were α-copaene (5.1%) and caryophyllene (17.2%). The higher percentages of flavour compounds found in the pericarp would impart a more potent odour, and the pericarp exhibited higher minor and tiny differences based on electronic nose analysis. It had more minerals than black pepper and peeled black pepper.

Introduction

Piper nigrum L. is an early and widely used spice in human history and is highly valued for its characteristic pungency. It is prepared as black and white pepper, according to the harvest time and processing method [1, 2]. Black pepper is the dried immature but fully developed fruit of pepper plants, whereas white pepper consists of the mature fruit devoid of the outer skin (pericarp) [3, 4]. Black pepper has been used as a spice and in herbal medicines. It also has applications as a preservative and biocontrol agent [5]. The essential oil or extract of black pepper displays antioxidant, anti-fungal, anti-amoebic, anti-asthmatic, anti-diabetic and immunomodulatory activities [3, 6, 7]. White pepper has many different applications too, such as a preservative, insecticide, anti-bacterial, anti-fungal and anti-protozoal herb [5, 8, 9]. Especially, black and white peppers contain a bioactive compound named piperine, also found in other members of the pepper family (Piperaceae), including long pepper (Piper longum). Piperine is the most abundant and active alkaloid in pepper. It is used as a therapeutic agent because of its many health benefits associated with its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and drug activity-enhancing activities, respiratory effects and inhibitory action on lung metastasis [10]. Spatial memory and neurodegeneration of Alzheimer can be improved by piperine in animal models [11].

Black pepper is composed of carbohydrate of 37.4%, proteins of 25.5%, fibres of 23.6%, moisture of 4.7% and fat of 5.3%, as well as minerals, including 0.66% potassium (K), 0.20% calcium (Ca), 0.16% phosphorus and 0.16% magnesium (Mg) [12, 13]. The main volatile flavour compounds in black pepper are terpenes, and black pepper oils contain nitrogen-containing compounds [4, 14]. Key odorants of black pepper are α- and β-pinene, myrcene, α-phellandrene, limonene, linalool, methyl propanal, 2- and 3-methylbutanal, butyric acid and 3-methylbutyric acid. Compounds 2,3-diethyl-5-methylpyrazine and 2-isopropyl-3-methoxypyrazine are responsible for the musty and mouldy off-flavour in black pepper [15]. Among 90 black pepper and 40 white pepper samples analysed by proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry, the black pepper samples had notably higher intensities for 41% (52 out of 128) of the masses compared with white pepper [16]. Most of the volatile organic compounds were found at higher concentrations in black pepper than in white pepper, except for five low-intensity compounds; butanoic acid (m/z 89), its isotope (m/z 90), ethyl propionate (m/z 103) and methyl isovalerate (m/z 117) [16]. These results account for the relatively mild and delicate flavour of white pepper. White pepper is widely used in Europe because of its light colour [17, 18].

Although the chemical composition of black and white peppers has been investigated, so far, no study has determined the chemical components in the pericarp of pepper. When the pericarp is removed from pepper to make white pepper, it is normally discarded. If the pericarp can be used to manufacture other pepper products, it would be economically beneficial. In this study, we identified the chemical components and antioxidant activity of pepper pericarp, and the advantages of using this part of the pepper fruit for food.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and materials

Folin’s phenol reagent, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH), 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), 2,2′-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPB), D-catechin, gallic acid monohydrate and ethyl alcohol were prepared by MilliporeSigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Nitric acid (Dongwoo Fine-Chem, Iksan, Korea) and standards of minerals (AccuStandard, New Haven, CT, USA), namely Ca, K, copper (Cu), iron (Fe), Mg, manganese (Mn), sodium (Na) and zinc (Zn), were used.

Samples

Pepper of 5 kg was prepared from mature peppercorns harvested in March 2017, by Ottogi Sesame Mills Co., Ltd (Eumseong, Choungcheonbuk-do, Korea). The peppercorns were separated from the stems after harvesting them, and then they were naturally sun-dried for 7–10 days to obtain a black colour. Finally, pericarp was mechanically peeled off from the pepper using a decorticating machine (Sinco Mechanical JSC, Vietnam). It was ground and sieved by 60-mesh and then it was stored at room temperature in darkness.

Sample preparation

The ground pericarp sample of 5 g was homogenised with 80% ethyl alcohol of 100 mL using KWG-150 of Sunway Electric Manufacture (Heshan, China). The mixture was incubated for a day in shaking incubator (a DH.WIS 02011, Daihan Scientific Co., Ltd., Daegu, Gyeongbuk, Korea), followed by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 10 min (Mega21R, Hanil Scientific, Inc., Gimpo, Gyenggi-do, Korea). The upper layer was taken and filtered by a Minisart filter (0.45 μm pore size, regenerated cellulose) and then concentrated to 20 mL on a rotary evaporator (N-1000, Eyela, Tokyo, Japan). The extract was stored at − 80 °C until analyzing chemical components and antioxidant activities.

Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activities of pepper pericarp

Total flavonoids

The total flavonoids were determined by a colorimetric assay [19, 20]. A 1 mL of sample extract and distilled water (4 mL) were placed in a 15-mL tube, then 0.3 mL of 5% NaNO2 was added to the tube, and the mixture was left to react at room temperature for 5 min. After adding 0.3 mL of 10% AlCl3, the mixture was left to react further at room temperature for 6 min before 2 mL of 1 N NaOH was added. Distilled water was added to adjust the total volume to 10 mL. The absorbance was recorded by a spectrophotometer (Optizen POP, Mecasys, Daejeon, Korea) at 510 nm. Catechin was used as the standard to establish the calibration curve. Total flavonoids were expressed as milligrams of catechin equivalents (CE)/100 g fresh weight (FW).

Total phenols

The total phenols were analysed by the Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method [19, 20]. Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (0.2 mL) was added to a 15 mL tube containing 0.2 mL of the sample extract and 2.6 mL of distilled water. The mixture was left at room temperature for 6 min, and then 0.2 mL of 7% Na2CO3 was added, followed by incubation at room temperature for 90 min in the dark. Spectrophotometric absorbance was determined at 750 nm. The total phenol contents were shown as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/100 g FW by evaluating a gallic acid calibration curve.

Piperine

Piperine was determined, as described by Santosh et al. with some modifications [21]. A 50 mL conical tube containing 0.1 g of the sample extract and 50 mL methanol was extracted by ultrasonication at 50 °C for 20 min. The extracted sample was cooled down at room temperature and filtered through a Minisart syringe filter (0.45 μm, regenerated cellulose). Piperine was detected using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) apparatus (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a diode array detector (340 nm) and Eclipse C18 Plus column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm; Agilent) maintained at 25 °C. Acetonitrile–1% citric acid (45:55, v/v) was used as the mobile phase in isocratic mode at the flow rate of 1 mL/min for 20 min. The injection volume was 10 μL. Peak of piperine and its spectra in the HPLC chromatogram was identified (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

HPLC chromatogram and absorption spectrum of black pepper pericarp

Full size image

DPPH radical scavenging activity

DPPH radical scavenging activity was analyzed by the method reported by Brand-Williams et al. with some modifications [22]. DPPH solution (100 μM) was diluted with 80% methanol to have an absorbance of 0.65 ± 0.02 at a wavelength of 517 nm. The extracted sample (50 μL) was mixed with 2950 μL of DPPH diluted from 0.1 mM of DPPH solution and reacted for 30 min. The absorbance at 517 nm (Optizen POP spectrophotometer, Mecasys) was shown as milligrams of vitamin C equivalents (VCE)/100 g FW.

ABTS radical scavenging activity

The ABTS radical scavenging activity was measured with an analytical method described by Floegel et al. [23]. ABTS (137.175 mg) and AAPH (27.117 mg) were prepared in 100 mL of phosphate-buffer, followed by reaction in a water bath at 70 °C for 40 min to produce ABTS radicals, and then cooled down at room temperature. The working solutions were diluted with the ABTS radical solution by phosphate-buffered saline to obtain an optical density at 734 nm of between 0.63 and 0.67. Finally, the sample (20 μL) and working solution (980 μL) were mixed and reacted at 37 °C for 10 min. The absorbance of the solution at 734 nm was determined by spectrophotometer (Optizen POP, Mecasys). The antioxidant activity of the solution was expressed as milligrams of VCE/100 g FW.

Flavour compounds by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS)

Two grams of sample was added into an amber vial of 20 mL with PTFE/silicone septa, and it was equilibrated at 80 °C for 30 min with the headspace sampler under agitation at 300 rpm. GC/MS analysis was performed using a 6890 GC/MS system (Agilent Co., Santa Clara, CA, USA) installed with an HP-INNOWax column (60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm; Agilent Co.) [24]. The sample (1 mL) was injected by a syringe in split injection mode (20:1) at 230 °C, with helium (> 99.9% purity) as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The oven was initially maintained at 40 °C for 2 min, then heated at a rate of 5 °C/min to 230 °C and maintained at this temperature for 10 min. The flavours were identified by comparison of the obtained spectra to library (NIST 2005, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA). Figure 2 is the GC/MS chromatogram of the peaks of flavours in the black pepper pericarp.

