Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

European current landscape in laboratory accreditation

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The number of accredited laboratories in the world shown considerable growth in the last 2 decades. These laboratories are from different institutions, such as national or multinational organizations, Higher Education Institutions (HEI) and Research Institutes (RI). This paper presents and comments on the current landscape of accreditation, from the point of view of testing and calibration laboratories under the ISO/IEC 17025 standard, in Europe. Laboratories accredited by signatory bodies of the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation Mutual Recognition Arrangement (ILAC MRA) were identified and classified by institution type. The results were compared with those obtained in a previous research on the American Continent. An upward trend in the number of accredited laboratories with the increase in the population and/or GDP was observed in EU countries. Several similar characteristics were found in both regions, America and Europe. Nevertheless, a strong regulation in specifics areas seems to be higher in Europe and a smaller disparity was observed between European countries. Besides, as accreditation of laboratories in HEI and RI presents additional difficulties, the identification of these laboratories will be used as a basis for future work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation—ILAC (2015) The ILAC mutual recognition arrangement. https://ilac.org/?ddownload=891. Accessed 17 Oct 2019

  2. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation—ILAC (2018) ILAC MRA annual report 2018. https://ilac.org/?ddownload=121875. Accessed 17 Oct 2019

  3. ISO/IEC 17025 (2017) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

  4. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation—ILAC (2018) Infographic ILAC MRA 2018. https://ilac.org/?ddownload=121902. Accessed 17 Oct 2019

  5. Grochau IH, ten Caten CS, Forte MMC (2017) Current American landscape in laboratory accreditation according to ISO/IEC 17025. Accred Qual Assur 22:57–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grochau IH et al (2018) Motivations, benefits and challenges on ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation of higher education institution laboratories. Accred Qual Assur 23:183–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodima A et al (2005) ISO 17025 quality system in a university environment. Accred Qual Assur 10:369–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vajda N et al (2006) On the way to formal accreditation. Accred Qual Assur 10:599–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zapata-García D, Llauradó M, Rauret G (2007) Experience of implementing ISO 17025 for the accreditation of a university testing laboratory. Accred Qual Assur 12:317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grochau IH et al (2010) Implementation of a quality management system in university test laboratories: a brief review and new proposals. Accred Qual Assur 15:681–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Iacob E (2016) Experience of accreditation in a surface science laboratory. Accred Qual Assur 21:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernandes De Nadai et al (2006) Quality system implementation in a Brazilian university laboratory. Accred Qual Assur 10:594–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lopes I et al (2014) Implementation of the quality management system at the Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Safety (LPSR) in Portugal. Accred Qual Assur 19:355–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules. Official Journal of the European Communities L 165/1, 2004. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0882&from=EN. Accessed 6 Nov 2019

  15. Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1787 of 6 October 2015 amending Annexes II and III to Council Directive 98/83/EC on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Official Journal of the European Union L 260/6, 2015. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32015L1787&from=EN. Accessed 6 Nov 2019

  16. European Network of Forensic Science Institutes—ENFSI. Homepage. http://enfsi.eu/. Accessed 6 Nov 2019

  17. European Network of Forensic Science Institutes—ENFSI (2011) Policy for accreditation. http://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/policy_on_scope_of_accreditation.pdf. Accessed 6 Nov 2019

  18. ISO 15189 (2012) Medical laboratories—requirements for quality and competence. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

  19. The World Bank Group (2018) GDP ranking. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/gdp-ranking. Accessed 14 Oct 2019

  20. The World Bank Group (2018) Total population. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/sp.pop.totl. Accessed 6 Apr 2020

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Brazilian government agencies: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—CAPES, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—CNPq and Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos—FINEP (SIBRATEC project).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

    Inês Hexsel Grochau, Dayane Karolina Barro Leal & Carla Schwengber ten Caten

Authors
  1. Inês Hexsel Grochau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dayane Karolina Barro Leal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carla Schwengber ten Caten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inês Hexsel Grochau.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grochau, I.H., Leal, D.K.B. & ten Caten, C.S. European current landscape in laboratory accreditation. Accred Qual Assur 25, 303–310 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-020-01440-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-020-01440-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation