Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What is at the Root of Construction 4.0: A Systematic Review of the Recent Research Effort

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The last decades have seen considerable effort invested in a digital transition in the construction industry. While the building information modeling (BIM) approach plays an important role in such a transition, more and more technological approaches are emerging and grouped together under the concept of Construction 4.0. However, the contours of Construction 4.0 as a scientific domain are far from being clearly defined. A few literature reviews have been published in an attempt to clarify its meaning and define its enabling technologies, but do not provide a complete view of the research efforts. To fully understand the research effort, it is necessary to study the different communities and clusters, their weights and their interrelationships. This paper proposes a mapping of the Construction 4.0 research themes and clusters over 10 years of scientific publications, using a systematic literature review approach. 2444 papers published in peer-reviewed journals between 2010 and 2019 were identified and the associated keywords were analyzed in order to highlight their co-occurrences. The research shows how BIM plays a central role in the digital transformation, hiding a forest of emerging technologies represented by the main clusters identified. Of the 10 main enabling technologies in 2018, only three were already mentioned in 2010. Some of these technologies (Internet of Things, additive manufacturing, 3D printing and Big Data) seem to be in the position to occupy an increasingly important place in the coming years. It seems more difficult for other technologies (e.g., cyber physical systems) to find an important place, due to a lack of awareness in the industry. Others seem less and less addressed, for contrary reasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Commission (2017) Digitising European Industry. Progress So Far, 18 Months After the Launch

  2. Craveiro F, Duarte JP, Bartolo H, Bartolo PJ (2019) Additive manufacturing as an enabling technology for digital construction: a perspective on Construction 4.0. Autom Constr 103(March):251–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roland Berger GmbH (2016) Digitization in the construction industry Building Europe’s road to ‘construction 4.0, pp 1–16

  4. Forgues D, Rivest L, Danjou C, Meyer J (2019) De l’Industrie 4.0 à la Construction 4.0: Des exemples concrets!

  5. Oesterreich TD, Teuteberg F (2016) Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: a triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Comput Ind 83:121–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Turk AŽ, Klinc R (2019) Perspectives for Industry 4.0 in Construction. In: World construction forum. Building and infrastructure resilience, p 2019

  7. Boton C, Forgues D (2017) Construction industrialization and it integration: how tall wood buildings can show the right path towards construction 4.0. In: Modular and offsite construction (MOC) summit proceedings, pp 201–207

  8. Lemaire C, Rivest L, Boton C, Danjou C, Braesch C, Nyffenegger F (2019) Analyzing BIM topics and clusters through ten years of scientific publications. J Inf Technol Constr 24:273–298

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oraee M, Hosseini MR, Banihashemi Namini S, Merschbrock C (2017) Where the gaps lie: ten years of research into collaboration on BIM-enabled construction projects. Constr Econ Build 17(1):121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li X, Wu P, Shen GQ, Wang X, Teng Y (2017) Mapping the knowledge domains of Building Information Modeling (BIM): a bibliometric approach. Autom Constr 84(October):195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dallasega P, Rauch E, Linder C (2018) Industry 4.0 as an enabler of proximity for construction supply chains: a systematic literature review. Comput Ind 99(March):205–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tang S, Shelden DR, Eastman CM, Pishdad-Bozorgi P, Gao X (2019) A review of building information modeling (BIM) and the internet of things (IoT) devices integration: present status and future trends. Autom Constr 101(January):127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang X et al (2019) Survey on blockchain for Internet of Things. Comput Commun 136:10–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jia M, Komeily A, Wang Y, Srinivasan RS (2019) Adopting Internet of Things for the development of smart buildings: a review of enabling technologies and applications. Autom Constr 101:111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Soltanmohammadlou N, Sadeghi S, Hon CKH, Mokhtarpour-Khanghah F (2019) Real-time locating systems and safety in construction sites: a literature review. Saf Sci 117:229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu Z, Deng Z, Demian P (2018) Integration of building information modelling (BIM) and sensor technology. In: CSAE’18, vol 57, pp 1–5

  17. Chen Z, Jiang C, Xie L (2018) Building occupancy estimation and detection: a review. Energy Build 169:260–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Valero E, Adán A, Cerrada C (2015) Evolution of RFID applications in construction: a literature review. Sensors (Switzerland) 15(7):15988–16008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tseng KC, Thi D, Giau N, Huang P (2017) Universal access in human–computer interaction. Human and technological environments. In: Universal access in human–computer interaction, vol 10279, pp 612–620

  20. Wang P, Wu P, Wang J, Chi HL, Wang X (2018) A critical review of the use of virtual reality in construction engineering education and training. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(6):1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li X, Yi W, Chi HL, Wang X, Chan APC (2017) A critical review of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) applications in construction safety. Autom Constr 86:150–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Luciano T (2011) Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research imagination. Eval Res Educ 24(4):303–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fink A (2005) Conducting research literature reviews: From the Internet to paper. SAGE Publications, Fourth edi

    Google Scholar 

  24. Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton A (2012) Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mulrow C, Cook D, Davidoff F (1997) Systematic reviews: critical links in the great chain of evidence. Ann Intern Med 126(5):389–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mulrow CD (1994) Systematic reviews: rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ 309(6954):597–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rousseau DM, Manning J, Denyer D (2008) Evidence in management and organizational science: assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. The Academy of Management Annals, 2 (1): 475–515, 2008. Market Lett 21:6581

    Google Scholar 

  28. Carney S, Geddes J (2002) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In: Evidence in mental health care. Routledge, London, pp 73–80

  29. Kitchenham B, Budgen D, Brereton OP (2010) The value of mapping studies—a participant-observer case study. In: Proceedings of the international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering (EASE’10), pp 25–33

  30. Petticrew M, Roberts H (2006) Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Eval J Aust 9(1):352

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cooper ID (2016) What is a ‘mapping study’? J Med Libr Assoc JMLA 104(1):76–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomé AMT, Scavarda LF, Scavarda AJ (2016) Conducting systematic literature review in operations management. Prod Plan Control 27(5):408–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2011) Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 62(7):1382–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. He Q, Wang G, Luo L, Shi Q, Xie J, Meng X (2016) Mapping the managerial areas of Building Information Modeling (BIM) using scientometric analysis. Int J Project Manage 35(4):670–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Oraee M, Hosseini MR, Papadonikolaki E, Palliyaguru R, Arashpour M (2017) Collaboration in BIM-based construction networks: a bibliometric-qualitative literature review. Int J Project Manage 35(7):1288–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Santos R, Costa AA, Grilo A (2017) Bibliometric analysis and review of Building Information Modelling literature published between 2005 and 2015. Autom Constr 80:118–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pezeshki Z, Ivari SAS (2018) Applications of BIM: a brief review and future outline. Arch Comput Methods Eng 25(2):273–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Guo B, Feng T (2019) Mapping knowledge domains of integration in BIM-based construction networks: a systematic mixed-method review. Adv Civil Eng 2019

  39. Martínez-Aires MD, López-Alonso M, Martínez-Rojas M (2018) Building information modeling and safety management: a systematic review. Saf Sci 101:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jamil AHA, Fathi MS (2018) Contractual challenges for BIM-based construction projects: a systematic review. Built Environ Project Asset Manag 8(4):372–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ganbat T, Chong HY, Liao PC, Lee CY (2018) A cross-systematic review of addressing risks in building information modelling-enabled international construction projects. Arch Comput Methods Eng

  42. Vigneault M-A, Boton C, Chong H-Y, Cooper-Cooke B (2019) An innovative framework of 5D BIM solutions for construction cost management: a systematic review. Arch Comput Methods Eng

  43. Ivson P, Moreira A, Queiroz F, Santos W, Celes W (2019) A systematic review of visualization in building information modeling. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 1–20

  44. Charef R, Alaka H, Emmitt S (2018) Beyond the third dimension of BIM: a systematic review of literature and assessment of professional views. J Build Eng 19(May):242–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang H, Pan Y, Luo X (2019) Integration of BIM and GIS in sustainable built environment: a review and bibliometric analysis. Autom Constr 103:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lee CY, Chong HY, Wang X (2018) Streamlining digital modeling and building information modelling (BIM) uses for the oil and gas projects. Arch Comput Methods Eng 25(2):349–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Niu Y, Anumba C, Lu W (2019) Taxonomy and deployment framework for emerging pervasive technologies in construction projects. J Constr Eng Manag 145(5):04019028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jacomy M, Venturini T, Heymann S, Bastian M (2014) ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS ONE 9(6):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Newman MEJ (2006) Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(23):8577–8582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Guimerà R, Amaral LAN (2005) Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature 433(7028):895–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Danon L, Díaz-Guilera A, Duch J, Arenas A (2005) Comparing community structure identification. J Stat Mech: Theory Exp 9:219–228

    Google Scholar 

  52. Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech: Theory Exp 10:2008

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Mitacs Globalink program (Project ID 17861).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. École de technologie supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame Street West, Montreal, QC, H3C 1K3, Canada

    Conrad Boton, Louis Rivest, Oussama Ghnaya & Moataz Chouchen

Authors
  1. Conrad Boton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Louis Rivest
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Oussama Ghnaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Moataz Chouchen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Conrad Boton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boton, C., Rivest, L., Ghnaya, O. et al. What is at the Root of Construction 4.0: A Systematic Review of the Recent Research Effort. Arch Computat Methods Eng 28, 2331–2350 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09457-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09457-7

Search

Navigation