Skip to main content
Log in

Asymmetric Hybridization of Kaluga Acipenser dauricus Georgi, 1775 and Amur Sturgeon A. schrenckii Brandt, 1869 (Acipenseridae) in Nature as Follows from Analysis of Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA Markers

  • ANIMAL GENETICS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural hybridization of sturgeon species in sympatry area is a relatively frequent but poorly studied phenomenon. A unique picture of asymmetric hybridization for Acipenseridae has developed in the Amur River, the place of inhabitation of two endemic sturgeons of this river basin—Kaluga and Amur sturgeon. Earlier, we showed that the fraction of their hybrids in different years was about 2.5% of the abundance of parent species. All analyzed hybrids carried only one type of mtDNA—Kaluga. However, the identification of hybrids and pure individuals in this study was based on consideration of only external morphological characteristics. In the present work, the set of genetic markers was expanded to include six nuclear loci in the analysis: two introns of the ribosomal protein L8 (RP4L8, RP5L8) and microsatellites An20, Afug41, HLJSX37, and HLJSX350. As a result, it was shown that all morphologically intermediate individuals, previously classified on this basis as hybrids, for each of the nuclear loci had a mixed composition of alleles characteristic of both Kaluga and Amur sturgeon. Among those individuals which by external morphology were identified by collectors as Kaluga, there were identified three individuals that should be classified as hybrids according to their genetic characteristics. In addition, four other individuals were classified as backcrosses to Kaluga. All hybrids and backcrosses had Kaluga mtDNA type, which confirms the earlier conclusion about unidirectional hybridization of Kaluga and Amur sturgeon in nature: Kaluga (♀) × Amur sturgeon (♂). The used set of markers has the necessary resolution and can be recommended for the identification of pure Kaluga and Amur sturgeon and their hybrids. The minimum set of markers for diagnosis includes mtDNA, introns RP4L8 and RP5L8, and microsatellite HLJSX37.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Arnold, M.L., Natural Hybridization and Evolution, New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Near, T.J., Eytan, R.I., Dornburg, A., et al., Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2012, vol. 109, no. 34, pp. 13698—13703. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206625109

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Birstein, V.J., Hanner, R., and DeSalle, R., Phylogeny of the Acipenseriformes: cytogenetic and molecular approaches, Environ. Biol. Fishes, 1997, vol. 48, pp. 127—155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berg, L.S., Fauna Rossii i sopredel’nykh stran: ryby (Marsipobranchii i Pisces) (Fauna of Russia and Adjacent Countries: Fishes (Marsipobranchi and Pisces)), vol. 3, issue 1: Ostariophysi (Ostariophysi), St. Petersburg: Imp. Akad. Nauk, 1912.

  5. Soldatov, V.K., Studies of the Amur acipenserids, in Materialy k poznaniyu russkogo rybolovstva (Materials to the Knowledge of Russian Fishing), 1915, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 96—415.

  6. Shedko, S.V. and Shedko, M.B., Unidirectional hybridization of kaluga Acipenser dauricus Georgi, 1775 and Amur sturgeon Acipenser schrenckii Brandt, 1869, inferred from the mitochondrial DNA genotyping of their natural hybrids, Russ. J. Genet., 2016, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 292—297. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795416020137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lagunova, V.S., The impact of conditions in the Volga River on hybridization, abnormal development and reproduction rate of sturgeon (Acipenseridae), J. Appl. Ichthyol., 1999, vol. 15, nos. 4—5, p. 291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.1999.tb00275.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tranah, G., Campton, D.E., and May, B., Genetic evidence for hybridization of Pallid and Shovelnose sturgeon, J. Hered., 2004, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 474—480. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esh077

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schrey, A.W., Boley, R., and Heist, E.J., Hybridization between Pallid sturgeon Scaphirhynchus albus and Shovelnose sturgeon Scaphirhynchus platorynchus,J. Fish Biol., 2011, vol. 79, no. 7, pp. 1828—1850. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03123.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eichelberger, J.S., Braaten, P.J., Fuller, D.B., et al., Novel single-nucleotide polymorphism markers confirm successful spawning of endangered Pallid sturgeon in the upper Missouri River basin, Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 2014, vol. 143, no. 6, pp. 1373—1385. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2014.935479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dudu, A., Suciu, R., Paraschiv, M., et al., Nuclear markers of Danube sturgeons hybridization, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2011, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 6796—6809. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms12106796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chassaing, O., Desse-Berset, N., Duffraisse, M., et al., Palaeogenetics of western French sturgeons spotlights the relationships between Acipenser sturio and Acipenser oxyrinchus,J. Biogeogr., 2013, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 382—393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02785.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, J., Liu, D., Ma, Q., et al., Discriminating Dabry’s sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus) and Chinese sturgeon (A. sinensis) based on DNA barcode and six nuclear markers, Hydrobiologia, 2015, vol. 757, no. 1, pp. 185—196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2251-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shedko, S.V., Miroshnichenko, I.L., Nemkova, G.A., et al., Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation, demographic history, and population structure of Amur sturgeon Acipenser schrenckii Brandt, 1869, Russ. J. Genet., 2015, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 169—183. https://doi.org/10.1134/S102279541502012X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shedko, S.V., Miroshnichenko, I.L., Nemkova, G.A., and Shedko, M.B., On the population genetic portrait of kaluga, Acipenser dauricus Georgi, 1775: analysis of sequence variation in the mitochondrial DNA control region, Russ. J. Genet., 2015, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 877—885. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795415080098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Boscari, E., Barmintseva, A., Zhang, S., et al., Genetic identification of the caviar-producing Amur and kaluga sturgeons revealed a high level of concealed hybridization, Food Control, 2017, vol. 82, pp. 243—250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.07.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Barmintseva, A.E. and Myuge, N.S., The use of microsatellite loci for identification of sturgeon species (Acipenseridae) and hybrid forms, Russ. J. Genet., 2013, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 950—961. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795413090032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu, J., Wang, D., Wei, Q., and Shen, L., Molecular identification of Amur sturgeon (Acipenser schrenckii), kaluga (Huso dauricus) and their reciprocal hybrids, J. Fish. Sci. China, 2010, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 21—30.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, Y., Lu, C., Li, C., et al., Genetic identification of Amur sturgeon, kaluga and their hybrids based on microsatellite markers, Chin. J. Fish., 2015, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 18—23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Welsh, A.B., Blumberg, M., and May, B., Identification of microsatellite loci in lake sturgeon, Acipenser fulvescens, and their variability in green sturgeon, A. medirostris,Mol. Ecol. Notes, 2002, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47—55. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00346.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zane, L., Patarnello, T., Ludwig, A., et al., Isolation and characterization of microsatellites in the Adriatic sturgeon (Acipenser naccarii), Mol. Ecol. Notes, 2002, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 586—588. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00328.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rohlf, F.J., NTSYSpc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System: Version 2.1, New York: Exeter Setauket, 2000.

  23. Dice, L.R., Measures of the amount of ecological association between species, Ecology, 1945, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 297—302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Azuma, N., Hagihara, S., Ichimura, M., et al., Genetic characterization of Amur sturgeon Acipenser schrenckii and its hybrid caught around Hokkaido, Ichthyol. Res., 2017, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 139—144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-016-0544-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shen, L., Shi, Y., Zou, Y.C., et al., Sturgeon aquaculture in China: status, challenge and proposals based on nation-wide surveys of 2010—2012, J. Appl. Ichthyol., 2014, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1547—1551. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12618

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was conducted as part of the research topic no. AAAA-A17-117062710083-0. Part of the work (analysis of microsatellites) was carried out with financial support from the Program “Priority Scientific Research for the Integrated Development of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences” (grant no. 18-4-032).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. V. Shedko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for animal care and use have been followed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shedko, S.V., Miroshnichenko, I.L. & Nemkova, G.A. Asymmetric Hybridization of Kaluga Acipenser dauricus Georgi, 1775 and Amur Sturgeon A. schrenckii Brandt, 1869 (Acipenseridae) in Nature as Follows from Analysis of Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA Markers. Russ J Genet 56, 718–724 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795420060101

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795420060101

Keywords:

Navigation