Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Atlas-based liver segmentation for nonhuman primate research

  • Short communication
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Certain viral infectious diseases cause systemic damage and the liver is an important organ affected directly by the virus and/or the hosts’ response to the virus. Medical imaging indicates that the liver damage is heterogenous, and therefore, quantification of these changes requires analysis of the entire organ. Delineating the liver in preclinical imaging studies is a time-consuming and difficult task that would benefit from automated liver segmentation.

Methods

A nonhuman primate atlas-based liver segmentation method was developed to support quantitative image analysis of preclinical research. A set of 82 computed tomography (CT) scans of nonhuman primates with associated manual contours delineating the liver was generated from normal and abnormal livers. The proposed technique uses rigid and deformable registrations, a majority vote algorithm, and image post-processing operations to automate the liver segmentation process. This technique was evaluated using Dice similarity, Hausdorff distance measures, and Bland–Altman plots.

Results

Automated segmentation results compare favorably with manual contouring, achieving a median Dice score of 0.91. Limits of agreement from Bland–Altman plots indicate that liver changes of 3 Hounsfield units (CT) and 0.4 SUVmean (positron emission tomography) are detectable using our automated method of segmentation, which are substantially less than changes observed in the host response to these viral infectious diseases.

Conclusion

The proposed atlas-based liver segmentation technique is generalizable to various sizes and species of nonhuman primates and facilitates preclinical infectious disease research studies. While the image analysis software used is commercially available and facilities with funding can access the software to perform similar nonhuman primate liver quantitative analyses, the approach can be implemented in open-source frameworks as there is nothing proprietary about these methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Bennett RS, Huzella LM, Jahrling PB, Bollinger L, Olinger GG Jr, Hensley LE (2017) Nonhuman primate models of Ebola virus disease. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 411:171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/82_2017_20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ewers EC, Pratt WD, Twenhafel NA, Shamblin J, Donnelly G, Esham H, Wlazlowski C, Johnson JC, Botto M, Hensley LE, Goff AJ (2016) Natural history of aerosol exposure with Marburg virus in rhesus macaques. Viruses 8(4):87. https://doi.org/10.3390/v8040087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hensley LE, Smith MA, Geisbert JB, Fritz EA, Daddario-DiCaprio KM, Larsen T, Geisbert TW (2011) Pathogenesis of Lassa fever in cynomolgus macaques. Virol J 8:205. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422x-8-205

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu G, Hu Y, Zhao Y, Yu H, Hu P, Shi H (2018) Variations of the liver standardized uptake value in relation to background blood metabolism: an 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography study in a large population from China. Med (Baltimore) 97(19):e0699. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000010699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Joskowicz L, Cohen D, Caplan N, Sosna J (2019) Inter-observer variability of manual contour delineation of structures in CT. Eur Radiol 29(3):1391–1399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5695-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cai W, He B, Fan Y, Fang C, Jia F (2016) Comparison of liver volumetry on contrast-enhanced CT images: one semiautomatic and two automatic approaches. J Appl Clin Med Phys 17(6):118–127. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6485

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Biswas A, Bhattacharya P, Maity SP (2018) 3D segmentation of liver and its lesions using optimized geometric contours. Procedia Comput Sci 133:240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang K, Mamidipalli A, Retson T, Bahrami N, Hasenstab K, Blansit K, Bass E, Delgado T, Cunha G, Middleton MS, Loomba R, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Sirlin CB, Hsiao A (2019) Automated CT and MRI liver segmentation and biometry using a generalized convolutional neural network. Radiology AI 1(2):e180022

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moghbel M, Mashohor S, Mahmud R, Bin Saripan MI (2016) Automatic liver segmentation on computed tomography using random walkers for treatment planning. EXCLI J 15:500–517. https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2016-473

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Horvat M, Nelson AS, Pirozzi SD (2014) Time savings of a multi-atlas approach for liver segmentation. J Nucl Med 55(Supplement 1):1523

    Google Scholar 

  11. Iglesias JE, Sabuncu MR (2015) Multi-atlas segmentation of biomedical images: a survey. Med Image Anal 24(1):205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Piper J (2007) Evaluation of an intensity-based free-form deformable registration algorithm. Med Phys 34(6):2353–2354

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Laura Bollinger and Jiro Wada for their expertise in helping to prepare this manuscript. Staff from MIM Software provided guidance in use of the digital atlas building framework. The authors also thank the comparative medicine group at the NIAID Integrated Research Facility for caring and handling of NHPs.

Funding

This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. HHSN261200800001E. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This work was funded in part through Battelle Memorial Institute’s prime contract with the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) under Contract No. HHSN272200700016I. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) or of the institutions and companies affiliated with the authors. MH, JS and RB performed this work as employees of Battelle Memorial Institute. Subcontractors to Battelle Memorial Institute who performed this work are: MC, CB, PS, and JL, all employees of MEDRelief Staffing. NHPs were provided by the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases and the Office of Research Services/Division of Veterinary Resources, National Institutes of Health (NOR15003-001-0000).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Christopher Bartos, Philip Sayre, Jennifer Sword, Jeffrey Solomon, Nina Aiosa and Dara Bradley. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jeffrey Solomon and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Solomon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors (Jeffrey Solomon, Nina Aiosa, Dara Bradley, Marcelo A. Castro, Syed Reza, Christopher Bartos, Philip Sayre, Ji Hyun Lee, Jennifer Sword, Michael R. Holbrook, Richard S. Bennett, Dima A. Hammoud, Reed F. Johnson, Irwin Feuerstein) declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval, human and animal rights

The animals were housed in an Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Care-International-accredited facility. All experimental procedures were approved by the NIAID Division of Clinical Research (DCR) Animal Care and Use Committee and were in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act regulations, Publish Health Service policy, and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals recommendations.

Code availability

MIM Software (Cleveland, Ohio) is commercially available.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Solomon, J., Aiosa, N., Bradley, D. et al. Atlas-based liver segmentation for nonhuman primate research. Int J CARS 15, 1631–1638 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02225-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02225-9

Keywords

Navigation