Research articleRegional disparities in decoupling economic growth and steel stocks: Forty years of provincial evidence in China
Graphical abstract
Introduction
The Anthropocene marks a new chapter in the geological era where human activity dominates the development of global ecosystems (Sterner et al., 2019), and the “Great Acceleration” marked by expansion in human population and development of novel materials has witnessed the remarkable influence of human activity (Lewis and Maslin, 2015). The process of modern urbanization and industrialization in the 20th century have converted large quantities of natural resources into a variety of manufactured capital in the form of extensively built infrastructure, industrial facilities, and transportation equipment, to enable human's modern life and support the economic development (Graedel and Cao, 2010; Graedel et al., 2015; Krausmann et al., 2017; Roberts, 1996). Globally, the manufactured capital, as the entire physical man-made stocks, expanded greatly and the growth was fastest in the three decades after World War Ⅱ (WWⅡ) at 4% per annum (Krausmann et al., 2017), while the global gross domestic product (GDP) grew at a similar pace (World Bank, 2018). With increasing population and living standards in developing countries, and “western lifestyles” in developed countries, the size of manufactured capital will continue to grow, and the waste and emissions resulted from their production, maintenance, and operation have been reaching or exceeding crucial ecological limits (Foley et al., 2011; Rockstrom et al., 2009).
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted by the UN General Assembly (2015), brought a renewed focus on a long-standing challenge: the potential for material throughput and environmental impact to decouple absolutely from economic growth. Essential to meeting this challenge is how to regulate the manufactured capital to reduce its environmental and resource impacts while maintaining its function for human well-being (Gielen et al., 2016; Tu et al., 2019), since the manufactured capital requires a socially organized continuous flows of materials and energy from and to the environment when providing services and shelter for human. Compared with extensive efforts devoted to analyzing the decoupling of economic growth from environmental impacts (Schandl et al., 2016; Shuai et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2019), decoupling of economic growth from manufactured capital has thus far received relatively little attention in sustainability science (Weisz et al., 2015).
Dematerialization, which refers to decoupling economic growth from material use due to improvements in material productivity, was proposed as a core strategy for resource conservation and environmental protection (Cleveland and Ruth, 1998; Der Voet et al., 2004). Although there are debates on how to achieve dematerialization, the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis is attractive enough for discussion to continue. It has been found widespread appeal in decoupling analysis research and policy circles (Stern, 2004; Dinda, 2004; Kempbenedict, 2018). Previous studies have shown that the long-term consumption or production of some bulk materials (e.g., aluminum, steel, cement, paper, wood, and ammonia) per dollar of gross national production (GNP), defined as intensity of use (IU), generally followed a bell-shaped curve in industrialized countries (Bringezu et al., 2004; Krausmann et al., 2017; Strout, 1985; Zhang et al., 2017). These findings support the EKC hypothesis for materials, which assumes that IU for a certain material increases in the initial stage of development but tends to fall as income rises and economy matures. The IU hypothesis believes that decoupling can occur after a sufficiently long period.
As more studies regarding material cycles become available, interests in decoupling between stocks and economic growth are growing (Helmut et al., 2017; Krausmann et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2017). Stocks are the drivers of materials consumption and production that are defined as flows in materials cycles (Krausmann et al., 2017; McMillan et al., 2010; Pauliuk and Müller, 2014; Song et al., 2019). Different with material flows which monitor at the interface of the coupled human-nature system, the stocks directly reflect the material base of an economy (Zhang et al., 2018). A number of studies have investigated the relationship between stocks and economic growth. For example, Fishman et al. (2015) found that economic growth was the driving force for stocks accumulation in Japan, and stocks relatively decoupled from economic growth. Zhang et al. (2017) developed an integrated analytical framework of dematerialization analysis for material flows and stocks, and conducted a case study on evolution of aluminum cycle in the U.S. They found that aluminum flows and stocks decoupled from economic growth in a clear sequential pattern. Zhang et al. (2017) further pointed out that flows and stocks of materials may play distinct roles in generating economic output. Any convenient dematerialization conclusion could be incomplete or even misleading without a complementary understanding of stocks-economy relationship. Furthermore, improving material productivity at stocks level, which can be measured as economic output per unit of stocks, is a fundamental way for improving material efficiency and decoupling resources depletion, and associated environmental pressures from economic growth (Liu et al., 2012; Weisz et al., 2015). These findings suggest that dematerialization and related material productivity analysis should be rooted in solid understanding of stocks (Zhang et al., 2017).
China, as the second largest economy in the world, has experienced rapid economic growth since its economic reform in 1978 (NBS, 2019). The acceleration of urbanization and industrialization was accompanied by massive infrastructure construction, which were largely achieved by massive inputs of resources, have attracted the world's attention (Gregg et al., 2008; Liang et al., 2014; Liu and Diamond, 2005; Wiedmann et al., 2015). Steel is one of the most important construction materials, and China consumed 48.8% of the world total steel in 2018 (World Steel Association, 2019). Steel industry, as a barometer of economic development in China, exerts considerable pressure on the environment (Tang, 2010). Following the global challenges on resources exhaustion and environmental degradation, the question arises whether economic growth actually has decoupled from steel stocks in China. Although growing efforts are devoted to understanding the relationship between steel stocks and economic growth of China (Song et al., 2019), there still exist many knowledge gaps regarding decoupling analysis between steel stocks and economic growth. Considering China's unbalance in regional economic development (Lu et al., 2019), a similar disparity can also be expected for decoupling pattern, which receives limited attention at present.
In this study, we analyzed the regional disparity of steel stocks estimated by bottom-up accounting method during 1978–2018 in 31 provinces in mainland China, evaluated the stocks productivity combined with economic output, and examined the decoupling pattern of steel stocks and economic growth. The following questions were explored:
- (1)
How is the disparity of steel stocks accumulation pattern on provincial scale?
- (2)
What is the development pattern of stocks productivity?
- (3)
Whether the steel stocks have decoupled from economic growth in China?
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces the framework of this study and describes the details of quantification method. Section 3 presents the results of the regional disparity of steel stocks, stocks productivity, and decoupling analysis of steel stocks and economic output. Section 4 discusses the implications of our results followed by conclusions in Section 5.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
A framework is developed for the decoupling analysis for provincial steel stocks and economic growth in our study (Fig. 1a). The discrete model time spreads from 1978 to 2018. When analyzing the regional disparity of steel stocks, we define a country-region-province hierarchical structure in our framework. To better understand the decoupling pattern between in-use steel stocks and economic output, we divide the 31 provinces (excluding Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan; including Beijing, Tianjin,
Spatial disparity of steel stocks and its productivity
The past four decades witnessed significant accumulation of steel stocks in China. More and more primary steel resources from under-ground ore deposits were relocated as stocks accumulated in society. It was estimated that national steel stocks in the ground (reserves) were 20.8 Gt (15.3 t/cap) (Fig. 2b). The largest steel stocks in reserves were found in Liaoning (5.2 Gt), Hebei (2.7 Gt), Sichuan (2.6 Gt), and Inner Mongolia (2.5 Gt). In contrast, the national in-use steel stocks had reached
Towards a high share of accumulation materials
In-use stocks are material basis of wealth. They can measure how much manufactured capital has been accumulated in society (Pauliuk and Müller, 2014; Roberts, 1996; Song et al., 2019). Our results, from the steel use perspective, reveal that the transition of Chinese economy from an agrarian base towards an industrial resource base has progressed considerably, and also highlight the transition from “throughput materials” towards a high share of “accumulation materials” (Krausmann et al., 2009).
Conclusions
Combining the data on provincial steel stocks with GDP, we investigate the changing dynamics of the decoupling status of steel stocks from economic growth based on a decoupling analysis framework. Our results indicate that there is a huge disparity among the provincial distribution of total steel stocks, per-capita steel stocks, and stocks density. Those provinces with the highest stocks density, e.g. Beijing, Tianjin, and Shanghai, have comparatively lower per-capita steel stocks and total
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Lulu Song: Writing - original draft, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis. Peng Wang: Writing - review & editing. Keying Xiang: Writing - review & editing. Wei-Qiang Chen: Writing - review & editing.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This study was sponsored by the National Key Research and Development Program of Ministry of Science and Technology (No. 2017YFC0505703), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41801207), Key Research Project of Frontier Science of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. QYZDB-SSW-DQC012), and External Cooperation Program of Fujian Science and Technology Department (No. 2018I0020).
References (63)
- et al.
International comparison of resource use and its relation to economic growth
Ecol. Econ.
(2004) Environmental kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey
Ecol. Econ.
(2004)- et al.
The socio-economic drivers of material stock accumulation in Japan's prefectures
Ecol. Econ.
(2015) - et al.
