The effect of wind and temperature to phytoplankton biomass during blooming season in Barents Sea
Introduction
The Barents Sea is one of the most studied regions regarding ice-edge phytoplankton blooms, lying between Norway and the Svalbard archipelago. As the most important remote region of Arctic Ocean, Barents Sea plays key role on Arctic ecosystems and climate change.
The climatic variations in the Barents Sea depend mainly on the activity and properties of inflowing Atlantic Water (Ådlandsvik and Loeng, 1991). The Norwegian Atlantic Current brings warm higher salty current into Barents Sea from southwest side and then divides into two main branches with one continues eastwards parallel to the coastal water current system and the other brunch turn north from the left of Bear Island (Loeng, 1991) (Fig. 1). The Arctic Current comes from northeast direction between Frans Josef Land and Novaja Zemlja Island brings colder and fresher water to the Barents Sea (Loeng, 1991; Signorini and McClain, 2009b). The merging of these currents forms the Polar Front identified by the strongest horizontal gradients (Johannessen and Foster, 1978). The variability of Atlantic inflow caused by wind conditions would lead to the strong increase of SST in Barents Sea. The warm periods in the Barents Sea are related to the stable low air pressure, little ice coverage and cyclonic circulation in the atmosphere; while low temperature is linked to high air pressure, anticyclonic air circulation with decreased Atlantic inflow and more severe ice conditions (Ådlandsvik and Loeng, 1991). The transition from one climate state to the other is likely to be enforced by the large scale of oceanic and atmospheric circulation which could be caused by formation of bottom water (Ådlandsvik and Loeng, 1991).
The following environmental factors have significant impact on the phytoplankton biomass in Barents Sea: Strong WIND, convective overturning deep mixed layers in winter, and restratification occurs in summer due to ice melt and increased solar radiation warming the surface waters (Signorini and McClain, 2009a). The highest CHL was observed in the ice edge (Rey et al., 1987; Matrai and Vernet, 1997; Engelsen et al., 2002; Qu et al., 2006). The strong phytoplankton bloom would appear two weeks after the ice edge had retreated column average. ation of China (Engelsen et al., 2002). In the southern region, where water masses are more influenced by Atlantic current, increase of vertical stability of water masses is important for the timing of the spring blooms. Northern region is less productive and influenced by Arctic water masses. Due to more ice gathers up north, ice melting is the major causes of blooming in spring and early summer (Sakshaug and Slagstad, 1992; Sakshaug et al., 1997). Similar like Greenland Sea, the northern region could have higher peak of CHL mainly caused by ice melting during spring time (Qu et al., 2014). After peaks of bloom appear in late April and early May, the blooms stop abruptly when nutrients become depleted, causing the CHL maximum to sink to great depths (Rey and Loeng, 1985). With the increase of solar irradiance and drawdown of nutrients, MLD would decrease to its minimum depth during summer. After September, when solar irradiance is significantly reduced, surface cooling and stronger WIND would deepen the MLD and nutrients levels begin to increase again via vertical mixing in winter months (Sakshaug and Slagstad, 1992; Signorini and McClain, 2009a).
It was found that identified Emiliana huxleyi is the most dominant species of coccolithophores in the Barents Sea (Signorini and McClain, 2009a). Diatom and flagellates are also abundant species in Barents Sea (Rey et al., 1987; Matrai and Vernet, 1997; Signorini and McClain, 2009b). The highest CHL were found near the ice edge (Rey and Loeng, 1985; Matrai and Vernet, 1997; Engelsen et al., 2002). Surface CHL was 60 % higher than the total column average. But the surface CHL is a good predictor for relative levels of total phytoplankton biomass during spring time (Engelsen et al., 2002).
The dynamics of sea ice is capable of influencing primary production and the carbon flux dynamics of the Barents Sea seasonally (Wassmann et al., 1999). When nutrients become depleted, the bloom stops immediately and causes the CHL maximum to sink to greater depths (Signorini and McClain, 2009a). During 1998–2002, the maximum CHL was located in the Marginal Ice Zone (MIZ)(72 °N -73 °N) within 30 °E -35 °E (Qu et al., 2006). However, the location of MIZ can vary by hundreds of kilometers for different years (Matrai and Vernet, 1997).
There are number of factors influence the phytoplankton biomass in Barents Sea. SST, WIND and melting of sea ice are the primary factors. North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) usually has a dominant influence on wintertime temperatures across much of the North Hemisphere (Hurrell et al., 2003). Mixing in the upper ocean depends strongly on winds and temperature and it controls marine ecosystem dynamics.
