Skip to main content
Log in

Creating a large aspheric primary mirror using spherical segments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Experimental Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of aspheric mirrors is a common practice to design astronomical telescopes with a few optical elements. In the most preferred optical design Ritchey Chretien (RC), both primary and secondary mirrors are hyperboloid. Nowadays large telescopes are being built using small mirror segments, however, making aspheric off-axis mirror segments is still a challenge. We have conducted a study in which, we explored the possibility to mimic an aspheric hyperbolic primary mirror by making use of smaller spherical mirror segments. Three different methods have been used to form a large segmented aspheric primary of nearly 12m aperture. In the first method, fixed ROC(radius of curvature) spherical mirror segments are reconfigured by a piston, tip, and tilt (PTT). In the other two methods, in addition to PTT, ROC of the segments are also varied. We further attempted to reduce the telescope wave-front error by varying the segment size and the F ratio of the primary. We found out that none of these three methods provided acceptable image quality unless we incorporate the warping harness in the segment support. The use of the warping harness emulated by Zernike coefficient correction, remarkably reduced the wave-front error and delivered a decent image quality over a large field of view. In this paper, we present the results of our study on designing an RC type optics for a 12m class optical-NIR(Near Infrared) telescope using spherical mirror segments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nelson, J., Mast, T., Chanan, G.: Segmented mirror telescopes. In: Oswalt, T.D., McLean, I.S. (eds.) Planets, stars and stellar systems. Springer, Dordrecht (2013)

  2. Horn, D., Arturo G.: Publications of the university astronomical observatory of bologna, VI, 6 (1955)

  3. Chevillard, J.-P., Connes, P., Cuisenier, M., Friteau, J., Marlot, C.: Near infrared astronomical light collector. Appl. Opt. 16(7), 1817–1833 (1977)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Unti, T.W.J.: Best-fit sphere approximation to a general aspheric surface. Appl. Opt. 5, 319–321 (1966)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yesudasan, S.: Fast geometric fit algorithm for sphere using exact solution (2015)

  6. Beckers, J.M., Ulich, B.L., Williams, J.T.: Performance of the multiple mirror telescope MMT I - MMT The first of the advanced technology telescopes. SPIE 332, 2–8 (1982)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson, J.E., Mast, T.S., Feber, S.M.: The design of the keck observatory and telescope. Keck Observatory Report 90, 5–65-5-70 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nelson, J.E., Mast, T.S.: Construction of the keck observatory. In: European southern observatory conference and workshop proceedings, vol. 30, p 7 (1988)

  9. Lubliner, J., Nelson, J.E.: Stressed mirror polishing. 1: a technique for producing nonaxisymmetric mirrors. Appl. Opt. 14, 2332–2340 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gray, C., Baker, I., Davies, G., et al.: Fast manufacturing of e-ELT mirror segments using CNC polishing. SPIE, 8838 (2013)

  11. Hugot, E., Bernard, A., Laslandes, M., et al.: Stress polishing demonstrator for ELT Ml segments and industrialisation. SPIE, 9145 (2014)

  12. Muller, U., Daniel, J.: Tinsley proves stress mirror polishing for giant segmented telescopes. SPIE, 8450 (2012)

  13. O’Donoghue, D., Swat, A.: Spherical aberration corrector of the southern african large telescope (SALT). SPIE, 4411 (2002)

  14. Swat, A., O’Donoghue, D., Swiegers, J., Nel, L., Buckley, D.A.H.: Optical design of the southern african large telescope. SPIE, 4837 (2003)

  15. Buckley, D.A.H., Meiring, J.G., Swiegers, J., Swart, G.P.: Many segments and dollars few: SALT solutions for ELTs?. SPIE, 5382 (2004)

  16. Burge, J.H., Angel, J.R.P.: Wide telescope using spherical mirror. SPIE 5174, 83–92 (2003)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Owner-Petersen, M.: Optical design and performance analysis of a 25-m class telescope with a segmented spherical primary, 2871 (1997)

  18. Wilson, R.N., Delabre, B., Franza, F.: New 4 mirror optical concept for very large telescopes with spherical primary and secondary mirrors, giving excellent field obstruction characteristics. SPIE, 2199 (1994)

  19. Ponslet, E., et al.: Development of the Primary Mirror Segment Support Assemblies for the Thirty Meter Telescope. SPIE, 6273 (2006)

  20. Williams, E.C., et al.: Advancement of the segment support system for the thirty meter telescope primary mirror. SPIE, 701810 (2008)

  21. Cavaller, L., Marrero, J., et al.: Design of the primary mirror segment support system for the e-ELT. SPIE, 70121F (2008)

  22. Wilson, R.N., Franza, F., Noethe, L.: Active optics I. A system for optimizing the optical quality and reducing the costs of large telescopes. J. Mod. Opt. 34(4), 485 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson, R.N.: The history and development of the ESO active optics system. Messenger (2003)

  24. Martin, H., et al.: Active supports and force optimization for the MMT primary mirror. SPIE, 3352 (1998)

  25. Byoung-Joon, S., et al.: Investigation of primary mirror segment’s residual errors for the thirty meter telescope. SPIE, 7427 (2009)

  26. Cui, X.-Q., et al.: The large sky area multi-object fiber spectroscopic telescope (LAMOST). Res. Astron. Astrophys. 12, 1197 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sporer, S.F.: TMT stressed mirror polishing fixture study. SPIE, 6267 (2006)

  28. Hugot, E., Bernard, A., Laslandes, M., Floriot, J.: Streess Polishing demonstrator for ELT M1 segments and industrialisation. SPIE, 9145 (2014)

  29. Zhang, Y., Cui, X.-Q.: Calculations for the pre-calibration of LAMOST active optics. Chin. J. Astron. Astrophys. 5(3), 302 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support received from Dr. Sreekumar P., Prof. Jayant Murthy and Prof. Anupama G.C. of the Indian Institute of Astrophysics (IIA). Without their regular encouragement and support, it would have been difficult to complete this work. Thanks to Mr.Sriram S. for his help in the ZEMAX related analysis. We would also like to extend our thanks to Sreekanth Reddy, Varun Kumar and Prasanna Deshmukh of the Indian Institute of Astrophysics. We also acknowledge Mr. Arjun Krishna P R and Mr. Rakesh Khanna for their help while developing the algorithm used in segmentation .

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annu Jacob.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

The best fit radius of curvature is found for each segment using matrix inversion techniques for a set of (x,y,z) coordinates corresponding to the chosen segment.

$$ S={\sqrt{({{R_{b}^{2}}}-(x-x_{c})^{2}-(y-y_{c})^{2})}+z_{c}} $$
(3)

where xc, yc, zc are the coordinates of the center of the sphere, and Rb is the radius of the best fit sphere. We can form following matrix equations as

$$ A= 2 \begin{bmatrix} \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{\frac{x_{i}({x_{i}-\overline{x}})}{n}} &\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{\frac{x_{i}({y_{i}-\overline{y}})}{n}} & \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{\frac{x_{i}({z_{i}-\overline{z}})}{n}}\\ \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{\frac{y_{i}({x_{i}-\overline{x}})}{n}} &\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{\frac{y_{i}({y_{i}-\overline{y}})}{n}} & \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{\frac{y_{i}({z_{i}-\overline{z}})}{n}}\\ \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{\frac{z_{i}({x_{i}-\overline{x}})}{n}} &\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{\frac{z_{i}({y_{i}-\overline{y}})}{n}} & \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{\frac{z_{i}({z_{i}-\overline{z}})}{n}}\\ \end{bmatrix} $$
(4)
$$ B= \begin{bmatrix} \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} {\frac{({x_{i}}^{2}+{y_{i}}^{2}+{z_{i}}^{2}).({x_{i}-\overline{x}})}{n}}\\ \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} {\frac{({x_{i}}^{2}+{y_{i}}^{2}+{z_{i}}^{2}).({y_{i}-\overline{y}})}{n}}\\ \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} {\frac{({x_{i}}^{2}+{y_{i}}^{2}+{z_{i}}^{2}).({z_{i}-\overline{z}})}{n}}\\ \end{bmatrix} $$
(5)

and

$$ X= \begin{bmatrix} x_{c}\\ y_{c}\\ z_{c}\\ \end{bmatrix} $$
(6)

Where, xi, yi, zi are the data points on the aspheric surface and

$$ \overline{x}=\frac{1}{n}{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} x_{i}}, \ \ \ \ \ \overline{y}=\frac{1}{n}{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} y_{i}}, \ \ \ \ \ \overline{z}=\frac{1}{n}{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} z_{i}} $$
(7)

Therefore, the solution for the center of the best fit sphere can be obtained by matrix inversion as follows

$$ \begin{bmatrix} x_{c}\\ y_{c}\\ z_{c}\\ \end{bmatrix} =(A^{T}.A)^{-1} .A^{T}.B $$
(8)

Once the center of the best fit is known then the best fit radius of curvature Rb can be derived

$$ R_{b}={\sqrt{\frac{{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}((x_{i}-x_{c})^{2}+(y_{i}-y_{c})^{2}}+(z_{i}-z_{c})^{2})}{n}}} $$
(9)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacob, A., Parihar, P. & James, M.K. Creating a large aspheric primary mirror using spherical segments. Exp Astron 50, 51–71 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-020-09663-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-020-09663-y

Keywords

Navigation