Correlation analysis of CO2 emissions, material stocks and economic growth nexus: evidence from Chinese provinces
J. Clean. Prod.
(2018) - et al.
Changing lifestyles and consumption patterns in developing countries: a scenario analysis for China and India
Futures
(2007) Dematerialization, decoupling, and productivity change
Ecol. Econ.
(2018)- et al.
Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century
Ecol. Econ.
(2009) - et al.
Quantifying U.S. aluminum in-use stocks and their relationship with economic output
Ecol. Econ.
(2010) - et al.
The role of in-use stocks in the social metabolism and in climate change mitigation
Global Environ. Change
(2014) - et al.
Steel all over the world: estimating in-use stocks of iron for 200 countries
Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
(2013)
Metal use and the world economy
Res. Pol.
Decoupling global environmental pressure and economic growth: scenarios for energy use, materials use and carbon emissions
J. Clean. Prod.
A three-step strategy for decoupling economic growth from carbon emission: empirical evidences from 133 countries
Sci. Total Environ.
Mapping provincial steel stocks and flows in China: 1978–2050
J. Clean. Prod.
The rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve.
World Dev.
Decoupling economic growth from carbon dioxide emissions in China's metal industrial sectors: a technological and efficiency perspective
Sci. Total Environ.
Decoupling China's economic growth from carbon emissions: empirical studies from 30 Chinese provinces (2001-2015)
Sci. Total Environ.
Empirical study on the environmental pressure versus economic growth in China during 1991–2012
Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
Economic Growth and the evolution of material cycles: an analytical framework integrating material flow and stock indicators
Ecol. Econ.
Measuring material efficiency: a review of the historical evolution of indicators, methodologies and findings
Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
Indicators of dematerialization and the materials intensity of use
J. Ind. Ecol.
Dematerialization: not just a matter of weight
J. Ind. Ecol.
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Nature
Climate and energy challenges for materials science
Nat. Mater.
Metal spectra as indicators of development
Proc Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
On the materials basis of modern society
Proc Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
China: emissions pattern of the world leader in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement production
Geophys. Res. Lett.
The material stock–flow–service nexus: a new approach for tackling the decoupling conundrum
Sustainability
Analysis of material stock accumulation in China's infrastructure and its regional disparity
Sustain. Sci.
The sampling distribution of the coefficient of variation
Ann. Math. Stat.
Dynamics of urban and rural housing stocks in China
Build. Res. Inf.
Cited by (21)
Material resource decoupling dilemma: Convergence and traps of in-use stock productivity in national economy development
2024, Journal of Environmental ManagementDecoupling analysis between economic growth and aluminum cycle: From the perspective of aluminum use and carbon emissions
2023, Journal of Environmental ManagementSpatial and in-product density characterization of in-use copper stocks in Japan for stock recyclability assessment
2023, Resources, Conservation and RecyclingThe evolution and decoupling of in-use stocks in Beijing
2023, Ecological EconomicsCitation Excerpt :However, GIS and RS have certain issues in combining multiple types of GIS datasets, accounting for the consumer durable stocks and acquiring data for consecutive years. As interest in in-use stocks research grows, researchers increasingly recognize that in-use stocks are closely related to economic development (Fishman et al., 2015; Krausmann et al., 2017; Song et al., 2019; Song et al., 2020b; Streeck et al., 2020). Economic and social rapid development requires a certain amount of in-use stocks (Daigo et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2020).
Human health and ecosystem impacts of China's resource extraction
2022, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :The proportion of human health damage caused by the construction sector's resource consumption in 2017 was as high as 28 %, and the growth rate during the research period was greater than 42 % (Fig. 4(a)). A large amount of infrastructure construction is still required in China (Song et al., 2020), which implies that reducing the intensity of environmental impacts of construction is a significant factor driving the slowing growth of China's environmental impacts of resource extraction. Optimization of the production structure had played an essential role in reducing the environmental impacts of China's resource extraction.
Quantification and spatial distribution of aluminum in-use stocks in Henan Province, China
2022, Resources, Conservation and RecyclingCitation Excerpt :Second, previous studies have shown that per capita metal stocks (Cu and Fe) do not match the level of economic development in China's northwestern and southeastern provinces (Hao et al., 2020b; Song et al., 2020a). In central China, Henan Province has steel stock productivity (the ratio of GDP to stock) closer to the national average (Song et al., 2020b). It is likely that the ALIS also has such a distribution characteristic; hence, taking Henan as the study object may be more representative of ALIS at the provincial level in China.