Elsevier

Atmospheric Research

Volume 246, 1 December 2020, 105120
Atmospheric Research

Lightning activity and its associations with cloud structures in a rainstorm dominated by warm precipitation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105120Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Investigating electrical characteristics in a rainstorm dominated by warm cloud precipitation is novel.

  • In this rainstorm, lightning discharges predominately occurred in areas featuring dry snow and relatively weak precipitation.

  • The lightning discharges spatially deviate from the origin area of charging; the cause of this is discussed.

Abstract

Lightning activity and its associations with cloud structures during a rainstorm dominated by warm cloud precipitation were studied in Guangdong, China on May 7, 2017, using three-dimensional lightning location and polarimetric radar data. The overall convection and lightning activities of the rainstorm were weak. The rainstorm generally showed a typical tripolar charge structure with the main negative charge core located between the −15 and − 8 °C environmental isotherms in the first 4 h. The height of the charge regions clearly decreased after this period, with the main negative charge core being below the −8 °C isotherm. Lightning discharges were more concentrated in areas featuring relatively weak convection and relatively low precipitation intensity. Most of the locations with lightning discharges were dominated by dry aggregated snow and weak updrafts and downdrafts. This investigation demonstrated that the lightning discharges were spatially separated from the area of origin of charging in this rainstorm. It is proposed that, with weak convection in the rainstorm, the charging rate was lower than the speed of charge transfer from the area of origin, causing a relatively low charge density and a low frequency of lightning in the area of origin of charging. Meanwhile, the aggregation of small charged particles in regions away from the area of origin of charging might be conducive to the formation of a relatively high charge density and therefore relatively frequent lightning flashes. This situation is different from a typical thunderstorm with strong convection.

Introduction

Different weather systems often display variations in their lightning activities. For example, in typical thunderstorms and climate statistics, positive cloud-to-ground (PCG) lightning usually accounts for ~10% of the total cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning (Liu et al., 2011; Rudlosky and Fuelberg, 2010; Zheng et al., 2010), but the ratio of PCG lightning in severe thunderstorms is relatively high, even greater than 50% (MacGorman et al., 1989; Soula et al., 2004; Zheng and MacGorman, 2016). Winter thunderstorms may also produce high-proportion and large-current PCG lightning (Suzuki, 1992; Takeuti et al., 1976; Zheng et al., 2019a). Typical thunderstorms usually have tripolar charge structures (Williams, 1989), while some severe thunderstorms may have inverted charge structures (Rust et al., 2005; Zheng and MacGorman, 2016; Zheng et al., 2009). In typical or severe thunderstorms, the most active lightning discharges are usually distributed in or around the regions characterized by the strong kinematics, because of the dependence of charging process on the rebounding collisions between ice-phase particles under the influence of airflow; while in the regions away from convection, the lightning flashes are usually less frequent and spatially dispersed (Bruning and MacGorman, 2013; Carey et al., 2005; Feng et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2011; López et al., 1990; Ribaud et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017; Zheng and MacGorman, 2016; Zheng et al., 2010).

For storms yielding heavy rainfall (i.e., rainstorms), their precipitation characteristics and triggering and maintenance mechanisms are often the focus of research, but their electrical attributes and characteristics have received less attention. In this study, we investigated lightning activity in an extraordinary rainstorm that occurred near the Pearl River Delta in Guangdong, China on May 7, 2017 (Beijing time, the same below). The rainstorm yielded extreme rainfall in the Pearl River Delta, with a maximum recorded precipitation of 446.6 mm, but a relatively low lightning flash rate, which prompted us to explore the relationship between its lightning activity and precipitation structure.

Section snippets

Observations and data

In the analysis, 3-D lightning location data, CG flash observation data, and polarimetric radar observation data were mainly used. They are introduced as follows.

Overall lightning activity

According to the method described in Section 2.1.1, a total of 2072 flashes (CG flashes and IC flashes) were observed by the LFEDA during the analysis period and were derived from 44,439 selected LPDEs. The GDLLS located 563 CG flashes that will be referred to in following analysis. To understand the possible impact of detection efficiency of the LFEDA on the analysis, we investigated the ratios of CG flashes to total flashes and the average number of LPDEs per flash before and after 06:00:00,

Spatial correspondence between lightning and precipitation

During the analysis, we found that the areas with active lightning discharges did not correspond to the heavy precipitation center. Fig. 5 shows the surface rainfall rate and superposed LPDEs and flash initiations at certain times. The heavy precipitation cores in Fig. 5a and b are mainly associated with the cells in Huadu district, and those in Fig. 5c and d are mainly associated with the cells in Zengcheng district. We can find that the positions of lightning discharges and initiations

Discussions

Previous studies on the mechanisms of the triggering, organization, and maintenance, and precipitation characteristics of this rainstorm have demonstrated that it was a high-efficiency precipitation system dominated by warm cloud precipitation, with weak convection and a high ratio of small-size raindrops in the raindrop spectrum (Fu et al., 2018; Tian et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2018; Zeng et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2018). We further examined the vertical development of this

Conclusions

In this study, 3-D lightning location data and polarimetric radar data were mainly used to analyze lightning activities and their associations with cloud structures in a rainstorm featuring weak convection and predominated by warm cloud precipitation in Guangzhou on May 7, 2017, and the following conclusions were obtained:

The lightning discharges were mainly concentrated in the height range from approximately 4–12 km, corresponding to an environmental temperature layers from approximately 0 to

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC1501503), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41675005 and 41975003), and Basic Research Fund of CAMS (2020Z009). The data associated with this paper can be accessed from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3902180 or from the corresponding author.

References (57)

  • L. Chen et al.

    Performance evaluation for a lightning location system based on observations of artificially triggered lightning and natural lightning flashes

    J. Atmos. Ocean Tech.

    (2012)
  • Z. Chen et al.

    A method of three-dimensional location for LFEDA combining the time of arrival method and the time reversal technique

    J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.

    (2019)
  • L.M. Coleman et al.

    Effects of charge and electrostatic potential on lightning propagation

    J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.

    (2003)
  • K.L. Cummins et al.

    A combined TOA/MDF technology upgrade of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network

    J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.

    (1998)
  • X.P. Fan et al.

    A new method of three-dimensional location for Low-frequency Electric Field Detection Array

    J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.

    (2018)
  • G. Feng et al.

    Lightning activity and precipitation structure of hailstorms

    Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci.

    (2007)
  • P. Fu et al.

    Microphysical characteristics, initiation and maintenance of record heavy rainfall over Guangzhou region on 7 May 2017

    Meteor. Mon.

    (2018)
  • K.R. Knupp et al.

    Variations in cloud-to-ground lightning characteristics among three adjacent tornadic supercell storms over the Tennessee Valley region

    Mon. Weather Rev.

    (2003)
  • P.R. Krehbiel

    The electrical structure of thunderstorms

  • M.R. Kumjian et al.

    The anatomy and physics of ZDR columns: investigating a polarimetric radar signature with a spectral bin microphysical model

    J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol.

    (2014)
  • D. Liu et al.

    Evolution of the total lightning activity in a leading-line and trailing stratiform mesoscale convective system over Beijing

    Adv. Atmos. Sci.

    (2011)
  • R.E. López et al.

    The lightning characteristics of convective cloud systems in northeastern Colorado

  • C. Luo et al.

    Characteristics of 3-D wind structure of Typhoon outer intensive banded echo using dual-doppler weather radar data

    Atmos. Sci.

    (2012)
  • D.R. MacGorman et al.

    Positive cloud-to-ground lightning in tornadic storms and hailstorms

    Mon. Weather Rev.

    (1994)
  • D.R. MacGorman et al.

    Lightning rates relative to tornadic storm evolution on 22 May 1981

    J. Atmos. Sci.

    (1989)
  • D.R. MacGorman et al.

    TELEX the thunderstorm electrification and lightning experiment

    Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.

    (2008)
  • M. Martinez

    The relationship between radar reflectivity and lightning activity at initial stages of convective storms

  • R.M. Mecikalski et al.

    Radar reflectivity and altitude distributions of lightning flashes as a function of three main storm types

    J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (9)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work, they are the co-first authors.

    View full text