Fig. 2
figure 2

GC/MS chromatogram of volatile compounds in black pepper pericarp

Full size image

Flavour compounds by electronic nose (e-nose)

A GC-type e-nose (Heracles II, Alpha MOS, Toulouse, France) with dual column (non-polar MXT-5 and slightly polar MXT-1701, 10 m length × 180 μm diameter; Restek, Lisses, France) and dual flame ionisation detector (FID) was used for flavour component profile analysis. The oven temperature was increased from 50 °C (maintained for 2 s) to 260 °C at 1 °C/s. The sample (0.8 g) was transferred to a 20-mL headspace vial and incubated at 50 °C for 5 min, with agitation at 500 rpm. Then, 1000 μL was injected at a flow rate of 1 mL/min and measured five times. For peak identification and principal component analysis (PCA), AroChemBase (NIST retention index database) and AlphaSoft (version 17.0; Alpha MOS) were used.

Minerals

Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na and Zn were identified by the procedure developed by Jung et al. [24]. Aliquot of the sample of 0.6 g was prepared in a Teflon digestion vessel with concentrated nitric acid of 7 mL, and it was digested for 40 min under incrementally increasing pressure heating at 1000 W. The digested sample was diluted with water in flasks of 50 mL for analysis of the minerals using an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ACTIVA-M, HORIBA Jobin–Yvon, Longjumeau, France) with a charge-coupled device. Argon gas plasma was used (flow rate of 13 L/min, sheath flow of 1.5 L/min). The absorption wavelengths were 317.933, 324.754, 238.207, 766.490, 285.213, 275.610, 589.592 and 213.857 nm for Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na and Zn, respectively. A multi-element standard solution was diluted for calibration. The determined concentrations were shown as milligrams/100 g FW.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were conducted triplicately. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation using Microsoft Office Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Analysis of variance was performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) for the statistical analysis of each experiment. Significance was determined by Duncan’s multiple range test with p < 0.05.

Results and discussion

Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of pepper pericarp

The total phenols, total flavonoids and piperine are important antioxidants in plants, including black pepper [11, 25, 26]. Pericarp contained total phenol, total flavonoid and piperine contents of 1421.95 ± 22.35 mg GAE/100 g, 983.82 ± 8.19 mg CE/100 g and 2352.19 ± 68.88 mg/100 g, respectively (Table 1). These data were compared with the corresponding literature values for black and white pepper and black pepper extract. Total phenols were from 11.9 to 654 mg GAE/100 g in black pepper and 447.23 mg GAE/100 g in white pepper. Total flavonoids were from 0.002 to 0.109 milligrams of quercetin equivalents (mg QE)/100 g in black pepper and methanol extracts of black pepper (Table 1). The concentration of total phenols was higher in pericarp than black pepper, white pepper and the methanol extract of black pepper, whereas pericarp contained less piperine compared with black pepper. However, the concentrations of total flavonoids in black pepper and the black pepper extract were determined as quercetin equivalents, so a direct comparison with pericarp was not feasible.

Table 1 Concentrations of total phenol, total flavonoid and piperine in black pepper pericarp
Full size table

The DPPH and ABTS antioxidant activities were 392.46 ± 6.84 and 1366.82 ± 25.14 mg VCE/100 g FW for pericarp, and 225.33 ± 6.84 and 793.97 ± 39.83 mg VCE/100 g FW for black pepper, respectively. The DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activities of pericarp were higher than those in black pepper by 42.5.2% and 41.9%, respectively.

Flavor compounds by GC/MS

Thirty-eight volatile flavour compounds were characterised in pericarp, and their peak areas were determined (Table 2). The main components were monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes and their oxygenated forms [27]. Most of the monoterpenes, except for linalool and 3-carene, were more volatile than the sesquiterpenes, with earlier retention times. The principal monoterpene compounds were α-pinene (9.2%), 2-β-pinene (14.3%), δ-3-carene (21.5%) and dl-limonene (18.8%), and the primary sesquiterpenes were α-copaene (5.1%) and caryophyllene (17.2%). β-Pinene, δ-3-carene, limonene and caryophyllene are abundant volatile flavour compounds in black, white and green peppers [28]. Pericarp contained a higher percentage of α-pinene and α-copaene than peppers. α-Pinene imparts a terpenic odour, according to Murthy and Bhattacharya [29]. Therefore, the pericarp has a more terpenic odour than black, white and green peppers. β-Myrcene and linalool are known as the most potent odorants of black pepper, although they are relatively minor flavour compounds in black pepper [15, 17], as confirmed in the current work. Therefore, pericarp would have a more potent odour compared with black pepper.

Table 2 Volatile flavour compounds composition in the black pepper pericarp
Full size table

Flavor compounds by an electronic nose

Black pepper, pericarp and inner kernel after removing the skin were analysed by an e-nose. Some of the discriminative volatile compounds were identified by the AroChemBase database (Table 3). Figure 3 shows the GC/FID of discriminative volatile compounds of black pepper, pericarp and inner kernel. 1R-(+)-α-pinene, o-chlorotoluene, cyclopentane, psi-cumene, heptyl mercaptan, dipentene, terpene, limonene, 3-methyldecane, 1-octanethiol, heptyl benzene and methyl undecanoate were identified as the main volatile compounds by an e-nose with two different columns. Although some volatile compounds, such as pinene, terpene and limonene, were identified by GC/MS, most of the volatile compounds identified by an e-nose were not identified by GC/MS. Therefore, GC/MS is not suitable as the sole method to identify volatile flavour compounds in black pepper, and an e-nose should be simultaneously used. Furthermore, cyclopentane, pentyl and dipentene/terpene/limonene were identified by only column MTX-1701. Column MTX-1791 is better for e-nose analysis than column MTX-5. Pericarp contained higher peak areas of heptyl benzene and methyl undecanoate compared with black pepper.

Table 3 Main volatile compounds identified by electronic nose in black pepper pericarp
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

GC/FID chromatogram of discriminant volatile compounds of black pepper, its pericarp and its inner kernel using an electronic nose with a MXT-5 column and b MXT-1701 column

Full size image

Figure 4 shows an odour map based on PCA of all volatile compounds of black pepper, and the three-dimensional odour map based on PCA of the discriminative volatile compounds of black pepper, pericarp and inner kernel. PC1 and PC2 accounted for major differences (99.379%) and minor differences (0.5935%), respectively. The flavour compounds in the various parts of black pepper had different flavour profiles, with the pericarp exhibiting higher minor and tiny differences. It shows that pericarp has a fruitful flavour than the other parts, as determined by GC/MS analysis.

Fig. 4
figure 4

An odour map of black pepper, its pericarp and its inner kernel based on principal component analysis

Full size image

Minerals

Based on the mineral composition of pericarp, K was the most abundant, followed by Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn and Na (Table 4). Comparatively lower concentrations of K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu have been reported in black pepper (Table 4) [13, 30]. Ca and Mg are important minerals in forming bone, strengthening heart functions, relaxing muscle, conducting memory and metaboliting glucose [31,32,33]. Black pepper pericarp would have stronger health effects than black pepper because of its higher concentrations of minerals. Moreover, it contained a much higher level of K relative to white bean (463.1 mg/100 g), one of the best sources of K. Black pepper contained higher concentrations of Ca compared with yoghurt (181.6 mg/100 g) and milk (120 mg/100 g), which are known to contain high levels of Ca. The Mg level in black pepper pericarp was more than that mentioned in spinach (87 mg/100 g), tuna (64 mg/100 g) and brown rice (44 mg/100 g), and only slightly lower than that in almonds (270 mg/100 g) [34,35,36].

Table 4 Mineral contents in black pepper pericarp
Full size table

Availability of data and materials

All data analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

DPPH:

2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl

ABTS:

2,2′-Azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)

References

  1. Purseglove JW, Brown EG, Green CL, Robbins SRT (1981) Spices: tropical agriculture series UK. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Omafuvbe BO, Kolawole DO (2004) Quality assurance of stored pepper (Pipper guineense) using controlled processing methods. Pak J Nutr. 3:244–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Agbor GA, Vinson JA, Oben JE, Ngogang JY (2006) Comparative analysis of the in vitro antioxidant activity of white and black pepper. Nutr Res. 26:659–663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jeleń HH, Gracka A (2015) Analysis of black pepper volatiles by solid phase microextraction-gas chromatrography: a comparison of terpenes profiles with hydrodistillation. J Chromatogr A 1418:200–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmad N, Fazal H, Abbasi BH, Farooq S, Ali M, Khan MA (2012) Biological role of Piper nigrum L. (Black pepper): a review. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2:S1945–S1953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gülçín İ (2005) The antioxidant and radical scavenging activities of black pepper (Piper nigrum) seeds. Int J Food Sci Nutr 56(7):491–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zaveri M, Khandhar A, Patel S, Patel A (2010) Chemistry and pharmacology of Piper longum L. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 5(1):67–76

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gasparetto A, Cruz AB, Wagner TM, Bonomoni TJ, Correa R, Malheiros A (2017) Seasonal variation in the chemical composition, antimicrobial and mutagenic potential of essential oils from Piper cernum. Ind Crops Prod 95:256–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sauter IP, Rossa GE, Lucas AM, Cibulski SP, Roehe PM, da Silva LAA, Rott MB, Vargas RMF, Cassel E, von Poser GL (2012) Chemical composition and amoebicidal acitivity of Piper hispidinervum (Piperaceae) essential oil. Ind Crops Prod 40:292–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gorgani L, Mohammadi M, Najafpour GD, Nikzad M (2017) Piperine-the bioactive compound of black pepper: from isolation to medicinal formulations. Compr Rev Food Sci F. 16(1):124–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chonpathompikunlert P, Wattanathorn J, Muchimapura S (2010) Piperine, the main alkaloid of Thai black pepper, protects against neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment in animal model of cognitive deficit like condition of Alzheimer’s disease. Food Chem Toxicol 48:798–802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pradeep KU, Geervani P, Eggum BO (1993) Common indian spices: nutrient composition, consumption and contribution to dietary value. Plant Food Hum Nutr. 44:137–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Jasass FM, Al-Jasser MS (2012) Chemical composition and fatty acid content of some spices and herbs under Saudi Arabia conditions. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/859892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clery RA, Hammond CJ, Wright AC (2014) Nitrogen-containing compounds in black pepper oil (Piper nigrum L.). J Essent Oil Res 18:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jagella T, Grosch W (1999) Flavour and off-flavour compounds of black and white pepper (Piper nigrum L.) II. Odour activity values of desirable and undesirable odorants of black pepper. Eur Food Res Technol 209(1):22–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Ruth SM, Silvis CJ, Ramos ME, Luning PA, Jansen M, Elliott CT, Alewijn M (2019) A cool comparison of black and white pepper grades. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 106:122–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jagella T, Grosch W (1999) Flavour and off-flavour compounds of black and white pepper (Piper nigrum L.) III. Desirable and undesirable odorants of white pepper. Eur Food Res Technol 209(1):27–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jin CQ, Jia YX, Dong HX, Zhou JW, Sun GF, Zhang YY, Zhao Q, Zheng BY (2013) Stir-fired white pepper can treat diarrhea in infants and children efficiently: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Chin Med 41(4):765–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meyers KJ, Watkins CB, Pritts MP, Liu RH (2003) Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of strawberries. J Agr Food chem. 51:6887–6892

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shin Y (2012) Correlation between antioxidant concentrations and activities of Yuja (Citrus junos Sieb ex Tanaka) and other citrus fruits. Food Sci Biotechnol. 21:1477–1482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Santosh MK, Shaila D, Rajyalakshmi I, Rao IS (2005) RP-HPLC method for determination of piperine from Piper longum Linn and Piper nigrum Linn. E J Chem. 2(2):131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C (1995) Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 28:25–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Floegel A, Kim DO, Chung SJ, Koo SI, Chung OK (2011) Comparison of ABTS/DPPH assays to measure antioxidant capacity in popular antioxidant-rich US foods. J Food composit anal. 24:1043–1048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jung E, Kim Y, Joo N (2013) Physicochemical properties and antimicrobial activity of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). J Sci Food Agr. 93(15):3769–3776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Madsen HL, Nielsen BR, Bertelsen G, Skibsted LH (1996) Screen of antioxidative activity of spices. A comparison between assays based on ESR spin trapping and electrochemical measurement of oxygen consumption. Food Chem 57:331–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun L, Zhang J, Lu X, Zhang L, Zhang Y (2011) Evaluation to the antioxidant activity of total flavonoids extract from persimmon (Diospyros kaki L.) leaves. Food Chem Toxicol 49(10):2689–2696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Buckle KA, Rathnawathie M, Brophy JJ (1985) Compositional differences of black, green and white pepper (Piper nigrum L.) oil from three cultivars. J Food Tech. 20:599–613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu H, Zeng F, Wang Q, Ou S, Tan L, Gu F (2013) The effect of cryogenic grinding and hammar milling on the flavour quality of ground pepper (Piper nigrum L.). Food Chem 141:3402–3408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Murthy CT, Bhattacharya S (2008) Cryogenic grinding of black pepper. J Food Eng 85:18–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Özcan MM, Akbulut M (2007) Estimation of minerals, nitrate and nitrite contents of medicinal and aromatic plants used as spices, condiments and herbal tea. Food Chem 106:852–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Brody T (1994) Nutritional biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  32. Slutsky I, Abumaria N, Wu LJ, Huang C, Zhang L, Li B, Zhao X, Govindarjan A, Zhao MG, Zhuo M, Tonegawa S, Liu G (2010) Enhancement of learning and memory by elevating brain magnesium. Neuron 65(2):165–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Veronese N, Watutantrige-Fernando S, Luchini C, Solmi M, Sartore G, Sergi G, Manzato E, Barbagallo M, Maggi S, Stubbs B (2016) Effect of magnesium supplementation on glucose metabolism in people with or at risk diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials. Eur J Clin Nutr 70:1354–1359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jones T. 14 healthy foods which are high in potassium. 2017. https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/high-potassium-foods. Accessed 22 Dec 2017

  35. Whitbread D. Top 10 foods highest in magnesium. 2018. https://www.myfooddata.com/articles/foods-high-in-magnesium.php. Accessed 8 Apr 2020

  36. National Institute of Health. Calcium: Fact sheet for health professionals. 2019. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Calcium-HealthProfessional/. Accessed 26 Mar 2020

  37. Ahmad A, Husain A, Mujeeb M, Khan SA, Alhadrami HAA, Bhandari A (2015) Quantification of total phenol, flavonoid content and pharmacognostical evaluation including HPTLC fingerprinting for the standardization of Piper nigrum Linn fruits. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 5(2):101–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tangkanakul P, Auttaviboonkul P, Niyomwit B, Lowvitoon N, Charoenthamawat P, Trakoontivakorn G (2009) Antioxidant capacity, total phenolic content and nutritional composition of Asian food after thermal processing. Int Food Res J. 16:571–580

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gupta D (2013) Comparative analysis of spices for their phenolic content, flavonoid content and antioxidant capacity. Am Int J Res Form Appl Nat Sci. 4(1):38–42

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nagy M, Socaci SA, Tofana M, Pop C, Muresan C, Pop A, Salanta L, Rotar AM (2015) Determination of total phenolics, antioxidant capacity and antimicrobial activity of selected aromatic spices. Bull Univ Agric Sci Vet Med Cluj-Napoca Food Sci Technol. 72(1):82–85

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mallick M, Bose A, Mukhi S (2016) Comparative evaluation of the antioxidant activity of some commonly used spices. Int J Pharm Res. 9(1):1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wood AB, Barrow ML, James DJ (1988) Peperine determination in pepper (Piper nigrum L.) and its oleoresins—a reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method. Flavour Frag J. 3:55–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Graham H (1965) Quantitative determination of piperine. II. Direct determination with phosphoric acid. J Food Sci 30(4):651–655

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Rao VRS, Raju SS, Sarma VU, Sabine F, Babu KH, Babu KS, Rao JM (2011) Simultaneous determination of bioactive compounds in Piper nigrum L. and a species comparison study using HPLC-PDA. Nat Prod Res 25(13):1288–1294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2017R1D1A1B03036312).

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2017R1D1A1B03036312).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Food Standard Division, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Heungduk, Cheongju, 28159, South Korea

    Joon-Goo Lee

  2. Centumtech, Gangseo, Seoul, 07566, South Korea

    Young Chae

  3. Department of Food Engineering, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam, 31116, South Korea

    Youngjae Shin

  4. Department of Food Science and Technology, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, Nowon, Seoul, 01811, South Korea

    Young-Jun Kim

Authors
  1. Joon-Goo Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Young Chae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Youngjae Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Young-Jun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JGL analyzed data and wrote the manuscript and YS analyzed the antioxidant ability. YC analyzed the flavours with e-nose analyzer. YJK organized this study and manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Jun Kim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, JG., Chae, Y., Shin, Y. et al. Chemical composition and antioxidant capacity of black pepper pericarp. Appl Biol Chem 63, 35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-020-00521-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-020-00521-1

Keywords