Synthesis of a zinc ferrite effectively encapsulated by reduced graphene oxide composite anode material for high-rate lithium ion storage

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.07.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Effectively immobilizing nano-sized electrochemical active materials with a 3D porous framework constituted by conductive graphene sheets brings in enhanced lithium ion storage properties. Herein, a reduced graphene oxide (RGO) supported zinc ferrite (ZnFe2O4) composite anode material (ZnFe2O4/RGO) is fabricated by a simple and effective method. Firstly, redox reaction takes place between the oxygen-containing functional groups on few-layered graphene oxide (GO) sheets and controlled quantity of metallic Zn atoms. ZnO nanoparticles are in-situ nucleated and directly grow on GO sheets. Secondly, the GO sheets are completely reduced by abundant Fe atoms, and corresponding γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles are formed neighboring the ZnO nanoparticles. In this step, 3D porous RGO supporting framework are constructed with γ-Fe2O3@ZnO nanoparticles effectively encapsulated between the RGO layers. Finally, the well-designed γ-Fe2O3@ZnO/RGO intermediate product undergoes a thermal treatment to allow a solid-state reaction and obtains the ZnFe2O4/RGO composite. At a high current rate of 1.0 A·g−1, the ZnFe2O4/RGO composite exhibits an inspiring reversible capacity of 1022 mAh·g−1 for 500 consecutive cycles as anode material for lithium ion batteries. And the insight into the attractive lithium storage performance has been studied in this work.

Graphical abstract

The interdependency for the construction of 3D RGO framework and formation of encapsulated ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles ensures good lithium ion storage properties.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (374KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

The current commercialized graphite anode materials of rechargeable lithium ion batteries have a low maximum specific capability of only 372 mAh·g−1, which is far from satisfying the requirement from the electric/hybrid vehicles and smart grid storage, etc. [1] There have been urgent demands for the exploration of new-type anode candidates possessing higher energy density as well as better lithium ion storage properties. Amongst the current studied anode materials, ZnFe2O4 is a prospective binary transition metal oxide (TMO) anode material, featured with high theoretical capacity (1000 mAh·g−1) due to its combination of conversion and alloy lithium ion storage mechanism, cost-effectiveness, abundance, eco-friendliness, low discharging voltage plateau of about 1.5 V. [2], [3] Moreover, ZnFe2O4 crystal possesses an AB2O4 spinel structure, where an oxygen is cubic-close packed to form a 3D framework for lithium ion diffusion. As a result, higher electrochemical activities can be achieved for the binary ZnFe2O4 anode than the unitary TMO counterparts, mainly due to the synergistic work from its complex components. [4], [5]

The practical application of ZnFe2O4 is hampered from the rapid reversible capacity fading upon cycle, resulting from both the pulverization caused by large volume change and poor inherent electrical conductivity of the ZnFe2O4 crystals. [6] Therefore, hybridizing nanostructured ZnFe2O4 with conductive and flexible carbon supporting framework is one of the most effective strategies to enhance its electric conductivity and structure stability of ZnFe2O4 composite anode. [7] Graphene and its derivates, e. g. GO and RGO, have been regarded as a promising carbonaceous supporting material for nano-sized electrochemical active materials. [8], [9], [10] Since the first time reported successful synthesis of ZnFe2O4/RGO composite in 2011 using a hydrothermal method [11], enhanced lithium ion storage performances have been witnessed compared with bare ZnFe2O4 electrodes in recent years. [12], [13], [14]

3D porous RGO framework could effectively improve the charge/electrolyte transfer and sustain the integrity of composite materials during electrochemical reaction, thus improved battery performances can be expected for composite materials. Moreover, as a precursor for RGO, 2D GO sheets are easy to be processed and the rich surface functional groups are agreeable to capture metal ions through electrostatic interaction, which usually function as metal source of TMO nanocrystals. [15], [16], [17] Therefore, nano-sized TMOs will be nucleated and grow on the surface side of RGO layers after further treatments. However, the previously reported preparation methods for TMO/RGO composites are always involved of expensive equipment, rigorous fabrication condition, toxic raw materials or poor scalability, which increases fabrication and/or environment cost. Particularly, the construction of 3D RGO framework and formation of TMOs are commonly independent. Consequently, the TMO nanocrystals will not be well encapsulated by the RGO sheets or excessively anchor on the exterior side of the 3D RGO skeleton, which is unbeneficial for fully realization of electrochemical reaction during charge/discharge.

Based on the above considerations, it is reported that some reductive metals are capable to reduce GO in moderate aqueous condition to obtain corresponding TMO/RGO composites. [18], [19] And a series of TMO/RGO composites with distinctive structures have been successfully prepared using metal Fe, Zn and Sn as both TMO precursor and GO reducing agent in our group. [20], [21], [22], [23] This type of TMO/RGO composite preparation methods is more facile, effective and eco-friendly. Particularly, the reduction of flexible GO sheets to construct mechanical strong RGO architecture and transformation of reductive metals to electroactive TMO nanoparticles are mutual dependent. As a result, good lithium ion storage performances have been delivered from these TMO/RGO composite electrodes. In this work, a ZnFe2O4/RGO composite is further designed and prepared on the above foundation. Few-layered GO sheets are first deoxygenated in sequence by metal Zn and Fe in ambient condition to obtain the corresponding ZnO and γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles, both of which are anchored on the RGO supporting layer to construct a well-designed intermediate product (γ-Fe2O3@ZnO/RGO). Then the γ-Fe2O3@ZnO/RGO undergoes a thermal treatment to obtain the final ZnFe2O4/RGO, during which solid-state reaction takes place between the ZnO and γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. The ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles are well immobilized by the constructed 3D porous RGO supporting matrix, which accelerates both electron transportation and electrolyte infiltrations. As a result, the ZnFe2O4/RGO electrode delivers attractive lithium ion storage performances. Particularly, at high current rate of 1.0 A·g−1, it exhibits a reversible capacity of 1022 mAh·g−1 for 500 cycles. And the insight into the attractive lithium storage performance has been studied. The overall fabrication process for the ZnFe2O4/RGO composite is novel and facile, which has good potential to find wider applications beyond lithium ion storage.

Section snippets

Sample preparation

All the chemicals used in this work to prepare GO precursor were purchased from Sinopharm (AP) and used as received without further purification. Few-layered GO, as is confirmed in Fig. S1, was first completely reduced by metal Zn powders (Sinopharm, 99.999%) and Fe foil (Sinopharm, 99.99%) in room temperature to obtain a γ-Fe2O3@ZnO/RGO intermediate sample. GO sample was fabricated based on our reported work. [23] Metal Zn powders (250 mg) were washed with ethanol/de-ionized water solution

Structure and morphology

Fig. 1A and 1B show the XRD result of γ-Fe2O3@ZnO/RGO and ZnFe2O4/RGO samples. The γ-Fe2O3@ZnO/RGO intermediate sample displays a broad diffraction peak at 22.7° (2θ), resulting from the formed RGO layers. This observation indicates the successful reduction of GO sheets during the metal reduction step. Moreover, it is more obvious to identify the sharp diffraction peaks from γ-Fe2O3 and ZnO crystals in this sample. After calcination, for the ZnFe2O4/RGO product, the diffraction peak for RGO

Conclusions

A 3D porous ZnFe2O4/RGO composite is prepared using an effective two-stepped method, where few-layered GO are reduced by metallic zinc and iron to obtain a γ-Fe2O3@ZnO/RGO intermediate product with the TMO nanoparticles well encapsulated by the 3D RGO framework to avoid excess exposure and a simple thermal treatment is used to obtain the final ZnFe2O4/RGO composite. As an anode material for lithium ion batteries, the ZnFe2O4/RGO composite electrode shows superior cycling stability with high

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Qingke Tan: Investigation, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. Chao Wang: Investigation, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. Yangdi Cao: Investigation. Xuehua Liu: Investigation. Haijie Cao: Software, Validation, Funding acquisition. Guanglei Wu: Funding acquisition. Binghui Xu: Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2017 M612194 and 2017 M610409), the Qingchuang Talents Induction Program of Shandong Higher Education Institution (Research and Innovation Team of Structural-Functional Polymer Composites), the Thousand Talents Plan, the World-Class University and Discipline, the Taishan Scholar's Advantageous and Distinctive Discipline Program and the world-Class Discipline Program of Shandong Province.

References (52)

  • C. Xu et al.

    Energy Environ. Sci.

    (2013)
  • C. Yuan et al.

    J. Mater. Chem. A

    (2015)
  • Y. Ma et al.

    Nano Energy

    (2017)
  • H. Guo et al.

    Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.

    (2017)
  • D. Bresser et al.

    Chem. Mat.

    (2013)
  • X. Sun et al.

    Small

    (2016)
  • L. Zhang et al.

    J. Mater. Chem. A

    (2017)
  • H. Wang et al.

    J. Mater. Chem. A

    (2017)
  • B. Xu et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2016)
  • W. Chen et al.

    Adv. Mater.

    (2011)
  • Y. Fu et al.

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (2011)
  • H. Qiao et al.

    Ceram. Int.

    (2017)
  • B. Joshi et al.

    J. Alloy. Compd.

    (2019)
  • L. Yao et al.

    J. Nanopart. Res.

    (2017)
  • Q. Tan et al.

    CrystEngComm

    (2020)
  • J. Wang et al.

    J. Mater. Chem. A

    (2019)
  • D. Liu et al.

    Mater. Interfaces

    (2018)
  • M. Chen et al.

    Mater. Interfaces

    (2013)
  • J. Hao et al.

    Carbon

    (2018)
  • B. Xu et al.

    J. Mater. Chem. A

    (2018)
  • B. Xu et al.

    CrystEngComm

    (2020)
  • Q. Tan et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2019)
  • Q. Tan et al.

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2019)
  • H. Wang et al.

    ACS Nano

    (2018)
  • M. Baynosa et al.

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2020)
  • Y. Zhao et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2017)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text