Decadal satellite derived data and historical metrological data are used for analysis the relationships of environmental factors with phytoplankton biomass. The correlations between SST, WIND, ICE and CHL are especially analyzed in the blooming season for a better understanding of future phytoplankton trends in Barents Sea.
Section snippets
Data sources
Satellite data and methodology data are retrieved for our study region within Barents Sea (70 °N -80 °N, 30 °E -40 °E) (Fig. 1) for the period of 11 years (from 2003 to 2013) based on global scaled data. The time series of CHL and AOD data are archived from MODISA (Aqua), level3, 8-day, mapped database (http://oceandata.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/MODISA/Mapped/8Day). The data analysis system SeaDAS 6.4 together with virtual window are used to retrieve regional data (seadas.gsfc.nasa.gov/). Weekly SST
Environmental factors for year 2003–2013
Light availability, amount of ice melt, degree of vertical mixing (MLD), the location of the Polar Front, SST and WIND are all environmental factors for phytoplankton blooming (Kogeler and Rey, 1999). SST, WIND are the two primary environmental factors controlling the southern region of Barents Sea spring and summer phytoplankton blooms. Ice melt and MLD are two other important factors controlling the phytoplankton blooming in the northern region. Hence, we divide our study region into two
Funding
This work is funded by National Nature Science Fundation of China. No. 41276097.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to the NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group and Goddard Space Flight Centre of SeaWiFS Project group for providing MODIS CHL data. Thanks to the NOAA NCEP EMC CMB GLOBAL Reyn-SmithOIv2 for the weekly sea-ice concentration data. Thanks to the Naval Research Laboratory Remote Sensing Division, the Naval Center for Space Technology, and the National Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS) Integrated Program Office (IPO) for providing wind speed, sea surface
References (30)
- et al.
A multi-sensor approach for the on-orbit validation of ocean color satellite data products
Remote Sens. Environ.
(2006) Role of Arctic Sea Ice in global atmospheric circulation: a review
Glob. Planet. Change
(2009)- et al.
Assessment of ocean color data records from MODIS-Aqua in the western Arctic Ocean
Deep Sea Res. Part II: Top. Stud. Oceanogr.
(2015) - et al.
Spatial variability of chlorophyll-a in the Marginal Ice Zone of the Barents Sea, with relations to sea ice and oceanographic conditions
J. Mar. Syst.
(2002) - et al.
North Atlantic climate variability: the role of the North Atlantic Oscillation
J. Mar. Syst.
(2009) - et al.
A study of the climatic system in the Barents Sea
Polar Res.
(1991) Arctic warming signals from clear-sky surface temperature satellite observations
J. Clim.
(2003)- et al.
Wind speed influence on phytoplankton bloom dynamics in the Southern Ocean Marginal Ice Zone
J. Geophys. Res.
(2007) - et al.
Experimentally determined temperature thresholds for Arctic plankton community metabolism
Biogeosciences
(2013) - et al.(2003)
A note on the topographically controlled oceanic polar front in the Barents Sea
J. Geophys. Res.
Ocean colour and the spatial and seasonal distribution of phytoplankton in the Barents Sea
Int. J. Remote Sens.
Feature of the physical oceanographic conditions of the Barents Sea
Polar Res.
Dynamics of the vernal bloom in the marginal ice zone of the Barents Sea: dimethylsulfide and dimethysulfoniopropionate budgets
J. Geophys. Res. - Ocean.
Long-term monitoring and analyses of physical factors regulating variability in coastal Antarctic phytoplankton biomass, in situ productivity and taxonomic composition over subseasonal, seasonal and interannual time scales
Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.
Cited by (3)
Contemporary variability in dimethylsulfide flux in the Barents Sea and simulated change under 4×CO<inf>2</inf> climate conditions
2021, Journal of Marine SystemsCitation Excerpt :After late May, with the increase of SST and depletion of nutrients,CHL reduced significantly (Holding et al., 2013; Qu et al., 2006; Qu et al., 2020; Qu and Liu, 2020; Rey et al., 1987). Kahru et al. (2010) noted that CHL and WIND are negatively correlated when the MLD is deep and positively correlated when the MLD is shallow (also see Qu and Liu (2020)). Fig. 4 shows that mean CHL and WIND are negatively correlated from March to May when MLD was deeper.
Recent Trends in Satellite-Derived Chlorophyll and Aerosol Optical Depth Together with Simulated Dimethylsulfide in the Eastern China Marginal Seas
2022, Journal of Ocean University of China