Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic Substructuring by the Craig–Bampton Method Applied to Frames

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The Craig–Bampton method is a substructuring technique that reduces the number of internal degrees of freedom of substructures by approximations, using a set of truncated vibration modes. It is useful for structural designs with many degrees of freedom. This work aims to develop substructuring through the Craig–Bampton method for free vibration analysis on planar frames according to the frequency range of interest.

Methods

The finite-element models of different substructures were assembled. Thus, the degrees of physical freedom were reduced according to the frequency range of interest. The reduced-order models were coupled. Thus, the physical response was obtained. Detailed calculation and the algorithm flowchart are provided.

Conclusions

The study of frame dynamics using the present method in different frequency ranges of interest was presented and validated with the results of a commercial software. It was possible to clarify the coupling formulations of the component mode synthesis, as well as the amount of reduction of the number of equations provided by the method, reaching less than 4% of the complete model, for the considered cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pippi A, Bernardes Júnior P, Avila S, Morais M, Doz G (2020) Dynamic response to different models of adjacent coupled buildings. J Vib Eng Technol 8:247–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00102-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yin J, Xu L, Wang H, Xie P, Huang S, Liu H, Yang Z, Li B (2019) Accurate and fast three-dimensional free vibration analysis of large complex structures using the finite element method. Comput Struct 221:142–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sahoo PR, Barik M (2020) Free vibration analysis of stiffened plates. J Vib Eng Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-020-00196-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cao DX, Wang JJ, Gao YH, Zhang W (2019) Free vibration of variable width beam: asymptotic analysis with FEM simulation and experiment confirmation. J Vib Eng Technol 7:235–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00116-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xiao F, Chen GS, Hulsey JL, Zatar W (2018) Characterization of nonlinear dynamics for a highway bridge in Alaska. J Vib Eng Technol 6:379–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-018-0048-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moussemi M, Nezamolmolki D, Sani AA (2016) Free vibration analysis of a steel T-Shape frame including semi-rigid Khorjini connection with continuous beam. Int J Steel Struct 16:657–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-0209-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gibanica M, Abrahamsson TJS, Rixen DJ (2019) Multifidelity component interface reduction and modal truncation augmentation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 120:105–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6126

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Craig R, Bampton M (1968) Coupling of substructures for dynamic analysis. AIAA J 6(7):1313–1319. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.4741

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Cui J, Wang X, Xing J, Zheng G (2018) An eigenvector-based iterative procedure for the free-interface component modal synthesis method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 116:723–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5941

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim J-H, Boo S-H, Lee P-S (2019) A dynamic condensation method with free interface substructuring. Mech Syst Signal Process 129:218–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bathe K-J, Dong J (2014) Component mode synthesis with subspace iterations for controlled accuracy of frequency and mode shape solutions. Comput Struct 139:28–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Trainotti F, Haeussler M, Rixen DJ (2020) A practical handling of measurement uncertainties in frequency based substructuring. Mech Syst Signal Process 144:106846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahmoudi AE, Rixen DJ, Meyer CH (2020) Comparison of different approaches to include connection elements into frequency-based substructuring. Exp Tech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-020-00360-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haeussler M, Klaassen SWB, Rixen DJ (2020) Experimental twelve degree of freedom rubber isolator models for use in substructuring assemblies. J Sound Vib 474:115253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Law M, Rentzsch H (2016) Predicting mobile machine tool dynamics by experimental dynamic substructuring. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 108:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Voormeeren SN, Rixen DJ (2012) A family of substructure decoupling techniques based on a dual assembly approach. mechanical systems and signal processing. Mech Syst Signal Proces 27:379–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.07.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang J, Wang Z-W, Lu L-X (2013) Step-by-step decoupling method for inverse substructuring analysis of a three-component coupled packaging system. J Vib Control 21:676–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546313490185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weng S, Zhu S, Xia Y, Li J, Tian W (2020) A review on dynamic substructuring methods for model updating and damage detection of large-scale structures. Adv Struct Eng 23(3):584–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219872429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghiasi R, Fathnejat H, Torkzadeh P (2019) A three-stage damage detection method for large-scale space structures using forward substructuring approach and enhanced bat optimization algorithm. Eng Comput 35:857–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0636-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuether RJ, Allen MS, Hollkamp JJ (2017) Modal substructuring of geometrically nonlinear finite element models with interface reduction. AIAA J 55(5):1695–1706. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim KT, Bathe K-J (2017) The Bathe subspace iteration method enriched by turning vectors. Comput Struct 186:11–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu Y, Du H, Li H, Li F, Sun W (2019) An improved method for parametric model order reduction by matrix interpolation. J Vib Eng Technol 7:603–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00153-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shanmugam A, Padmanabhan CA (2006) Fixed-free interface compoment mode synthesis method for rotordynamic analysis. J Sound Vib 297(664–679):2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel of Brazil (CAPES) and the Federal University of Ouro Preto. The second author thanks the “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq" and Fapemig support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lidianne de Paula Pinto Mapa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mapa, L., das Neves, F. & Guimarães, G.P. Dynamic Substructuring by the Craig–Bampton Method Applied to Frames. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 9, 257–266 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-020-00223-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-020-00223-4

Keywords

Navigation