Electromagnetic coupling phenomena in co-axial rectangular channels
Introduction
The Breeding Blanket (BB) is one of the key components of a nuclear fusion reactor, since it has the tasks of producing and extracting the tritium and thermal power generated therein. In the Water-Cooled Lead Lithium (WCLL) concept, PbLi is employed as tritium breeder/carrier and neutron multiplier, whereas pressurized water cools the system. The current design (2018), based on DEMO 2017 specifications and derived from R&D activities conducted in the framework of the EUROfusion Programme, relies on the Single Module Segment approach, with a breeding element repeated along the poloidal direction [1]. The liquid metal is distributed to the elementary cells composing the Breeding Zone (BZ) through a compact poloidal manifold constituted by two long co-axial rectangular channels that fulfill both the distribution and collection task (Fig. 1A).
A liquid metal that flows through a magnetic field, as the one in the fusion reactor, leads to the appearance of MagnetoHydroDynamic (MHD) effects, which significantly influence the flow features. Indeed, the magnetic field induces electric currents in the metal that, in turn, interact with the magnetic field and generate a Lorentz force, which changes the force balance in the fluid. Moreover, the Lorentz force is not uniformly distributed on the channel cross-section but, rather, it is dependent on the overall magnitude and paths of the current inside the fluid, which, in turn, depends on the electric conductivity of the walls. When two or more channels are electrically connected by a common conductive wall, currents generated in one fluid body can be exchanged with adjacent ones and, therefore, influence their flow features. These “leakage currents” make such channels electromagnetically coupled that is fluid motion in one channel is no longer univocally determined by the current field internally generated (Madarame effect).
The first study on MHD coupled flow is the seminal work by Madarame et al. [2] (1985) that demonstrated how pressure loss in a simple square orifice can be greatly magnified by the interaction with nearby channels. The first studies considering this effect on the manifold are those of McCarthy and Abdou [3] (1991) and Molokov [4] (1993), that investigated the global influence of leakage currents in a manifold composed by square channels and found that flow distribution is also affected. Recently, Bluck and Wolfendale [5] have analytically investigated a coupled array of ducts, in both co- and counter-flow configurations, stacked parallel to the applied magnetic field, where these ducts have insulated side walls and conducting Hartmann walls. Mistrangelo and Buhler [6] numerically studied a similar configuration with an arbitrary orientation of the magnetic field and direction of driving pressure gradients. Swain et al. [7] (2018) have been performed numerical simulation and experiments at high magnetic fields for PbLi flow in coupled co- and counter-flow configuration, L- and U-type bend. Studies dealing with a co-axial coupled channel are scarcer compared with duct arrays. One of the few examples of note is Chen et al. [8] that investigates the MHD phenomena in an assembly composed by three co-axial counter-flowing rectangular channels electrically decoupled or coupled from each other through multi-layer flow channel inserts of arbitrary conductivity.
In this paper, the MHD electro-coupled forced convection flow in co-axial and co-flowing annular configuration is studied. Numerical simulations are performed for a wide range of magnetic field intensity () and with a finite electrical conductivity for both the internal and external walls, as foreseen in the WCLL current design, using the general CFD code ANSYS CFX 18.2. A similar model has been used in [9] to study the basic phenomena in an uncoupled annular channel and it has been updated to account for the inner channel effect in this work that can be considered as an extension of [9].
A correct estimate of the MHD pressure drop is critical to design the WCLL PbLi loop and, therefore, an accurate prediction of the losses in the manifold is required since these account for the bulk of the blanket contribution [10]. The pressure gradient calculated by the CFD code for both the external annular channel () and the internal one () is compared with the analytical value calculated for the fully developed flow neglecting coupling phenomena. For the annular channel, the theoretical value () is computed from an equivalent square duct, whereas it is directly calculated for the internal one (). Engineering correction factors () are defined to express the relationship between the flow in co-axial, coupled, channels and the flow in square, uncoupled, conduits. Then, it is demonstrated that these correction factors are invariant at . This allows to extrapolate our results at higher field intensity, thus making possible to calculate the co-axial manifold pressure loss from analytical correlation.
Section snippets
Numerical model
The geometry of the WCLL 2018 design manifold external channel is quite complex featuring several conductive obstacles and an asymmetric layout (Fig. 1A). To characterize the influence of the electro-coupling phenomena the manifold external channel is simplified to its more basic analogue: a square annular channel with the same internal width, blockage ratio and internal wall thickness (Fig. 1A) with respect to the original channel and without obstacles to streamline the configuration. The
Variable flow rate, fixed
Fig. 3 shows the velocity contour for and for different combinations of total mass flow rate (velocity scales for each case are listed in Table 3), whereas Fig. 4, Fig. 5 show the velocity distribution along four sampling locations, as shown in Figs. 1B and 3, respectively for the external and internal channel. Since the flow is symmetrical with respect to , the results are shown on half of the channel. The velocity is scaled with the respective physical mean velocity , collected
Pressure drop analysis: correction factor
In order to estimate the MHD pressure drop in WCLL manifold, a relation is tentatively proposed between the pressure gradient calculated by the CFD code , for both the external annular and internal channel, and the theoretical value () [16]. This value is computed for the fully developed flow in an equivalent square duct for the external annular channel and for the same channel without considering the coupling phenomena for the internal channel. This relation is defined through
Conclusions and follow up
The MHD forced convection flow in co-axial rectangular coupled channels is investigated with ANSYS CFX 18.2 code to a Hartmann number up to . The coupling phenomena leads to several changes in the flow features for this geometry that depends on both the Hartmann number and the repartition of mass flow rate between the external and the internal channel.
The internal channel is less affected by the coupling, maintaining the classic features of MHD flow in an electroconductive rectangular
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Simone Siriano: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing - original draft. Alessandro Tassone: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Gianfranco Caruso: Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Alessandro Del Nevo: Supervision.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium and has received funding from the Euratom research and training programme 2014-2018 and 2019-2020 under grant agreement No 633053. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission.
References (17)
- et al.
Recent progress in developing a feasible and integrated conceptual design of the WCLL BB in EUROfusion project
Fusion Eng. Des.
(2019) - et al.
Analysis of liquid metal MHD flow in multiple adjacent ducts using an iterative method to solve the core flow equations
Fusion Eng. Des.
(1991) - et al.
Electro-magnetic flow coupling for liquid metal blanket applications
Fusion Eng. Des.
(2016) - et al.
Numerical and experimental MHD studies of Lead-Lithium liquid metal flows in multichannel test-section at high magnetic fields
Fusion Eng. Des.
(2018) - et al.
Numerical investigation of liquid metal magnetohydrodynamic flow in multilayer flow channel inserts
Fusion Eng. Des.
(2013) - et al.
MHD forced convection flow in dielectric and electro-conductive rectangular annuli
Fusion Eng. Des.
(2020) - et al.
Influence of PbLi hydraulic path and integration layout on MHD pressure losses
Fusion Eng. Des.
(2020) - et al.
Literature review of lead-lithium thermophysical properties
Fusion Eng. Des.
(2019)
Cited by (10)
RELAP5/Mod3.3 MHD module development and validation: WCLL-TBM mock-up model
2024, Fusion Engineering and DesignMHD flow between electromagnetically coupled concentric cylinders with slipping walls
2022, European Journal of Mechanics, B/FluidsCitation Excerpt :Bluck and Wolfendale [41] obtained series solutions to the MHD flow in electromagnetically coupled ducts stacked parallel to the applied magnetic field. Recently, Siriano et al. [42] investigated MHD electro-coupled forced convection flow in co-axial and co-flowing rectangular pipes numerically by using a general CFD code. In most of the applications where a viscous fluid is in contact with a solid wall a common assumption is a good wettability at the liquid–solid interface.
Multi-objective optimization to minimize pumping power and flow non-uniformity at the outlets of a distributor manifold using CFD simulations and ANN rapid predictions
2022, Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement ConfederationCitation Excerpt :Extensive studies to date have shown that the behavior of various streams of electric conductive fluids such as different liquid metals [1–10], miscible and immiscible multilayer conductive flows [11–13], molten salts [14,15], and magnetic nanofluids [16–19] can be controlled by the applied external magnetic fields.
Fusion technologies development at ENEA Brasimone Research Centre: Status and perspectives
2020, Fusion Engineering and DesignCitation Excerpt :The water coolant temperatures are 295 °C and 328 °C at the inlet and outlet, respectively. The LLE manifolds are currently designed as coaxial square structures [11], delimited in radial direction by the water coolant manifold and the breeding zone. The LLE does not transport heat by design, thus its temperature is constant (330 °C) at the inlet and outlet of the breeding zone.
MHD pressure drop estimate for the WCLL in-magnet PbLi loop
2020, Fusion Engineering and DesignCitation Excerpt :configuration T01.A in Ref. [7], to rationalize the manifold design and reduce losses. Detailed CFD analyses have been performed to investigate the MHD flow for the basic annular geometry [14] and coupled co-axial channel [15]. Manifold pressure gradient and loss for the arbitrary inboard cell are presented in Figs. 3 and 4.
MHD flows in a U-channel under the influence of the spatially different channel-wall electric conductivity and of the magnetic field orientation
2021, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology